Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Lung cancer detection by canine scent: will there be a lab in the lab?

M. McCulloch, K. Turner, M. Broffman
European Respiratory Journal 2012 39: 511-512; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00215511
M. McCulloch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mcculloch@pinestreetfoundation.org
K. Turner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Broffman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A team of researchers led by R. Ehmann at Ambulante Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) have published an article in the current issue of the European Respiratory Journal reporting on a study in which trained dogs detected lung cancer with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 72% [1]. Their well-designed study involved 60 lung cancer patients and 110 healthy controls, and is novel for also including “disease controls”; 50 patients with non-malignant lung disease. The findings of EHMANN et al. [1] corroborate the results of an earlier study of canine scent detection of lung cancer, which reported sensitivity and specificity of 99%. Together, these two papers, which achieved high accuracy while using different dogs, trainers and human subjects, beg the question of where this might all be leading. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for canine scent detection of human cancers, and focus on how these papers may help advance knowledge in the field of lung cancer. There are very few published data on canine scent detection of cancers in general, or lung cancer in particular, and they vary widely in accuracy achieved and disease studied. However, the high accuracy of canine scent detection of lung cancer suggests dogs might, in the future, make some modest contribution to successes in lung cancer screening and detection.

CURRENT METHODS FOR LUNG CANCER DETECTION FACE MANY CHALLENGES

The goal of accurate, safe and noninvasive methods to detect lung cancer in its early and curable stages is shared by patients, researchers and clinicians worldwide. However, lung cancer is all too often diagnosed at late stages. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths across the European Union, both in terms of standardised mortality rates and absolute numbers of people dying [2]. In 2010, an estimated 220,000 new cases of lung cancer were diagnosed, and over 150,000 deaths occurred, making it the leading cause of cancer death in both males and females in the USA [3]. Early detection of lung cancer remains a challenge, despite recent evidence from the ongoing National Lung Screening Trial in the USA showing that lung cancer mortality can be reduced by up to 20% with low-dose spiral computed tomography (CT) screening compared to chest radiography [4].

While patients diagnosed with advanced lung cancer have a 5-yr survival rate of <5%, survival can increase to >70% for patients whose disease is identified early when the lesion is small and localised [4]. However, at first diagnosis, over 75% of patients have advanced stage disease. Identifying lung cancer early is crucial to improve treatment outcomes and patient survival. The low sensitivity of chest radiographs, combined with the low specificity and high radiation dose of CT scanning, limit the reliability and safety of these technologies as screening tools. Furthermore, cumulative radiation exposure resulting from the use of repeated CT scanning can increase the risk of developing cancer [5].

EXHALED BREATH ANALYSIS: DOGS ARE ONE OF MANY DIFFERENT TYPES OF SCENT DETECTORS

An alternative strategy to lung cancer detection is the improved accuracy that can be gained from combining several tests as screening tools; one possible candidate may be the use of exhaled breath analysis.

There is strong biological plausibility to the idea of dogs detecting lung cancer in exhaled breath. Both our paper [6] and that of Ehmann et al. [1], in the current issue of the European Respiratory Journal, used an independent validation phase in which dogs were able to distinguish lung cancer patient breath samples from controls, using samples from individuals not previously encountered in their training. Nevertheless, critics may turn up their nose at the mention of using sniffer dogs.

This may arise in part because there are very few published data on canine scent detection of cancers in general (n=8) [1, 7–13], or lung cancer in particular (n=2) [1, 9]. The findings of these studies vary widely in accuracy achieved and types of cancer studied, and papers on either replication of early findings or screening trials have not yet been published [14, 15]. It can be said, however, that the high-quality papers among those published, in which the investigators used rigorous patient selection, sample handling and dog training methods, have shown promising results.

Work toward the development of an “electronic nose” for cancer detection has been underway for several decades; however, dogs still appear to be ahead in the race and seem to have sniffed their way to the front of the line. We recently published a systematic review of all known data on the evidence for cancer biomarkers in exhaled breath [16], and a limited number of other research teams have published pilot data on exhaled breath analysis in lung cancer. There are no agreed upon standards for sampling methods or detection technology platform, each of these methods has limitations hampering their use for highly accurate lung cancer screening, and none have achieved the high sensitivity and specificity seen with dogs.

DETECTING HUMAN DISEASE BY ODOUR HAS A LONG HISTORY

The first published report of detecting human disease in a specific organ system by odour appeared in a 3rd century BC Chinese medical text, the Nan Jing Classic of Difficulties.

Embedded Image [Every disease of the five solid organs is reflected in (externally observable) colour and smell. For diseases of the liver, it is a greenish colour and rank odour] (author's translation).

An earlier writing by Hippocrates (ca. 460 BC to ca. 370 BC) included a more general mention of odour changing in febrile patients in the medical text Hippocratic Corpus, Prorrhetics II.

Embedded Image [The (doctors) nostrils indicate much and well in (the case of) fever patients; the odours, however, differ a lot] (translated by R. Christo).

Cancer detection by dogs

The first publication of a dog detecting cancer is the case of a young female from the UK who remarked to a dermatologist examining a suspicious mole on her leg, that her dog had been licking, nipping and barking energetically and persistently at the lesion [12]. The subject of this paper was then interviewed for a television documentary broadcast in 2006 in the UK [17]. Following the publication of our group's lung and breast cancer paper [9], several dozen people have written letters reporting a similar story (data not shown).

A vision for the role of dogs in detecting cancer

Since we began our work in canine scent detection of lung cancer 10 yrs ago, we have frequently heard patients, clinicians and researchers lament about several critical issues at conferences, presentations and during scent trials: 1) the frustrations related to the slow progress in the forward movement of science, specifically with early detection; and 2) the anxieties caused by false positives and regrets resulting from false negatives, with current cancer screening and diagnostic methods. These comments from patients are understandable, given the frequent reports in the media about problems with lung cancer detection methods, whether it be the poor ability to detect lung cancer with chest radiographs, the hazards of cumulative radiation from CT scans, or the poor resolving power with small modules of the positron emission tomography (PET) scan.

However, imagine a future in which the term PET takes on a new meaning. Dogs could serve as an inspirational role, with the story of dogs detecting cancer in rigorous trials used as a friendly message to the public, perhaps encouraging patients who may be reluctant to seek medical help to do so.

Dogs could also serve a more pragmatic role. If enough funding were allocated to allow other research groups to replicate and refine the encouraging results of the two existing papers on canine scent extension of lung cancer [1, 9], dogs could be used as a noninvasive preliminary diagnostic screening tool or be used to help reduce false positives and false negatives of existing imaging technologies. This would maximise the power of joint probabilities, similar to the combination of prostate specific antigen and digital examination being more accurate than either method alone for detecting prostate cancer, or CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound for detecting ovarian cancer.

In both the literal and the metaphorical sense, with the publication of these papers on canine scent detection of lung cancer, dogs are once again demonstrating their ability to serve as our protectors and guides. People worldwide feel a close affinity with the dog as a friend and protector. Dogs also serve us faithfully in their dilagent work at finding cadavers, bombs, drugs, weapons and truffles, detecting diabetes and seizures, conducting search and rescue, providing sighting assistance and giving loving companionship. Whether or not sniffer dogs actually make it into the continuum of diagnostic evaluation has yet to be seen; their image could be employed in public health outreach for cancer screening, and may encourage people with worrisome symptoms to take earlier action. This would be a case of the dog acting as a shepherd; Lassie and Rin Tin Tin are still out there, looking out for our health.

Footnotes

  • Statement of Interest

    None declared.

  • ©ERS 2012

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Ehmann R,
    2. Boedeker E,
    3. Friedrich U,
    4. et al
    . Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 669–676.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Malvezzi M,
    2. Arfe A,
    3. Bertuccio P,
    4. et al
    . European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2011. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 947–956.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Xu J,
    4. et al
    . Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Aberle DR,
    2. Berg CD,
    3. Black WC,
    4. et al
    . The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 2011; 258: 243–253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Sodickson A,
    2. Baeyens PF,
    3. Andriole KP,
    4. et al
    . Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009; 251: 175–184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. McCulloch M,
    2. Jezierski T,
    3. Broffman M,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of canine scent detection in early- and late-stage lung and breast cancers. Integr Cancer Ther 2006; 5: 1–10.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Gordon RT,
    2. Schatz CB,
    3. Myers LJ,
    4. et al
    . The use of canines in the detection of human cancers. J Altern Complement Med 2008; 14: 61–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Horvath G,
    2. Jarverud GA,
    3. Jarverud S,
    4. et al
    . Human ovarian carcinomas detected by specific odor. Integr Cancer Ther 2008; 7: 76–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. McCulloch M,
    2. Jezierski T,
    3. Broffman M,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of canine scent detection in early- and late-stage lung and breast cancers. Integr Cancer Ther 2006; 5: 30–39.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pickel D,
    2. Manucy GP,
    3. Walker DB,
    4. et al
    . Evidence for canine olfactory detection of melanoma. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2004; 89: 107–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Sonoda H,
    2. Kohnoe S,
    3. Yamazato T,
    4. et al
    . Colorectal cancer screening with odour material by canine scent detection. Gut 2011; 60: 814–819.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Williams H,
    2. Pembroke A
    . Sniffer dogs in the melanoma clinic? Lancet 1989; 1: 734.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Willis CM,
    2. Church SM,
    3. Guest CM,
    4. et al
    . Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study. BMJ 2004; 329: 712.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Moser E,
    2. McCulloch M
    . Canine scent detection of human cancers: a review of methods and accuracy. J Vet Behav 2010; 5: 145–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Lippi G,
    2. Cervellin G
    . Canine olfactory detection of cancer versus laboratory testing: myth or opportunity? Clin Chem Lab Med 2011 [Epub ahead of print DOI: 10.1515/cclm.2011.672]
  13. ↵
    1. Szulejko JE,
    2. McCulloch M,
    3. Jackson J,
    4. et al
    . Evidence for cancer biomarkers in exhaled breath. IEEE Sensors J 2010; 10: 185–210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Can Dogs Smell Cancer? Storyville. BBC television documentary 2006. Available from: www.passionateproductions.co.uk/film_can_dogs.htm
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 39 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 39 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lung cancer detection by canine scent: will there be a lab in the lab?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Lung cancer detection by canine scent: will there be a lab in the lab?
M. McCulloch, K. Turner, M. Broffman
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2012, 39 (3) 511-512; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00215511

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Lung cancer detection by canine scent: will there be a lab in the lab?
M. McCulloch, K. Turner, M. Broffman
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2012, 39 (3) 511-512; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00215511
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • CURRENT METHODS FOR LUNG CANCER DETECTION FACE MANY CHALLENGES
    • EXHALED BREATH ANALYSIS: DOGS ARE ONE OF MANY DIFFERENT TYPES OF SCENT DETECTORS
    • DETECTING HUMAN DISEASE BY ODOUR HAS A LONG HISTORY
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung cancer
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Nefer, Sinuhe and clinical research assessing post-COVID-19 syndrome
  • Asthma and COVID-19: do we finally have answers?
  • Noninvasive strategies in COVID-19: epistemology, randomised trials, guidelines, physiology
Show more Editorial

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society