Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Supported home-care schemes: the key to increasing outpatient care?

A.M. Collins, S. Wilks, D. Wootton, S.B. Gordon
European Respiratory Journal 2012 39: 508; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00165911
A.M. Collins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: andrea.collins@liverpool.ac.uk
S. Wilks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Wootton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.B. Gordon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editors:

We agree with Choudhury et al. [1] that more patients (18–20%) could be managed at home by family practitioners with the application of current guidelines, but we would like to comment that a greater number of patients (approximately 60%) could be managed at home with additional supported home-based care.

As described by the authors, factors other than disease severity often prompt hospital admission. These include substance abuse, inability to cope alone at home, inability to take oral antibiotics, comorbidities and homelessness [2, 3]. The case for outpatient care based on severity markers is clear, but there is an urgent need for more evidence regarding early supported discharge schemes to facilitate the discharge of patients with more complex needs [4]. A randomised controlled trial from New Zealand, where both early supported discharge and admission avoidance models were used, showed patient satisfaction improved by 40% (p<0.001) in those allocated to supported home care [5]. A recent expert review suggested that supported home care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) “shows enormous potential for improving the care of elderly and disabled patients, and should be further evaluated in terms of efficacy and cost-effectiveness” [6].

We recently conducted a retrospective study of the 58% of our CAP patients who had a CVRB-65 (confusion, >7 mmol·L−1 urea, respiratory frequency ≥30 breaths·min−1, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≤60 mmHg and age ≥65 yrs score ≤2. Two reviewers used pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria to assess eligibility to a supported home care scheme and found that 48% of these low-risk patients were deemed suitable for early supported discharge. We noted that in total 8.7% of patients experienced delayed discharge due to lack of social support, 10.9% due to delayed medical review or senior medical review, 4.3% due to awaiting medical investigations (urgent outpatient investigations would have been suitable) and 17.4% due to unstable non-pneumonia acute/chronic comorbidities. We feel that a more heterogeneous group of patients, including those with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and even with hospital-acquired pneumonia could also safely benefit from such a service. The total potential reduction in length of stay, with an early supported discharge scheme utilising these broader inclusion criteria, was calculated at 2.75 (range 1–7) days. Hospital episode data from England for pneumonia, influenza with respiratory manifestation and acute LRTI (2009–2010) showed annual admissions of over 250,000 per year; this would amount to a potential saving of 687,500 bed-days annually.

We have considered what the components of an effective supported home care scheme for CAP would include. A complete service should incorporate fast access to occupational therapy, physiotherapy and social services as well as to outpatient investigations and clinics. A supported home care scheme presents an opportunity to improve health policy, healthcare delivery and services and to reduce admission rates and nosocomial infections, all areas of major strategic importance internationally. This intervention is amenable to randomised controlled trial testing and we propose that such a trial is urgently needed. In order to maximise effectiveness, however, we suggest that conditions beyond CAP should be included, particularly with regard to mild-severity illness without the diagnostic radiological change required as part of the standard CAP definition.

Footnotes

  • Statement of Interest

    None declared.

  • ©ERS 2012

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Choudhury G,
    2. Chalmers JD,
    3. Mandal P,
    4. et al
    . Physician judgement is a crucial adjunct to pneumonia severity scores in low-risk patients. Eur Respir J 2011; 38: 643–648.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Goss CH,
    2. Rubenfeld GD,
    3. Park DR,
    4. et al
    . Cost and incidence of social comorbidities in low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a public hospital. Chest 2003; 124: 2148–2155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Masotti L,
    2. Ceccarelli E,
    3. Cappelli R,
    4. et al
    . Length of hospitalization in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Aging (Milano) 2000; 12: 35–41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Chalmers JD,
    2. Akram AR,
    3. Hill AT
    . Increasing outpatient treatment of mild community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 858–864.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Richards DA,
    2. Toop LJ,
    3. Epton MJ,
    4. et al
    . Home management of mild to moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2005; 183: 235–238.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Ewig S,
    2. Welte T,
    3. Chastre J,
    4. et al
    . Rethinking the concepts of community-acquired and health-care-associated pneumonia. Lancet Infect Dis 2010; 10: 279–287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 39 Issue 2 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 39 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Supported home-care schemes: the key to increasing outpatient care?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Supported home-care schemes: the key to increasing outpatient care?
A.M. Collins, S. Wilks, D. Wootton, S.B. Gordon
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2012, 39 (2) 508; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00165911

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Supported home-care schemes: the key to increasing outpatient care?
A.M. Collins, S. Wilks, D. Wootton, S.B. Gordon
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2012, 39 (2) 508; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00165911
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical outcomes of bronchiectasis in India
  • Reply: Clinical outcomes of bronchiectasis in India
  • Risk factors for disease progression in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society