Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Comparison of aerosol deposition pattern in healthy subjects: 3D SPECT measurements vs simulation results

Marine Pichelin, Cécile Dubau, Ira Katz, John Fleming, Joy Conway, Lesley Collier, Livia Tossici-Bolt, Spyridon Montesantos, Caroline Majoral, Georges Caillibotte
European Respiratory Journal 2012 40: P657; DOI:
Marine Pichelin
1Medical Gases Group - Centre de Recherche Claude Delorme, Air Liquide Santé International, Jouy-en-Josas, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cécile Dubau
1Medical Gases Group - Centre de Recherche Claude Delorme, Air Liquide Santé International, Jouy-en-Josas, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ira Katz
1Medical Gases Group - Centre de Recherche Claude Delorme, Air Liquide Santé International, Jouy-en-Josas, France
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lafayette College, Easton, PA, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Fleming
3Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
4Southampton NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joy Conway
4Southampton NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
5Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lesley Collier
5Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Livia Tossici-Bolt
3Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spyridon Montesantos
1Medical Gases Group - Centre de Recherche Claude Delorme, Air Liquide Santé International, Jouy-en-Josas, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Majoral
1Medical Gases Group - Centre de Recherche Claude Delorme, Air Liquide Santé International, Jouy-en-Josas, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georges Caillibotte
1Medical Gases Group - Centre de Recherche Claude Delorme, Air Liquide Santé International, Jouy-en-Josas, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction

A clinical study designed to validate computational models of aerosol deposition using controlled parametric experiments has been completed and the experimental conditions have been simulated using analytical models of aerosol deposition.

Objectives

For the modeling side of this study, the aim was twofold: (i) to introduce realistic asymmetric features in the description of the human respiratory tract and (ii) to compare the simulated aerosol deposition patterns within the lungs with measurements.

Methods

The 6 healthy subjects performed 2 inhalations each, which differed by a single controlled parameter: particle size, ventilation regime, or carrier gas. 3D Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) was performed to measure aerosol deposition location in the respiratory tract.

An analytical model was used to mimic aerosol inhalation experiments and simulate particle deposition within the lungs. Simulations were performed using asymmetric lung morphologies based on patient's morphometric data extracted from High Resolution Computed Tomography images, such as length and diameter of the first airway generations, and lobar volumes (in terms of percentage of the functional residual capacity).

Results

Comparisons with experimental measurements have been done for total, tracheobronchial (TB) and lobar deposition, showing good correlation between measured and simulated values. For instance, mean experimental TB deposition fraction in the left lung is 14.5±2.4, vs. 14.9±4.1 for simulation results.

Conclusions

This work provides a scientific foundation for addressing both asymmetric and individualized lung morphologies in analytical modeling of aerosol deposition.

  • Physiology
  • Morphology
  • Lung mechanics
  • © 2012 ERS
Previous
Back to top
Vol 40 Issue Suppl 56 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of aerosol deposition pattern in healthy subjects: 3D SPECT measurements vs simulation results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of aerosol deposition pattern in healthy subjects: 3D SPECT measurements vs simulation results
Marine Pichelin, Cécile Dubau, Ira Katz, John Fleming, Joy Conway, Lesley Collier, Livia Tossici-Bolt, Spyridon Montesantos, Caroline Majoral, Georges Caillibotte
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2012, 40 (Suppl 56) P657;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparison of aerosol deposition pattern in healthy subjects: 3D SPECT measurements vs simulation results
Marine Pichelin, Cécile Dubau, Ira Katz, John Fleming, Joy Conway, Lesley Collier, Livia Tossici-Bolt, Spyridon Montesantos, Caroline Majoral, Georges Caillibotte
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2012, 40 (Suppl 56) P657;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACT: The correlations of automated lung emphysema analysis software results with pulmonary function test
  • Radiologic features of lung involvement in young patients with viral pneumonia
  • Long-term results obtained by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and somatostatin receptor PET in cardiac sarcoidosis
Show more 1.3 Imaging

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society