Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Towards a total ban on links with the tobacco industry: new rules for the ERS

Klaus F. Rabe, Christina Gratziou, Brian Ward, Florence Berteletti
European Respiratory Journal 2012 40: 809-810; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00117012
Klaus F. Rabe
*Krankenhaus Großhansdorf, Großhansdorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Gratziou
#Evgenidio Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Ward
¶European Respiratory Society
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: brian.ward@ersnet.org
Florence Berteletti
+Smoke Free Partnership, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • “Towards a total ban on links with the tobacco industry: new rules for the ERS.” Klaus F. Rabe, Christina Gratziou, Brian Ward and Florence Berteletti. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 809–810. - November 01, 2012

FROM DISCLOSURE TO TOTAL BAN

Tobacco use is one of the greatest preventable causes of premature death and disease in the world. In addition, the interference of the tobacco industry in public health, medical research and public policy has been and continues to be unprecedented, grotesque and unacceptable [1]. The interference is of such a scale that it requires a robust and resolute response [2]. This is why the European Respiratory Society (ERS) has recently assessed its conflict of interest rules and decided to move towards a total ban on links with the tobacco industry.

Conflict of interest policies are now standard practice in the medical world and, although guidelines and procedures may vary, most medical bodies have some form of conflict of interest disclosure policy [3, 4]. However, conflict of interest with the tobacco industry requires more than a disclosure policy [5]. It requires a total ban on relations and this, with some notable exceptions, has been rather rare among medical bodies [5].

ENDING THE MANIPULATION

In the scientific world, “Big Tobacco” continues to invest strongly in science [6] and is the undeniable leader in organised subterfuge and manipulation of the scientific process [7–9]. The industry has used quasi-scientific organisations and individuals to promote controversy and uncertainty, such as denying for as long as possible the health effects associated with passive smoking [10]. We must view with extreme scepticism funding of scientific research by the tobacco industry. In funding research, the industry seeks not only to manipulate but also acquire credibility. Credibility is essential to their image and to increasing product consumption, influencing public opinion and rallying opposition to effective public health policies [2]. The devious manipulation of science must be met by a firm and radical response, and the cloak of scientific credibility lifted once and for all.

In wider society, the tobacco industry has tried all methods possible (including science) to prevent the development of global, regional and local strategies to combat tobacco [11–13]. Consequently, the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control explicitly warns of the threat posed by the tobacco industry to public health. Furthermore, the preamble of the convention and the article 5.3 guidelines advise of the need to be very alert to industry efforts to subvert tobacco control [14].

NEW RULES ON RELATIONSHIPS WITH INDUSTRY

In this light, the ERS has developed new, clear and stringent rules to counteract the threat posed by real or perceived, direct or indirect links to the tobacco industry and to ensure the scientific integrity and independence of the society [15]. These new rules draw a line in the sand, and stipulate the following.

Membership and leadership

Membership (which includes elected officers) of the society will not be open to persons who are, or have been, full or part time employees of, or paid consultants to the tobacco industry, or those with any real or perceived direct or indirect links to the tobacco industry, at any time after January 1, 2000.

Addressing current and past relationships with industry

The ERS will not accept, at any of its events meetings and/or courses, faculty who are receiving funding from the tobacco industry. Invited faculty will be asked to disclose any funding and/or conflict of interest related to the tobacco industry. In the case of a disclosure of a conflict of interest any time after January 1, 2000 by the person concerned, there will be a 5 year ban from the date of disclosure before that person is allowed to participate actively in an ERS event again. In the case of the discovery of a conflict of interest, which was not disclosed by the person concerned, there will be a ban for life from participating actively in any ERS activity, including all ERS publications and scientific and intellectual contributions of any type.

The future: a total ban from 2013

Any relation to, or funding from, the tobacco industry after January 1, 2013 will lead to a ban for life from any ERS activity, including all ERS publications and scientific and intellectual contributions of any type for the person concerned.

It is hoped that the new ERS policy can serve as an inspiration to other medical societies seeking to prevent, as much as possible, the tobacco industry's continued attempts to manipulate science, researchers and public health policy. Together as a scientific and medical community we must move to a total ban on relations. The recently adopted European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights recalls that “everyone has the right of access to preventive healthcare” [16]. This right must extend to preventing as best we can the influence of a malevolent industry from affecting the health of our citizens. In the face of such adversity radical steps are needed. We realise that implementation will be difficult. It will require the utmost honesty and integrity from people and sometimes even sacrifice. However, as a medical society we have a duty to ensure that we do all we can to protect health and curb the epidemic of tobacco.

Footnotes

  • Statement of Interest

    Statements of interest for K.F. Rabe, B. Ward and F. Berteletti can be found at www.erj.ersjournals.com/site/misc/statements.xhtml

  • ©ERS 2012

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Bero LA
    . Tobacco industry manipulation of research. Public Health Rep 2005; 120: 200–208.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Malone RE,
    2. Bero L
    . Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 546–548.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Parascandola M
    . A turning point for conflicts of interest: the controversy over the National Academy of Sciences' first conflicts of interest disclosure policy. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3774–3779.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Smith E,
    2. Potvin MJ,
    3. Williams-Jones B
    . Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals. J Med Ethics 2012; [Epub ahead of print DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100524].
  5. ↵
    1. Bero LA,
    2. Glantz S,
    3. Hong MK
    . The limits of competing interest disclosures. Tob Control 2005; 14: 118–126.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Burrows R
    . British American Tobacco plc, speech at 2012 Annual General Meeting. “BAT invests £166 million in research in 2011.” www.bat.com/group/sites/uk__3mnfen.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DO8TQAUJ?opendocument&SKN=1 Date last updated: April 26, 2012. Date last accessed: June 19, 2012.
  7. ↵
    1. Parascandola M
    . Hazardous effects of tobacco industry funding. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 548–549.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Schick FS,
    2. Glantz SA
    . Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement. Tob Control 2006; 16: 157–164.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Proctor RN
    . The history of the discovery of the cigarette–lung cancer link: evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll. Tob Control 2012; 21: 87–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Gruning T,
    2. Gilmore A,
    3. McKee M
    . Tobacco industry influence on science and scientists in Germany. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 20–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Weishaar H,
    2. Collin J,
    3. Smith K,
    4. et al
    . Global health governance and the commercial sector: a documentary analysis of tobacco company strategies to influence the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. PLoS Med 2012; 9: e1001249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. World Health Organization: Tobacco Free Initiative for a Tobacco Free Future. Tobacco Industry Interference with Tobacco Control. Geneva, WHO, 2008. Available from: www.who.int/tobacco/resources/publications/Tobacco%20Industry%20Interference-FINAL.pdf.
  12. ↵
    1. Grüning T,
    2. Weishaar H,
    3. Collin J,
    4. et al
    . Tobacco industry attempts to influence and use the German government to undermine the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Tob Control 2012; 21: 30–38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva, WHO, 2003; Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/9241591013.pdf.
  14. ↵
    European Respiratory Society. ERS Conflict of Interest Policy www.ersnet.org/about-us/who-we-are.html Date last accessed: June 26, 2012.
  15. ↵
    Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf Date last updated: December 18, 2000. Date last accessed: June 26, 2012.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 40 Issue 4 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 40 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Towards a total ban on links with the tobacco industry: new rules for the ERS
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Towards a total ban on links with the tobacco industry: new rules for the ERS
Klaus F. Rabe, Christina Gratziou, Brian Ward, Florence Berteletti
European Respiratory Journal Oct 2012, 40 (4) 809-810; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00117012

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Towards a total ban on links with the tobacco industry: new rules for the ERS
Klaus F. Rabe, Christina Gratziou, Brian Ward, Florence Berteletti
European Respiratory Journal Oct 2012, 40 (4) 809-810; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00117012
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • FROM DISCLOSURE TO TOTAL BAN
    • ENDING THE MANIPULATION
    • NEW RULES ON RELATIONSHIPS WITH INDUSTRY
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • GM-CSF targeting in COVID-19, an approach based on fragile foundations
  • Short and Long Term Non-Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Assessment in previously Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients
  • Commemorating World Tuberculosis Day 2022
Show more Editorial

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society