Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics of exhaled breath condensate: methodological aspects

A. Motta, D. Paris, D. Melck, G. de Laurentiis, M. Maniscalco, M. Sofia, P. Montuschi
European Respiratory Journal 2012 39: 498-500; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00036411
A. Motta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Paris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Melck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. de Laurentiis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Maniscalco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Sofia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Montuschi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pmontuschi@rm.unicatt.it
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editors:

Due to the lack of standardised procedures for exhaled breath condensate (EBC), a noninvasive technique for investigating lung inflammatory mediators [1], the between-laboratory comparison of results is difficult. Moreover, different collecting devices have been reported to influence the EBC content [2, 3].

The analysis of metabolic profiles (“metabolomics”) of EBC using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy discriminates between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and healthy subjects (HS) [4]; asthmatic children and HS [5]; and patients with stable cystic fibrosis and unstable cystic fibrosis and HS [6].

This approach has recently been questioned as NMR-based metabolomics of EBC collected using a condenser with reusable parts was reported to be affected by cleaning procedures, generating artificial signals that were not related to the endogenous metabolites of the lungs [7].

In this study we assessed the effects of a different cleaning procedure of a reusable-part condenser on EBC metabolomics; the possible time and carry-over effects when the same device is repeatedly used; technique sensitivity; the ability of NMR spectroscopy of EBC to discriminate between COPD patients and HS; and the potential of NMR spectroscopy in identifying selective EBC metabolites.

If the cleaning procedure produces artificial signals in the NMR spectra of EBC, the separation between COPD patients and HS reported previously [4] is certainly surprising, as the residual signals derived from the disinfectant Descogen (Antiseptica chem.-pharm. Produkte GmbH, Pulheim/Brauweiler, Germnay) should have randomly affected both groups. Moreover, using a different reusable-part condenser, Carraro et al. [5] reported that NMR-based metabolomics of EBC differentiates asthmatic children from HS with a success rate of 86% [5].

To verify the influence of the disinfectant on EBC metabolomics, we modified the proposed cleaning procedure [4] by replacing Descogen with Milton (Milton Pharmaceutical UK Ltd, Gloucester, UK), a pure sodium hypochlorite solution. The reusable parts of the EcoScreen condenser (Jaeger, Hoechberg, Germany) were soaked for 15 min with a 3.55 mM Milton solution (according to manufacturer guidelines), and then flushed for 15 min with deionised distilled water. 1H-NMR spectra were recorded at 600 MHz (14.1 T) on a Bruker Avance spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with a 5-mm CPTCI CryoProbe™ (Bruker BioSpin GmbH).

Figure 1a reports the NMR spectrum of the Milton solution. Except for the reference 0.1 mM sodium 3-trimethylsilyl[2,2,3,3-2H4]propionate (TSP) signal at 0.0 ppm, no other signals were present in the spectrum. The absence of signals (implying the absence of contaminant) was confirmed in the vertical expansion of the spectrum (fig. 1b). To exclude the presence of contaminants in the deionised water used for rinsing the collection set-up, we acquired the spectrum of the soaking water after rinsing for 5 min (fig. 1c). No peak was observed, indicating that the disinfection and the rinsing steps of the EBC collection set-up do not affect the EBC spectra. These data exclude the fact that cleaning procedure based on Milton solution affects NMR spectroscopy of EBC, indicating that the observed profiles of EBC metabolites are not artificial signals but represent endogenous metabolites.

Figure 1–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1–

1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of sodium hypochlorite cleaning solution (Milton; Milton Pharmaceutical UK Ltd, Gloucester, UK), which is used for the reusable parts of an EcoScreen condenser, and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples. a) A 3.55 mM Milton solution (512 scans). Except for the reference 0.1 mM sodium 3-trimethylsilyl[2,2,3,3-2H4]propionate signal at 0.0 ppm, no other signals were present in the spectrum. b) The absence of contaminant peaks was confirmed in the vertical expansion (×32) of the spectrum and c) in the deionised water used for rinsing the condenser for 5 min (1,024 scans, ×32). Therefore, the EBC spectra (512 scans) of d) a healthy subject and e) a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient are not contaminated by the cleaning solution. Spectra were recorded at 300 K.

When a reusable-part condenser (EcoScreen) was repeatedly used [8], the measurement of several EBC biomarkers detected no carry-over effects from previous sampling periods. If carry-over effects were present, the metabolites would display an “average distribution” after a number of EBC samples had been collected. The NMR spectra of EBC samples from different classes of subjects would be expected to be very similar, therefore, preventing any classification with multivariate analysis.

To verify this, 54 EBC samples were collected from 27 patients with COPD (16 males and 11 females, mean±sd age 58.9±5.7 yrs) and 27 HS (16 males and 11 females, mean±sd age 55.6±6.2 yrs) using an EcoScreen condenser as described previously [4], and spectra were acquired in a randomised sequential order. The Milton cleaning procedure was applied. EBC samples were treated and stored as reported previously [4]. Sample drying was avoided to prevent irreversible solute precipitation and/or formation of insoluble aggregates, which we observed upon dissolving the dried condensate.

Figure 1d shows the EBC spectrum of a HS. Signals were identified through two-dimensional NMR experiments (data not shown), and confirmed those reported previously [4]. Compared to a HS (fig. 1d), the corresponding spectrum from a COPD patient (fig. 1e) showed some differences located in the regions centred at 2.2 and 1.2 ppm. These regions contain the propionate αCH2 at 2.19 ppm (fig. 1d and e), the acetoine αCH3 at 2.23 ppm (fig. 1d), the fatty acid (CH2)2COO at 2.23 ppm (fig. 1e), the propionate βCH3 at 1.06 ppm (fig. 1d and e), the ethanol CH3 at 1.21 ppm (fig. 1d and e), the fatty acid CH2CH3 at 1.27 ppm (fig. 1d and e), the lactate βCH3 at 1.33 ppm (fig. 1d and e), and the threonine γCH3 at 1.39 ppm (fig. 1e). Many other resonances of lower intensity are observed at increased vertical scale, and they have all been assigned by two-dimensional NMR experiments. The detection limit of our NMR technique was calculated by integrating 10 EBC spectra; they were normalised to the standard TSP (0.1 mM), obtaining an average concentration of 0.14±0.04 μM for the endogenous phenylalanine (signals at 7.3–7.0 ppm), among the lowest detected signals.

Spectral differences between COPD and HS were verified by principal components analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis. NMR-based metabolomics of EBC clearly discriminates between COPD patients and HS (r2=99.9%) (fig. 2) confirming our previous NMR results on EBC collected with reusable-part condenser [4], and results obtained by others using a non-reusable-part condenser and mass spectrometry (MS) [7].

Figure 2–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2–

Three-dimensional score plot obtained from a partial least squares discriminant analysis based on nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) from 27 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 27 healthy subjects (HS). All HS were nonsmokers or ex-smokers. COPD patients were ex-smokers and they had stopped smoking for ≥24 months. Diagnosis of COPD was based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines. No subject was exposed to organic solvents. None of the COPD patients was on systemic or inhaled corticosteroid treatment for ≥4 weeks, and they were asked not to use long-acting β2-agonist and anticholinergic agents for ≥12 and 24 h, respectively. No subject had COPD exacerbations or upper and/or lower airway infection in the previous 4 weeks. Subjects refrained from food intake for at least 4 h and from alcoholic drinks for at least 18 h before EBC collection. In the score plot, t[1], t[2] and t[3] represent the scores (the first three partial least squares components) of the model, which are sufficient to build a satisfactory classification model. COPD and HS EBC classes show a clear separation in two distinct clusters. The total significance of the model was r2=99.9%.

The data mentioned previously demonstrate that the cleaning procedure with Milton does not alter the metabolic profiles of EBC, and that NMR spectroscopy is suitable for investigating EBC samples.

By using an Anacon condenser (Biostec, Valencia, Spain), different results have been reported [7]. Collection devices are an important source of variability of EBC biomarkers [2, 3, 8]. The principal variability factors include cooling temperature [9] and condenser materials [2]. For example, a warm-up during condensation is observed when RTube or Anacon are used (condensers using a disposable collection kit), whereas EcoScreen cools down slightly during the procedure [8, 9]. Such differences affect biomarker concentrations [2, 9]. More importantly, there was no correlation between biomarkers measured in EBC collected with EcoScreen and Anacon condensers [9], and there was only an ∼60% correlation between biomarkers measured in EBC collected with RTube and Anacon condensers; although both used a disposable collection kit [9]. However, as no NMR details were found (i.e. the operating magnetic field, the number of acquisitions, the possible use of a cryoprobe, and the detection limit), it is difficult to conclude that NMR spectroscopy cannot be used to analyse EBC samples because it does not have the sensitivity required to observe the endogenous metabolites in the EBC [7]. With our spectrometer set-up, we have estimated a detection limit that is notably low for NMR-based metabolomics [10].

In conclusion, our cleaning procedure of EBC collection set-up does not generate artificial signals in the metabolic profile of EBC. Furthermore, NMR-based metabolomics are suitable for identifying specific EBC metabolites and are potentially useful for characterising the metabolic fingerprints of patients with respiratory diseases. Although a head-to-head comparison of different condensers is required, the combination of different reference analytical techniques, including NMR and MS, might consolidate “breathomics” as a new noninvasive approach to the assessment of patients with respiratory disease with important diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Footnotes

  • Statement of Interest

    None declared.

  • ©ERS 2012

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Horvath I,
    2. Hunt J,
    3. Barnes PJ
    . Exhaled breath condensate: methodological recommendations and unresolved questions. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 523–548.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Rosias P,
    2. Robroeks C,
    3. Kester A,
    4. et al
    . Biomarker reproducibility in exhaled breath condensate collected with different condensers. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 934–942.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Koczulla R,
    2. Dragonieri S,
    3. Schot R,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients. Respir Res 2009; 10: 78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. de Laurentiis G,
    2. Paris D,
    3. Melck D,
    4. et al
    . Metabonomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate in adults by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Eur Respir J 2008; 32: 1175–1183.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Carraro S,
    2. Rezzi S,
    3. Reniero F,
    4. et al
    . Metabolomics applied to exhaled breath condensate in childhood asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 175: 986–990.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Montuschi P,
    2. Paris D,
    3. Melck D,
    4. et al
    . Metabolomic analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of exhaled breath condensate in patients with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 63s.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Izquierdo-García JL,
    2. Peces-Barba G,
    3. Heili S,
    4. et al
    . Is NMR-based metabolomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate accurate? Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 468–470.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Hoffmeyer F,
    2. Raulf-Heimsoth M,
    3. Harth V,
    4. et al
    . Comparative analysis of selected exhaled breath biomarkers obtained with two different temperature-controlled devices. BMC Pulm Med 2009; 9: 48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Czebe K,
    2. Barta I,
    3. Antus B,
    4. et al
    . Influence of condensing equipment and temperature on exhaled breath condensate pH, total protein and leukotriene concentrations. Respir Med 2008; 102: 720–725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. del Campo G,
    2. Berregi I,
    3. Caracena R,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative determination of caffeine, formic acid, trigonelline and 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural in soluble coffees by 1H-NMR spectrometry. Talanta 2010; 81: 367–371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 39 Issue 2 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 39 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics of exhaled breath condensate: methodological aspects
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics of exhaled breath condensate: methodological aspects
A. Motta, D. Paris, D. Melck, G. de Laurentiis, M. Maniscalco, M. Sofia, P. Montuschi
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2012, 39 (2) 498-500; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00036411

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics of exhaled breath condensate: methodological aspects
A. Motta, D. Paris, D. Melck, G. de Laurentiis, M. Maniscalco, M. Sofia, P. Montuschi
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2012, 39 (2) 498-500; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00036411
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • COPD and smoking
  • Asthma and allergy
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Obesity in COPD: the effect of water-based exercise
  • Burden of CAP in Italian general practice
  • Neutrophilia independently predicts death in tuberculosis
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society