Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Woo-Jung Song, Yoon-Seok Chang, Shoaib Faruqi, Ju-Young Kim, Min-Gyu Kang, Sujeong Kim, Eun-Jung Jo, Min-Hye Kim, Jana Plevkova, Heung-Woo Park, Sang-Heon Cho, Alyn H. Morice
European Respiratory Journal 2015 45: 1479-1481; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00218714
Woo-Jung Song
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Woo-Jung Song
Yoon-Seok Chang
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Dept of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shoaib Faruqi
3Centre for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Hull York Medical School, Castle Hill Hospital, University of Hull, Cottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ju-Young Kim
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Min-Gyu Kang
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sujeong Kim
4Dept of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eun-Jung Jo
5Dept of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Min-Hye Kim
6Dept of Internal Medicine, Ewha Woman's University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jana Plevkova
7Dept of Pathophysiology and Simulation Centre, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heung-Woo Park
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang-Heon Cho
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
8Both authors contributed equally; S-H. Cho and A.H. Morice are joint lead authors of this article
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alyn H. Morice
3Centre for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Hull York Medical School, Castle Hill Hospital, University of Hull, Cottingham, UK
8Both authors contributed equally; S-H. Cho and A.H. Morice are joint lead authors of this article
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Chronic cough has a high global epidemiological burden. A standard definition would facilitate further studies. http://ow.ly/HPCnw

To the Editor:

Cough is an essential defence mechanism [1]. However, chronic cough is a significant cause of morbidity, seriously impairing quality of life [2]. Previously, chronic cough was considered a consequence of various diseases, such as asthma/eosinophilic bronchitis, rhinitis and gastro-oesophageal acid reflux disease [3, 4]. Recent evidence, however, suggests that chronic cough is a clinical syndrome with distinct intrinsic pathophysiology characterised by neuronal hypersensitivity [5–7]. Here, we estimated the worldwide epidemiological burden of chronic cough irrespective of putative diagnosis in general adult populations using a comprehensive systematic literature review.

We searched the literature for prevalence of chronic cough in community-based adult populations using Pubmed and Embase databases according to the recommendations of the PRISMA statement [8]. The search terms were “cough AND (epidemiology OR epidemiologic OR epidemiological OR prevalence OR incidence)” for articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 1980 and 2013. An additional search was performed in Google Scholar and via cross-referenced articles. Language was not restricted. If full-text links were not available, we contacted the corresponding authors by e-mail.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) cross-sectional or longitudinal studies conducted in community-based or unselected adult populations, and 2) reported prevalence of chronic cough. Owing to the lack of a validated epidemiological classification for chronic cough [9], various definitions were accepted. Exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) no relevant analyses, 2) convenience sample studies without detailed information, 3) birth cohort studies, 3) specific occupation studies, 4) studies using duplicate samples, or 5) non-original papers. In determining eligibility, discrepancies were resolved by consensus among the authors. For all the included articles, data were extracted by researchers, and confirmed by W-J. Song and Y-S. Chang. The extracted outcomes included research question, study design, study region, study year, participant characteristics and case definition.

We adapted a quality effects model for meta-analyses. Heterogeneity is the main issue with meta-analysis of prevalence, probably due to a combination of true variance in the prevalence and variability produced by the methodological differences used to measure the outcome [10]. The quality effects model has strengths in that it gives more weight to studies of high quality, as it uses quality scores assigned to each study [10]. Briefly, the quality of the included studies were calculated by summation of six items: 1) definition of the population, 2) use of reported diagnostic criteria, 3) method of case ascertainment, 4) administration of measurement protocol, 5) characteristics of catchment area, and 6) prevalence measure, according to the developer's protocol [10].

For meta-analyses, the numbers of subjects with chronic cough in each study were combined. Homogeneity testing was performed using the I2 test. Correlation between chronic cough and smoking prevalence was evaluated by Spearman's test. Relationships of chronic cough with region and smoking were examined using meta-regression. Quality effects model analyses were performed using MetaXL 2.2 (http://www.epigear.com); and all other statistical analyses were conducted by using Stata 12.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

A total of 17 891 citations were initially identified by the search strategy, and 398 full-text articles were retrieved after screening. 90 studies were finally selected. In pooled analyses, the overall prevalence of chronic cough was 9.6% (95% CI 7.6–11.7%; I2=99%; 576 839 subjects). The regional prevalences were higher in Oceania (18.1% (95% CI 9.8–27.2%) in 5541 subjects from three studies), Europe (12.7% (95% CI 10.4–15.2%) in 344 522 subjects from 44 studies) and America (11.0% (95% CI 7.8–14.4%) in 60 585 subjects from 14 studies) than in Asia (4.4% (95% CI 1.8–7.4%) in 131 566 subjects from 22 studies) and Africa (2.3% (95% CI 0.0–6.7%) in 34 625 subjects from seven studies). The pooled prevalence according to country is presented in figure 1.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Map showing the pooled prevalence of chronic cough by country.

The prevalence of current smoking correlated with cough prevalence (r=0.501, p<0.001). However, in the meta-regression analyses, the regional differences in chronic cough prevalence were independent of smoking.

Only 16 studies analysed chronic cough as the primary outcome, while the remaining majority included chronic cough as part of a general inquiry into respiratory symptoms. A total of 19 different definitions were utilised among 90 studies. The most common definitions were “cough ≥3 months (such as “Do you usually cough on most days for 3 consecutive months or more during the year?”)” (n=42) and “cough ≥3 months for 2 successive years” (n=16); they had similar pooled prevalences of 7.9% (95% CI 4.8–11.2%; I2=100%) and 7.9% (95% CI 5.2–10.9%; I2=99%), respectively. Only three studies utilised the 8-week cut-off duration [11–13], reporting the prevalence as 12.0% (UK), 2.2% (Japan), and 1.1% (Nigeria), respectively. Considering the heterogeneity in the definitions, we repeated the meta-regression analyses in a subsample of these 58 studies using two common definitions, and found the relationships between region and chronic cough prevalence to be consistent.

The present study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the epidemiological burden of chronic cough in general adult populations. The primary finding was a high global prevalence (9.6%), comparable to that reported for asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [14, 15]. Heterogeneity in the definitions may have biased the prevalence. However, chronic cough showed a 7.9% prevalence, even when the most stringent temporal definition, “cough ≥3 months” was used. Therefore, chronic cough appears to be a global, but poorly recognised, condition causing significant morbidity.

Chronic cough was significantly more frequent in Europe and America than in Asia and Africa. Dicpinigaitis et al. [16] found no ethnic difference in cough reflex sensitivity between Caucasian, Indian or Chinese subjects using capsaicin cough challenge. Therefore, ethnic or genetic differences in cough reflex sensitivity are unlikely to be solely responsible for this regional variation. Environmental factors may account for the regional variation; urbanisation in Western countries may increase the risk of inhalational exposure to irritants. Supporting this hypothesis, we found significant correlations between smoking and chronic cough prevalence. Comorbidities such as obesity or rhinitis might also contribute to the regional variability [11, 17]; however, we were unable to examine these relationships, since relevant outcomes were reported in relatively few studies.

Future investigation into the epidemiology of chronic cough will require the development of an international consensus definition. As shown here, more than 80% of previous studies were not primarily intended to study chronic cough, and 19 different definitions were utilised. Current clinical guidelines define chronic cough using an arbitrary cut-off duration of 8 weeks [3, 4]. However, the majority of the epidemiological studies in the existing literature used a 3-month cut-off. Prospective investigations into the temporal characteristics of acute and chronic cough will be required to inform evidence-based definitions of the clinical syndromes.

Several limitations need to be considered. First, the definitions were heterogeneous, and thus the prevalence estimation might have been biased. The majority of included studies utilised the 3-month cut-off duration, and thus the estimated prevalence may not be directly applied to chronic cough in clinical guidelines (cough ≥8 weeks). However, the prevalence data from three studies using the 8-week cut-off duration were in line with their corresponding regional prevalence in general. Secondly, relatively few of the studies were conducted in non-European countries, which might have skewed the global prevalence estimation, particularly because of their lack of standardised definitions. To compensate for this heterogeneity, we performed sub-analyses by case definitions, and found similar degrees of prevalence and consistent patterns of regional association.

Despite these limitations, the present study is the first systematic analysis to estimate the epidemiological burden of chronic cough. We included all the available literature published during the last three decades, with no language restriction in study selection. Such inclusivity allowed the examination of regional difference. We identified the methodological inconsistencies in the existing literature and suggest that there is an urgent need for global standardisation.

In conclusion, the high epidemiological burden of chronic cough demonstrated here represents a major unmet clinical need.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the help of GlaxoSmithKline (UK) in providing data translation assistance. We also wish to acknowledge the statistical advice from Soyeon Ahn (Division of Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea).

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received September 23, 2014.
  • Accepted December 24, 2014.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2015

References

  1. ↵
    1. Brooks SM
    . Perspective on the human cough reflex. Cough 2011; 7: 10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Birring SS,
    2. Prudon B,
    3. Carr AJ, et al.
    Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Thorax 2003; 58: 339–343.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Fontana GA,
    3. Sovijarvi AR, et al.
    The diagnosis and management of chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 481–492.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Irwin RS,
    2. Baumann MH,
    3. Bolser DC, et al.
    Diagnosis and management of cough executive summary: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006; 129: 1S–23S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Chung KF,
    2. McGarvey L,
    3. Mazzone SB
    . Chronic cough as a neuropathic disorder. Lancet Respir Med 2013; 1: 414–422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Millqvist E,
    3. Belvisi MG, et al.
    Expert opinion on the cough hypersensitivity syndrome in respiratory medicine. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1132–1148.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Jakes AD,
    3. Faruqi S, et al.
    A worldwide survey of chronic cough: a manifestation of enhanced somatosensory response. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1149–1155.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Moher D,
    2. Liberati A,
    3. Tetzlaff J, et al.
    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Liard R,
    2. Neukirch F
    . Questionnaires: a major instrument for respiratory epidemiology. ERS Monogr 2000; 15: 154–166.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Barendregt JJ,
    2. Doi SA,
    3. Lee YY, et al.
    Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health 2013; 67: 974–978.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Ford AC,
    2. Forman D,
    3. Moayyedi P, et al.
    Cough in the community: a cross sectional survey and the relationship to gastrointestinal symptoms. Thorax 2006; 61: 975–979.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Desalu O,
    2. Salami A,
    3. Fawibe A
    . Prevalence of cough among adults in an urban community in Nigeria. West Afr J Med 2011; 30: 337–341.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Fujimura M
    . Frequency of persistent cough and trends in seeking medical care and treatment-results of an internet survey. Allergol Int 2012; 61: 573–581.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Anandan C,
    2. Nurmatov U,
    3. Van Schayck O, et al.
    Is the prevalence of asthma declining? Systematic review of epidemiological studies. Allergy 2010; 65: 152–167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Halbert RJ,
    2. Natoli JL,
    3. Gano A, et al.
    Global burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2006; 28: 523–532.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Dicpinigaitis PV,
    2. Allusson VR,
    3. Baldanti A, et al.
    Ethnic and gender differences in cough reflex sensitivity. Respiration 2001; 68: 480–482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Song WJ,
    2. Morice AH,
    3. Kim MH, et al.
    Cough in the elderly population: relationships with multiple comorbidity. PLoS One 2013; 8: e78081.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 45 Issue 5 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 45 (5)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Woo-Jung Song, Yoon-Seok Chang, Shoaib Faruqi, Ju-Young Kim, Min-Gyu Kang, Sujeong Kim, Eun-Jung Jo, Min-Hye Kim, Jana Plevkova, Heung-Woo Park, Sang-Heon Cho, Alyn H. Morice
European Respiratory Journal May 2015, 45 (5) 1479-1481; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00218714

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Woo-Jung Song, Yoon-Seok Chang, Shoaib Faruqi, Ju-Young Kim, Min-Gyu Kang, Sujeong Kim, Eun-Jung Jo, Min-Hye Kim, Jana Plevkova, Heung-Woo Park, Sang-Heon Cho, Alyn H. Morice
European Respiratory Journal May 2015, 45 (5) 1479-1481; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00218714
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • Airway immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in COPD patients
  • Wider access to rifapentine-based regimens is needed for TB care globally
  • Association between immunosuppressants and outcomes of COVID-19
Show more Agora

Research letters

  • Characteristics of individuals with AATD from European countries
  • CFTR modulators and platelet activation in blood of COVID-19 patients
  • Implications of new ERS/ATS standards on lung function test interpretation
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society