Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Comparative efficacy of the therapy strategies for the asthma control maintenance in real clinical practice

Evgeny Kulikov, Ludmila Ogorodova, Ivan Deev
European Respiratory Journal 2011 38: p888; DOI:
Evgeny Kulikov
Faculty Pediatrics, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ludmila Ogorodova
Faculty Pediatrics, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivan Deev
Faculty Pediatrics, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Introduction: Today there is no clear answer to the question which therapy regimen will be optimal for disease control maintenance in real clinical practice.

Aim: To compare the efficiency of strategies of control achievement from position of maintenance control in patients with persistent asthma in real clinical practice by ACT-test.

Methods: Multicenter prospective 24-week observation study was conducted in 19 centers in Russia. Investigator was only to record the changes of therapy prescribed by the attending physician. Patients were aposterior stratified into three groups: A – step-up regime of combined therapy (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate), B – stable regime, C – step-down regime.

Result: According to the inclusion criteria the patients in all groups had the uncontrolled disease course (ACT score <20). Of the 288 patients (50%) who achieved control in the first 3 months of observation, 263 (91.3%) persons maintained or increased the disease control level and only 23 (8.0%) of the patients “lost” the disease control. The ACT score decreasing to the uncontrolled level (<20 points) in group A and B was registered in 7.7% and 2.8% of cases, respectevely. The significantly biggest proportion of patients with the loss of asthma control was registered in group C - 24,3% (p<0,05). Declining therapy is associated with a decrease in the proportion of controlled patients and fold increase in the probability of loss of control.

Conclusion: Combined therapy at step-up and stable regimes are optimal in real clinical practice from position of maintenance control in patients with persistent asthma.

  • © 2011 ERS
Previous
Back to top
Vol 38 Issue Suppl 55 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative efficacy of the therapy strategies for the asthma control maintenance in real clinical practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparative efficacy of the therapy strategies for the asthma control maintenance in real clinical practice
Evgeny Kulikov, Ludmila Ogorodova, Ivan Deev
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2011, 38 (Suppl 55) p888;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparative efficacy of the therapy strategies for the asthma control maintenance in real clinical practice
Evgeny Kulikov, Ludmila Ogorodova, Ivan Deev
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2011, 38 (Suppl 55) p888;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Functional effects of long term ICS treatment in controlled asthma
  • Anti-immunoglobulin E antibodies may improve remodeling in a mouse model of asthma
  • Clinical course and outcome of patients with status asthmaticus in a tertiary care centre in Pakistan over the last ten years
Show more 97. Asthma: control and treatment

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society