Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Cystic fibrosis in Europe: patients live longer but are we ready?

Carsten Schwarz, Dominik Hartl
European Respiratory Journal 2015 46: 11-12; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00026615
Carsten Schwarz
1Dept of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Cystic Fibrosis Centre Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominik Hartl
2 Dept of Pediatrics I, Comprehensive Cystic Fibrosis Center (CCFC) Tübingen-Stuttgart, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Dominik.hartl@med.uni-tuebingen.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This study highlights the future challenge to deal with an ageing CF population and innovative, but expensive drugs http://ow.ly/JRCnx

Having passed the 25th anniversary of discovering the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, let's take a look forward to the next 25 years. Newborn screening, animal models, biomarkers, innovative drugs (prototypical CFTR modulators), and advances in lung transplantation have moved the field forward, probably faster than for any other lung disease in recent years [1–5]. As a consequence, the mean survival of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is steadily increasing and now exceeds 40 years of age in most European countries [6, 7] and beyond [8].

But no progress comes without a price. At least two major changes stir up the CF landscape today. 1) New drugs [9]: a CFTR potentiator (VX-770 known as ivacaftor) entered the market as the first mutation-specific therapy for a subgroup of patients with CF (∼5% of patients in Europe, carrying class 3 mutations). However, the costs of this drug pose a challenge for several CF healthcare systems, an issue gaining even broader relevance with the expected introduction of combined CFTR potentiators and correctors for patients with ΔF508, the most common mutation in CF [10]. 2) Demographics: the CF population ages with a transition from classical child-disease to adult-disease entity, resulting in a significantly higher proportion of adult CF patients in most industrialised countries [11]. But are we prepared for this change? To assess this issue at the European level, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) joined forces with the European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) in 2012 and initiated the ERS/ECF Task Force on The Provision of Care for Adults with Cystic Fibrosis in Europe. The findings from this task force are published in the current edition of the European Respiratory Journal [12]. The task force utilised CF patient registries in order to predict the number of CF patients by the year 2025, in 34 European countries. Although relying on population dynamics and statistical models, the findings from this study comprehensively demonstrate that the CF population in Europe will increase significantly (50%) by the year 2025. Stratifying estimated patient numbers according to age, the study forecasts that mainly the number of adult CF patients will increase (75%). The estimated rise in adult CF patients in Europe seems dramatic for some smaller Eastern European countries, which currently have low patient numbers and no established CF infrastructure, e.g. Moldova, Serbia and Slovenia are expected to have increases in CF patients of 212%, 168% and 164%, respectively, by the year 2025. However, European countries with pre-existing larger CF populations and established CF healthcare systems are predicted to face a substantial increase of their adult CF patients as well, for instance France, Belgium, Spain and Italy. The ERS/ECFS task force went beyond estimating future patient numbers and compared the gross national incomes (GNIs) of these countries. A special light should be shed on countries with a very low GNI. These countries are already facing serious problems in taking care of their CF patient population, e.g. in the Ukraine where not only adult but also child CF patients are forecasted to increase significantly in the future. These healthcare systems won't be prepared for the demographic change and the financial burden that comes with it.

Methodologically, the findings from this ERS/ECFS task force have highlighted the lack of high-quality patient registries in several European countries, thereby limiting the conclusions drawn from this study and underscoring that registries are indispensable for demographic research and should be promoted throughout Europe.

This first pan-European study of future CF demographics should remind us that early diagnosis and longer survival comes with a cost. It is the imperative responsibility of all CF healthcare professionals across Europe to plan ahead for the CF of tomorrow. To understand the demographics is the first, but should not be the last, step in order to optimise CF care, because patients should not pay the price for growing old with this disease.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received February 13, 2015.
  • Accepted February 16, 2015.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2015

References

  1. ↵
    1. Stoltz DA,
    2. Meyerholz DK,
    3. Welsh MJ
    . Origins of cystic fibrosis lung disease. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 351–362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Pittman JE,
    2. Cutting G,
    3. Davis SD, et al.
    Cystic fibrosis: NHLBI workshop on the primary prevention of chronic lung diseases. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11: Suppl. 3, S161–S168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mall MA,
    2. Hartl D
    . CFTR: cystic fibrosis and beyond. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1042–1054.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. De Boeck K,
    2. Kent L,
    3. Davies J, et al.
    CFTR biomarkers: time for promotion to surrogate end-point. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 203–216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Amin R,
    2. Ratjen F
    . Emerging drugs for cystic fibrosis. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2014; 19: 143–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. MacKenzie T,
    2. Gifford AH,
    3. Sabadosa KA, et al.
    Longevity of patients with cystic fibrosis in 2000 to 2010 and beyond: survival analysis of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161: 233–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Kerem E,
    2. Viviani L,
    3. Zolin A, et al.
    Factors associated with FEV1 decline in cystic fibrosis: analysis of the ECFS Patient Registry. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 125–133.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Stephenson AL,
    2. Tom M,
    3. Berthiaume Y, et al.
    A contemporary survival analysis of individuals with cystic fibrosis: a cohort study. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 670–679.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Bell SC,
    2. De Boeck K,
    3. Amaral MD
    . New pharmacological approaches for cystic fibrosis: promises, progress, pitfalls. Pharmacol Ther 2015; 145C: 19–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Boyle MP,
    2. Bell SC,
    3. Konstan MW, et al.
    A CFTR corrector (lumacaftor) and a CFTR potentiator (ivacaftor) for treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis who have a phe508del CFTR mutation: a phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 527–538.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Simmonds NJ
    . Ageing in cystic fibrosis and long-term survival. Paediatr Respir Rev 2013; 14: Suppl. 1, 6–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Burgel PR,
    2. Bellis G,
    3. Olesen HV, et al.
    Future trends in cystic fibrosis demography in 34 European countries. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 133–141.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 46 Issue 1 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 46 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cystic fibrosis in Europe: patients live longer but are we ready?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Cystic fibrosis in Europe: patients live longer but are we ready?
Carsten Schwarz, Dominik Hartl
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2015, 46 (1) 11-12; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00026615

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Cystic fibrosis in Europe: patients live longer but are we ready?
Carsten Schwarz, Dominik Hartl
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2015, 46 (1) 11-12; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00026615
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • CF and non-CF bronchiectasis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Interstitial abnormalities on CT associated with hiatus hernia
  • Novel gas exchange analysis in COVID-19
  • Transcriptomic landscape of diffuse radiological bronchiectasis
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society