Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Plasma pro-surfactant protein B and lung function decline in smokers

Janice M. Leung, John Mayo, Wan Tan, C. Martin Tammemagi, Geoffrey Liu, Stuart Peacock, Frances A. Shepherd, John Goffin, Glenwood Goss, Garth Nicholas, Alain Tremblay, Michael Johnston, Simon Martel, Francis Laberge, Rick Bhatia, Heidi Roberts, Paul Burrowes, Daria Manos, Lori Stewart, Jean M. Seely, Michel Gingras, Sergio Pasian, Ming-Sound Tsao, Stephen Lam, Don D. Sin for the Pan-Canadian Early Lung Cancer Study Group
European Respiratory Journal 2015 45: 1037-1045; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00184214
Janice M. Leung
1Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Mayo
3Dept of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wan Tan
1Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Martin Tammemagi
4Dept of Community Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catharines, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey Liu
5University Health Network, Ontario Cancer Institute, and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart Peacock
6The Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
7The British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frances A. Shepherd
5University Health Network, Ontario Cancer Institute, and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Goffin
8The Juravinsky Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glenwood Goss
9The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Garth Nicholas
10Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Tremblay
11University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Johnston
12Beatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Martel
13Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec and Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francis Laberge
13Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec and Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rick Bhatia
14Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heidi Roberts
5University Health Network, Ontario Cancer Institute, and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Burrowes
11University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daria Manos
15Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lori Stewart
16Dept of Diagnostic Imaging, Henderson Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean M. Seely
9The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
10Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
17University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel Gingras
13Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec and Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergio Pasian
13Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec and Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ming-Sound Tsao
5University Health Network, Ontario Cancer Institute, and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Lam
1Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
7The British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Don D. Sin
1Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: don.sin@hli.ubc.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • “Plasma pro-surfactant protein B and lung function decline in smokers.” Janice M. Leung, John Mayo, Wan Tan, C. Martin Tammemagi, Geoffrey Liu, Stuart Peacock, Frances A. Shepherd, John Goffin, Glenwood Goss, Garth Nicholas, Alain Tremblay, Michael Johnston, Simon Martel, Francis Laberge, Rick Bhatia, Heidi Roberts, Paul Burrowes, Daria Manos, Lori Stewart, Jean M. Seely, Michel Gingras, Sergio Pasian, Ming-Sound Tsao, Stephen Lam and Don D. Sin, for the Pan-Canadian Early Lung Cancer Study Group. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1037–1045. - September 01, 2016

Abstract

Plasma pro-surfactant protein B (pro-SFTPB) levels have recently been shown to predict the development of lung cancer in current and ex-smokers, but the ability of pro-SFTPB to predict measures of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity is unknown. We evaluated the performance characteristics of pro-SFTPB as a biomarker of lung function decline in a population of current and ex-smokers.

Plasma pro-SFTPB levels were measured in 2503 current and ex-smokers enrolled in the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study. Linear regression was performed to determine the relationship of pro-SFTPB levels to changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) over a 2-year period as well as to baseline FEV1 and the burden of emphysema observed in computed tomography (CT) scans.

Plasma pro-SFTPB levels were inversely related to both FEV1 % predicted (p=0.024) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (p<0.001), and were positively related to the burden of emphysema on CT scans (p<0.001). Higher plasma pro-SFTPB levels were also associated with a more rapid decline in FEV1 at 1 year (p=0.024) and over 2 years of follow-up (p=0.004).

Higher plasma pro-SFTPB levels are associated with increased severity of airflow limitation and accelerated decline in lung function. Pro-SFTPB is a promising biomarker for COPD severity and progression.

Abstract

High plasma pro-SFTPB levels are associated with more rapid short-term declines in FEV1 in current and ex-smokers http://ow.ly/E9Gmx

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is currently the fourth leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA [1], yet efforts to treat the disease effectively remain elusive, in part because of a scarcity of disease-modifying treatments and our inability to risk-stratify patients accurately for disease progression. The US Food and Drug Administration currently endorses the use of serial spirometric measures such as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) as a primary efficacy end-point for disease-modifying drugs treating COPD. FEV1 measurements, while useful for diagnosis, are nonetheless highly variable. For clinical trials evaluating COPD therapies, the use of FEV1 measurements requires the enrolment of thousands of patients over a long period of time to effectively assess disease progression. A simple and robust blood biomarker of lung function decline would be paradigm shifting, for both patient care as well as drug development. The search for biomarkers to reflect disease progression accurately in COPD, however, has yielded mixed results, with a number of systemic inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein and fibrinogen, lacking the desired specificity for useful clinical application [2, 3]. Instead, lung-specific proteins, such as surfactant protein D [4] and club cell protein 16 [5], may carry greater promise in their ability to better reflect the disease environment in question.

Surfactant protein B (SFTPB) is an 8-kD protein that is synthesised exclusively by type 2 alveolar pneumocytes and nonciliated bronchiolar cells. Its predominant role in the lung is to decrease the surface tension at the air–liquid interface. Specifically, SFTPB achieves this by promoting the adsorption and spread of phospholipids [6] and by preventing plasma proteins from disrupting these phospholipids [7]. In addition, its anti-inflammatory [8] and anti-oxidant properties [9] have made it a useful protein to study within the context of lung diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome [10], neonatal respiratory distress [11] and lung cancer [12]. Although its hydrophobic properties make it exceedingly difficult to measure reliably in plasma or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, its precursor, pro-surfactant protein B (pro-SFTPB), is a hydrophilic 42-kD protein that is cleaved at the N and C terminus into the mature SFTPB form and secreted into the alveolar space. Recent detection of the N-terminal pro-peptide of SFTPB by mass spectrometry has allowed the development of a sandwich ELISA for pro-SFTPB that has subsequently been validated for prediction of the development of lung cancer through measurement in plasma samples [13]. Whether pro-SFTPB can demonstrate similar usefulness in COPD remains unknown. In this study, we investigated whether plasma levels of pro-SFTPB are related to lung function and to declines in FEV1 over time.

Methods

Study population

The patient population for this study was derived from the multicentre Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer (Pan-Can) Study (NCT00751660; Screening Methods in Finding Lung Cancer Early in Current or Former Smokers). Details of this cohort have been published previously [14]. Patients enrolled in this study had to meet the following criteria: age 50–75 years, current or former smokers, and with an estimated 3-year lung cancer risk of >2% based on a prototype of a Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial lung cancer risk prediction model [15]. Enrolment occurred from September 2008 until December 2010. Demographic information was collected from participants and blood samples were drawn and stored at their baseline visit.

Spirometry and computed tomographic imaging

Yearly spirometry was performed based on American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines [16], with quality control conforming to criteria outlined by the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study [17]. Only pre-bronchodilator measurements were available for the entire cohort and thus were used in the analysis. Participants also underwent baseline low-dose computed tomography (CT) scanning of the chest. From these images, qualitative assessment of the extent of emphysema was performed using a method modified from Kazerooni et al. [18] and employed in the COPDGene Study [19]. Individual emphysema scores for each of the five lobes of the lung plus the lingula were assessed as a percentage of total lung volume, and a score of 0–4 was assigned, defined as follows: 0=absence of emphysema, 1=1–25% emphysema, 2=26–50% emphysema, 3=51–75% emphysema, and 4=76–100% emphysema. A total score was obtained by the summation of the six individual “lobe” scores (five lobes and lingula). Reading radiologists were unaware of spirometry values.

Pro-SFTPB measurements

Details describing the development of the pro-SFTPB assay and its ability to predict lung cancer in the Pan-Can cohort have been published previously [13]. Details of the assay are provided in the online supplementary material. Briefly, the sandwich pro-SFTPB ELISA was developed from mouse monoclonal antibodies against the N-terminus of pro-SFTPB. Anti-pro-SFTPB mouse monoclonal antibody (#464) was biotinylated with EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and used for incubation at 0.5 µg·mL−1. After washing, each well was incubated with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase followed by incubation of colour reagents and addition of stop solution (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The absorbance was measured at 450 nm with a VersaMax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with a correction factor of 620 nm. The specificity of the pro-SFTPB assay was validated using mass spectrometry. For samples whose pro-SFTPB levels were below the level of detection, we assigned a value that was half the detection limit. Baseline plasma levels of pro-SFTPB were used for this analysis, with samples performed in duplicate.

Statistical analysis

Measurements of pro-SFTPB were first divided into quartiles to evaluate the relationship of pro-SFTPB to demographic and respiratory parameters. The baseline characteristics across the quartiles were compared using the Jonckheere–Terpstra trend test for continuous variables and the Cochran–Armitage test for dichotomous variables [20, 21]. Change in lung function over time was calculated as the change in FEV1 (mL) per year over 1- and 2-year periods. Multivariable regression models with the outcome variable as the annual decline in FEV1 (mL·year−1) over a 1-year and 2-year period were constructed using the following variables: age, body mass index (BMI), baseline FEV1, current smoking status and sex. We performed the multivariate analysis using PROC MIXED to take into account the hierarchical structure of the covariates and the multiple measurements of FEV1 over time within the same subjects. All analyses were performed using JMP or SAS statistical software (version 10.0; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and two-sided p-values <0.05 were considered significant.

Ethics and informed consent

This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, BC, Canada) and at each of the participating Pan-Can study sites. All participants in the study gave written informed consent.

Results

Baseline demographic characteristics

Plasma pro-SFTPB was measured in 2503 participants of the Pan-Can study. A flow diagram indicating patients enrolled and the reasons for exclusion from the study is shown in figure 1. Baseline characteristics for all subjects and for the quartiles of pro-SFTPB are shown in table 1. The mean±se age of the cohort was 62.34±0.12 years and, although 38.2% of patients had quit smoking by the time of the study, heavy smoking habits were reported (mean±se 54.09±0.47 pack-years). Patients in the quartiles with the highest pro-SFTPB levels were more likely to be men (p=0.023) and have a lower BMI (p=0.006). They were also more likely to be current smokers (p<0.001) and to have the greatest amount and duration of smoking, as given by pack-years (p=0.005).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Flow diagram of patients included in and excluded from the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study. Pro-SFTPB: pro-surfactant protein B.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics for all subjects and for pro-surfactant protein B (pro-SFTPB) quartiles

Respiratory-related characteristics

Respiratory-related variables for all subjects and for the quartiles of pro-SFTPB are shown in table 2. Notably, those in the highest quartiles of pro-SFTPB levels had a lower FEV1 % predicted (p=0.007) and FEV1/FVC ratio (p<0.001), but there were no significant differences in FEV1, FVC or FVC % predicted across the quartiles. Linear regression analysis of FEV1 % predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio as continuous variables also demonstrated a significant relationship with pro-SFTPB levels (fig. 2). Higher pro-SFTPB levels were seen in patients with more advanced Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages (p-trend <0.001) (fig. 3a), although there were no differences between patients with normal spirometry and those designated as GOLD stage unclassified (FEV1/FVC ≥70% and FEV1 <80% predicted). Chest CT imaging was available for qualitative scoring in 2467 patients. Higher CT emphysema scores, signifying greater extent of emphysema, were found in the highest quartiles of pro-SFTPB levels (p-trend <0.001) (fig. 3b).

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

The univariate relationship between pro-surfactant protein B (pro-SFTPB) levels (logarithmic scale) and measures of airway obstruction by spirometry. The solid line represents the mean line and the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence intervals. a) Higher pro-SFTPB levels were associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % predicted (p=0.024, R2=0.002). b) Higher pro-SFTPB levels were associated with lower FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratios (p<0.001, R2=0.007).

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Pro-surfactant protein B (pro-SFTPB) levels in relation to measures of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. Error bars represent se. a) Pro-SFTPB levels for patients according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage classification. Higher pro-SFTPB levels were seen with more severe GOLD stages (overall p-trend <0.001). There was no significant difference in pro-SFTPB levels between normal and GOLD stage U individuals, or between GOLD stage I and ≥II, by the Steel–Dwass test for multiple comparisons. U: GOLD unclassified stage (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity ≥70%, FEV1 <80% predicted). b) Pro-SFTPB levels for patients according to computed tomography (CT) emphysema scores. Higher CT emphysema scores denote greater severity of disease. Higher pro-SFTPB levels were associated with higher CT emphysema scores (overall p-trend <0.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Respiratory variables for all subjects and for pro-surfactant protein B (pro-SFTPB) quartiles

For the 2220 subjects who had FEV1 measurements until 1 year after enrolment and for the 1687 subjects who had FEV1 measurements until 2 years after enrolment, a 1-year annual decline in FEV1 and a 2-year annual decline in FEV1 were calculated, respectively. Prior to adjustment for confounding variables, patients in the highest pro-SFTPB quartiles had significantly greater 1-year annual FEV1 declines, both in litres (p=0.037) and in percentage change from baseline (p=0.034). Similar trends were seen for 2-year percentage change in FEV1 (p=0.037) and in FEV1 in litres over 2 years (p=0.005). When analysed as continuous variables and after adjustment for confounding variables (age, sex, BMI, baseline FEV1 (L), current smoking and pack-years of smoking), FEV1 declines calculated over 1-year and 2-year periods were significantly greater in patients with the highest pro-SFTPB levels (p=0.024 and p=0.004, respectively) (fig. 4).

FIGURE 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4

The adjusted relationship between pro-surfactant protein B (pro-SFTPB) levels (logarithmic scale) and the rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) over a) 1 year and b) 2 years. Covariates adjusted for included FEV1 (L), age, body mass index (kg·m−2), current smoking and sex. The solid line represents the mean line and the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence intervals. Higher pro-SFTPB levels were associated with a greater decline in FEV1 in patients with a) 1-year spirometry values available (p=0.006, R2=0.059) and b) 2-year spirometry values available (p=0.004, R2=0.076).

Multivariable linear regression models

Adjustments for significant covariates made little difference to the findings. Pro-SFTPB levels were significantly associated with rapid decline in lung function over 2 years (table 3). Higher pro-SFTPB levels were associated with severe CT emphysema (score ≥4), higher pack-years of smoking, current smoking, older age and male sex (table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Linear regression models for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) change#

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Clinical and physiological factors associated with pro-surfactant protein B levels#

Discussion

The most novel finding in this study was that circulating levels of pro-SFTPB, a highly lung-specific protein, were associated with increased severity of airflow limitation and most importantly with rapid progression of COPD over 2 years in a large population of current and ex-smokers. While caution should be applied to clinical application, due to the wide variation in levels of pro-SFTPB, there appears to be a threshold effect whereby subjects in the second quartile of pro-SFTPB levels had markedly faster lung function decline than subjects in the first quartile. Clinical utility may be tied to this threshold level. We had previously shown that higher levels of circulating pro-SFTPB were associated with another important smoking-related lung disease, lung cancer [13]. Together, these data indicate that pro-SFTPB may be a very promising biomarker of two major smoking-related disorders: COPD and lung cancer.

Superficially, our current results appear to be discordant with a previous study that interrogated the relationship between plasma pro-SFTPB levels and airway obstruction [22]. However, this latter study contained a small sample size and as such lacked the statistical power to adequately evaluate this relationship. Our data are consistent with previous investigations that have evaluated surfactants in plasma with lung function. Surfactant protein D, for instance, has been shown to be increased in patients with severe COPD [23]. SFTPB has higher specificity for lungs (as its source) than other hydrophilic surfactants such as surfactant A or D, making it a much more desirable plasma biomarker for COPD. Although the exact mechanism for the increased levels of surfactants in plasma of severe COPD patients is unknown, it is postulated that with greater severity of lung disease, increased lung permeability allows for the transit of surfactant into the bloodstream where it is then measured in elevated quantities. A similar mechanism has been proposed for SFTPB [24, 25]. We speculate that increased plasma levels of pro-SFTPB may be the result of translocation from the lung to the blood, with disease being associated with primary lung deficiency; further studies would be necessary to confirm this mechanism.

How pro-SFTPB may come to reflect severe COPD phenotypes is subject to some debate. Murine models completely deficient in SFTPB die soon after birth from respiratory failure [26] and humans with frameshift mutations in the SFTPB gene develop neonatal respiratory distress [27, 28]. Partial deficiencies in SFTPB may also be problematic. For instance, heterozygosity for the SP-B 121ins2 mutation in humans, in which production of SFTPB is reduced by half, has also been shown to be associated with reduced lung function and the presence of COPD [29]. Similarly, mice with partial deficiencies of SFTPB develop lung physiology reminiscent of COPD. Despite seemingly normal lung growth and histological appearance, these mice display increased air trapping and early small airway closure compared with control mice with full complements of SFTPB [30]. Upstream regulators of SFTPB gene expression may play a role in this process. Transcriptional regulation of SFTPB is performed by thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1)/NK2 homeobox 1 (NKX2-1), levels of which fluctuate in response to pulmonary injury [31]. One known trigger for such injury is ceramide, a second messenger sphingolipid responsible for mediating apoptosis [32]. By inhibiting TTF-1/NKX2-1 DNA-binding activity, ceramide effectively decreases SFTPB protein levels. Incidentally, ceramide has also been implicated in the development of emphysema [33]. Intratracheal installation of ceramide into mice causes increases in alveolar diameter, a process that is prevented in mice whose de novo synthesis of ceramide is blocked.

While apoptosis is thought to be the mechanism by which this emphysema develops, an additional role may be played by SFTPB, particularly considering its role in mediating inflammatory insults. SFTPB deficiency in a transgenic murine model increases several measures of pulmonary inflammation, including bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell number, macrophage and neutrophil migration, and levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 [8]. This heightened inflammatory response is, furthermore, attenuated with the restoration of SFTPB. Similarly, SFTPB, unlike surfactant proteins A and C, may modulate the oxidative stress response of the lung. Specifically, in vitro models of alveolar macrophages cultured from rat lungs and incubated with SFTPB showed reduced nitric oxide levels in response to lipopolysaccharide [9]. Both the anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties of SFTPB may work to protect the lung from the toxic effects of cigarette smoke.

Our analysis has several limitations that should be taken into consideration. First, our patient population was made up entirely of former and current smokers. Generalisation of our findings to nonsmoking populations must therefore be performed with caution. Although it is well established that COPD can occur in nonsmokers, the performance of the pro-SFTPB plasma assay in predicting lung function decline in this population remains unknown. Secondly, we cannot at the moment claim that pro-SFTPB levels can predict long-term outcomes, as we were only able to measure lung function decline through a 2-year period after enrolment. Future studies would need not only to assess the ability of pro-SFTPB levels to predict lung function changes over longer periods of time, but also to evaluate other clinically important measures, such as respiratory-related health status, rate of exacerbations, hospitalisations and mortality. Thirdly, the use of pre-bronchodilator rather than post-bronchodilator spirometry was also a limitation to the study, as the diagnosis of COPD is preferably made through post-bronchodilator measurements. Finally, we did not measure other inflammatory biomarkers in this cohort, so whether pro-SFTPB is merely a marker for inflammation or whether pro-SFTPB performs favourably or unfavourably compared with other inflammatory biomarkers remains unknown.

While previous efforts to quantify SFTPB have been hampered by the technical limitations of assaying a hydrophobic molecule, a new ELISA method based on SFTPB's pro-form now allows for accurate and reproducible measurements. Its specificity for reflecting the lung in particular may give pro-SFTPB an advantage over nonspecific inflammatory biomarkers that have yet to show proven clinical utility. We demonstrate here that pro-SFTPB may reflect certain measures of COPD severity. Future investigation over extended periods of spirometric follow-up may help to clarify what role pro-SFTPB can play in the diagnosis and management of COPD.

Acknowledgements

The Pan-Canadian Early Lung Cancer Study Group members and their affiliations are as follows. Diana Ionescu, Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra, Mark Elwood and Sharon Gee: The British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sonya Cressman: The Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Diana Sonnichsen: Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada; Annette McWilliams: Fiona Stanley Hospital and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia; Serge Puksa, Bill Evans and Elaine Moore: The Juravinsky Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Christian Couture and Carolle St-Pierre: Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada; Erin Pennell: Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada; Harman Sekhon, Kayvan Amjadi and Sharon Kelly: The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Xu Zhaolin: Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada; J-C Cutz: St Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Stefan Urbanski, Paul MacEachern and Rommy Koetzler: University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; David Hwang, Kam Sopharati, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Natasha Leighl and Maureen McGregor: University Health Network and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Tom Sutedja: Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Footnotes

  • This article has been revised according to the correction published in the September 2016 issue of the European Respiratory Journal.

  • For editorial comments see Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 872–874 [DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00236314]

  • This article has supplementary material available from erj.ersjournals.com

  • Support statement: This study received funding from the Terry Fox Research Institute (Vancouver, BC, Canada), the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Toronto, ON, Canada), US Public Health Service contracts from the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA) (N01-CN-85188, U01CA96109, P01 CA096964-01A1 and N01-CN 35000), and the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) Lusi Wong Lung Cancer Early Detection Fund. Funding information for this article has been deposited with FundRef.

  • Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside the online version of this article at erj.ersjournals.com

  • Received September 3, 2014.
  • Accepted November 1, 2014.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2015

References

  1. ↵
    US Burden of Disease Collaborators. The state of US health, 1990–2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA 2013; 310: 591–608.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Dickens JA,
    2. Miller BE,
    3. Edwards LD, et al.
    COPD association and repeatability of blood biomarkers in the ECLIPSE cohort. Respir Res 2011; 12: 146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Garcia-Rio F,
    2. Miravitlles M,
    3. Soriano JB, et al.
    Systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based study. Respir Res 2010; 11: 63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lomas DA,
    2. Silverman EK,
    3. Edwards LD, et al.
    Serum surfactant protein D is steroid sensitive and associated with exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 95–102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Park HY,
    2. Churg A,
    3. Wright JL, et al.
    Club cell protein 16 and disease progression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188: 1413–1419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Oosterlaken-Dijksterhuis MA,
    2. Haagsman HP,
    3. van Golde LM, et al.
    Characterization of lipid insertion into monomolecular layers mediated by lung surfactant proteins SP-B and SP-C. Biochemistry 1991; 30: 10965–10971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Seeger W,
    2. Gunther A,
    3. Thede C
    . Differential sensitivity to fibrinogen inhibition of SP-C- vs. SP-B-based surfactants. Am J Physiol 1992; 262: L286–L291.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Ikegami M,
    2. Whitsett JA,
    3. Martis PC, et al.
    Reversibility of lung inflammation caused by SP-B deficiency. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2005; 289: L962–L970.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Miles PR,
    2. Bowman L,
    3. Rao KM, et al.
    Pulmonary surfactant inhibits LPS-induced nitric oxide production by alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol 1999; 276: L186–L196.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Bersten AD,
    2. Hunt T,
    3. Nicholas TE, et al.
    Elevated plasma surfactant protein-B predicts development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 648–652.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Melton KR,
    2. Nesslein LL,
    3. Ikegami M, et al.
    SP-B deficiency causes respiratory failure in adult mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2003; 285: L543–L549.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Taguchi A,
    2. Politi K,
    3. Pitteri SJ, et al.
    Lung cancer signatures in plasma based on proteome profiling of mouse tumor models. Cancer Cell 2011; 20: 289–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Sin DD,
    2. Tammemagi CM,
    3. Lam S, et al.
    Pro-surfactant protein B as a biomarker for lung cancer prediction. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 4536–4543.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. McWilliams A,
    2. Tammemagi MC,
    3. Mayo JR, et al.
    Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 910–919.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Tammemagi CM,
    2. Pinsky PF,
    3. Caporaso NE, et al.
    Lung cancer risk prediction: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal And Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial models and validation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1058–1068.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Miller MR,
    2. Hankinson J,
    3. Brusasco V, et al.
    Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 319–338.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Buist AS,
    2. Vollmer WM,
    3. Sullivan SD, et al.
    The Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Initiative (BOLD): rationale and design. COPD 2005; 2: 277–283.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Kazerooni EA,
    2. Martinez FJ,
    3. Flint A, et al.
    Thin-section CT obtained at 10-mm increments versus limited three-level thin-section CT for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: correlation with pathologic scoring. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 977–983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    COPDGene CT Workshop Group, Barr RG, Berkowitz EA, et al. A combined pulmonary-radiology workshop for visual evaluation of COPD: study design, chest CT findings and concordance with quantitative evaluation. COPD 2012; 9: 151–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Bewick V,
    2. Cheek L,
    3. Ball J
    . Statistics review 10: Further nonparametric methods. Crit Care 2004; 8: 196–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Bewick V,
    2. Cheek L,
    3. Ball J
    . Statistics review 8: Qualitative data – tests of association. Crit Care 2004; 8: 46–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Um SJ,
    2. Lam S,
    3. Coxson H, et al.
    Budesonide/formoterol enhances the expression of pro surfactant protein-B in lungs of COPD patients. PLoS One 2013; 8: e83881.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Winkler C,
    2. Atochina-Vasserman EN,
    3. Holz O, et al.
    Comprehensive characterisation of pulmonary and serum surfactant protein D in COPD. Respir Res 2011; 12: 29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Doyle IR,
    2. Bersten AD,
    3. Nicholas TE
    . Surfactant proteins-A and -B are elevated in plasma of patients with acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 1217–1229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Robin M,
    2. Dong P,
    3. Hermans C, et al.
    Serum levels of CC16, SP-A and SP-B reflect tobacco-smoke exposure in asymptomatic subjects. Eur Respir J 2002; 20: 1152–1161.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Clark JC,
    2. Wert SE,
    3. Bachurski CJ, et al.
    Targeted disruption of the surfactant protein B gene disrupts surfactant homeostasis, causing respiratory failure in newborn mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 7794–7798.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Nogee LM,
    2. Garnier G,
    3. Dietz HC, et al.
    A mutation in the surfactant protein B gene responsible for fatal neonatal respiratory disease in multiple kindreds. J Clin Invest 1994; 93: 1860–1863.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Baekvad-Hansen M,
    2. Nordestgaard BG,
    3. Dahl M
    . Heterozygosity for E292 V in ABCA3, lung function and COPD in 64,000 individuals. Respir Res 2012; 13: 67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Baekvad-Hansen M,
    2. Dahl M,
    3. Tybjaerg-Hansen A, et al.
    Surfactant protein-B 121ins2 heterozygosity, reduced pulmonary function, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: 17–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Clark JC,
    2. Weaver TE,
    3. Iwamoto HS, et al.
    Decreased lung compliance and air trapping in heterozygous SP-B-deficient mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1997; 16: 46–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Wert SE,
    2. Dey CR,
    3. Blair PA, et al.
    Increased expression of thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) in respiratory epithelial cells inhibits alveolarization and causes pulmonary inflammation. Dev Biol 2002; 242: 75–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Hannun YA,
    2. Obeid LM
    . The ceramide-centric universe of lipid-mediated cell regulation: stress encounters of the lipid kind. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 25847–25850.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Petrache I,
    2. Natarajan V,
    3. Zhen L, et al.
    Ceramide upregulation causes pulmonary cell apoptosis and emphysema-like disease in mice. Nat Med 2005; 11: 491–498.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 45 Issue 4 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 45 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Plasma pro-surfactant protein B and lung function decline in smokers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Plasma pro-surfactant protein B and lung function decline in smokers
Janice M. Leung, John Mayo, Wan Tan, C. Martin Tammemagi, Geoffrey Liu, Stuart Peacock, Frances A. Shepherd, John Goffin, Glenwood Goss, Garth Nicholas, Alain Tremblay, Michael Johnston, Simon Martel, Francis Laberge, Rick Bhatia, Heidi Roberts, Paul Burrowes, Daria Manos, Lori Stewart, Jean M. Seely, Michel Gingras, Sergio Pasian, Ming-Sound Tsao, Stephen Lam, Don D. Sin
European Respiratory Journal Apr 2015, 45 (4) 1037-1045; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00184214

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Plasma pro-surfactant protein B and lung function decline in smokers
Janice M. Leung, John Mayo, Wan Tan, C. Martin Tammemagi, Geoffrey Liu, Stuart Peacock, Frances A. Shepherd, John Goffin, Glenwood Goss, Garth Nicholas, Alain Tremblay, Michael Johnston, Simon Martel, Francis Laberge, Rick Bhatia, Heidi Roberts, Paul Burrowes, Daria Manos, Lori Stewart, Jean M. Seely, Michel Gingras, Sergio Pasian, Ming-Sound Tsao, Stephen Lam, Don D. Sin
European Respiratory Journal Apr 2015, 45 (4) 1037-1045; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00184214
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • COPD and smoking
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Allergen inhalation associated with airway dysfunction
  • OSTEOPOROSIS AND FACTURE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH ICS USE IN COPD
  • Cost-effectiveness of azithromycin in reducing asthma exacerbations
Show more Original Articles

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society