Abstract
Right ventricular adaptation to the increased pulmonary arterial load is a key determinant of outcomes in pulmonary hypertension (PH). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and total arterial compliance (C) quantify resistive and elastic properties of pulmonary arteries that modulate the steady and pulsatile components of pulmonary arterial load, respectively. PVR is commonly calculated as transpulmonary pressure gradient over pulmonary flow and total arterial compliance as stroke volume over pulmonary arterial pulse pressure (SV/PApp). Assuming that there is an inverse, hyperbolic relationship between PVR and C, recent studies have popularised the concept that their product (RC-time of the pulmonary circulation, in seconds) is “constant” in health and diseases. However, emerging evidence suggests that this concept should be challenged, with shortened RC-times documented in post-capillary PH and normotensive subjects. Furthermore, reported RC-times in the literature have consistently demonstrated significant scatter around the mean. In precapillary PH, the true PVR can be overestimated if one uses the standard PVR equation because the zero-flow pressure may be significantly higher than pulmonary arterial wedge pressure. Furthermore, SV/PApp may also overestimate true C. Further studies are needed to clarify some of the inconsistencies of pulmonary RC-time, as this has major implications for our understanding of the arterial load in diseases of the pulmonary circulation.
Abstract
Empiric estimates of pulmonary arterial load are prone to errors and may result in overestimation of RC-time http://ow.ly/QqtAV
Footnotes
Previous articles in this series: No. 1: Naeije R, Vachiery J-L, Yerly P, et al. The transpulmonary pressure gradient for the diagnosis of pulmonary vascular diseases. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 217–223. No. 2: Hughes JMB, van der Lee I. The TL,NO/TL,CO ratio in pulmonary function test interpretation. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 453–461. No. 3: Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Westerhof N. Describing right ventricular function. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 1419–1423. No. 4: Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Teboul J-L. Pulsus paradoxus. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 1696–1705. No. 5: Prisk GK. Microgravity and the respiratory system. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1459–1471. No. 6: Dempsey JA, Smith CA. Pathophysiology of human ventilatory control. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 495–512. No. 7: Petersson J, Glenny RW. Gas exchange and ventilation–perfusion relationships in the lung. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1023–1041. No. 8: Wagner PD. The physiological basis of pulmonary gas exchange: implications for clinical interpretation of arterial blood gases. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 227–243. No. 9: Robertson H.T. Dead space: the physiology of wasted ventilation. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1704–1716.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
- Received May 12, 2015.
- Accepted July 8, 2015.
- Copyright ©ERS 2015