Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT)

B.B. Koolen, M.W.H. Pijnenburg, H.J.L. Brackel, A.M. Landstra, N.J. van den Berg, P.J.F.M. Merkus, W.C.J. Hop, A.A.P.H. Vaessen-Verberne
European Respiratory Journal 2011 38: 561-566; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00173710
B.B. Koolen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.W.H. Pijnenburg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.J.L. Brackel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.M. Landstra
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N.J. van den Berg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.J.F.M. Merkus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.C.J. Hop
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.A.P.H. Vaessen-Verberne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: avaessen-verberne@amphia.nl
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Several tools are useful in detecting uncontrolled asthma in children. The aim of this study was to compare Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) in detecting uncontrolled asthma in children.

145 children with asthma filled in a web-based daily diary card for 4 weeks on symptoms, use of rescue medication and limitations of activities, followed by either the C-ACT or ACT. For predicting uncontrolled asthma, score cut-off points of 19 were used for C-ACT and ACT.

According to GINA guidelines, asthma was uncontrolled in 71 (51%) children and completely controlled in 19 (14%) children. The area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curves for C-ACT and ACT versus GINA guidelines were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively. Cut-off points of 19 for C-ACT and ACT resulted in a sensitivity of 33% and 66% in predicting uncontrolled asthma, respectively.

C-ACT and ACT correlate well with GINA criteria in predicting uncontrolled asthma, but commonly used cut-off points for C-ACT and ACT seem to underestimate the proportion of children with uncontrolled asthma as defined by GINA.

  • Asthma
  • asthma control
  • asthma control test
  • child
  • childhood asthma control test
  • Global Initiative for Asthma

Footnotes

  • Support Statement

    A.A.P.H. Vaessen-Verberne received an unrestricted research grant from GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals and Consumer Healthcare (Zeist, the Netherlands) for developing web-based versions of C-ACT and ACT.

  • Statement of Interest

    Statements of interest for H.J.L. Brackel and A.A.P.H. Vaessen-Verberne can be found at www.erj.ersjournals.com/site/misc/statements.xhtml

  • Received November 8, 2010.
  • Accepted January 25, 2011.
  • ©ERS 2011
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 38 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 38 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT)
B.B. Koolen, M.W.H. Pijnenburg, H.J.L. Brackel, A.M. Landstra, N.J. van den Berg, P.J.F.M. Merkus, W.C.J. Hop, A.A.P.H. Vaessen-Verberne
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2011, 38 (3) 561-566; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00173710

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT)
B.B. Koolen, M.W.H. Pijnenburg, H.J.L. Brackel, A.M. Landstra, N.J. van den Berg, P.J.F.M. Merkus, W.C.J. Hop, A.A.P.H. Vaessen-Verberne
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2011, 38 (3) 561-566; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00173710
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Paediatric pulmonology
  • Asthma and allergy
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Article

  • Lung volumes and survival in chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • StO2 during weaning from mechanical ventilation
  • Automated quantification of radiological patterns predicts IPF survival
Show more Original Article

Asthma

  • SABA prescriptions are associated with poor clinical outcomes of asthma
  • Prednisolone versus prednisolone and itraconazole in acute ABPA complicating asthma
  • Factors affecting adherence with treatment advice in a clinical trial of patients with severe asthma
Show more Asthma

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society