Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Dual gas techniques for peripheral airway function: diffusing the issues

Sylvia Verbanck, Manuel Paiva
European Respiratory Journal 2015 45: 1491-1494; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00207514
Sylvia Verbanck
1Respiratory Division, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Paiva
2Respiratory Division, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Peripheral ventilation heterogeneity can be extracted from the dual gas test by considering all its gas components http://ow.ly/I62C8

To the Editor:

In the quest to investigate small airway function in a range of lung diseases, multiple-breath washout tests have been applied for their potential to represent the most peripheral air spaces [1, 2]. The aim of reducing the burden on the patient has recently also revived interest in the single-breath washout. A single-breath washout test has now been proposed which involves an inhalation of 5% SF6, 26.3% He, 21% O2 and the balance as N2 in order to obtain a so-called dual gas tracer (DTG) phase III slope [3]. After having been introduced as a practical and promising lung function tool [3] and as an early detection tool in cystic fibrosis lung disease [4], the DTG phase III slope is now advocated as a specific index of acinar function abnormality in children with mild asthma [5]. An editorial in the European Respiratory Journal [6], reflecting upon a DTG reproducibility study in normal subjects and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients [7], rightly pointed out that the clinical utility of DTG indices will depend on their actual physiological meaning. We provide here a critical appraisal of the physiological meaning of the DTG phase III slope.

Why use two gases, such as He and SF6, at all? Because the He diffusion front is located a few generations proximal to the SF6 diffusion front [8], and the He and SF6 phase III slopes are thought to represent airway function in the proximal and peripheral part of the acinus, respectively. Ventilation heterogeneities generated in the conductive airways are expected to affect the He and SF6 phase III slopes to the same extent. Hence, the difference between He phase III slope and SF6 phase III slope (SF6–He phase III slope difference) has been used as an indicator of intra-acinar function. Even if lung geometry were to change dramatically so as to push the He and SF6 diffusion fronts out of, or further into the acinus, similar principles would apply, with SF6 representing more peripheral structures than He. The SF6–He phase III slope difference has been used as an indicator of peripheral lung disease: it has been correlated to histomorphometry of airways in the smoker's lungs [9], indicated peripheral changes in asthmatics [10], detected a specific peripheral response to methacholine in lung transplant recipients [11], and suggested peripheral sites of allergic reaction [12]. One pitfall when interpreting dual gas washout tests is that an absence of change in SF6–He phase III slope difference cannot exclude an intra-acinar effect, for instance when both proximal and peripheral acinar structures affect He and SF6 phase III slopes to the same extent. By contrast, however, a change in SF6–He phase III slope difference definitely signals an intra-acinar effect.

The interpretation problem with the DTG phase III slope lays much closer to the way it is determined: derived from the molar mass (MM) signal, the DTG signal is generally referred to as an “aggregate” measure of He and SF6. Yet it is assumed that the DTG phase III slope somehow also differentiates between He and SF6 diffusive transport in the lungs, and that ternary diffusion (between He, SF6 and N2) can be neglected. Also, as pointed out in the editorial [6], the confounding effect of, for instance, the partial N2 washout on the DTG curve is not understood. In an attempt to better understand the potential of the DTG curve, we first considered a set of physiologically plausible He, SF6, O2, CO2 and N2 traces as a function of exhaled volume during a DTG experiment (fig. 1a). Besides considering dilution of the various inhaled gas components (26.3% He, 5% SF6, 21% O2 and 47.7 %N2), we imposed the following physiological constraints (based on published experimental data for normal subjects [8, 13–15]): Fowler dead space for He and SF6 was considered to differ by 40 mL [13, 14]; He and SF6 normalised phase III slopes were set to 0.07 and 0.13 L−1, respectively [8, 13, 14]; at mid-expiration, CO2 and O2 concentrations were set to 4 and 17%, respectively, and their phase III slopes were considered to be opposite but equal in magnitude [3, 15]. Finally, N2 concentration traces were obtained by mass balance at each instance during the expiration. Using 146, 44, 32, 28 and 4 g·mol−1 for SF6, CO2, O2, N2 and He, respectively, we then derived the corresponding MM signal and removed an offset based on the MM signal for air breathing, as previously described [3, 7], to obtain MM(He,SF6) or the so-called DTG curve. From this curve, the DTG peak (0.6 g·mol−1) and DTG phase III slope (−0.2 g·mol−1·L−1 between 0.6 and 0.9 L expired volume) correspond to that obtained by Husemann et al. [7] in their normal group. Basically, this approach consists of considering a set of internally consistent He, SF6, O2, CO2, N2 traces, and calculating the MM(He,SF6) curve as its mathematical consequence.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Expired concentration traces of gases involved (He, SF6, CO2, O2 and N2) when considering a 1 L inspiration of the dual gas mixture in an air-filled 3 L lung volume, and the corresponding so-called dual tracer gas (DTG) curve based on molar mass (MM(He,SF6)); see the text for computational details. Also indicated are the phase III slopes computed between 0.6 and 0.9 L of expired volume (grey area) for all gases; for ease of assessing compatibility with phase III slope values in the literature, He and SF6 phase III slopes are divided by the inspired minus the mean expired He or SF6 concentration; N2 phase III slope is divided by the mean expired minus the inspired N2 concentration; MM(He,SF6), O2 and CO2 phase III slopes are not normalised. Three cases are considered: a) a normal lung; b) a diseased lung showing increased He and SF6 phase III slopes with SF6–He phase III slope difference unaffected; or c) with SF6–He phase III slope difference increased.

We now apply this same approach to two potential scenarios of lung disease: 1) He and SF6 phase III slope are increased by a same amount, leaving the SF6–He phase III slope difference unaltered at 0.06 L−1 (fig. 1b); or 2) both He and SF6 phase III slopes are increased proportionally, resulting in an increased SF6–He phase III slope difference (fig. 1c). In both hypothetical disease states, the average of the He and SF6 phase III slope is five-fold that of the normal case (0.5 versus 0.1 L−1). Let us now observe the corresponding behaviour of the DTG curve and its phase III slope. Scenario 1, where the He and SF6 phase III slopes increase to the same extent (by 0.4 L−1), can be representative of either a conductive airway change (e.g. bronchoprovocation) or an intra-acinar change coincidently affecting He and SF6 by the same fixed amount. As expected in this case, the SF6–He phase III slope difference is unaffected, yet the DTG phase III slope does change (in this particular case, it becomes zero). Scenario 2, where the He and SF6 phase III slopes show the same relative increase (by a factor of five), both the SF6–He phase III slope difference and the DTG phase III slope increase in absolute value, probably due to an acinar effect. In fact, the DTG curve obtained with scenario 2 probably represents a typical COPD patient in [7], even if a rigorous approach should include perfusion inequality (affecting O2 and CO2 curves). However, in a first approximation, DTG phase III slope in COPD patients with low diffusing capacity [7] probably relates to the acinar defect. It is in other disease states that extreme caution is warranted when propagating DTG phase III slope as an indicator of acinar change. Otherwise, some patients with a modified DTG phase III slope, e.g. in a state of bronchoprovocation leading to scenario 1, might get treated for peripheral lung defects that are simply not there.

The intrinsic problem with using an aggregate MM(He,SF6) signal to derive a DTG phase III slope as an index of acinar ventilation heterogeneity, also points to a possible solution. The O2 and CO2 traces, which are measured independently, can be inspected for variations in respiratory quotient. They can also be converted into their combined molar mass, to then extract a N2 concentration curve. Then, the ensemble of DTG curves can be inspected in order to determine whether a particular patient phenotype is compatible with a scenario of type 1 or 2, or another alternative. We conclude that the noninvasive DTG test does hold promise for clinical use, but inevitably the patient's ease of performing the test is inversely related to the physician's effort to extract physiological meaning from it.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received November 7, 2014.
  • Accepted December 24, 2014.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2015

References

  1. ↵
    1. Verbanck S,
    2. Paiva M
    . Gas mixing in the airways and airspaces. Compr Physiol 2011; 1: 809–834.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Robinson PD,
    2. Latzin P,
    3. Verbanck S, et al.
    Consensus statement for inert gas washout measurement using multiple- and single- breath tests. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 507–522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Singer F,
    2. Stern G,
    3. Thamrin C, et al.
    Tidal volume single breath washout of two tracer gases – a practical and promising lung function test. PLoS One 2011; 6: e17588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Singer F,
    2. Stern G,
    3. Thamrin C, et al.
    A new double-tracer gas single-breath washout to assess early cystic fibrosis lung disease. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 339–345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Singer F,
    2. Abbas C,
    3. Yammine S, et al.
    Abnormal small airways function in children with mild asthma. Chest 2014; 145: 492–499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Latzin P,
    2. Thompson B
    . Double tracer gas single-breath washout: promising for clinics or just a toy for research? Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1113–1115.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Husemann K,
    2. Berg N,
    3. Engel J, et al.
    Double tracer gas single-breath washout: reproducibility in healthy subjects and COPD. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1210–1222.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Dutrieue B,
    2. Vanholsbeeck F,
    3. Verbanck S, et al.
    A human acinar structure for simulation of realistic alveolar plateau slopes. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89: 1859–1867.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Van Muylem A,
    2. De Vuyst P,
    3. Yernault JC, et al.
    Inert gas single-breath washout and structural alteration of respiratory bronchioles. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 146: 1167–1172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Gustafsson PM,
    2. Ljungberg HK,
    3. Kjellman B
    . Peripheral airway involvement in asthma assessed by single-breath SF6 and He washout. Eur Respir J 2003; 21: 1033–1039.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Van Muylem A,
    2. Paiva M,
    3. Estenne M
    . Involvement of peripheral airways during methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 1200–1203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Haccuria A,
    2. Michils A,
    3. Michiels S, et al.
    Exhaled nitric oxide: a biomarker integrating both lung function and airway inflammation changes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 134: 554–559.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Lacquet LM,
    2. van Muylem A
    . He and SF6 single-breath expiration curves. Comparison with the paiva-engel model. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1982; 18: 239–246.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Paiva M,
    2. van Muylem A,
    3. Ravez P, et al.
    Inspired volume dependence of the slope of the alveolar plateau. Respir Physiol 1984; 56: 309–325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Cormier Y,
    2. Bélanger J
    . Quantification of the effect of gas exchange on the slope of phase III. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1983; 19: 13–16.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 45 Issue 5 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 45 (5)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dual gas techniques for peripheral airway function: diffusing the issues
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Dual gas techniques for peripheral airway function: diffusing the issues
Sylvia Verbanck, Manuel Paiva
European Respiratory Journal May 2015, 45 (5) 1491-1494; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00207514

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Dual gas techniques for peripheral airway function: diffusing the issues
Sylvia Verbanck, Manuel Paiva
European Respiratory Journal May 2015, 45 (5) 1491-1494; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00207514
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung structure and function
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • Reply: Is high-dose glucocorticoid beneficial in COVID-19?
  • Is high-dose glucocorticoid beneficial in COVID-19?
  • Corticosteroids in COVID-19: one size does not fit all
Show more Agora

Research letters

  • Reply: Is high-dose glucocorticoid beneficial in COVID-19?
  • Is high-dose glucocorticoid beneficial in COVID-19?
  • Corticosteroids in COVID-19: one size does not fit all
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society