Abstract
Rationale: Some severe asthma patients require oral corticosteroids (OCS) likely due to greater disease severity. Exhaled molecular markers can provide phenotypic information in asthma.
Objectives: Determine whether patients on OCS (OCS+) have a different breathprint compared with those who were not on OCS (OCS-); determine the classification accuracy of eNose as compared to FEV1 % pred, % sputum eosinophils, and exhaled nitric oxide (FENO).
Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the U-BIOPRED cohort. Severe asthma was defined by IMI-criteria [Bel Thorax 2011]. OCS+ patients had daily OCS. OCS- patients had never had OCS and were on maintenance inhaled fluticasone equivalent >1000 μg/day. Exhaled volatile organic compounds trapped on adsorption tubes were analysed by centralized eNose platform (Owlstone Lonestar, Cyranose 320, Comon Invent, Tor Vergata TEN) including a total of 190 sensors. t test was used for comparing groups and support vector machine with leave-one-out cross-validation as a classifier.
Results: 33 OCS+ (age 55±11yr, mean±SD, 52% female, 27% smokers, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 64.1±24% pred) and 40 OCS- severe asthma patients (age 54±15yr, mean±SD, 55% female, 35% smokers, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 61.8±24% pred) were studied. Sensor by sensor analysis showed that 56 sensors provided different mean values (change in sensor resistance or frequency) between groups (P<0.05). Accuracy of classification was as follows: eNose 71% (n=73), FENO 71% (n=70), FEV1 62% (n=73) and sputum eosinophils 59% (n=37).
Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest OCS+ and OCS- severe asthma patients can be distinguished by an eNose platform.
- © 2014 ERS
