Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Time interval to conversion of interferon-γ release assay after exposure to tuberculosis

S.W. Lee, D.K. Oh, S.H. Lee, H.Y. Kang, C-T. Lee, J-J. Yim
European Respiratory Journal 2011 37: 1447-1452; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00089510
S.W. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.K. Oh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.H. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.Y. Kang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C-T. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J-J. Yim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yimjj@snu.ac.kr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The proper interval for repeating an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) among tuberculosis contacts with initially negative results is unknown. The interval for IGRA conversion after exposure to patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis in an outbreak setting was evaluated.

In a platoon of 32 soldiers, four active pulmonary tuberculosis patients, in addition to one index patient, were diagnosed during a contact investigation. For the other 27 contacts, a tuberculin skin test (TST) and QuantiFERON® TB-Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay were performed. For soldiers with a negative result on the initial QFT-GIT assay, the test was repeated at 2, 4, 8, 14, 18 and 30 weeks until positive conversion occurred. When conversion was identified, the subject was treated for latent tuberculosis infection.

Initially, 17 (63.0%) soldiers gave positive QFT-GIT results, whereas 21 (77.8%) showed positive TST results. Among 10 participants with initially negative QFT-GIT results, three showed conversion at 2 weeks, three at 4 weeks and three at 14 weeks. Conversion did not occur during the 30-week observation period in one contact.

Based on the tuberculosis exposure time-points among the contacts, IGRA conversion generally occurred 4–7 weeks after exposure, although it could occur as late as 14–22 weeks after exposure.

  • Contacts
  • infection control
  • interferon-γ assay
  • serial testing
  • tuberculosis

Despite global efforts, the total number of new tuberculosis (TB) cases continues to rise, with 9.27 million new cases and 1.32 million deaths reported in 2007 [1]. For effective and efficient treatment of active TB, and for disease control in developing countries, the rapid diagnosis and treatment of patients with sputum smear-positive TB are critical. In countries with low or intermediate rates of TB, the treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) to prevent progression to active disease has been an essential component of public health efforts to eliminate the disease [2, 3].

Despite its well-known limitations, the tuberculin skin test (TST) has been the only method of diagnosing LTBI for over a century. However, two interferon (IFN)-γ release assays (IGRAs) that overcome several TST limitations were recently introduced into routine clinical practice. The IGRAs appear to be unaffected by previous bacille Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination. They do not require intradermal injection or a second visit. In addition, IGRAs provide objective results.

Compared with the TST, two commercially available tests, the ELISA-based QuantiFERON® TB-Gold assay (Cellestis, Carnegie, Australia) and the enzyme-linked immunospot-based T-SPOT.TB test (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK), produce more specific results [4, 5]. The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines (covering England) recommend the use of IGRAs in individuals at risk of LTBI who have tested positive with TSTs [6]. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines recommend initial use of IGRAs in all groups as a direct replacement for the TST [7].

Nevertheless, the interval for positive conversion of the IGRA following exposure to a patient with active TB is unclear, whereas conversion of the TST is known to occur within 2–12 weeks [8–10]. NICE guidelines recommend repetition of an IGRA test after 6 weeks for contacts with negative TST results, although there is no concrete evidence for this recommendation [6]. Similarly, CDC guidelines recommend that negative IGRA results be confirmed with a repeat test performed 8–10 weeks after the end of exposure, while admitting that the best interval for requesting a retest is unknown [7].

In the present study, the time interval for positive IGRA conversion after a TB outbreak was evaluated in a Korean military platoon, which is a closed communal setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Status of TB control in South Korea

In 2007, the incidence and prevalence of TB in South Korea were 90 and 126 per 100,000 population, respectively. In addition, annual TB mortality was 4,887 [1], and the rate of BCG coverage was ∼95% [11]. The prevalence of positive TST results among young South Koreans without contact with TB patients was reported to be 28% in 2006 [12].

Index patient and identification of the TB outbreak

The first patient diagnosed with pulmonary TB was a 20-yr-old male soldier in a platoon of two officers and 32 soldiers. This soldier had no underlying disease and was HIV-negative. The soldier developed a productive cough at the beginning of January 2009 and showed haemoptysis in March 2009. Subsequently, the soldier was diagnosed with sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB in April 2009, and was evacuated from the platoon for isolation. The soldier was treated for active pulmonary TB and, 5 weeks later, culture confirmed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Within 7 days of this patient’s diagnosis, simple chest radiography (CXR) was performed for all of the officers and soldiers in the same platoon. Acid-fast staining and mycobacterial sputum culture were also conducted for any contacts who could expectorate sputum.

Study protocol

On May 2009, the investigation of the present study was initiated for all of the soldiers in the same platoon. Although the soldiers in the platoon lived in two adjacent rooms, they shared a bathroom and dining room, and lived their daily lives together. Therefore, all of them were invited to participate in the present study. However, two officers were excluded from the study because they did not have such close contact as the soldiers themselves. After giving written consent, each participant was asked to complete a questionnaire regarding demographics, previous history of TB, smoking status and other factors. Additionally, chest low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), a TST and a QuantiFERON® TB-Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay (Cellestis), as well as acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smears and mycobacterial culture of sputum where possible, were performed for all close contacts (fig. 1). LDCT was included to detect any active lesions that were not identified by CXR [13, 14]. The present study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of the Armed Forces Medical Command of the Republic of Korea.

Figure 1–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1–

Schematic of the study protocol. CXR: chest radiography; LDCT: low-dose computed tomography; QFT-GIT: QuantiFERON® TB-Gold In-Tube; TST: tuberculin skin test; AFB: acid-fast bacillus; exam: examination; LTBI: latent tuberculosis infection; HR: isoniazid/rifampicin.

Tuberculin skin test

After QFT-GIT blood sampling, the two-step TST was performed by trained personnel following standard procedures [9], with 0.1 mL (2 tuberculin units) purified protein derivative (RT23; Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark). A positive test was defined as an induration of ≥10 mm [9].

Interferon-γ release assay

The QFT-GIT assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The plasma concentration of IFN-γ was measured by ELISA, and the technician had no information about the subjects. Test results were interpreted as negative, indeterminate or positive (cut-off 0.35 IU·mL−1) using the manufacturer’s software. QFT-GIT conversion was defined as a change from a negative (<0.35 IU·mL−1) to a positive (≥0.35 IU·mL−1) result [15].

Chest LDCT

LDCT was performed using a 64-channel multidetector (Brilliance 64; Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and a thickness of 5 mm. A board-certified radiologist (certification performed by Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Republic of Korea), who was blinded to the participants’ clinical information, interpreted the results.

AFB smears and mycobacterial sputum culture

For participants who could expectorate sputum, three AFB smears and mycobacterial culture of the sputum were performed. Sputum was decontaminated with 4% NaOH, homogenised and concentrated by centrifugation for 20 min at 3,000×g. The processed sediment was stained using the Ziehl–Neelsen method [16]. Sputum was also cultured in 3% Ogawa medium and observed for growth every week for 8 weeks.

Diagnosis and treatment of active TB and LTBI

Active TB

Active TB was diagnosed when specimens showed positive AFB staining, M. tuberculosis was cultured or patient data met the definition of a clinical case of TB as defined by the World Health Organization [17]. Since the isolated M. tuberculosis showed susceptibility to all anti-TB drugs, treatment with isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol was initiated and continued for 6 months for participants diagnosed with active TB.

LTBI

Participants with positive QFT-GIT results, but without active TB lesions on CXR and LDCT, were diagnosed with LTBI, and daily isoniazid and rifampicin were recommended for 3 months [18].

Follow-up evaluation

Participants with negative QFT-GIT results on initial screening were tested again at 2, 4, 8, 14, 18 and 30 weeks after the outbreak investigation had begun. When a positive QFT-GIT conversion occurred, the follow-up tests were stopped, and the participant was treated daily with isoniazid and rifampicin for 3 months (fig. 1).

DNA fingerprinting of isolated M. tuberculosis

In order to confirm an outbreak of M. tuberculosis at the molecular level, DNA fingerprinting was performed using PvuII (Proteus vulgaris II) restriction, as described previously [19].

Statistical analysis

Agreement between the TST results and whole-blood IFN-γ levels was measured using the κ statistic. Statistical significance was defined by a two-tailed p-value of ≤0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using PASW 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Patients identified with active pulmonary TB

During the investigation, two more soldiers with productive cough were diagnosed with active pulmonary TB based on symptoms and CXRs, despite giving negative AFB sputum smear results; after a few weeks, M. tuberculosis was isolated from one of the two soldiers. In addition, two more soldiers with normal CXRs were diagnosed and treated for active TB based on abnormal LDCT lesions; although their AFB smears were negative, M. tuberculosis was isolated from the sputum of one of the soldiers several weeks later. In total, five soldiers in the present platoon, including the index case, were diagnosed with active pulmonary TB. Three of the soldiers had culture-confirmed pulmonary TB. All five patients were isolated from the platoon as soon as active TB was suspected. Their symptoms and radiographic findings improved with anti-TB treatment. M. tuberculosis cultured from two patients (index patient and one subsequent patient who had lesions on CXR) showed the same restriction fragment length polymorphism pattern; however, the patient diagnosed as having active TB based on LDCT showed a different pattern of M. tuberculosis (table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1– Demographic and clinical characteristics of five patients with pulmonary tuberculosis

Demographic characteristics of contacts without active TB

All 27 contacts in the platoon with normal LDCT results completed the study protocol. Their median age was 21 yrs (range 20–24 yrs), and all were male. A total of 21 (77.8%) contacts had BCG scars, and 19 (70.4%) were current smokers. All contacts were negative for HIV, and none had a previous history of TB. A total of 16 contacts were residing with the platoon when the index case started to cough; seven contacts were deployed to the platoon before the diagnosis and isolation of the index case, and four contacts were deployed to the platoon after isolation of the index case, but were exposed to the four other patients with active TB.

Results of the initial investigation for contacts without active TB

Among the 27 contacts, 17 (63.0%) gave a positive QFT-GIT result and none had an indeterminate result, whereas 21 (77.8%) showed a positive response on the TST. Of the contacts, 16 (59.3%) gave positive results on both the QFT-GIT assay and TST, and five (18.5%) gave negative results on both tests. The overall agreement between the TST and QFT-GIT results was moderate (κ = 0.56; p = 0.001) [20].

Follow-up IGRAs among contacts with initially negative results

A total of 10 contacts gave negative QFT-GIT results during the initial study investigation. Among them, three participants (all with a positive TST result in the first step) showed conversion at 2 weeks, with IFN-γ levels of 0.51 (subject 18), >10.0 (subject 19) and 1.47 IU·mL−1 (subject 20). Another three (all with a negative TST result) showed conversion at 4 weeks, with IFN-γ levels of 0.58 (subject 24), 0.90 (subject 25) and 0.96 IU·mL−1 (subject 26). Three other participants (one with a positive TST result in the first step and two with a negative TST result) showed conversion at 14 weeks; the IFN-γ levels were 1.09 (subject 22), 1.92 (subject 23) and 2.74 IU·mL−1 (subject 27). No conversion occurred in one contact (subject 21) during the 30-week observation period (fig. 2).

Figure 2–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2–

Interval between tuberculosis (TB) exposure and QuantiFERON® TB-Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT; Cellestis, Carnegie, Australia) conversion among 27 contacts without active TB. Each numbered square represents one participant and is placed at the point at which the participant started to reside with the platoon. TST: tuberculin skin test.

Subsequent development of active TB among participants

None of the 26 contacts were diagnosed with active TB during the 10-month follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

Current guidelines recommend repeating the IGRA at 6–10 weeks after TB exposure among contacts with an initially negative IGRA result [6, 7]. However, this recommendation has not emerged from observed data, but from speculation. Using the results of the present study, the interval between exposure and IGRA conversion could be estimated.

The results of the serial QFT-GIT assay in subjects 24–26 showed the shortest interval to conversion. Given that these three subjects had been deployed to the platoon 3 weeks before the investigation began, and considering that conversion occurred at 4 weeks after the investigation began, the interval from exposure to conversion must have been 4–7 weeks for these subjects. The longest interval to conversion was also estimated using the data from subjects 22 and 23, who could have contacted persons with active TB as long as 2 months before the investigation and showed conversion 14 weeks after the investigation began. Based on the present results, conversion is possible as early as 4–7 weeks and as late as 14–22 weeks after exposure to TB, although contacts were not checked for >6 months.

The present study was performed to estimate the interval between exposure and IGRA conversion under ideal conditions. First, the participants in the present study had scant possibility of further exposure to other patients with active TB. In a platoon of 32 soldiers, five with active TB were isolated as soon as active TB was suspected. Although two participants with initially negative IGRA results had spent a few days outside the barracks before IGRA conversion, they denied contact with TB patients while they were outside. None of the other participants left their platoon for holiday before IGRA conversion. Furthermore, the possibility of missing a patient with active TB was minimised by performing LDCT for all contacts, as LDCT has been shown to be superior to a simple CXR for diagnosing active TB [13, 14]. Indeed, two patients in the present investigation were diagnosed with active pulmonary TB based on LDCT. Furthermore, contact between the participants and soldiers from other units was very unlikely as the platoon had performed their duties independently in an isolated barracks. We believe that, in this setting, the observed positive conversions resulted from exposure to the index patient or subsequent patients with TB, rather than from other sources. Secondly, none of the contacts with a negative QFT-GIT result were released from military service. This condition provided an ideal opportunity to observe the whole set of contacts and minimised selection bias. The high rate of positive TST (21 out of 27) and QFT-GIT results (17 out of 27) among the contacts at the first screening raised the possibility of widespread pre-existing LTBI among the soldiers; however, a large proportion of the LTBI among the participants was thought to be the result of the intense exposure to the TB case, given that the prevalence of positive TST results among young South Koreans without contact with TB patients is only 28% in South Korea [12].

Theoretically, the TST could affect the results of subsequent IGRA tests, because both 6-kDa early secretory antigenic target and culture filtrate protein 10, which are used in the IGRA, are included in tuberculin. However, the data regarding a boosting effect of the TST on IGRA assays are inconsistent across studies, and some previous studies confute a definite boosting of IGRA response by the TST [21–23].

Owing to within-subject variability in the IFN-γ responses [24], a higher threshold (≥0.70 IU·mL−1) has been suggested to define conversion for the QFT-GIT assay [25]. Without a higher threshold, minor fluctuations around the current IFN-γ cut-off level of 0.35 IU·mL−1 could be mistakenly regarded as conversions. In the present study, the participants showing conversion had IFN-γ levels of >0.70 IU·mL−1, with the exception of two participants (IFN-γ level of 0.51 IU·mL−1 in subject 6 and 0.58 IU·mL−1 in subject 27). Considering previous studies, the high IFN-γ levels of participants in the present study can be regarded as real conversions, rather than boosting from the TST or within-subject variability in the IFN-γ response.

Given the TB exposure time-points of contacts, IGRA conversion generally occurred 4–7 weeks after exposure, and occurred as late as 14–22 weeks after exposure in a smaller number of cases. No conversion was observed 22–30 weeks after the outbreak investigation. Thus, for close contacts with an initially negative IGRA result, the appropriate time over which to repeat the IGRA may be longer than the currently recommended 6–10 weeks.

Footnotes

  • Support Statement

    This study was supported by the Korean Military Medical Research Project funded by the Ministry of National Defense of the Republic of Korea (Seoul, Republic of Korea).

  • Statement of Interest

    None declared.

  • Received June 10, 2010.
  • Accepted November 7, 2010.
  • ©ERS 2011

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Control: Epidemiology, Strategy, Financing: WHO Report 2009. Report No. WHO/HTM/TB/2009.411. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2009
  2. ↵
    1. Broekmans JF,
    2. Migliori GB,
    3. Rieder HL,
    4. et al
    . European framework for tuberculosis control and elimination in countries with a low incidence. Eur Respir J 2002; 19: 765–775.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Jasmer RM,
    2. Nahid P,
    3. Hopewell PC
    . Clinical practice. Latent tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1860–1866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Kang YA,
    2. Lee HW,
    3. Yoon HI,
    4. et al
    . Discrepancy between the tuberculin skin test and the whole-blood interferon γ assay for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in an intermediate tuberculosis-burden country. JAMA 2005; 293: 2756–2761.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Menzies D,
    2. Pai M,
    3. Comstock G
    . Meta-analysis: new tests for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: areas of uncertainty and recommendations for research. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 340–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Tuberculosis: Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculosis, and Measures for its Prevention and Control. Clinical Guideline 33. London, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006
  7. ↵
    1. Mazurek M,
    2. Jereb J,
    3. Vernon A,
    4. et al
    . Updated guidelines for using interferon gamma release assays to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection – United States, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010; 59: 1–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Wasz-Hockert O
    . On the period of incubation in tuberculosis. Ann Med Intern Fenn 1947; 96: 764–772.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: S221–S247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Huebner RE,
    2. Schein MF,
    3. Bass JB Jr.
    . The tuberculin skin test. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 17: 968–975.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kim HJ,
    2. Oh SY,
    3. Lee JB,
    4. et al
    . Tuberculin survey to estimate the prevalence of tuberculosis infection of the elementary schoolchildren under high BCG vaccination coverage. Tuberc Respir Dis 2008; 65: 269–276.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Choi CM,
    2. Kang CI,
    3. Kim DH,
    4. et al
    . The role of TST in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection among military personnel in South Korea. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2006; 10: 1342–1346.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Lee SW,
    2. Jang YS,
    3. Park CM,
    4. et al
    . The role of chest CT scanning in TB outbreak investigation. Chest 2010; 137: 1057–1064.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Lew WJ,
    2. Jung YJ,
    3. Song JW,
    4. et al
    . Combined use of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold assay and chest computed tomography in a tuberculosis outbreak. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009; 13: 633–639.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Cellestis, Inc. QuantiFERON®-TB Gold (In-Tube Method) Package Insert. Valencia, CA, Cellestis, Inc., 2006. www.cellestis.com/IRM/Content/pdf/QuantiFeron%20US%20VerH_Jul2010.pdf Date last updated: July 2010. Date last accessed: October 7, 2010
  16. ↵
    World Health Organization. Laboratory Services in Tuberculosis Control. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1998
  17. ↵
    World Health Organization. Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines for National Programmes. 3rd Edn. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2003
  18. ↵
    Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Control and prevention of tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: code of practice 2000. Thorax 2000; 55: 887–901.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. van Embden JD,
    2. Cave MD,
    3. Crawford JT,
    4. et al
    . Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 406–409.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG
    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Naseer A,
    2. Naqvi S,
    3. Kampmann B
    . Evidence for boosting Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific IFN-γ responses at 6 weeks following tuberculin skin testing. Eur Respir J 2007; 29: 1282–1283.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Igari H,
    2. Watanabe A,
    3. Sato T
    . Booster phenomenon of QuantiFERON-TB Gold after prior intradermal PPD injection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007; 11: 788–791.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Vilaplana C,
    2. Ruiz-Manzano J,
    3. Gil O,
    4. et al
    . The tuberculin skin test increases the responses measured by T cell interferon-γ release assays. Scand J Immunol 2008; 67: 610–617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. van Zyl-Smit RN,
    2. Pai M,
    3. Peprah K,
    4. et al
    . Within-subject variability and boosting of T-cell interferon-γ responses after tuberculin skin testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 180: 49–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Pai M,
    2. Joshi R,
    3. Dogra S,
    4. et al
    . Serial testing of health care workers for tuberculosis using interferon-γ assay. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 349–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 37 Issue 6 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 37 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Time interval to conversion of interferon-γ release assay after exposure to tuberculosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Time interval to conversion of interferon-γ release assay after exposure to tuberculosis
S.W. Lee, D.K. Oh, S.H. Lee, H.Y. Kang, C-T. Lee, J-J. Yim
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2011, 37 (6) 1447-1452; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00089510

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Time interval to conversion of interferon-γ release assay after exposure to tuberculosis
S.W. Lee, D.K. Oh, S.H. Lee, H.Y. Kang, C-T. Lee, J-J. Yim
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2011, 37 (6) 1447-1452; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00089510
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Article

  • Lung volumes and survival in chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • Prediction of new-onset asthma and nasal allergy
  • Mortality and causes of death in HIV/tuberculosis patients
Show more Original Article

Tuberculosis

  • Gene expression signatures identify distinct TB endotypes
  • Biomarkers to identify M. tuberculosis infection among borderline QFT results
  • CD4 T-cell scoring discriminates TB infection from disease
Show more Tuberculosis

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society