Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Breath-by-breath delivered dose comparison from three anti-static valved holding chambers with facemasks under simulated pediatric breathing conditions

Wenchi Hsu, Dirk von Hollen, Zhen Xu, Tao Bai, Kurt Nikander, Richard Dalby
European Respiratory Journal 2011 38: p4831; DOI:
Wenchi Hsu
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dirk von Hollen
2Philips Respironics, Respironics New Jersey, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhen Xu
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tao Bai
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt Nikander
2Philips Respironics, Respironics New Jersey, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Dalby
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Facemasks serve as a patient-device interface to facilitate drug delivery from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with an attached valved holding chamber (VHC), and are capable of significantly affecting inhalation drug therapy. A novel horizontal test rig designed for the evaluation of facemask performance under simulated conditions was used to measure delivered dose from ProAir HFA pMDIs (108 μg albuterol sulfate/actuation, Teva Specialty Pharmaceuticals LLC). Three brands of VHC-facemask systems were tested: preproduction OptiChamber Diamond (Diamond) VHCs with preproduction LiteTouch facemasks (Philips Respironics), AeroChamber Plus Z Stat (Z Stat) VHCs with ComfortSeal facemasks (Monaghan Medical Corp.), and Vortex VHCs with Spinner Duck facemasks (PARI GmbH).

A face replica of a four-year-old child, with a replaceable aerosol filter in the “mouth”, was connected to a breathing simulator (ASL 5000; IngMar Medical Ltd) to simulate a pediatric breathing pattern (Vt=155 mL, f=25 bpm I:E=2:3). Each VHC-facemask system was naturally positioned against the face replica with a constant applied force supplied by a mass of 1.9 kg. Albuterol sulfate was quantified using HPLC after 1, 2, 4 and 8 “breaths” following pMDI actuation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 1. Mean dose recovered on filter (%, n=3)

The delivered dose using the Diamond-LiteTouch system, after 1 breath, was significantly higher than the delivered dose using the Z Stat-ComfortSeal or the Vortex-Spinner Duck system after 8 breaths (p<0.01).

  • © 2011 ERS
Previous
Back to top
Vol 38 Issue Suppl 55 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Breath-by-breath delivered dose comparison from three anti-static valved holding chambers with facemasks under simulated pediatric breathing conditions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Breath-by-breath delivered dose comparison from three anti-static valved holding chambers with facemasks under simulated pediatric breathing conditions
Wenchi Hsu, Dirk von Hollen, Zhen Xu, Tao Bai, Kurt Nikander, Richard Dalby
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2011, 38 (Suppl 55) p4831;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Breath-by-breath delivered dose comparison from three anti-static valved holding chambers with facemasks under simulated pediatric breathing conditions
Wenchi Hsu, Dirk von Hollen, Zhen Xu, Tao Bai, Kurt Nikander, Richard Dalby
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2011, 38 (Suppl 55) p4831;
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Designing a holding chamber mask using anthropometric data and CAD-simulation
  • Did inappropriate delivery systems hamper therapeutic efficacy of di-sodium-cromo-glycate (DSCG)? Time for a reappraisal
Show more 495. Treating childhood asthma

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society