Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Pulmonary rehabilitation in Italy: professional barriers to overcome

Bruno Balbi, Nicolino Ambrosino, Marta Lazzeri, Franco Pasqua, Michele Vitacca, Enrico Clini
European Respiratory Journal 2014 44: 1382-1383; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00098714
Bruno Balbi
1Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Fondazione Maugeri IRCCS, Veruno, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicolino Ambrosino
2Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Weaning, Auxilium Vitae Rehabilitation Centre, Volterra, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Lazzeri
3Associazione Riabilitatori della Insufficienza Respiratoria (ARIR), Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franco Pasqua
4Pulmonary Medicine and Rehabilitation, San Raffaele Hospital, Montecompatri, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Vitacca
5Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Fondazione Maugeri IRCCS, Lumezzane, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enrico Clini
6Dept of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Ospedale Villa Pineta, University of Modena Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: enrico.clini@unimore.it
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation requires specific competence and skill, must be a matter for pulmonologists http://ow.ly/xC6tD

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the study on pulmonary rehabilitation by Spruit et al. [1] and the accompanying editorial by Rochester et al. [2]. From the starting point of a global view on pulmonary rehabilitation programmes and organisation, the study reports the modalities by which pulmonary rehabilitation is delivered worldwide, showing substantial differences between North America and Europe. As pulmonary physicians working in Italy, we are clearly more interested in the European scenario with the aim to compare our practice with that of other European countries, and to understand the unmet needs and problems in Europe in delivering robust and effective pulmonary rehabilitation programmes.

Overall, many barriers hampering the possibility to undergo pulmonary rehabilitation still exist for Italian patients with chronic disabling respiratory diseases.

There are still a few centres specifically devoted to pulmonary rehabilitation across Italy. In a national study published in 2004 [3], only 53 rehabilitation departments and/or pulmonology units were estimated to warrant availability and accessibility to pulmonary rehabilitation, with more than half of them being located in the north of the country. This seems to be a poor perspective when related to the actual epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients (2.5 to 3 million in Italy) [4] dealing with the early onset of disability. As well as additional and increasing problems of difficult weaning, pulmonary rehabilitation and physiotherapy in chronic and critically ill patients admitted to acute hospital care [5]. Most of the patients still have their rights to pulmonary rehabilitation denied. There is no information as to whether there have been improvements in the number and distribution of pulmonary rehabilitation centres across the country in the last 10 years; thus, as a consequence, we are now planning an update of that survey.

An additional problem in Italy may be represented by the so called “P factor”, namely the physiatrist factor, i.e. doctors specialised in physiatry. Likewise, across Europe these specialists are in charge of and deal with the overall problem of rehabilitation in the healthcare system. Notwithstanding, they traditionally specialise in disabilities associated with musculoskeletal diseases and/or conditions following surgery, with only a very few of them experiencing rehabilitation following neurological conditions such as cerebral stroke. In 2011, the Italian Ministry of Health published a report on rehabilitation [6]. For the first time, this document, approved by an ad hoc committee, recognised not only physiatrists as experts in rehabilitation but also cardiologists, pulmonologist and oncologists, among others. Notwithstanding, and as a compromise, it also reinforced the “P factor” by stating that physiatrists should have overseen all the rehabilitation indications and programmes, including in patients suffering from diseases not within their own specific competence, but leaving space for all 21 national regions to decide independently. As a consequence, regional rules and health policies issued after 2011 are different across Italy, with regions in which pulmonary rehabilitation can and cannot be approved without an evaluation by a physiatrist being the very last stage of the decision. Notably, and in contrast with this behaviour, the international survey by Spruit et al. [1] essentially did not find any prominent role for physiatrists in the pulmonary rehabilitation course.

In the past decades, several Italian pulmonologists working in pulmonary rehabilitation have been widely recognised as national leaders and international experts, attending task forces and contributing to research in this field. A quick search in PubMed revealed that in the period of 1970 to date, Italian pulmonologists actively participated in ∼5% of all the published peer-reviewed articles and documents dealing with pulmonary rehabilitation and lung diseases (339 out of 7169), whereas national physiatrists actively participated in <1.7% of articles related to rehabilitation and neurological or orthopaedic disorders. Thus, the national group of pulmonologists expert in pulmonary rehabilitation contributed greatly to the development of this discipline as an evidence-based, non-pharmacological treatment for disabled respiratory individuals.

Finally, and in contrast to the organisations in North and South America, in Europe there is still a lack of physiotherapists specifically involved in pulmonary rehabilitation and qualified to deliver programmes to respiratory patients. This has been emphasised in Italy in recent years [7], with the academic qualification of these healthcare professionals being an important aspect of the problem. On the one hand, the overall request to study a degree in physiotherapy is very high in Italy (one student admitted to the university over 14 requests of admission) [8], on the other hand, the specific qualification of a respiratory physiotherapy does not exist and only post-doctoral courses (masters) can be obtained for this qualification. In addition, during the degree course in physiotherapy, <10% of teaching credits are dedicated to cardiopulmonary problems.

Taken together, this situation is calling for national, and hopefully international, action. As pulmonologists and respiratory physiotherapists who have been practicing pulmonary rehabilitation for many years, we are trying to reinforce, at each level, the partnership and the concept that respiratory patients should be optimally treated by experts qualified in the field, in secondary and even primary level care. The generic concept of “undefined” or “unspecialised” rehabilitation as an intervention argued to instead be able to ameliorate any type of disability reinforces the wrong concept of a “one-size-fits-all” type of medicine, likely causing loss of time and resources. A more focused professional approach in the rehabilitation field, recognising the specificity of pulmonary rehabilitation and leaving the responsibility of it to pulmonologists, is the way to allocate resources that are able to ameliorate the condition in disabled respiratory patients.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received May 29, 2014.
  • Accepted May 30, 2014.
  • ©ERS 2014

References

  1. ↵
    1. Spruit MA,
    2. Pitta F,
    3. Garvey C,
    4. et al
    . Differences in content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1326–1337.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Rochester CL,
    2. Spanevello A
    . Heterogeneity of pulmonary rehabilitation: like apples and oranges – both healthy fruit. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1223–1226.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Foglio K,
    2. Murgia A,
    3. Ambrosino N
    . Application of respiratory rehabilitation programmes in Italy. Second investigation survey by the AIPO Rehabilitation Study Group. Rass Patol App Respir 2004; 19: 53–61.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Age.Na.S. BPCO.Linee guida nazionali di riferimento per la prevenzione e la terapia. Broncopneumopatia Cronica Ostruttiva. www.pneumonet.it/scientifico/editoriali/linee_guida_BPCO_2010/BPCO.pdf Date last updated: June 2010. Date last accessed: May 2014.
  5. ↵
    1. Ambrosino N,
    2. Venturelli E,
    3. Vagheggini G,
    4. et al
    . Rehabilitation, weaning and physical therapy strategies in chronic critically ill patients. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 487–492.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Quaderni del Ministero della Salute. La centralità della Persona in riabilitazione: nuovi modelli organizzativi e gestionali. No.8 March–April 2011. www.quadernidellasalute.it/archivio-quaderni/8-marzo-aprile-2011.php Date last accessed: May 2014.
  7. ↵
    1. Clini E,
    2. Lazzeri M,
    3. Lusuardi M
    . Respiratory therapist: urgent need for a professional profile. Rass Patol App Respir 2004; 19: 185–186.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Mastrillo A
    . Lauree triennali delle professioni sanitarie. Dati sull’accesso ai corsi e programmazione posti nell’ A.A. 2013–14. http://cplps.altervista.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Report-mastrillo-7-dic.2013-x-Oss..pdf Date last updated: December 2013. Date last accessed: May 2014.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 44 Issue 5 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 44 (5)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pulmonary rehabilitation in Italy: professional barriers to overcome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Pulmonary rehabilitation in Italy: professional barriers to overcome
Bruno Balbi, Nicolino Ambrosino, Marta Lazzeri, Franco Pasqua, Michele Vitacca, Enrico Clini
European Respiratory Journal Nov 2014, 44 (5) 1382-1383; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00098714

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Pulmonary rehabilitation in Italy: professional barriers to overcome
Bruno Balbi, Nicolino Ambrosino, Marta Lazzeri, Franco Pasqua, Michele Vitacca, Enrico Clini
European Respiratory Journal Nov 2014, 44 (5) 1382-1383; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00098714
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • COPD and smoking
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Ivacaftor modifies cystic fibrosis neutrophil phenotype
  • Serum mitochondrial DNA predicts exacerbation and progression of IPF
  • CTEPH and totally implantable central venous access systems
Show more Agora

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society