Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

The best laid schemes of airway repair

Emma L. Rawlins, Adam Giangreco
European Respiratory Journal 2014 44: 299-301; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00088014
Emma L. Rawlins
1Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Giangreco
2Lungs for Living Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: a.giangreco@ucl.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The best-laid schemes o’ mice an’ men

Gang aft agley,

An’ lea’e us nought but grief an' pain,

For promis’d joy!

Still thou are blest, compared wi’ me!

The present only toucheth thee:

But och! I backward cast my e’e,

On prospects drear!

An’ forward, tho’ I canna see,

I guess an’ fear!

Excerpt from “To a Mouse” by Robert Burns

Two recent studies have provided new insights into the cellular identity and preferred regenerative schemes of progenitor cells in mouse and human airways [1, 2]. These findings not only have important implications for disease progression, but may also help scientists develop new techniques for improving human airway regeneration.

Schemes of homeostasis and repair

The mouse trachea is lined by basal, secretory and ciliated cells. Previous genetic lineage tracing studies have shown that in the homeostatic and repairing mouse trachea, basal cells are widespread, multipotent progenitor cells capable of both long-term self-renewal and differentiation into ciliated and secretory cells [3, 4]. Similar experiments have also shown that differentiated tracheal club cell (Clara cell) secretory protein (CCSP)-expressing cells can also self renew and give rise to ciliated cells, but that these do not play a major role in tracheal homeostasis [5]. In a recent publication, Tata et al. [1] found that murine airways exhibit an unexpected cellular plasticity in response to genetically mediated basal progenitor cell ablation. Lineage labelling showed that tracheal CCSP-expressing cells can differentiate into fully functional basal cells competent to act as epithelial progenitors. This alternate strategy of CCSP-expressing cell-mediated repair of the tracheal epithelium was also replicated in vitro, suggesting that contact-mediated signalling between airway basal cells and CCSP-expressing cells is required to prevent CCSP-expressing cells dedifferentiating to basal progenitor cells in homeostatic airways. The Notch and Egfr intercellular signalling pathways, or those of other surface receptors, such as cadherins, are candidates to mediate such a signal [6–8].

This work illustrates how flexible stem/progenitor cell hierarchies can be in response to injury. Loss of the preferred progenitor cell type (basal cells) provides an inductive cue to remaining cells to dedifferentiate and initiate airway repair. Similar findings have also recently been reported in more established stem cell hierarchies including the intestinal crypt [9, 10]. It is plausible that similar plasticity amongst cells of the distal airways and alveoli could reconcile many of the apparent contradictions amongst murine lineage tracing experiments in this region. Specifically, lineage labelling and chimeric analysis in mice have clearly demonstrated that at homeostasis, CCSP-expressing cells [5, 11] and type 2 pneumocytes [12, 13] are widespread epithelial progenitors in the smaller airways and alveoli. However, in response to different types and severities of injury, alternative progenitor cell populations that express both CCSP and surfactant protein C, as well as cells that express integrins α6 and β4, and keratins 5 and 14, have also been identified [14–18]. At present, the cellular origin and precise identity of these keratin 5-expressing distal airway progenitor cells remains elusive. Future experiments, perhaps with a focus on potential lineage plasticity using multiple injury-repair models, will no doubt bring further clarity.

Of mice and men

The flexibility in schemes of murine airway homeostasis and regeneration are potentially important for regenerative medicine and in treating lung diseases such as cancer. But before these issues are examined, we need to know how similar the epithelial cell hierarchy is between mouse and human airways. In vitro studies using human cells have supported the hypothesis that, similar to those of mice, human basal cells are a multipotent airway epithelial progenitor [4, 19]. Independent in vivo studies by Teixeira et al. [2] have taken advantage of naturally occurring mitochondrial mutations to perform quantitative analysis of stochastically occurring cell clones within intact human airways. Results of this study suggest that basal cells are a preferred multipotent progenitor cell in human airways, and that over time a natural process of clonal consolidation reduces the number of clonally distinct basal progenitor cell clones (fig. 1). Moreover, by comparing clone size and abundance in smokers versus nonsmokers, it appeared that the rate of clonal consolidation was accelerated in smokers, most likely due to the more rapid turnover of smokers’ airways (fig. 1, red line). Whether one or multiple types of human basal cells are responsible for human airway homeostasis and clonal consolidation remains an open question. In either case, in human oral squamous cell carcinoma, it was recently shown that mitochondrial DNA mutations, which may be indicative of clonal consolidation, are associated with increased cancer recurrence and reduced patient survival [20]. These data suggest that further in vitro and in vivo investigations of basal cell clonal consolidation may be relevant in patients undergoing surgery for early stage lung cancer. The presence of extensive clonal consolidation may warrant more aggressive therapeutic interventions, such as adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy, even in the absence of identifiable micro-metastases. Future studies are now required to address this possibility.

Figure 1–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1–

Ageing and clonal consolidation. As lungs age, a natural process of clonal consolidation results in reduced airway epithelial clonal diversity (- - - -) and increased individual clone size (––––). In healthy individuals, it is currently unclear whether this process occurs predominantly in old age (blue lines) or continuously throughout life (black lines). In either case, evidence suggests that clonal consolidation is accelerated in the airways of smokers, resulting in a rapid loss of airway clonal diversity (red lines).

Interestingly, CCSP-expressing cells are virtually absent from proximal human airways [2]. This suggests that CCSP-expressing cells are unlikely to function as alternate progenitor cells in human upper airways. It is also unlikely that this difference between human and murine lungs simply reflects an underlying human lung pathology, as CCSP-expressing cells are absent in the airways of smokers and nonsmokers alike. Could other secretory cells, such as mucinous goblet cells, fulfil a multipotent progenitor cell role in a repair setting? Or do human airways lack the flexibility of progenitor cell choice that exists in murine lungs? Answering these questions is not merely academic, but has significant implications for both airway regenerative medicine and lung disease ontogeny. For example, if multiple airway progenitor cell types exist in human lungs, which are responsible for the initiation of lung diseases such as cancer? And which cell type would be most useful as a cellular therapy for lung regeneration?

Forward, though we cannot see

If the ultimate aim of this research is to develop new treatments for human lung disease, then understanding the contribution of the various stem and progenitor cells and their associated niches to lung pathology is of primary importance. This will undoubtedly require complementary approaches involving both clinically relevant animal systems and improved human models for studying lung repair and regeneration. Examples of human models are likely to include ex vivo lung perfusion and in vitro organoid models.

One immediate future direction of airway stem cell research, with potential for short- to medium-term clinical benefits, is investigating the possibility of links between tumour recurrence and airway regeneration. The incidence of lung cancer recurrence in patients with stage 1 (T1N0) disease following surgical lobectomy is 20–30% [21]. This high recurrence rate suggests that mutated cells capable of regenerating a tumour are frequently located outside of resectable tumour margins. This is consistent with the recent identification of widely dispersed, clonally related, preinvasive lung cancer cells located throughout the airways of many smokers [22]. Whether these cells have become intrinsically more progenitor- or stem-like, or whether their contribution to tumour growth is controlled extrinsically within permissive airway microenvironments (such as endogenous stem cell niches) remains unclear. In either case, it will be valuable to test the hypothesis that distinct airway microenvironments may extrinsically regulate airway progenitor cell fate in health and disease.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received March 14, 2014.
  • Accepted May 27, 2014.
  • ©ERS 2014

References

  1. ↵
    1. Tata PR,
    2. Mou H,
    3. Pardo-Saganta A,
    4. et al
    . Dedifferentiation of committed epithelial cells into stem cells in vivo. Nature 2013; 503: 218–223.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Teixeira VH,
    2. Nadarajan P,
    3. Graham TA,
    4. et al
    . Stochastic homeostasis in human airway epithelium is achieved by neutral competition of basal cell progenitors. Elife 2013; 2: e00966.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Hong KU,
    2. Reynolds SD,
    3. Watkins S,
    4. et al
    . In vivo differentiation potential of tracheal basal cells: evidence for multipotent and unipotent subpopulations. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004; 286: L643–L649.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Rock JR,
    2. Onaitis MW,
    3. Rawlins EL,
    4. et al
    . Basal cells as stem cells of the mouse trachea and human airway epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 12771–12775.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Rawlins EL,
    2. Okubo T,
    3. Xue Y,
    4. et al
    . The role of Scgb1a1+ Clara cells in the long-term maintenance and repair of lung airway, but not alveolar, epithelium. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 4: 525–534.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Rock JR,
    2. Gao X,
    3. Xue Y,
    4. et al
    . Notch-dependent differentiation of adult airway basal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2011; 8: 639–648.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Vermeer PD,
    2. Einwalter LA,
    3. Moninger TO,
    4. et al
    . Segregation of receptor and ligand regulates activation of epithelial growth factor receptor. Nature 2003; 422: 322–326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Lu L,
    2. Teixeira VH,
    3. Yuan Z,
    4. et al
    . LRIG1 regulates cadherin-dependent contact inhibition directing epithelial homeostasis and pre-invasive squamous cell carcinoma development. J Pathol 2013; 229: 608–620.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Ritsma L,
    2. Ellenbroek SI,
    3. Zomer A,
    4. et al
    . Intestinal crypt homeostasis revealed at single-stem-cell level by in vivo live imaging. Nature 2014; 507: 632–365.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Buczacki SJ,
    2. Zecchini HI,
    3. Nicholson AM,
    4. et al
    . Intestinal label-retaining cells are secretory precursors expressing Lgr5. Nature 2013; 495: 65–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Giangreco A,
    2. Arwert EN,
    3. Rosewell IR,
    4. et al
    . Stem cells are dispensable for lung homeostasis but restore airways after injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 9286–9291.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Barkauskas CE,
    2. Cronce MJ,
    3. Rackley CR,
    4. et al
    . Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 3025–3036.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Desai TJ,
    2. Brownfield DG,
    3. Krasnow MA
    . Alveolar progenitor and stem cells in lung development, renewal and cancer. Nature 2014; 507: 190–194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Zheng D,
    2. Limmon GV,
    3. Yin L,
    4. et al
    . Regeneration of alveolar type I and II cells from Scgb1a1-expressing cells following severe pulmonary damage induced by bleomycin and influenza. PLoS One 2012; 7: e48451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chapman HA,
    2. Li X,
    3. Alexander JP,
    4. et al
    . Integrin α6β4 identifies an adult distal lung epithelial population with regenerative potential in mice. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 2855–2862.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kumar PA,
    2. Hu Y,
    3. Yamamoto Y,
    4. et al
    . Distal airway stem cells yield alveoli in vitro and during lung regeneration following H1N1 influenza infection. Cell 2011; 147: 525–538.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rock JR,
    2. Barkauskas CE,
    3. Cronce MJ,
    4. et al
    . Multiple stromal populations contribute to pulmonary fibrosis without evidence for epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: E1475–E1483.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Tropea KA,
    2. Leder E,
    3. Aslam M,
    4. et al
    . Bronchioalveolar stem cells increase after mesenchymal stromal cell treatment in a mouse model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2012; 302: L829–L837.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Hackett NR,
    2. Shaykhiev R,
    3. Walters MS,
    4. et al
    . The human airway epithelial basal cell transcriptome. PLoS One 2011; 6: e18378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Lai CH,
    2. Huang SF,
    3. Liao CT,
    4. et al
    . Clinical significance in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma of pathogenic somatic mitochondrial mutations. PLoS One 2013; 8: e65578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kelsey CR,
    2. Marks LB,
    3. Hollis D,
    4. et al
    . Local recurrence after surgery for early stage lung cancer: an 11-year experience with 975 patients. Cancer 2009; 115: 5218–5227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Pipinikas CP,
    2. Kiropoulos TS,
    3. Teixeira VH,
    4. et al
    . Cell migration leads to spatially distinct but clonally related airway cancer precursors. Thorax 2014; 69: 548–557.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 44 Issue 2 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 44 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The best laid schemes of airway repair
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The best laid schemes of airway repair
Emma L. Rawlins, Adam Giangreco
European Respiratory Journal Aug 2014, 44 (2) 299-301; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00088014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The best laid schemes of airway repair
Emma L. Rawlins, Adam Giangreco
European Respiratory Journal Aug 2014, 44 (2) 299-301; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00088014
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Schemes of homeostasis and repair
    • Of mice and men
    • Forward, though we cannot see
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Mechanisms of lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • The importance of patient's quality of life perception in PAH
  • Noninvasive strategies in COVID-19
  • Effectors of oxidative stress in the asthmatic lung
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society