Abstract
Smoking cannabis is associated with symptoms of bronchitis. Little is known about the persistence of symptoms after stopping cannabis use. We assessed associations between changes in cannabis use and respiratory symptoms in a population-based cohort of 1037 young adults.
Participants were asked about cannabis and tobacco use at ages 18, 21, 26, 32 and 38 years. Symptoms of morning cough, sputum production, wheeze, dyspnoea on exertion and asthma diagnoses were ascertained at the same ages. Frequent cannabis use was defined as ≥52 occasions over the previous year. Associations between frequent cannabis use and respiratory symptoms were analysed using generalised estimating equations with adjustments for tobacco smoking, asthma, sex and age.
Frequent cannabis use was associated with morning cough (OR 1.97, p<0.001), sputum production (OR 2.31, p<0.001) and wheeze (OR 1.55, p<0.001). Reducing or quitting cannabis use was associated with reductions in the prevalence of cough, sputum and wheeze to levels similar to nonusers.
Frequent cannabis use is associated with symptoms of bronchitis in young adults. Reducing cannabis use often leads to a resolution of these symptoms.
Abstract
Smoking cannabis causes symptoms of bronchitis but these symptoms improve after quitting or cutting down cannabis use http://ow.ly/JGL2q
Introduction
Cannabis is the world's most commonly used illicit drug [1]. In New Zealand, cannabis use is almost as widespread as tobacco and about half of young adults admit to having used it in the previous year [2–4]. The long-term respiratory effects of smoking cannabis remain uncertain: although there are numerous case reports of bullous lung disease in very heavy cannabis users, there is little epidemiological evidence that cannabis smoking causes chronic lung disease [5–8].
The effects of smoking cannabis on respiratory symptoms are better documented: even moderate levels of cannabis use are associated with proximal airway inflammation [9–11] and symptoms of bronchitis [11–17]. These associations persist after adjusting for tobacco smoking and also occur in those who only smoke cannabis, indicating that cannabis can cause bronchitis independently of tobacco [14].
Although prolonged tobacco smoking can cause irreversible airway obstruction, the cessation of tobacco smoking often leads to the resolution of respiratory symptoms within months of quitting [18–20]. It is important to know whether quitting cannabis leads to a similar resolution of symptoms. Only one study has explored the impact of changes in cannabis use on respiratory symptoms [21]. That study found that symptoms of bronchitis improved after quitting either cannabis or tobacco use. However, there was only a small number of cannabis quitters in the cohort and these observations need to be confirmed in a larger population-based study.
We studied the effect of quitting cannabis use in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a population-based birth cohort. A previous analysis of this study found that many cannabis users had symptoms of bronchitis at the age of 21 years [16]. Further follow-up of this cohort has been undertaken at the ages of 26, 32 and 38 years. We analysed associations between cannabis use and respiratory symptoms at these ages to assess whether symptoms of bronchitis persisted or resolved among those who continued or quit cannabis use.
Methods
The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study is a population-based birth cohort of 1037 people (52% male) born in Dunedin between April 1972 and March 1973 [22, 23]. Participants have been followed throughout childhood and into adulthood. Follow-up rates have been high with 95% of the surviving cohort continuing to participate in the most recent assessment at age 38 years. The study is approved by the Otago Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained for each assessment.
Cannabis and tobacco smoking histories were obtained at the ages of 18, 21, 26, 32 and 38 years. At each assessment, participants were asked how many times they had used marijuana in the previous year. Frequent cannabis users are defined as those who reported using marijuana ≥52 times (at least weekly on average) over the previous year. Those who used cannabis less than this were defined as infrequent or occasional users. Changes or persistence in frequent cannabis use between two consecutive assessments (e.g. between the ages of 21 and 26 or between 32 and 38 years) were used to classify study members as “nonusers” (not using cannabis frequently in either the current or previous assessment), “quitters” (frequent cannabis use at the previous assessment but less than frequent at the current assessment), “starters” (not using cannabis frequently at the previous assessment but using it frequently now) and “continuing users” (frequent cannabis use at both assessments). Cumulative cannabis use was measured in joint-years (one “joint” of cannabis a day for 1 year is defined as 1 joint-year), as previously reported [23]. For the purpose of calculating joint-years, if cannabis data were missing for one assessment, the amount of cannabis use reported at the previous assessment was used.
Current tobacco smoking is defined as smoking at least one cigarette a day for a month in the previous year [24]. Cumulative tobacco use was calculated in pack-years (20 cigarettes a day for 1 year is defined as 1 pack-year), as previously reported [23].
At each of these assessments, participants were asked if they had symptoms of cough, sputum production, wheeze and dyspnoea on exertion. Cough was defined as a positive answer to the question “Do you usually cough on getting up or first thing in the morning?”. Sputum production was defined as a positive answer to the question “Do you usually bring up phlegm from your chest on getting up or first thing in the morning?”. Current wheeze was defined as recurrent episodes of wheezing in the previous year, excluding those with only one or two episodes lasting <1 h, as previously reported [25]. Dyspnoea on exertion was defined as a positive answer to the question “Are you troubled by shortness of breath when hurrying on the level or walking up a slight hill?”. Current asthma was defined as a self-reported diagnosis of asthma with episodes of asthma, wheezing or asthma medication use within the previous year. Height and weight were measured in light clothing without shoes at each assessment to calculate body mass index (BMI) in kg·m−2.
Statistical analysis
Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the associations between both current frequent cannabis use at the age of 38 years and cumulative joint-years of cannabis use up to the age of 38 years with the symptoms of morning cough, sputum production, current wheeze and dyspnoea on exertion. These analyses were adjusted for both current (yes/no) and cumulative (pack-years) tobacco smoking, asthma diagnosis, and sex. Further analyses tested for potential interactions between tobacco and cannabis use by fitting a term for current smoking by frequent cannabis use in the models. To assess whether respiratory symptoms persisted after quitting frequent cannabis use, the logistic regression analyses were repeated using cumulative joint-years of cannabis exposure as the main predictor and excluding those reporting current frequent cannabis use at the age of 38 years.
The associations between frequent cannabis use and symptoms of morning cough, morning sputum production, current wheeze and dyspnoea on exertion at each assessment age were assessed using generalised estimating equations to take into account repeated measures among individuals, while adjusting for age, tobacco smoking, asthma diagnosis at that assessment and sex. Further analyses also tested for potential interactions between cannabis and tobacco as described above. Sensitivity analyses repeated the analyses among non-tobacco smokers and current tobacco smokers separately. Because both tobacco and cannabis smoking habits may influence body weight [26, 27], which may in turn influence respiratory symptoms [28], additional sensitivity analyses included BMI in the models and excluded pregnant women.
Generalised estimating equations were further used to assess the effect of changes in cannabis use between each assessment on the presence of respiratory symptom at the next assessment, with adjustments for the same covariates. Pairwise comparisons between categories were investigated where the overall test was statistically significant.
Finally, to assess whether quitting or reducing cannabis use was associated with improvements in morning cough, morning sputum production, current wheeze and dyspnoea on exertion, within-individual changes in these symptoms among those who quit or reduced their use to less than “frequently” were assessed by comparing the presence of these symptoms before and after quitting or cutting down. These were performed using McNemar's Chi-squared for matched pairs of binary data. Because it would be possible to “quit” frequent cannabis use more than once during the follow-up from 18 to 38 years of age, only the first recorded episode of quitting was used. Similarly, we assessed the persistence of symptoms among those who continued frequent use of cannabis using data from the first two consecutive phases in which continuing frequent cannabis use was recorded.
Analyses used all available data: the number of participants available for the analyses of each symptom varied slightly because of missing data for some symptoms. Statistical significance was defined as two-sided p-values <0.05. Analyses were performed using Stata (version 13; StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
The prevalence of frequent and occasional cannabis use, changes and persistence in frequent cannabis use between each assessment, and the prevalence of morning cough, sputum production, wheeze and dyspnoea on exertion at each age are shown in table 1. Cannabis use was associated with tobacco: at each age, between 68% and 83% of frequent cannabis users were also current tobacco smokers (p<0.001) (table S1).
Symptoms of morning cough, sputum production, wheeze, and dyspnoea on exertion at the age of 38 years were all significantly associated with both current cannabis use and cumulative cannabis use after adjustment for current and cumulative tobacco smoking, asthma and sex (table 2). After excluding current frequent cannabis users at the age of 38 years, morning cough and wheeze, but not sputum production or dyspnoea on exertion, were associated with cumulative cannabis use. An association between cumulative cannabis use and morning cough persisted if participants reporting any cannabis use in the past year were excluded (OR 1.18, p=0.014). There were no significant interactions between current tobacco and cannabis use for any of the symptoms (all p≥0.062).
Using generalised estimating equations adjusted for sex, age, and asthma and tobacco smoking at that age, it was found that morning cough, sputum production and wheeze were associated with frequent cannabis use (table 3). The association between cannabis use and dyspnoea was not quite statistically significant (p=0.086). There were no significant interactions between tobacco and cannabis use for any of the symptoms (all p≥0.317) and the findings were similar among current tobacco smoking and nonsmoking subgroups (table S2). Including BMI as an additional covariate made no material difference to the analyses (table S3).
Changes in cannabis use between assessments were also associated with the prevalence of morning cough, sputum and wheeze (all p≤0.006), but not dyspnoea (p=0.347) (table 4). For the three symptoms with statistically significant differences overall, those who had quit frequent cannabis use since the previous assessment had a similar prevalence of these symptoms to those who had not been frequent cannabis users at either the preceding or current assessment (all p≥0.321). By contrast, continuing frequent cannabis users had a higher prevalence of these symptoms (all p≤0.001). Those who had started frequent cannabis use since the last assessment also had a higher prevalence of morning cough (p=0.034) and sputum (p≤0.001) but not wheeze (p=0.164). This pattern of findings was similar if current tobacco smokers and nonsmokers were analysed separately (tables S4). Those who quit were less likely to have morning cough or sputum compared to continuing users (p<0.001) but a lower prevalence of wheeze did not reach statistical significance (p=0.118).
Changes in the prevalence of morning cough, sputum production, wheeze and dyspnoea among those who continued or quit frequent cannabis smoking between assessments are shown in figure 1. Over the assessment phases between ages 18 and 38 years, 161 participants who had been using cannabis frequently either quit or reduced cannabis use to less than weekly for at least one assessment phase. Among these, 46 (29%) reported a morning cough at the visit before they quit. This prevalence fell to 32 (20%) at the assessment after quitting (p=0.031). The number reporting morning sputum production fell from 42 (26%) at the assessment before quitting to 22 (14%) after quitting (p=0.001). The number reporting wheeze fell from 72 (45%) at the assessment before quitting to 56 (35%) after quitting (p=0.039). The prevalence of dyspnoea was similar before (27%) and after (23%) quitting (p=0.355).
Only 50 participants who had used cannabis frequently quit completely between consecutive assessments (cannabis use reduced from ≥52 times a year to none at all). Among these participants, the magnitude of changes in cough (30% to 20%, p=0.096) and wheeze (40% to 30%, p=0.225) were similar to the reductions observed with reducing cannabis use from weekly to less than weekly. There was a greater fall in sputum production from 28% to 6% (p=0.001). Dyspnoea was unchanged (32% to 26%, p=0.405)
Over the assessment phases between ages 18 and 38 years, 158 participants continued to use cannabis frequently for at least two consecutive phases. Between these assessments, the prevalence of cough increased from 30% (47 out of 158 subjects) to 44% (69 out of 158 subjects) (p=0.002) but there were no significant changes in the prevalence of sputum production (35% versus 39%; p=0.297), wheeze (46% versus 46%, p=1.00) or dyspnoea on exertion (32% versus 31%, p=0.882).
Discussion
In this population-based cohort followed through early adulthood, the use of cannabis was associated with symptoms of cough, sputum production, wheeze and dyspnoea. These associations were independent of tobacco smoking and asthma. Symptoms of cough and sputum production tended to improve in those who stopped using cannabis frequently but persisted or worsened in those who continued to use cannabis frequently. These findings indicate that cannabis users have a high prevalence of bronchitis but that this often resolves on quitting.
Although all of the four respiratory symptoms were associated with both current and cumulative cannabis use at the age of 38 years, the symptoms most strongly associated with cannabis were cough and sputum production. These two symptoms also showed the greatest decline in prevalence among those who quit frequent use: across the assessments, those who had stopped using cannabis frequently did not have a higher prevalence of cough or sputum than nonusers, whereas starting frequent cannabis use was associated with an increase in these symptoms (table 4). By the age of 38 years, however, cumulative lifetime cannabis exposure was associated with morning cough and wheeze even after excluding current frequent cannabis users (table 2) and the association with cough at the age of 38 years persisted if those who had used any cannabis in the past year were excluded. These findings suggest that heavy cannabis use may sometimes lead to bronchitis symptoms that persist even after cutting down or quitting.
These findings confirm earlier reports that cannabis use is associated with a high prevalence of bronchitis symptoms [12–16], and extend the causal inference by demonstrating a temporal sequence between starting and quitting cannabis use and the development and resolution of symptoms. Although the majority of frequent cannabis users also smoked tobacco, the association of cough and sputum production with cannabis persisted after adjusting for tobacco use and also after excluding current tobacco users from the analyses, indicating that the association was unlikely to be due to confounding by tobacco use. The findings were also independent of asthma diagnosis, another potential confounder for symptoms of bronchitis in this age group.
We are aware of only one study that has explored the effect of stopping cannabis use on respiratory symptoms [21]. That study also found that quitting cannabis smoking was associated with a reduction in the symptoms of bronchitis among a cohort of adults aged 25–49 years, originally recruited from newspaper and radio announcements, who had been followed for a mean of 9.8 years. Unlike continuing smokers of either cannabis or tobacco, those who quit smoking either cannabis or tobacco during follow-up were no more likely to have chronic respiratory symptoms at follow up than never smokers.
Although the airways were not directly observed in this study, the finding that the prevalence of cough, sputum production and wheeze reduce to levels similar to non-cannabis users after quitting cannabis frequently suggests that the airway inflammation and bronchitis induced by cannabis are largely reversible. The extent to which bronchitis improves on quitting cannabis may be underestimated by this analysis because we classified those who had reduced their cannabis use to less than once a week as “quitters”. Quitting cannabis use altogether appeared to have a greater effect on sputum production than reducing use: only 6% of frequent users who quit completely reported this symptom at follow-up.
These findings may provide an incentive for patients to consider quitting cannabis smoking. Surprisingly, major international guidelines do not mention cannabis smoking as a potential cause of cough [29–32]. It is not known how many patients presenting to health services with chronic cough are cannabis users, but the finding that cough and sputum production are so common among cannabis smokers suggests that this should be considered [33]. We do not know whether any of the participants in this study quit because of respiratory symptoms but our data suggest that quitting cannabis use may be one of the most effective management options for cough and sputum production. Unless clinicians specifically ask about cannabis use, this potential cause of the patient's symptoms may be missed because patients may be reluctant to volunteer information about illegal drug use.
A potential source of error in this study is the reliance on self-reports of cannabis use without objective confirmation. However, the study's well-established record of confidentiality and nonintervention tends to encourage reporting of use, and is likely to have minimised reporting bias. We also classified those who reported using cannabis <52 times a year as nonusers based on our assumption that infrequent cannabis use would be unlikely to have a major effect on respiratory symptoms. Hence, a modest reduction in reported cannabis use could have led to some study members being classified as quitters. Another limitation is that we asked about marijuana use but not specifically about smoking, although smoking marijuana is by far the most common method of using cannabis in New Zealand. However, such classification errors regarding the extent of cannabis smoking and quitting would be most likely to attenuate the observed associations with respiratory symptoms. The study has a number of important strengths, including the high cohort retention rate, and repeated measures of cannabis use, respiratory symptoms and potential confounding factors using standardised questionnaires.
In summary, frequent cannabis use is associated with symptoms of cough, sputum production and wheeze independently of tobacco smoking. These symptoms tend to improve in people who quit indicating that the airway inflammation caused by cannabis may be largely reversible.
Acknowledgements
We thank the study members their friends and families for their continued support. We also thank Phil Silva, the study founder, and the unit staff. We are grateful to Terrie Moffit and Avshalom Caspi (Duke University, Durham, NC, USA) for sharing data used in this report.
Footnotes
Editorial comment in Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 1–4 [DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00034515]
This article has supplementary material available from erj.ersjournals.com
Support statement: The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Research Unit is supported by the Health Research Council (New Zealand). Funding from UK Medical Research Council (grants G0100527 and MR/K00381X/1), US National Institute on Aging (AG032282), US National Institute of Mental Health (MH077874), US National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30 DA023026) and the Jacobs Foundation was used to collect data used in this report. H.H. Shin was funded by a scholarship from the New Zealand Asthma Foundation. M.R. Sears holds the AstraZeneca Chair in Respiratory Epidemiology, McMaster University. Funding information for this article has been deposited with FundRef.
Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside the online version of this article at erj.ersjournals.com
- Received December 13, 2014.
- Accepted February 20, 2015.
- Copyright ©ERS 2015