Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Paediatric tuberculosis in Europe: lessons from Denmark and inclusive strategies to consider

Ben J. Marais, Marina Tadolini, Matteo Zignol, Giovanni Battista Migliori
European Respiratory Journal 2014 43: 678-684; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00133613
Ben J. Marais
1Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity (MBI) and The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ben.marais@health.nsw.gov.au
Marina Tadolini
2Dept of Medical and Surgical Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matteo Zignol
3Global Tuberculosis Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giovanni Battista Migliori
4World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Fondazione S. Maugeri, Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Background

Despite suffering high morbidity and mortality in tuberculosis (TB)-endemic areas, children with TB are generally less infectious than adult cases and are therefore low on the priority list of national tuberculosis control programmes [1]. Accurate disease burden assessment in children is hampered by diagnostic challenges [2], limited surveillance data and the poor quality of routinely collected programmatic data. In 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) produced its first estimates of the TB disease burden suffered by children worldwide, which were updated in 2013: 530 000 cases and 74 000 child deaths were attributed to TB [3]. Many deficiencies were acknowledged and it probably is an underestimate given the conservative assumptions made [1]. However, it provided formal recognition of the plight of these children and supplemented the focus on paediatric TB during World TB Day commemorations in 2012. Despite improved awareness, pragmatic service delivery strategies are often lacking, with pronounced policy–practice gaps in TB-endemic areas with limited resources [3, 4].

This editorial puts recent paediatric TB trends in Denmark, as described by Hatleberg et al. [5] in this issue of the European Respiratory Journal, into perspective; it explores study findings that may seem counterintuitive, advises on the importance of consistent and accurate classification of clinical syndromes in order for reports to be more informative, and argues for new strategies to reduce TB transmission to a minimum in low-burden settings.

The situation in Europe

Relatively good data exist on the paediatric TB disease burden in Europe. A descriptive analysis of European Union/European Economic Area surveillance data from 2000 to 2009 reported 39 695 paediatric cases, accounting for 4.3% of all notified TB cases [6]. Overall TB incidence rates in children <15 years of age dropped from 5.5 per 100 000 in 2000 to 4.2 per 100 000 in 2009, but rates were highly variable. Interestingly, epidemiological patterns described by the available adult and paediatric notification data do not necessarily overlap, as would be expected. This suggests different epidemic characteristics, case finding and prevention strategies, or case definitions used in various countries. Only 16.9% of paediatric cases were bacteriologically confirmed, highlighting diagnostic hurdles and the need for standardised approaches.

Paediatric TB cases present with a wide spectrum of pathology and, therefore, accurate classification of clinical syndromes of disease is highly informative. The disease spectrum in Europe remains poorly characterized since most reports utilize standard adult reporting templates that recognize pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB but fail to differentiate important disease entities. This is illustrated by hilar lymph node enlargement, which is variably categorised as sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB or extrapulmonary TB, while associated complications are not considered or described (fig. 1) [1, 7]. Extrapulmonary disease as a category is similarly uninformative, ranging from life threatening manifestations such as tuberculous meningitis and miliary (disseminated) TB to uncomplicated peripheral adenitis [8]. Key differences between adult and paediatric TB are summarised in table 1. Given the level of sophistication and coordination that exists in Europe, it seems important for the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, in collaboration with existing paediatric networks like the Paediatric Tuberculosis Network European Trials Group [9], to develop and implement enhanced definition and reporting procedures for children diagnosed with TB, linked to strong advocacy to secure commitment from national TB programmes [10].

Figure 1–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1–

Schematic illustration of intrathoracic lymph node disease variably categorised as either sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) or extrapulmonary TB using standard adult classification. a) Uncomplicated lymph node disease may include radiologically visible Ghon foci with adjacent pleural reaction and/or regional lymph nodes. b) Complicated lymph node disease with complete airway obstruction and lobar collapse (right middle and right lower lobe collapse with bronchus intermedius obstruction, as illustrated for right lung) or partial obstruction with a ball-valve effect and hyperinflation (as illustrated for left lung). Reproduced and modified from [1] with permission from the publisher.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1– Differences between adult and paediatric tuberculosis (TB)

Lessons from Denmark

A study by Hatleberg et al. [5] presents long-term trend data from a 10-year survey conducted in Denmark. Similar to observations in Sweden [11], the majority of children diagnosed with TB were recent immigrants or refugees from TB-endemic countries, essentially providing “a mirror to the world”. Clustering of cases within the first few years of arrival is consistent with the experience in most nonendemic areas. Identifying feasible TB screening and preventive therapy strategies that optimise the risk/benefit balance at the individual and community level remains an important ethics discussion and research priority.

Immigrant versus Danish cases

The interesting observation that Danish cases were, on average, younger than immigrant cases probably reflects selection bias, as most Danish cases were identified following active contact evaluation of young and vulnerable children. Selection bias is an important consideration when assessing variable TB disease rates in children and is often reflected in the disease spectrum identified [7, 12]. Active case finding among child contacts and the small number of Danish-born adult cases offers the most likely explanation for the counterintuitive observation that child/adult case notification ratios were higher among Danes compared with immigrants, rather than this being an indication of increased TB transmission within the Danish population. The fact that 13 “immigrant children” who developed TB were born in Denmark illustrate the importance of considering TB contact within the extended family and wider community, as well as visits to the parents’ country of origin. It also emphasises the need to consider future TB exposure risk in children born to immigrant families when formulating bacille Calmette–Guérin vaccination policies [13, 14].

Robust case definitions

The inclusion of a positive tuberculin skin test and/or interferon-γ release assay result as a “verifying test” is confusing, since neither differentiates Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection from TB disease [1, 15]. European Union standards of TB care acknowledge the role of these tests in screening for M. tuberculosis infection, but a positive result offers only ancillary evidence for TB disease while a negative result cannot be used as a rule-out test [16]. Although roll-out of the Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) test offers the prospect of rapid molecular diagnosis [17], yields in children remain suboptimal (∼70% of culture-positive cases, which represents the minority of children treated for TB). This emphasises the difficulty of establishing robust case definitions for use in research. To offer clear guidance for diagnostic research, a consensus document was developed following a US National Institutes of Health-sponsored workshop in Washington, DC, USA, that defines standard case definitions for use in clinical research [18]. table 2 provides a summary of the disease categories proposed. The fact that diagnostic yields varied widely depending on specimen type in the Danish study probably reflects differences in the disease spectrum and age profile of patients in whom these specimens were collected [19], though variations in the quality, quantity, and technique of sample collection and processing can also have a significant impact. Improved specimen collection methods and diagnostic tests with enhanced sensitivity in children with paucibacillary disease remain key research priorities [2].

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2– Clinical case definitions for consideration, derived from consensus intrathoracic tuberculosis (TB) case definitions proposed by the US National Institutes of Health expert group for use in clinical paediatric research

Drug-resistant TB

Relatively few children with drug-resistant TB were detected in Denmark (18 out of 159, 11.3%), but as in Sweden [11], the majority of cases originated in sub-Saharan Africa and figures were highly dependent on immigration patterns. Globally, the ominous rise of drug-resistant TB threatens the very fabric of traditional TB control efforts [20]. Although levels of multidrug (isoniazid and rifampicin)-resistant (MDR)-TB in children are highly variable among countries, the proportion of MDR-TB in children and adults is similar in many settings, and there is no indication that children have lower risk of MDR-TB than adults [21]. In Europe, high rates of drug-resistant TB in conflict areas around the globe pose particular threats among the refugee population, while many eastern European states struggle with high rates of “indigenous” drug-resistant TB. In Moldova, up to 60% of children diagnosed with culture-confirmed TB have MDR-TB, demonstrating on-going MDR-TB transmission within the country [22]. In general, the outcome of MDR-TB treatment in children is excellent, if the diagnosis is timely and access to second-line drugs can be secured [8, 23]. Since the management of children with MDR-TB can be daunting, the European Respiratory Society/WHO Consilium has been established to support clinicians with the management of difficult cases [24]. The provision of preventive therapy to young and vulnerable contacts of MDR-TB cases remains controversial due to a lack of rigorous evidence [25]; however, the available evidence suggests benefit and more TB clinicians are considering its use [26].

Inclusive strategies to consider

The rise of drug-resistant TB and the long-term objective of global TB elimination demand increased efforts to reduce vulnerability at the community level, optimise early case detection and explore novel ways of reducing ongoing transmission within communities.

Targeted active case finding and wide-scale use of preventive therapy

TB elimination is defined as the point at which less than one infectious (sputum smear positive) case per 1 000 000 inhabitants emerges annually in the general population or when the prevalence of TB in the general population is <1% and continues to decrease. Working towards this goal requires multiple areas of action, including enhanced case finding and careful reassessment of TB prevention strategies [27, 28]. Targeted active case finding is important, since delayed diagnosis facilitates on-going TB transmission. Accurate programmatic data, consideration of local circumstances and operational research should guide active case finding efforts. Massive policy–practice gaps in the provision of TB preventive therapy to young and vulnerable children in TB-endemic areas should be addressed [2, 4], while wide-scale use of preventive therapy to reduce the “pool of latent infection” requires consideration in nonendemic areas with limited transmission [28, 29].

Moving towards zero TB transmission

An interesting opportunity is presented by the situation in Denmark, where TB is essentially an imported disease and local transmission is minimal, reflecting the reality in many low-burden countries. Providing a formal definition of being “TB transmission free” and challenging nonendemic countries to aspire to this goal may galvanise national action and encourage the incorporation of cutting-edge molecular tools into routine TB control activities together with the development of active response systems [30]. Benefits of new molecular tools such as whole-genome sequencing include rapid detection of known drug-resistance mutations (allowing for earlier initiation of effective medications, thereby cutting transmission) and accurate identification of transmission clusters to guide outbreak investigation and public health responses. It also allows TB control to join the genomic revolution and provides an important vehicle to engage low-burden countries. Achieving and maintaining the status of being TB transmission free provide a strong focus for national and regional action in nonendemic areas, similar to the focus provided by the “Roll Back Polio” campaign for global poliomyelitis eradication. Minimising local transmission also has important benefits for children.

Considering “natural herd immunity”

The observation that only a small minority of those infected with M. tuberculosis ever progress to TB disease remains intriguing; however, it is rarely appreciated that this important characteristic differentiates TB from classic vaccine-preventable diseases. The fact that >90% of immune-competent individuals are inherently “resistant” to TB provides a high level of natural herd immunity. The natural herd immunity concept underlies the importance of population factors that may erode this herd immunity effect to below the crucial level required for community protection (fig. 2) [31]. At a population level, natural herd immunity is significantly reduced by the social determinants of disease, such as malnutrition, HIV infection, age-related immune immaturity, diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease and cigarette or biofuel smoke exposure [32]. It is important to recognise that both natural and acquired, induced by a protective vaccine, immunity contribute to herd immunity. Acknowledging the natural herd immunity concept does not detract from the urgency to explore novel vaccination approaches, but it emphasises the need to consider inclusive strategies to reduce relevant comorbidities and address the social determinants of disease.

Figure 2–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2–

Applying the concept of “natural herd immunity” to illustrate key differences between tuberculosis (TB) and classic vaccine-preventable diseases. #: decrease in natural herd immunity influenced by the social determinants of disease; the effects of an ageing global population and the rapid rise in noncommunicable diseases may also contribute. Reproduced and modified from [31] with permission from the publisher.

Better integration with maternal and child health programmes

Children are poorly served by traditional TB control efforts and service delivery channels, especially in resource-limited settings. This calls for better integration of TB care into maternal and child health programmes [33]. Despite well-recognised benefits and latent synergies, practical service integration remains a major challenge, given existing funding channels and performance assessment formats [34, 35]. There have been numerous calls to reassess the way that global health support programmes to “do business”. A recent paper by the president of the World Bank, Jim Kim, emphasised the urgent need to redefine global healthcare delivery models [36].

Conclusions

The report by Hatleberg et al. [5] presents interesting longitudinal data and demonstrates the value of good quality surveillance data, which would be enhanced by better disease classification. Paediatric cases encourage a renewed focus on strategies to reduce TB transmission. Approaches that incorporate rapid whole-genome sequencing into routine surveillance may in future guide targeted public health interventions and assist European countries to become TB transmission free. It also encourages TB control agencies to reconsider the role of treating latently infected individuals, and to identify integrated strategies that will reduce vulnerability at the population level and improve service delivery to children in TB-endemic areas (fig. 3).

Figure 3–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3–

Children in Benin. Copyright© MatthieuZellweger (with AIDSpartners.org)/matthieuzellweger.com

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received August 1, 2013.
  • Accepted October 13, 2013.
  • ©ERS 2014

References

  1. ↵
    1. Perez-Velez CM,
    2. Marais BJ
    . Tuberculosis in children. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 348–361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Marais B,
    2. Graham S,
    3. Maeurer M,
    4. et al
    . Progress and challenges in childhood tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13: 287–289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2012. www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/index.html.
  4. ↵
    1. Hill PC,
    2. Rutherford ME,
    3. Audas R,
    4. et al
    . Closing the policy-practice gap in the management of child contacts of tuberculosis in developing countries. PLoS Med 2011; 8: e10001105.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Hatleberg CI,
    2. Prahl JB,
    3. Rasmussen JN,
    4. et al
    . A review of paediatric tuberculosis in Denmark: 10-year trend, 2000–2009. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 863–871.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Sandgren A,
    2. Hollo V,
    3. Quinten C,
    4. et al
    . Childhood tuberculosis in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2000 to 2009. Euro Surveill 2011; 16: 12.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Marais BJ,
    2. Gie RP,
    3. Schaaf HS,
    4. et al
    . A proposed radiologic classification of childhood intra-thoracic tuberculosis. Pediatr Rad 2004; 33: 886–894.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Marais BJ,
    2. Gie RP,
    3. Schaaf HS,
    4. et al
    . Childhood pulmonary tuberculosis – old wisdom and new challenges. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 1078–1090.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    ptbnet. www.tb-net.org/index.php/ptbnet Date last accessed: September 25, 2013.
  10. ↵
    1. Sandgren A,
    2. Cuevas LE,
    3. Dara M,
    4. et al
    . Childhood tuberculosis: progress requires an advocacy strategy now. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 294–297.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Nejat S,
    2. Buxbaum C,
    3. Eriksson M,
    4. et al
    . Pediatric tuberculosis in Stockholm: a mirror to the world. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012; 31: 224–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Nelson LJ,
    2. Wells CD
    . Global epidemiology of childhood tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004; 8: 636–647.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. van der Werf MJ,
    2. Blasi F,
    3. Giesecke J,
    4. et al
    . Lessons learnt in Europe on tuberculosis surveillance, outbreaks and BCG vaccination in 2011. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 767–771.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Dara M,
    2. Acosta CD,
    3. Rusovich V,
    4. et al
    . Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination: the current situation in Europe? Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 24–35.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Diel R,
    2. Goletti D,
    3. Ferrara G,
    4. et al
    . Interferon-γ release assays for the diagnosis of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 88–99.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Migliori GB,
    2. Zellweger JP,
    3. Abubakar I,
    4. et al
    . European Union standards for tuberculosis care. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 807–819.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Weyer K,
    2. Mirzayev F,
    3. Migliori GB,
    4. et al
    . Rapid molecular TB diagnosis: evidence, policy making and global implementation of Xpert MTB/RIF. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 252–271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Graham SM,
    2. Ahmed T,
    3. Amanullah F,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics in children: 1. proposed clinical case definitions for classification of intrathoracic tuberculosis disease. Consensus from an expert panel. J Infect Dis 2012; 205: Suppl. 2, S199–S208.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Marais BJ,
    2. Hesseling AC,
    3. Gie RP,
    4. et al
    . Bacteriologic yield in children with intra-thoracic tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42: e69–e71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Abubakar I,
    2. Ford N,
    3. Cox H,
    4. et al
    . The rising tide of drug-resistant tuberculosis – time for visionary leadership. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13: 529–539.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Zignol M,
    2. Sismanidis C,
    3. Falzon D,
    4. et al
    . Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in children: evidence from global surveillance. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 701–707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Jenkins HE,
    2. Plesca V,
    3. Ciobanu A,
    4. et al
    . Assessing spatial heterogeneity of MDR-TB in a high burden country. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 1291–1301.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Ettehad D,
    2. Schaaf HS,
    3. Seddon J,
    4. et al
    . Treatment outcomes for children with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2012; 12: 449–456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Blasi F,
    2. Dara M,
    3. van der Werf MJ,
    4. et al
    . Supporting TB clinicians managing difficult cases: the ERS/WHO Consilium. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 491–494.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. van der Werf MJ,
    2. Langendam MW,
    3. Sandgren A,
    4. et al
    . Lack of evidence to support policy development for management of contacts of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients: two systematic reviews. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2012; 16: 288–296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Williams B,
    2. Ramroop S,
    3. Shah P,
    4. et al
    . Management of pediatric contacts of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in the United Kingdom. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2013; 32: 926–927.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Marais BJ,
    2. Ayles H,
    3. Graham SM,
    4. et al
    . Screening and preventive therapy for tuberculosis. Chest Clin N Am 2009; 30: 827–846.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Diel R,
    2. Loddenkemper R,
    3. Zellweger JP,
    4. et al
    . Old ideas to innovate tuberculosis control: preventive treatment to achieve elimination. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 785–801.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Blasi F,
    2. Barnes PJ,
    3. Gaga M,
    4. et al
    . Future Directions for the ERS: presidential plans. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 875–880.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Koser CU,
    2. Bryant JM,
    3. Becq J,
    4. et al
    . Whole-genome sequencing for rapid susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 290–292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Marais BJ
    . Tuberculosis in children. Ped Pulmonol 2008; 43: 322–329.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Lönnroth K,
    2. Castro KG,
    3. Chakaya JM,
    4. et al
    . Tuberculosis control and elimination 2010–50: cure, care, and social development. Lancet 2010; 375: 1814–1829.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Getahun H,
    2. Sculier D,
    3. Sismanidis C,
    4. et al
    . Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of tuberculosis in children and mothers: evidence for action for maternal, neonatal, and child health services. J Infect Dis 2012; 205 Suppl. 2:S216–S227.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Marais B,
    2. Lönnroth K,
    3. Lawn S,
    4. et al
    . Tuberculosis co-morbidity with communicable and non-communicable diseases: integrating health services and control efforts. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13: 436–448.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Keshavjee S,
    2. Farmer PE
    . Tuberculosis, drug resistance and the history of modern medicine. N Engl J Med 2012; 36: 931–936.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Kim JY,
    2. Farmer P,
    3. Porter M
    . Redefining global health-care delivery. Lancet 2013; 382: 1060–1069.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 43 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 43 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Paediatric tuberculosis in Europe: lessons from Denmark and inclusive strategies to consider
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Paediatric tuberculosis in Europe: lessons from Denmark and inclusive strategies to consider
Ben J. Marais, Marina Tadolini, Matteo Zignol, Giovanni Battista Migliori
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2014, 43 (3) 678-684; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00133613

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Paediatric tuberculosis in Europe: lessons from Denmark and inclusive strategies to consider
Ben J. Marais, Marina Tadolini, Matteo Zignol, Giovanni Battista Migliori
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2014, 43 (3) 678-684; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00133613
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Background
    • The situation in Europe
    • Lessons from Denmark
    • Inclusive strategies to consider
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Paediatric pulmonology
  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung function testing may reveal SAD in patients with asthma
  • Evolving definition of chronic breathlessness
  • ERS Tobacco Control Committee statement on Tobacco 21
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society