Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Non-invasive estimation of pulmonary artery pressure and resistance with CMR imaging: Derivation and prospective validation cohort study

Andrew Swift, Smitha Rajaram, Dave Capener, Tom Sproson, Allison Morton, Charlie Elliot, Robin Condliffe, Jim Wild
European Respiratory Journal 2012 40: 380; DOI:
Andrew Swift
1Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Smitha Rajaram
1Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dave Capener
1Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Sproson
1Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allison Morton
2Sheffield Pulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlie Elliot
2Sheffield Pulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin Condliffe
2Sheffield Pulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jim Wild
1Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to develop a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging model for non-invasive estimation of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and total pulmonary resistance (TPR).

Methods

A derivation cohort of 64 consecutive patients with known or suspected pulmonary hypertension underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR within 12hours. Cardiac volumes and function and pulmonary arterial (PA) flow were quantified. The strongest statistical model to predict mPAP from the derivation cohort was identified. Total pulmonary resistance (TPR) was estimated utilising the physiological model: TPR= pressure (CMR-derived mPAP) divided by blood flow (CMR-derived PA flow).

An independent prospective validation cohort of (n= 40) tested the accuracy of the model.

Results

The multivariate regression CMR model gave the following equation: mPAP = 33.4 + [right ventricular end-diastolic mass index (g/cm2) x 1.21] – [PA average velocity (cm/s) x 0.99). In the prospective validation cohort, predicted and invasively measured mPAP were strongly correlated (R2=0.74; p<0.0001). For detection of mPAP ≥ 25mmHg the area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) was 0.91 (p<0.0001). CMR-estimated TPR correlated strongly with RHC-derived TPR (R2=0.75; p<0.0001) in the validation cohort. CMR estimated TPR reliably identified TPR > 5WU with a high degree of accuracy, the area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) was 0.96 (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

A CMR Imaging derived model can accurately estimate mPAP and vascular resistance in patients with PH.

  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Imaging
  • Circulation
  • © 2012 ERS
Previous
Back to top
Vol 40 Issue Suppl 56 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non-invasive estimation of pulmonary artery pressure and resistance with CMR imaging: Derivation and prospective validation cohort study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Non-invasive estimation of pulmonary artery pressure and resistance with CMR imaging: Derivation and prospective validation cohort study
Andrew Swift, Smitha Rajaram, Dave Capener, Tom Sproson, Allison Morton, Charlie Elliot, Robin Condliffe, Jim Wild
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2012, 40 (Suppl 56) 380;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Non-invasive estimation of pulmonary artery pressure and resistance with CMR imaging: Derivation and prospective validation cohort study
Andrew Swift, Smitha Rajaram, Dave Capener, Tom Sproson, Allison Morton, Charlie Elliot, Robin Condliffe, Jim Wild
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2012, 40 (Suppl 56) 380;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Do doctors understand the test characteristics of lung cancer screening? – A randomized trial
  • Applicative value of chest HRCT for bronchiectasis evaluating in pulmonary infection with pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis
  • Estimation of the doses of ionizing radiation related to diagnostic and follow-up imaging in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules
Show more 1.3 Imaging

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society