Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

A cross-sectional study examining inpatients' metered dose inhaler technique and the impact of assessment and education on its effective use

Judith Jade, Janet Lee, S. Fayyaz Hussain
European Respiratory Journal 2012 40: P2176; DOI:
Judith Jade
1Respiratory Medicine, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet Lee
1Respiratory Medicine, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Fayyaz Hussain
1Respiratory Medicine, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction: Metered dose inhalers (MDI) are often prescribed during hospital admission. MDI technique influences clinical effectiveness, yet inpatient assessment and education regarding this skill may not happen routinely.

Objectives: We hypothesised that a) inpatients on an acute medical ward often have poor MDI technique and b) simple assessment and education could improve MDI technique.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on inpatients prescribed an MDI on an acute medical ward during the month of October 2011. Technique was assessed using an Aerosol Inhalation Monitor, by a Health Care Assistant (HCA) trained in its use. Patients with poor technique had simple training and assessment was repeated.

Results: A total of 38 patients were studied (M:F=1.1:1, Age range=40-91). Initial assessment showed only seven patients (18.4%) were able to use the device effectively. The 31 patients (81.5%) that failed initial assessment had simple education regarding technique, and of these eight (25.8%) were then able to successfully use the MDI. Out of the 23 patients that failed reassessment, even after education, 10 (43.5%) were unable to “synchronise” administration of medication and a spacer was prescribed. The remaining 13 patients (56.5%) that failed reassessment were unable to use an MDI even with a spacer device.

Conclusions: The majority of inpatients prescribed an MDI were unable to use the device effectively. Basic education and inhaler adjuncts addressed many of the difficulties with MDI usage in this patient group. HCA led assessment of inhaler technique appears to be an invaluable tool in tailoring the use of MDI.

  • COPD - management
  • Treatments
  • Nursing care
  • © 2012 ERS
Previous
Back to top
Vol 40 Issue Suppl 56 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A cross-sectional study examining inpatients' metered dose inhaler technique and the impact of assessment and education on its effective use
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A cross-sectional study examining inpatients' metered dose inhaler technique and the impact of assessment and education on its effective use
Judith Jade, Janet Lee, S. Fayyaz Hussain
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2012, 40 (Suppl 56) P2176;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A cross-sectional study examining inpatients' metered dose inhaler technique and the impact of assessment and education on its effective use
Judith Jade, Janet Lee, S. Fayyaz Hussain
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2012, 40 (Suppl 56) P2176;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Slow dissociation kinetics of LAMAs contribute to the functional interactions with LABAs
  • Alpha-7 nicotinic receptor stimulation reduces airway inflammation in a murine model of asthma
  • Dysphonia in asthmatic women using inhaled corticosteroids: It is not only a laryngeal inflammation
Show more 5.1 Airway Pharmacology and Treatment

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society