Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Ageing and COPD affect different domains of nutritional status: the ECCE study

S. Battaglia, M. Spatafora, G. Paglino, C. Pedone, A. Corsonello, N. Scichilone, R. Antonelli-Incalzi, V. Bellia
European Respiratory Journal 2011 37: 1340-1345; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00032310
S. Battaglia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: s.battaglia@unipa.it
M. Spatafora
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Paglino
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Pedone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Corsonello
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Scichilone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Antonelli-Incalzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Bellia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and ageing may contribute to malnutrition. We aimed to explore whether COPD and ageing determine malnutrition in different manners.

460 stable COPD outpatients (376 males and 84 females) from the Extrapulmonary Consequences of COPD in the Elderly (ECCE) study database were investigated (age 75.0±5.9 yrs; forced expiratory volume in 1 s 54.7±18.3% predicted). Nutritional status was evaluated using the Mini Nutritional Assessment® (MNA) questionnaire. From the MNA, three scores exploring the domains of the nutritional status were calculated: body composition, energy intake and body functionality scores.

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages were negatively correlated with five MNA items exploring mobility, patient’s perception of own nutrition and health status, and arm and calf circumferences (lowest Spearman’s rho (rs) = -0.011; highest p = 0.039). GOLD stages were independently correlated with body composition and body functionality scores (model r2 = 0.073). Age was negatively correlated with four MNA items exploring loss of appetite, fluid intake, mobility and autonomy in daily life (lowest rs = -0.013; highest p = 0.030). Age was independently correlated with body functionality score (model r2 = 0.037).

Severe COPD and ageing are independent and probably concurrent conditions leading to malnutrition. The MNA questionnaire allows a valuable insight into the complexity of components of nutritional status and may provide useful clues for treatment strategies.

  • Ageing
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • geriatric medicine
  • malnutrition

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common condition characterised by a poorly reversible limitation in airflow resulting from inflammation and remodelling of the airways [1], and many systemic effects have been recognised [2]. Amongst these, malnutrition is very common and its prevalence increases along with the severity of the disease [3, 4]. Malnutrition has been recognised as a risk factor for mortality [5]. The relationship between malnutrition and mortality has been also confirmed in elderly COPD patients [6].

Regardless of disease status, the prevalence of malnutrition increases with age [7]; consistent with this concept, subjects aged ≥80 yrs have a five times higher prevalence of malnutrition than subjects aged <50 yrs [8]. Thus, it is conceivable that COPD and ageing may contribute, in at least an additional manner, to malnutrition.

Nutritional status is the result of the interaction of food intake, absorption and utilisation of nutrients, and it is possible to define it through three variables: body composition, energy intake and body functionality [9]. Malnutrition is an overall term including: undernutrition, overnutrition, specific nutrient deficiencies and imbalance because of disproportionate intake [9]. However, in the elderly, it often refers to undernutrition [9] and it is used in this sense in the present study.

In the assessment of nutritional status, the World Health Organization (WHO) has adopted the body mass index (BMI) as the reference method to classify adults as: underweight (BMI <18.5 kg·m−2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg·m−2), overweight (25–29.9 kg·m−2) or obese (≥30 kg·m−2) [10]. However, it has been demonstrated that BMI is inadequate to assess malnutrition in COPD [11, 12], where reduction in the fat-free mass, especially in patients with over-represented fat mass, may not be detected by the BMI alone. As a single variable may be inadequate to fully describe the nutritional status, questionnaires and composite indexes have been developed [9, 13, 14]. Among these diagnostic tools, the Mini Nutritional Assessment® (MNA) questionnaire has been designed and validated to provide a rapid assessment of malnutrition in elderly patients [15]. Moreover, the MNA identifies people at risk for malnutrition before severe changes in weight or albumin levels occur, and is predictive of mortality and hospital costs [15].

The characteristics and correlates of malnutrition in elderly COPD patients are still debated, and the role of ageing has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, we aimed at exploring whether COPD and ageing determine malnutrition in different manners. For this purpose, we investigated the characteristics of nutritional status by BMI and MNA questionnaire, and assessed its correlates in elderly COPD patients.

METHODS

Design overview

We analysed data from the Extrapulmonary Consequences of COPD in the Elderly (ECCE) study, a multicentre population-based observational study of Caucasian stable COPD outpatients aged ≥65 yrs [16]. Protocol details are reported elsewhere [16].

Patients

Participants were recruited from among those attending the pulmonary medicine outpatient clinics of 15 participating Italian centres (a full list of the participating centres can be found in the Aknowledgements). Among the 516 screened patients, 56 were excluded from the analysis because of age <65 yrs (n = 20), unconfirmed diagnosis (n = 27), low-quality spirometry (n = 5) and incomplete data on the MNA (n = 4). The final sample was composed of 460 patients (376 males and 84 females).

The diagnosis and staging of COPD was made according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines [1, 17]. To be included in the study, patients had to be in a stable condition and not have reported acute symptoms or therapy modifications in the 30 days before enrolment. People with a diagnosis of cancer were excluded, regardless of disease activity.

Nutritional assessment

The nutritional status was evaluated by BMI and the MNA questionnaire (online supplementary material) [15, 18]. The MNA questionnaire explores the three domains of the nutritional status: body composition, energy intake and body functionality [9]. It consists of 18 items: four explore the body composition (BMI, arm and calf circumferences, and weight loss in the previous 3 months), six explore the energy intake (number of total, proteic and vegetable- and fruit-based daily meals, reduction of appetite, hydration, and feeding autonomy) and eight explore the body functionality (number of drugs, acute events, autonomy in daily life and in transfers, pressure ulcers, cognitive status, patient’s perception of his/her own nutritional status and own health status compared to the other elderly persons) [9]. A score for each of the three nutritional domains was calculated.

The MNA questionnaire was completed according to the developers’ instructions (www.mna-elderly.com). MNA is divided into a two-step procedure: the screening step and the global assessment step. According to the total score achieved (screening plus global), patients are classified as “malnourished”, “at risk of malnutrition” or “well nourished”. According to the conventional procedure, the “global assessment step” of the MNA should only be performed in patients not reaching the screening threshold. However, we also extended the global assessment step to patients with a score over the screening threshold. This extension was decided as an amendment to the original protocol after the study was started. As a result, the calculation of the scores for each of the three nutritional domains (body composition, energy intake and body functionality) was only obtained in 286 patients. 288 patients had a score over the screening threshold. Amongst these, 114 completed the “global assessment step” of the MNA and 174 did not; these two groups did not differ for age, BMI, Medical Research Council dyspnoea score, oxyhaemoglobin saturation, distance walked in the 6-min walking test, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical software package, version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In descriptive analyses, data are presented as mean±sd or median (range) depending on their distribution, whereas when groups were compared, data are presented as mean±sem. Differences between groups were evaluated by one-way ANOVA with appropriate post hoc analysis. Correlations were assessed using Pearson’s coefficient (r) or Spearman’s rho (rs).

Multiple ordinal regression models were performed including GOLD stages as dependent variable and as independent variables: 1) the 18 items of the MNA questionnaire; or 2) the three MNA domains. The models were corrected for age. The same approach was adopted with linear regression models, with age as dependent variable. These models were corrected for GOLD stages. Probability values of p<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Anthropometric and functional characteristic of the sample are summarised in table 1. The mean±sd age of enrolled patients was 75.0±5.9 yrs and the mean FEV1 was 54.7±18.3% pred. Distribution of the sample by stage was as follows: 41 (8.9%) patients in stage I, 202 (43.9%) in stage II, 133 (28.9%) stage III and 61 (13.3%) stage IV; GOLD stage was undetermined in 23 (5%) patients, due to lack of acceptable spirometry.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1– Anthropometric and functional characteristic of the whole sample

Description of the nutritional status

The mean±sd BMI was 27.1±5.3 (range 14.4–51.4) kg·m−2. The distribution of patients according to the BMI-based WHO classification of nutritional status [10] was as follows: 14 (3.0%) patients were underweight (BMI <18.5 kg·m−2), 157 (34.1%) patients had normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg·m−2), 168 (36.5%) patients were overweight (25–29.9 kg·m−2) and 121 (26.3%) patients were obese (≥30 kg·m−2).

When patients were categorised according to the MNA score, 288 (62.6%) patients passed the screening step of the MNA questionnaire and were immediately classified as “well nourished”. After completion of the test, 31 (6.7%) additional patients were classified as “well nourished”, bringing the total number of “well nourished” patients to 319 (69.3%); 124 (27.0%) patients were classified as “at risk of malnutrition” and 17 (3.7%) patients were classified as “malnourished”.

Although the BMI decreases along with MNA groups (well nourished: n = 319, mean±sd BMI 28.3±4.8 kg·m−2; at risk of malnutrition: n = 124, BMI 24.9±5.2 kg·m−2; malnourished: n = 17, BMI 20.5±4.0 kg·m−2; ANOVA p<0.001), there were 75 (47.7%) normal, 35 (20.8%) overweight and 17 (14%) obese subjects classified as malnourished or at risk of malnutrition according to the MNA. These data are displayed in table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2– Cross-table of body mass index (BMI) versus Mini Nutritional Assessment® groups

Mean age did not differ between GOLD stages (table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3– Differences of body mass index (BMI) and Mini Nutritional Assessment® (MNA) total score by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage

Nutritional characteristics of COPD

BMI was higher in GOLD stages I and II compared with stages III and IV (ANOVA p<0.001), and the MNA total score was higher (i.e. better) in GOLD stage I compared with the other three stages (ANOVA p = 0.020) (table 3).

When the 18 items of the MNA questionnaire were separately analysed, five of them qualified as negative correlates of GOLD stages, as follows. Question C: Mobility (rs = -0.11; p = 0.017); question O: Self view of nutritional status (rs = -0.13; p = 0.039); question P: In comparison with other people of the same age, how does the patient consider his/her health status? (rs = −0.20; p = 0.001); question Q: Mid-arm circumference (rs = -0.20; p = 0.001); question R: Calf circumference (rs = -0.23; p<0.001) (online supplementary material). Multiple ordinal regression analysis demonstrated that only questions R and P of the MNA questionnaire were independently correlated with GOLD stage (model r2 = 0.136; β = -0.379 and β = -1.058; p = 0.036 and p = 0.004, respectively).

We analysed the three domains of the MNA questionnaire in 286 patients. The 114 patients with a score over the screening threshold who completed the “global assessment step” of the MNA were representative of the whole sample of 288 patients with a score over the screening threshold, as described in the Methods section. While the energy intake score was the same in different GOLD stages, the body composition score was lower (i.e. worse) in GOLD stage IV and the body functionality score was lower (i.e. worse) in GOLD stages III and IV (table 4). Multiple ordinal regression analysis confirmed that body composition and body functionality scores were independently correlated with GOLD stages (table 5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4– Differences in body composition, energy intake and body functionality scores between Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5– Multiple ordinal regression analysis

Nutritional characteristics of ageing

Age did not differ among BMI groups based on WHO classification (ANOVA p = 0.063).

The age of malnourished patients was significantly higher (mean±sem age 78.0±1.6 yrs) compared with the other two groups (at risk 75.6±0.5 and well nourished 74.6±0.3 yrs; ANOVA p<0.031).

When the 18 items of the MNA questionnaire were separately analysed, four of them qualified as negative correlates of age, as follows. Question A: Has food intake declined over the past 3 months due to loss of appetite, digestive problems, chewing or swallowing difficulties? (rs = −0.17; p<0.001); question C: Mobility (rs = -0.24; p<0.001); question G: Lives independently (rs = -0.27; p<0.001); question M: How much fluid…is consumed per day? (rs = −0.13; p = 0.03) (online supplementary material). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that only questions C and G of the MNA questionnaire were independently correlated with age (model r2 = 0.108; β = -0.198 and β = -0.172; p = 0.004 and p = 0.013, respectively).

Energy intake and body functionality scores were significantly and negatively correlated with age (r = -0.16 (p = 0.008) and r = -0.15 (p = 0.009), respectively), whereas body composition was not. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that only body functionality was independently correlated with age (table 6).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 6– Multiple regression analysis

Finally, body composition, energy intake and body functionality scores did not differ between sexes (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The main finding of this study is that COPD severity and ageing are significantly, although weakly, correlated with different aspects of the nutritional status: disease severity correlated with body composition and body functionality, whereas ageing did so mainly with decreased body functionality. While BMI remains a primary index of malnutrition and disease severity, the MNA questionnaire allows a valuable insight into complexity of components of nutritional status and may provide useful clues for treatment strategies. In fact, our results suggest that prevention and treatment of body functionality deterioration might be the main objective of nutritional interventions, whatever their effects on body composition.

Our findings confirm and extend previous observations by other authors. First, it has been demonstrated that the prevalence of underweight increases with severity of COPD [12] and that fat-free mass decreases in advanced GOLD stages [19]. Furthermore, both gold standard and surrogate parameters of body composition, such as low fat-free mass [4], mid-thigh muscle cross-sectional area [11] and mid-arm muscle area [20], are better predictors of mortality than BMI. Secondly, our study demonstrates that energy intake is not correlated with disease severity. This is consistent with data from a systematic review, which indicated that nutritional support has no significant effect on anthropometric measures, lung function or exercise capacity in patients with stable COPD [21]. Furthermore, recent data [22] demonstrated that moderate-to-severe COPD patients report an adequate intake of main foods and macro- and micronutrients. However, other authors found that dietary counselling and higher caloric intake resulted in weight gain and improvement in outcome in COPD outpatients at risk of malnutrition [23].

Body composition score did not correlate with age. However, the sample of the present study only included patients aged ≥65 yrs. This narrowed range may explain this lack of expected correlation. Indeed, muscle mass loss is a progressive component of ageing, exacerbated by limited physical activity and not linked to age-associated diseases [24]. Bioelectrical impedance analysis demonstrates a clear trend toward a reduction of lean mass with age [25]. In addition, a longitudinal study confirmed a significant decrease in fat-free mass and body water in both sexes from age 75 to 80 yrs, even in the absence of significant body weight changes [26].

Data in the literature about “body functionality” in COPD patients are sparse. The most considered body functionality indices are autonomy in activities of daily life, and the number and type of current pathologies that may influence malnutrition [9]. The present study demonstrated that this component of the nutritional status was correlated with both disease severity and aging. Data on elderly COPD showed that the following factors were more frequent among the malnourished patients compared with those identified as at risk for malnutrition: living alone, not living in one’s own home, requiring daily community service and meals-on-wheels [27]. This is consistent with our observation of negative correlation between age and question G (Lives independently) of the MNA.

A potential weakness of the present study could be the age range (65–92 yrs), which precludes comparisons with younger patients. The present study was designed to focus on elderly patients with COPD. This represents a homogeneous setting, with patients sharing similar characteristics, and probably allows performance of observations and analysis targeted to this population, also taking into account the fact that a reasonably wide age range, including almost three decades (65–92 yrs), was studied. While it must be recognised that a comparison with younger subjects may have added valuable information, it must be underlined that COPD at a younger age is relatively uncommon or at earlier stage, and so it would have been hard to enrol significant numbers of much younger patients with similar clinical phenotypes.

The choice of any assessment instrument (including MNA) could be questionable, because many variables and, consequently, tools may be used to assess malnutrition. It has to be taken into account that no single measurement has emerged as gold standard in defining malnutrition in the elderly [9, 14]. However, the use of the MNA questionnaire seems a suitable choice because it explores all three determinants of the nutritional status [9], and the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition endorsed it as a recommended screening tool in the elderly [14]. Another potential limitation of the study concerns the submission of the full MNA questionnaire to all patients, regardless of screening score. It should be considered that originally, the MNA was developed in its full version (18 items) and only subsequently the short form (that is the screening; six items) was developed [18]. The authors who developed the MNA pointed out that the MNA short form can be used with confidence; however, administering the full MNA might be more efficient in some settings [18]. The screening is only a way to save time in some clinical situations, while the full MNA is appropriate in all kinds of elderly patients. In addition, the statistical analysis shows the absence of difference between subjects who did or did not complete the full MNA (see Methods section).

MNA was originally designed as a composite tool in which various domains contribute to the final score [18]. As such, the individual validity of each domain may be questioned. However, previous studies on malnutrition in the elderly have shown that lower dietary score distinguishes between malnourished and at-risk populations better than body composition and body function domains of the MNA [28].

Several mechanisms may explain the finding that ageing and COPD determine malnutrition by acting on different aspects of the nutritional status. In COPD patients, both physical inactivity due to exercise intolerance [29] and systemic inflammation [3] may explain the prevalent loss of fat-free mass. In addition, the expansion of extracellular and intracellular water volumes, driven by hypoxaemia, may explain why malnutrition may occur despite normal weight [30]. However, in elderly subjects, weight loss and malnutrition are highly prevalent and variously depend upon physical, social and medical factors [7]. The observed negative correlation between ageing and energy intake might be due to nutritional (e.g. loss of taste, poor dentition, dysphagia, poor chewing and swallowing ability, poor appetite or food aversion) and social (e.g. living or eating alone or poverty) problems, and to decreased energy and inability to self feed. Furthermore, many age-related medical factors (comorbidity, polypharmacy, infections, fractures, dementia and physical disability) can contribute to a link between ageing and body functionality, as found in this study. Body functionality includes several variables that can be causes or effects of malnutrition at the same time. Nevertheless, as stated by Chen et al. [31] “malnutrition in the elderly is a multidimensional concept encompassing physical and psychosocial elements. It is precipitated by loss, dependency, loneliness and chronic illness”. With this perspective, the management of malnutrition in the elderly COPD can not only include “nutrients”. Consistent with this and taking together the present results on correlations between GOLD stage, and age, Mobility (item C) and Subjective perception of health status (item P) appear susceptible to specific intervention, such as rehabilitation or treatment of depression. As a result, a pure nutritional intervention is highly unlikely to improve nutritional status and physical performance in COPD [32], while only an integrated multidimensional intervention centered on rehabilitation is likely to succeed. The favourable findings in both very old and frail patients [33] and in selected COPD populations [34, 35] support this conclusion. Within this setting, particular attention is warranted by depression as a factor susceptible of intervention: in fact, an association between malnutrition, as assessed by MNA, and depressive symptoms has been demonstrated [36].

In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that severe COPD and ageing are independent and probably concurrent conditions leading to malnutrition. COPD influences aspects related to body composition, whereas both COPD and ageing contribute to poor body functionality. The present findings should be considered preliminary, due to the cross-sectional design and the small size of the correlation coefficients. Nevertheless, they probably contribute to our understanding of the complex relationship between COPD severity, ageing and nutritional status.

Acknowledgments

The ECCE participating centres and study investigators are as follows. Dipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy (chief: V. Bellia; investigators: S. Battaglia, G. Paglino, R. Catania, M. Spatafora, N. Scichilone); Università Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy (chief: R. Antonelli Incalzi; investigators: S. Scarlata, E. Conte); Università Cattolica, Rome (chief: R. Pistelli; M. Andreani, F. Baldari); Medicina Respiratoria, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy (chief: V. Grassi; investigators: C. Tantucci, S. Ghibelli, S. Casella); Università degli Studi Federico II, Naples, Italy (chief: F. Rengo; investigators: C. Visconti); Azienda ULSS13, Mirano, Italy (chief: A. Cester; investigators: E. Vitale); Policlinico Ospedale D'Avanzo, Foggia, Italy (chief: M.P. Foschino; investigators: I. Ventura, M.G. Cagnazzo); Università S.Cuore-CEMI, Rome (chief: R. Bernabei; investigators: F. Cerullo, C. Palmacci); Pio Albergo Trivulzio, Milano (chief: P. Berardinelli; investigators: E. Carotenuto); Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy (chief: O. Resta; investigators: G. Di Gioia, C. Scoditti); Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy (chief: L. Casali; investigators: C. Gradoli); Fondazione San Raffaele, Cittadella della Carità, Taranto, Italy (chief: G. Guadalupi); Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy (chief: G. Masotti; investigators: M. Di Bari); INRCA Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Cosenza, Italy (chief: B. Mazzei; investigators: C. Zottola); Ospedale San Giuseppe Moscati, Taranto (chief: A. Giusti; investigators: C. Spada).

Footnotes

  • This article has supplementary material available from www.erj.ersjournals.com

  • Statement of Interest

    None declared.

  • Received March 1, 2010.
  • Accepted October 4, 2010.
  • ©ERS 2011

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Rabe KF,
    2. Hurd S,
    3. Anzueto A,
    4. et al
    . Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 176: 532–555.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Agusti AG,
    2. Noguera A,
    3. Sauleda J,
    4. et al
    . Systemic effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2003; 21: 347–360.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. King DA,
    2. Cordova F,
    3. Scharf SM
    . Nutritional aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5: 519–523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Schols AM,
    2. Broekhuizen R,
    3. Weling-Scheepers CA,
    4. et al
    . Body composition and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82: 53–59.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Landbo C,
    2. Prescott E,
    3. Lange P,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic value of nutritional status in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 1856–1861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Ranieri P,
    2. Bianchetti A,
    3. Margiotta A,
    4. et al
    . Predictors of 6-month mortality in elderly patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease discharged from a medical ward after acute nonacidotic exacerbation. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56: 909–913.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Hickson M
    . Malnutrition and ageing. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82: 2–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Pirlich M,
    2. Schutz T,
    3. Kemps M,
    4. et al
    . Social risk factors for hospital malnutrition. Nutrition 2005; 21: 295–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Donini LM,
    2. Savina C,
    3. Rosano A,
    4. et al
    . Systematic review of nutritional status evaluation and screening tools in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 2007; 11: 421–432.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    World Health Organization. Physical Status: the Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report; Series 854. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1995. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_854.pdf.
  11. ↵
    1. Marquis K,
    2. Debigare R,
    3. Lacasse Y,
    4. et al
    . Midthigh muscle cross-sectional area is a better predictor of mortality than body mass index in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 809–813.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Vestbo J,
    2. Prescott E,
    3. Almdal T,
    4. et al
    . Body mass, fat-free body mass, and prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from a random population sample: findings from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 79–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Bouillanne O,
    2. Morineau G,
    3. Dupont C,
    4. et al
    . Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82: 777–783.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Kondrup J,
    2. Allison SP,
    3. Elia M,
    4. et al
    . ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 2003; 22: 415–421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Vellas B,
    2. Guigoz Y,
    3. Garry PJ,
    4. et al
    . The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition 1999; 15: 116–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Antonelli Incalzi R,
    2. Corsonello A,
    3. Pedone C,
    4. et al
    . Chronic renal failure: a neglected comorbidity of COPD. Chest 2010; 137: 831–837.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Celli BR,
    2. MacNee W,
    3. Agusti A
    . Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper. Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 932–946.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Guigoz Y
    . The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) review of the literature – what does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging 2006; 10: 466–485.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Ischaki E,
    2. Papatheodorou G,
    3. Gaki E,
    4. et al
    . Body mass and fat-free mass indices in COPD: relation with variables expressing disease severity. Chest 2007; 132: 164–169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Soler-Cataluna JJ,
    2. Sanchez-Sanchez L,
    3. Martinez-Garcia MA,
    4. et al
    . Mid-arm muscle area is a better predictor of mortality than body mass index in COPD. Chest 2005; 128: 2108–2115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Ferreira IM,
    2. Brooks D,
    3. Lacasse Y,
    4. et al
    . Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 2: CD000998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. de Batlle J,
    2. Romieu I,
    3. Anto JM,
    4. et al
    . Dietary habits of firstly admitted Spanish COPD patients. Respir Med 2009; 103: 1904–1910.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Weekes CE,
    2. Emery PW,
    3. Elia M
    . Dietary counselling and food fortification in stable COPD: a randomised trial. Thorax 2009; 64: 326–331.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Roubenoff R
    . Sarcopenia and its implications for the elderly. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: Suppl. 3, S40–S47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Buffa R,
    2. Floris G,
    3. Marini E
    . Migration of the bioelectrical impedance vector in healthy elderly subjects. Nutrition 2003; 19: 917–921.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Dey DK,
    2. Bosaeus I,
    3. Lissner L,
    4. et al
    . Changes in body composition and its relation to muscle strength in 75-year-old males and females: a 5-year prospective follow-up study of the NORA cohort in Goteborg, Sweden. Nutrition 2009; 25: 613–619.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Odencrants S,
    2. Ehnfors M,
    3. Ehrenberg A
    . Nutritional status and patient characteristics for hospitalised older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 1771–1778.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Feldblum I,
    2. German L,
    3. Castel H,
    4. et al
    . Characteristics of undernourished older medical patients and the identification of predictors for undernutrition status. Nutr J 2007; 6: 37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Wagner PD
    . Skeletal muscles in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: deconditioning, or myopathy? Respirology 2006; 11: 681–686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Faisy C,
    2. Rabbat A,
    3. Kouchakji B,
    4. et al
    . Bioelectrical impedance analysis in estimating nutritional status and outcome of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 518–525.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Chen CC,
    2. Schilling LS,
    3. Lyder CH
    . A concept analysis of malnutrition in the elderly. J Adv Nurs 2001; 36: 131–142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Ferreira IM,
    2. Brooks D,
    3. Lacasse Y,
    4. et al
    . Nutritional support for individuals with COPD: a meta-analysis. Chest 2000; 117: 672–678.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Fiatarone MA,
    2. O'Neill EF,
    3. Ryan ND,
    4. et al
    . Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1769–1775.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Slinde F,
    2. Gronberg AM,
    3. Engstrom CR,
    4. et al
    . Individual dietary intervention in patients with COPD during multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Respir Med 2002; 96: 330–336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Steiner MC,
    2. Barton RL,
    3. Singh SJ,
    4. et al
    . Nutritional enhancement of exercise performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2003; 58: 745–751.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Smoliner C,
    2. Norman K,
    3. Wagner KH,
    4. et al
    . Malnutrition and depression in the institutionalised elderly. Br J Nutr 2009; 102: 1663–1667.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 37 Issue 6 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 37 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ageing and COPD affect different domains of nutritional status: the ECCE study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Ageing and COPD affect different domains of nutritional status: the ECCE study
S. Battaglia, M. Spatafora, G. Paglino, C. Pedone, A. Corsonello, N. Scichilone, R. Antonelli-Incalzi, V. Bellia
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2011, 37 (6) 1340-1345; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00032310

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Ageing and COPD affect different domains of nutritional status: the ECCE study
S. Battaglia, M. Spatafora, G. Paglino, C. Pedone, A. Corsonello, N. Scichilone, R. Antonelli-Incalzi, V. Bellia
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2011, 37 (6) 1340-1345; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00032310
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • COPD and smoking
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung volumes and survival in chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • Spirometer controlled cine-MRI and TBM in paediatric patients
  • Prior CV disease and mortality COPD pneumonia patients
Show more Original article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society