To the Editors:
Acute exacerbations (AEs) are now recognised as a frequent and severe complication of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In a large series, 1- and 3-yr incidences were 14.2% and 20.7%, respectively [1]. New diagnostic criteria were published in 2007 [2]. The pathogenesis of these episodes remains unknown, although invasive procedures have been described as possible triggers. Prognosis is poor, with a short-term mortality rate of 45–85%. There is no consensus regarding treatment, as no published study has compared the efficiency of different treatment regimens, and treatment often differs between patients within a given study [1–4]. Since 2005, exacerbations of IPF identified in our referral centre (Centre Hospitalier Régional de Lille, Lille, France) have been treated with pulses of methylprednisolone followed by pulses of cyclophosphamide [5]. The main goal of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the mortality of exacerbations of IPF treated with this regimen.
Following admission for aggravation of dyspnoea, a series of tests were run to determine diagnosis and functional impairment. When an exacerbation of IPF was diagnosed, patients were treated with a methylprednisolone pulse (1,000 mg) at days 1–3 and on day 4 placed on an escalating regimen of cyclophosphamide with an initial dose of 500 mg intravenously [5]. The dose of cyclophosphamide was increased by 200 mg every 2 weeks, provided the total white blood cell count remained at >3,000 cells·mm−3. The maximum single administered dose was 1,500 mg of cyclophosphamide. The diagnosis of IPF was reassessed for the purpose of this study [6]. AE was defined as an aggravation of dyspnoea within 1 month, with newly developed pulmonary infiltrates on chest computed tomography (CT), after lung infection, heart failure and pulmonary embolism had been ruled out. The definition of a sub-acute exacerbation (SAE) was identical except that the time span from the onset of symptoms to admission was set at 30–90 days. All the data were retrospectively collected from the patients' medical records. Baseline and exacerbation chest CT scans were reviewed by two physicians unaware of the clinical data. New parenchymal opacities on CT at the time of exacerbation were categorised according to the method of Akira et al. [7].
Over a 42-month period, 10 patients were treated for 11 episodes of AE, and seven patients were treated for an SAE. Re-evaluation of the CT scan was possible in 14 out of the 18 cases. Newly appeared opacities were labelled as peripheral in six (43%) cases, multifocal in three cases and diffuse in five (36%) cases. Characteristics at baseline and during the exacerbation are presented in table 1]. All patients were alive 1 month after treatment was initiated. At 3 months, 72% of patients were alive: all patients with SAE and 55% patients with AE. At 6 months, overall survival was 56%; 1-yr survival was 33% (fig. 1]). The cause of death was respiratory failure in all cases. Forced vital capacity at admission was significantly associated with 6- and 12-month survival (p=0.01 and p=0.003, respectively). Likewise, a higher arterial oxygen tension (Pa,O2) at admission for exacerbation was associated with better 6-month survival (p=0.03). Patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) had better 1-yr survival. The type of high-resolution CT pattern was not related to survival. Three patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute respiratory failure during the second or third month of treatment. Two of them were intubated and died at day 1 and day 17 of mechanical ventilation, respectively, from worsening hypoxaemia and multiple organ failure. The third patient was not intubated and died 6 days after ICU admission. While undergoing treatment for IPF exacerbation, six patients received antibiotics for a suspected undocumented respiratory infection; the outcome was positive. Pulmonary infection was suspected in the three patients admitted to the ICU but was documented in only one case. None of these suspected infectious episodes were related to neutropenia, as no severe haematological toxicity was observed. No urological or kidney toxicity was observed.
Our study describes the characteristics and outcome of exacerbations of IPF occurring in a Caucasian population, and treated by a protocol combining pulse steroid therapy followed by pulse cyclophosphamide therapy. Survival appears better than that which has previously been reported, mainly in Asian populations, without systematic immunosuppressive treatment. Most publications report a very high mortality rate, up to 85%. Most deaths occur within a few weeks after the onset of the exacerbation. A recent review estimated the mortality rate at 1 month to be 60% (70% at 3 months) and the in-hospital mortality rate was recently reported at 50% [1]. In our study, mortality appears to be lower, and to occur later. These differences may be explained by the efficiency of the cyclophosphamide treatment regimen, but also by differences in the studied populations or by an over-estimation of mortality in previously published studies. In most observations, patients are treated with corticosteroids (often by 500–1,000-mg methylprednisolone pulses), sometimes with the addition of immunosuppressive therapies. Some authors report better survival in patients treated with cyclosporin A than in patients treated with corticosteroids alone, suggesting that immunosuppressive therapy associated with corticosteroids could be more effective than corticosteroids alone. There are currently no trials of antioxidant or anti-fibrotic drugs for AEs of IPF. Treatment of stable IPF with pirfenidone was not found to be associated with a lesser occurrence of AEs [8]. One study, conducted on a limited number of patients, showed that anticoagulant therapy reduces the mortality of acute exacerbations [9]. Optimal treatment for exacerbations of IPF has yet to be defined.
Most publications about AEs of IPF come from East Asia (South Korea and Japan). European and North American publications are case series on selected patients (e.g. with a lung biopsy), with potentially biased mortality rates. Genetic and/or environmental differences between populations could influence the incidence, expression and severity of AEs of IPF. Mortality in pathological studies can also be biased, as the morbidity–mortality of the lung biopsy adds to the mortality of the exacerbation. The mortality rates from prospective studies are among the lowest reported. This could be explained by a better identification and inclusion of less severe cases, the incidence of exacerbations also being higher in these studies.
The association found between forced vital capacity and Pa,O2 at admission for exacerbation and survival suggests that the prognosis of exacerbations might be linked to their initial severity as well as to the severity of IPF [1, 10] and the Pa,O2/inspired oxygen fraction ratio seems to be lower in the studies reporting the highest mortality rates. A higher BMI was found to be a protecting factor towards 1-yr mortality. Obesity has been shown to be a factor in favour of good prognosis in stable IPF. In our study, survival was not related to CT findings.
We also studied SAEs of IPF, along with AEs, as we found that seven patients with IPF had a similar clinical and radiological presentation, developed over 4–12 weeks. SAEs of IPF have not been addressed in previous publications. We found no difference in epidemiological and functional data at baseline and during exacerbation. Survival analysis at 3 months showed that mortality was significantly higher in AEs, but 1-yr survival was similar in the two groups. These data suggest that SAEs of IPF could be a slower-evolving type of the same underlying pathophysiological mechanism as AEs, resulting in a similar medium-term prognosis.
Footnotes
Statement of Interest
A statement of interest for I. Tillie-Leblond can be found at www.ersjournals.com/site/misc/statements.xhtml
- ©ERS 2011