Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Is the EBUS TBNA cytology adequate for EGFR analysis?

Mohammed Harris, Shahul Leyakathali khan, Sarah Diver, Saba Bokhari, Jane Edwards, Joanna Pickles, Mohammed Munavvar
European Respiratory Journal 2012 40: P4406; DOI:
Mohammed Harris
1Respiratory Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shahul Leyakathali khan
1Respiratory Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Diver
1Respiratory Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saba Bokhari
1Respiratory Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Edwards
1Respiratory Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanna Pickles
1Respiratory Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed Munavvar
1Respiratory Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) allows safe and reliable sampling of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes with excellent specificity and good sensitivity. It is a well established technique in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer including pathologic sub-typing and recent studies have shown that the samples may also be adequate for molecular testing.

Aim: To evaluate the adequacy of EBUS TBNA samples used for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation screening.

Methods: Retrospective study of 46 consecutive EBUS-TBNA samples obtained from lymph nodes > 5mm short-axis and central lung parenchymal lesions. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the 2 groups.

Results: Of the 46 EBUS TBNA samples sent for EGFR testing, 38 were obtained from lymph nodes (19 subcarinal, 9 right paratracheal, 4 left paratracheal, 10 right hilar and 4 left hilar) and 8 from central lung parenchymal masses.

In the lymph node group, 35 (92%) samples were negative for EGFR mutation, 3(8%) failed testing and none were positive for EGFR; 30 had adenocarcinoma, 1 adenosquamous, 2 squamous and 5 NSCLC-NOS(not otherwise specified). In the central lung mass group (n=8), one positive with exon19 deletion, 6 negative and one failed testing or was inadequate; 3 had adenocarcinoma, 3 NSCLC-NOS, 1 squamous and 1 adenosquamous.

The overall EBUS-TBNA adequacy from both lymph nodes and central lung masses was 91% and there was no difference between the groups.

Conclusion: Molecular testing of EBUS TBNA samples obtained from mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes is feasible and our study shows a higher proportion of 92% adequacy. The common reason for failed testing was paucicellular specimen and degraded DNA.

  • Lung cancer / Oncology
  • © 2012 ERS
Previous
Back to top
Vol 40 Issue Suppl 56 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is the EBUS TBNA cytology adequate for EGFR analysis?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is the EBUS TBNA cytology adequate for EGFR analysis?
Mohammed Harris, Shahul Leyakathali khan, Sarah Diver, Saba Bokhari, Jane Edwards, Joanna Pickles, Mohammed Munavvar
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2012, 40 (Suppl 56) P4406;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Is the EBUS TBNA cytology adequate for EGFR analysis?
Mohammed Harris, Shahul Leyakathali khan, Sarah Diver, Saba Bokhari, Jane Edwards, Joanna Pickles, Mohammed Munavvar
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2012, 40 (Suppl 56) P4406;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Progression vs. pseudo progression in the treatment of squamous NSCLC with nivolumab
  • Lung adenocarcinoma mimicking interstitial lung disease showed good response to navelbine monotherapy
  • Should preoperative FDG uptake on PET/CT guide postoperative surveillance in surgical non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Show more 11.1 Lung Cancer

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society