Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon

R. Ehmann, E. Boedeker, U. Friedrich, J. Sagert, J. Dippon, G. Friedel, T. Walles
European Respiratory Journal 2012 39: 669-676; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00051711
R. Ehmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Boedeker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
U. Friedrich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Sagert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Dippon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Friedel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Walles
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Thorsten.Walles@klinik-schillerhoehe.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Patient prognosis in lung cancer largely depends on early diagnosis. The exhaled breath of patients may represent the ideal specimen for future lung cancer screening. However, the clinical applicability of current diagnostic sensor technologies based on signal pattern analysis remains incalculable due to their inability to identify a clear target. To test the robustness of the presence of a so far unknown volatile organic compound in the breath of patients with lung cancer, sniffer dogs were applied.

Exhalation samples of 220 volunteers (healthy individuals, confirmed lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)) were presented to sniffer dogs following a rigid scientific protocol. Patient history, drug administration and clinicopathological data were analysed to identify potential bias or confounders.

Lung cancer was identified with an overall sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 93%. Lung cancer detection was independent from COPD and the presence of tobacco smoke and food odours. Logistic regression identified two drugs as potential confounders.

It must be assumed that a robust and specific volatile organic compound (or pattern) is present in the breath of patients with lung cancer. Additional research efforts are required to overcome the current technical limitations of electronic sensor technologies to engineer a clinically applicable screening tool.

  • Biomarker
  • breath analysis
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • diagnosis
  • lung cancer
  • sniffer dogs

Footnotes

  • For editorial comments see page 511.

  • A press release for this article is available from www.erj.ersjournals.com/site/misc/presspack.xhtml

  • This article has supplementary material accessible from www.erj.ersjournals.com

  • Support Statement

    The study was funded by private financial resources of R. Ehmann, E. Boedeker and T. Walles.

  • Clinical Trial

    This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT01141842.

  • Statement of Interest

    Statements of interest for R. Ehmann, E. Boedeker, U. Friedrich, T. Walles and the study itself can be found at www.erj.ersjournals.com/site/misc/statements.xhtml

  • Received March 23, 2011.
  • Accepted July 5, 2011.
  • ©ERS 2012
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 39 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 39 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon
R. Ehmann, E. Boedeker, U. Friedrich, J. Sagert, J. Dippon, G. Friedel, T. Walles
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2012, 39 (3) 669-676; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00051711

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon
R. Ehmann, E. Boedeker, U. Friedrich, J. Sagert, J. Dippon, G. Friedel, T. Walles
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2012, 39 (3) 669-676; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00051711
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung cancer
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Article

  • Lung volumes and survival in chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • EBUS-guided cryobiopsies in peripheral pulmonary lesions
  • Safety of formoterol in asthma clinical trials
Show more Original Article

Lung Cancer

  • Hyperoxia suppresses lung cancer metastasis through MYC/SLC1A5 pathway
  • Participation in community-based lung cancer screening
  • Cancer risk in severe alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency
Show more Lung Cancer

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society