Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and metalworking fluids contaminated by mycobacteria

I. Tillie-Leblond, F. Grenouillet, G. Reboux, S. Roussel, B. Chouraki, C. Lorthois, J-C. Dalphin, B. Wallaert, L. Millon
European Respiratory Journal 2011 37: 640-647; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00195009
I. Tillie-Leblond
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: I-Tillie@chru-lille.fr
F. Grenouillet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Reboux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Roussel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Chouraki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Lorthois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J-C. Dalphin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Wallaert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Millon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Metalworking fluids (MWF) are responsible for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). The aim of the present study was to identify the antigen (Ag) responsible for MWF-associated HP, and to optimise serological diagnosis by definition of a threshold allowing discrimination between HP patients and asymptomatic exposed workers.

13 patients, who were workers at a car engine manufacturing plant, were suspected of MWF-associated HP. Microbial analysis of 83 used MWFs was carried out. Sera from 13 MWF-associated HP patients, 12 asymptomatic exposed workers and 18 healthy unexposed controls were tested to determine their immunological responses to three Ags, including Mycobacterium immunogenum.

M. immunogenum was identified in 40% of used fluids by culture and confirmed by DNA sequencing. The threshold for differentiating MWF-associated HP patients from asymptomatic exposed workers was five arcs of precipitation (sensitivity 77% and specificity 92%), as determined by electrosyneresis (ES). Using ELISA methods with protein extract from M. immunogenum, a threshold leading to 92% sensitivity and 100% specificity was established.

The detection of specific antibodies against M. immunogenum Ag at high levels in case sera suggests that M. immunogenum-contaminated MWF is responsible for MWF-associated HP. To discriminate MWF-associated HP patients from asymptomatic exposed workers, we suggest a five-arc threshold for ES and a 1.6-AU threshold for ELISA methods.

  • Electrosyneresis
  • ELISA
  • hypersensitivity pneumonitis
  • metalworking fluid
  • Mycobacterium immunogenum
  • precipitins

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), or extrinsic allergic alveolitis, is caused by a wide range of antigens (Ags), including bacteria. Variability in its clinical presentation and the similarity of HP to other respiratory diseases can lead to under-diagnosis. Exposure to a relevant Ag is the most important predictor of HP 1. Identification of the aetiological agent, and definition of a serological threshold for HP patients, asymptomatic exposed workers and healthy unexposed individuals are essential for the immunological diagnosis of HP. Exposure to metalworking fluids (MWF) is described in the literature as being responsible for HP. In the USA, 1.2 million persons have been exposed to MWF. More than 100 cases of MWF-associated HP have been described in North America 2, 3. Rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) were considered to be the most likely aetiological agent of MWF-associated HP 4. The French automobile industry has become concerned about the emergence of pathologies related to exposure to MWF.

13 workers from a car engine manufacturing plant in Lille, France, were referred to the local University Hospital as consecutive patients between 2004 and 2007. They suffered from respiratory symptoms consistent with HP and, after other causes had been ruled out, MWF-associated HP was suspected. The aim of the study was to identify the main Ag that may be involved with MWF-associated HP and to define a threshold to discriminate HP patients from asymptomatic exposed workers and healthy unexposed individuals. The following strategy was used: 1) cases of MWF-associated HP were confirmed by assessment of clinical, functional, radiological and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) data; 2) microbiological analysis of the MWF from the plant was performed; 3) Ag extracts from the most frequently isolated microorganisms (Mycobacterium immunogenum, Bacillus simplex and Fusarium solani) were performed; 4) the immunological response of the patients, asymptomatic controls and unexposed healthy controls to these antigens was assessed using electrosyneresis (ES) and ELISA methods; 5) a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method was used to define a threshold between groups.

METHODS

Subjects

This study compared exposure and immunological response for MWF-associated HP cases (n = 13), asymptomatic exposed controls (n = 12) and unexposed healthy controls (n = 18). Informed written consent was obtained from all subjects. The protocol was approved by the local review board for research involving human subjects.

Case subjects were diagnosed with MWF-associated HP in our department (Dept of Pneumonology, University of Lille, Lille, France) according to clinical, biological and radiological criteria 1, 5, 6 (medical investigations are given in the Results section).

Asymptomatic exposed controls were volunteers exposed to MWF at the same plant, in the same workshop and performing the same task as the MWH-associated HP cases. They were selected and examined by the occupational medical doctor when they were included in the study and again 1 yr later.

The 18 unexposed healthy controls were volunteers recruited by health insurance company employees, living in urban areas (towns of ≥5,000 residents). They were examined by the occupational medical doctor on an annual visit and gave responses to a medical questionnaire. The two control groups were similar to the MWF-associated HP patients group with respect to age (±5 yrs) and sex, and all were nonsmokers.

Microbiological analyses

Eight series of microbiological analyses were performed (one per month) between November 2006 and July 2007 on MWF from the machine shops where the 13 MWF-associated HP patients had been working (there were >50 workers per shop).

Sampling

Samples of 50 mL were taken from each vat of used MWF (n = 83), new MWF (n = 4), industrial water (n = 2), osmosed water (n = 5), ultrafiltered water (n = 2) and additives (n = 1) included in the preparation of MWF.

Microbiological techniques

MWF and other samples were analysed for bacteria, RGM, actinomycetes and fungi on three different solid media: Actinomycetes Difco™ (Becton Dickinson®, Cockeysville, MD, USA), Mueller–Hinton (Becton Dickinson®) and Sabouraud chloramphenicol agar (Bio-Rad®, Marnes la Coquette, France). Petri dishes plated with 0.1 mL of one of the samples were incubated at 30°C for 3 weeks. Colonies of bacteria and fungi were identified and numerated. The limit of detection was 10 colony-forming units (CFU)·mL−1.

Screening for M. immunogenum was performed by PCR–restriction analysis of heat shock protein (hsp) genes, using a combination of patterns obtained after digestion with three different enzymes, as described previously (HhaI, HinfI and MspI) 4, and compared to five reference RGM strains, including M. immunogenum.

Identification of suspected M. immunogenum isolates was confirmed by PCR amplification followed by sequencing of hsp and RNA polymerase (rpo) genes, using previously described PCR methods 7, 8.

Mycobacteria were identified by using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) searches of their sequences compared with sequences in the GenBank database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). Identification of species was determined by a similarity of both hsp and rpo genes >97% 9.

Immunological methods

Strains, culture and Ag production

One strain of M. immunogenum, isolated during the first survey of MWF samples from the car engine manufacturing plant, was cultured on Mueller–Hinton plates at 30°C for 1 week to obtain a microbial mass. The structures of M. immunogenum were recovered by scraping and filtration. Two M. immunogenum Ag extracts were produced: a total aqueous lyophilised extract (somatic Ag) used for ES on cellulose acetate 10, 11 and a protein extract used for ELISA tests 12.

Somatic Ag extracts from M. immunogenum, F. solani and B. simplex were produced as follows: strains were cultured on Mueller–Hinton (for M. immunogenum and B. simplex) or Dichloran-glycerol 18 agar (Oxoid; Unipath, Basingstoke, UK) with 0.5% chloramphenicol (Merck®, Darmstat, Germany) (for F. solani) culture media for 2 weeks, crushed with an ULTRA-TURRAX® (IKA Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany), sonicated, extracted overnight in NH4CO3 (6 g·L−1) at 4°C, centrifuged at 1,580×g (13,000 rpm), ultrafiltered with a Centricon 10 (Amicon Millipore®, Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France), lyophilised and resuspended to a concentration of 100 mg·mL−1 in sterile distilled water.

Protein extract from M. immunogenum was produced as follows: mycobacteria from 20 densely grown Mueller–Hinton plates were first suspended in 60 mL of 1 M tris-(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane (Tris)–HCl buffer, PH 7.5, supplemented with protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 1 mM phenanthroline and 1 μM pepstatin; Sigma–Aldrich®, St Louis, MO, USA). The mixture was lysed by grinding with an ULTRA-TURRAX® device then sonication using five cycles of alternate 1 min pulsing and 1 min chilling on ice. Cell fragments were eliminated by two subsequent centrifugations for 3 min at 1,580×g (10,000 rpm) at 4°C, recovering the supernatant after each spin. 100 μL 0.1% deoxycholic acid solution (Sigma–Aldrich®) was added per millilitre of supernatant and the preparation was incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Proteins were pelleted on ice for 15 min with 70 μL 0.6 M trichloroacetic acid (Sigma–Aldrich®) per millilitre of supernatant. Precipitated proteins were subsequently pelleted by centrifugation (4°C for 15 min at 30,000×g using a JA 20.1 rotor (Beckman Coulter®, Roissy, France). Protein extracts were purified with an SDS-PAGE Clean-Up Kit (Roche Diagnostics®, Basel, Switzerland) as recommended by the manufacturer. Protein concentrations of the purified extracts were determined using the DC Protein Assay (Bio-Rad®) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

ES on cellulose acetate

Samples of 15 μL of each serum were placed on three spots on the anode side and a 15-μL line of somatic antigen was placed on the cathode side 3.5 cm from the first deposit (fig. 1). The samples were washed and stained after 150 min of migration in a 90 mV current. The number of arcs was determined for each serum and results were analysed by ROC curve to determine a threshold between groups 10.

Figure 1–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1–

Electrosyneresis with Mycobacterium immunogenum antigen (Ag) against three sera from metalworking fluid-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis cases. Serum 1: case 8 (three arcs); serum 2: case 11 (seven arcs; from May 2007); serum 3: case 11 (seven arcs; from September 2007).

ELISA

As described previously 10, 12, 96-well plates (PolySorp Immunomodule; Nalge Nunc®, Rochester, NY, USA) were coated with 200 μL 1 μg·mL−1 protein Ag solution in 50 mM K2HPO4 buffer (Sigma–Aldrich®), pH 8.5, at 4°C for 48 h. Excess binding sites were blocked at 37°C for 1 h with 250 μL of 50 mM NaH2PO4 buffer (Sigma–Aldrich®) containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma–Aldrich®) and 60 g·L−1 sorbitol (Sigma–Aldrich®). 100-μL serum samples diluted 1:200 were added in triplicate to all wells. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 h under constant agitation. Plates were washed four times with washing buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5; 0.25% Tween). Next, 100 μL peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human immunoglobulin (Ig)G diluted 1:4,000 (Sigma–Aldrich®) were added to all wells and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The washing procedure was repeated once and 100 μL of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine solution (TMB One-Step Substrate System; RD Biotech®, Besançon, France) at room temperature were added to the wells for 10 min. To stop the colour reaction, 100 μL of an acid solution (0.5 N H2SO4) were added. Wells were read spectrophotometrically at 450 nm (Titertek Multiskan®, Huntsville, AL, USA) and the results were expressed in arbitrary units.

Statistical analysis

Concentrations of serum and Ags used were preliminarily determined by dilution assays. Sera were deposited on plates in triplicate and variation coefficients corresponding to standard deviation divided by mean of the triplicate were calculated. If a variation coefficient was >15%, the serum was tested again. This was done only for optical densities >0.050. A reference serum, which was a pool of two sera from nonexposed subjects, was deposited on each plate in triplicate. The ratio the mean of the triplicate for the tested serum to the mean of the triplicate for reference pool was used for analysis. This ratio was expressed in arbitrary units. ROC analysis was chosen to compare the diagnostic performance of immunological tests. The optimum cut-off level was determined with sensitivity and specificity tables provided by STATA Software Release 9 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). The value selected corresponded to the maximum sensitivity and specificity. The area under the ROC curve indicated the discriminating capacity of the Ags. A high value for the area under the curve (AUC) indicated good sensitivity and specificity. AUC <0.5 indicated that the test could not discriminate patients from exposed controls.

A bilateral, unpaired t-test was used to compare the ELISA and ES results (in arbitrary units and number of precipitin arcs, respectively) of patient and control groups. STATA Software Release 9 was also used for this test.

RESULTS

Subjects

MWF-associated HP was diagnosed in 13 male patients referred to the University Hospital of Lille between January 2004 and September 2007. Their mean age was 46.3 yrs (range 34–56 yrs). All had been chronically exposed to MWF, with a mean duration of exposure of 9 yrs (range 3–20 yrs). 12 patients were workers on a car engine assembly line coating metal parts with semisynthetic MWF; one patients had been intermittently exposed to MWF once or twice a day when supervising the car engine machine shops. All 13 MWF-associated HP patients showed significant improvement of clinical symptoms after stopping work for 1 month. Subjects with MWF-associated HP had clinical symptoms compatible with HP (crackles, cough and/or fever, loss of weight, and asthenia), low diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL,CO), and lymphocytosis on BAL (>20%). Radiographic imaging was performed (high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) lung scans) in order to assess nodules, ground-glass opacities, septal thickening, consolidation, honeycombing, traction bronchiectasis and bronchiolectasis, reticular pattern, pleural effusion, and adenopathy 1, 5, 6. HRCT was performed as soon as possible after working periods. In cases 2, 3, 4 and 5, HRCT was performed from 6–9 weeks after exposure. HRCT was normal in three cases (cases 2, 4 and 5). For these three patients, other criteria for HP diagnosis were present. Cases that had suggestive HRCT were classified as confirmed patients (n = 10) and those who did not were classified as probable patients (n = 3). DL,CO was measured and BAL carried out. Serological analysis of sera was performed routinely to look for Aspergillus fumigatus and Pseudomonas antibodies, by ES and ELISA. All were negative. Consequently serological research was extended to other Ags effectively present in MWF. The clinical characteristics of the MWF-HP patients are reported table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1– Characteristics of metalworking fluid-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis patients#

Exposed controls were all nonsmoking workers with no underlying respiratory disease. All were asymptomatic: they had no crackles, and lung function and DL,CO were normal (HRCT scan and BAL were not performed).

Unexposed controls were also all nonsmoking workers. They had no crackles at auscultation and gave negative responses to question about respiratory symptoms.

MWF microbiological results

M. immunogenum was identified in 33 used MWF samples from the car engine machine shops. No M. immunogenum was found in any samples of osmotically ultrafiltered or industrial water, or additives. All samples from new oil were sterile. Microbial contamination was found in 74 (89%) out of 83 samples of used MWF.

M. immunogenum was isolated from 33 (40%) out of 83 used MWF samples. Concentration of M. immunogenum varied from 2 to >4,000 CFU·mL−1 (mean 847 CFU·mL−1). Bacillus spp. (including B. simplex) were isolated from 35 (42%) out of 83 of samples. Gram-negative bacteria (excluding Pseudomonas spp.) were present in <12% of used MWF samples. Fungi were isolated in nine (11%) out of 83 samples of used MWF, mainly F. solani (three (4%) out of 83 samples) and Aspergillus spp. (five (6%) out of 83 samples; A. fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus). In one case, A. fumigatus was isolated with Curvularia lunata in the same sample

A polymorphic bacterial flora (including RGM in one case, i.e. Mycobacterium llatzerense) was found in samples of osmosed water, but no M. immunogenum was isolated from these or from the washing effluents. Microbiological results by culture method are presented in table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2– Isolation frequencies for the microorganisms in metalworking fluid (MWF), water and additive samples#

Precipitins and IgG against M. immunogenum, F. solani and B. simplex Ags

ES was performed to detect precipitin arcs against M. immunogenum, F. solani and B. simplex Ags, corresponding to microorganisms present in fluid samples (table 3). For M. immunogenum Ag, the number of precipitin arcs was significantly higher for MWF-associated HP patients than for the asymptomatic exposed controls (t-test p = 0.002). A five precipitin arcs threshold (superior or equal) gave AUC 0.853 (95% CI 0.68–1.00), 77% sensitivity and 92% specificity. For F. solani and B. simplex Ags, the number of precipitin arcs was not significantly higher for MWF-associated HP patients than for asymptomatic exposed controls (t-test p = 0.76 and p = 0.65, respectively). AUCs were 0.468 (95% CI 0.28–0.65) for F. solani Ag and 0.571 (95% CI 0.35–0.79) for B. simplex Ag. ROC curves are presented in figure 2.

Figure 2–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2–

Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing Mycobacterium immunogenum (––—), Fusarium solani (-----) and Bacillus simplex (– – –) in electrosyneresis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3– Number of precipitin arcs for three antigens (Ags) by electrosyneresis in metalworking fluid-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis patients and exposed controls

The mean±sd M. immunogenum-specific IgG, as measured by ELISA, was significantly higher in patients (2.6±1.2 AU) than in asymptomatic exposed controls (1.1±0.3 AU; t-test p<0.001) or unexposed controls (1±0.4 AU; t-test p<0.001). The difference between mean IgG for exposed and unexposed controls was not significant (t-test p = 0.29).

ES results are reported in table 3 and comparison of performances for three antigens by ROC curves were given in fig. 2. Performances for ES and ELISA using M. immunogenum Ags were reported in table 4 with two different comparisons: results for asymptomatic exposed controls were compared the first with results for all patients with MWF-associated HP (probable and confirmed patients; n = 13) and secondly with results for patients with abnormal HRCT scan (confirmed patients; n = 10). Determinate thresholds with ES and ELISA were equal for both comparisons. Performances of ELISA (sensitivity and specificity) were similar if we considered probable or confirmed patients. Sensibility and likelihood ratio of positive test for ES were slightly decreased when we considered only confirmed patients instead of all patients. AUCs were 0.853 (95% CI 0.681–1.000) for ES and 0.936 (95% CI 0.810–1.000) for ELISA in considering all patients, and were 0.833 (95% CI 0.615–0.955) for ES and 0.917 (95% CI 0.718–0.988) for ELISA when considering confirmed patients only (figs 3 and 4).

Figure 3–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3–

Receiver operating characteristic curves comparing electrosyneresis (––—) and ELISA (-----) results with Mycobacterium immunogenum antigen for all patients (n = 13) and exposed controls.

Figure 4–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4–

Receiver operating characteristic curves comparing electrosyneresis (––—) and ELISA (-----) results with Mycobacterium immunogenum antigen for confirmed patients (n = 10) and exposed controls.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4– Parameters for immunological tests using antigens of Mycobacterium immunogenum comparing total patients to exposed controls, and confirmed patients to exposed controls

DISCUSSION

Our study reports an outbreak of 13 cases of MWF-associated HP arising at a single automobile factory between 2004 and 2007. To our knowledge, this is the second such episode of grouped cases arising in an automobile factory in Europe. The study demonstrates that M. immunogenum was identified in MWF even though this species is weakly susceptible to common antiseptics. The detection of specific precipitins for M. immunogenum in sera enabled a strong link to be established between MWF-associated HP and M. immunogenum-contaminated MWF. A threshold to differentiate MWF-associated HP cases from asymptomatic exposed controls is suggested.

Working procedures to limit exposure to MWF are particularly developed in the USA 1, 13, where most MWF-associated HP cases have been described. Large volumes of MWF are used in manufacturing industries for cooling and lubrication of metal pieces and tools during machining, especially in the manufacture of automotive parts. Respiratory manifestations have been described, such as an increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness, asthma 14 and HP 2, 15–17. MWF may be toxic in various ways, for example by inhalation of toxic particles, endotoxins 18, 19 or a complex population of microbial flora 20. Bernstein et al. 15 reported HP associated with the use of semisynthetic MWF, called “machine operator’s lung”. Aerobic Gram-negative rods, such as P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter 13, fungi, and members of the Mycobacterium chelonae complex, including Mycobacterium abscessus, M. chelonae and M. immunogenum, have been identified in MWF 21–24. Mycobacteria and Pseudomonas may also be identified in MWF by real-time PCR assays 25. The role of microorganisms in the induction of manifestation of HP is commonly established by precipitins or specific immunoglobulin (IgG) response. Precipitins against Pseudomonas fluorescens were observed in serum from six workers from a plant in 1992 15. Dawkins et al. 26. described 12 cases (2003–2004) of MWF-associated HP who had precipitins against Acinetobacter and Ochrobactrum, but precipitins were also present in a similar proportion of exposed control workers without disease at the same plant. Many of MWF-associated HP cases were linked to MWF containing nontuberculous RGM 21, 24, 27–29. Wilson et al. 4 and Wallace et al. 24 showed that 95% of mycobacterial isolates recovered from industrial MWF in plants with cases of machinist HP belong to M. immunogenum. MWF containing M. immunogenum induced granulomatous lung lesions and peribronchiolar lymphocytosis consistent with HP in laboratory mice 30. The present study brings additional evidence for the role of M. immunogenum in HP related to MWF exposure in humans. Gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas, are often predominant organisms in MWF 31–33. In our study, predominant bacteria were M. immunogenum and Bacillus spp., whereas Gram-negative bacteria were present in <12% of used MWF.

Identification of pathogens in MWF and/or specific antibodies directed against the pathogen is essential for HP diagnosis. In the present work, we also suggested a threshold for M. immunogenum precipitins to differentiate MWF-associated HP cases from asymptomatic exposed individuals. The ELISA method seems to be the stronger test to differentiate MWF-associated HP cases from asymptomatic exposed individuals in this series of experiments. This difference may be related to the Ag extracts used, which were different in the ELISA and ES experiments (protein extract was used for ELISA). Previous studies have also suggested serological scores or thresholds to differentiate HP from exposed asymptomatic persons in farmer’s lung and bird breeder’s lung 34–36.

Without specific procedures for prevention of MWF-associated HP and identification of cases by occupational physicians, there is a risk that only severe forms of the disease will be diagnosed. At the time of writing, 12 clustered cases have been described in Europe, in the UK 26, and ∼100 cases in USA 2, 3. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) published a recommended exposure limit (REL) for MWF in 1998 to prevent respiratory disorders associated with industrial lubricants 37. The REL is 0.4 mg·m−3 37. Cohen et al. 37 recently suggested that manufacturing companies failed to control the level of exposure to <1 mg·m−3 and that protective equipment or medical surveillance programmes are insufficient. Gupta and Rosenman 38 point out that HP arose from environments with exposures well below the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit for MWF and, in one case, from exposures well below the NIOSH REL. We deduce that particular levels are insufficient to assess whether or not a risk of HP exists. In our opinion, microbiological surveys, especially with real-time PCR to assess presence or absence of M. immunogenum, are needed in order to evaluate HP risk in a plant.

Implementation of specific medical surveillance programmes is essential in manufacturing plants. Factors associated with reduced aerosol exposure included machining aluminium, milling, the height of the machine shop roof and the presence of mechanical machine shop ventilation 39.

Conclusion

The presence of large amounts of M. immunogenum in >40% of used MWF samples taken from several machine shops at the same manufacturing plant and the detection of specific precipitins against M. immunogenum Ag in sera suggest that M. immunogenum-contaminated MWF is responsible for MWF-associated HP. The threshold of five arcs by ES differentiates MWF-associated HP cases from asymtomatic exposed controls with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 92%. An ELISA method using protein Ag improves this discrimination (sensitivity 92% and specificity 100%). Clearly, any investigation of contamination of MWF in a manufacturing plant must include identification and quantification of RGM, with special focus on M. immunogenum. The introduction of a prevention programme of regular sampling and analysis the MWF, adequate protective action, and medical surveillance of exposed workers may prevent or minimise HP disease.

Future studies involving several plants with new cases of MWF-associated HP are needed to confirm that the thresholds are able to discriminate between patients and exposed controls.

Footnotes

  • Statement of Interest

    None declared.

  • Received December 10, 2009.
  • Accepted July 8, 2010.
  • ©ERS 2011

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Lacasse Y,
    2. Selman M,
    3. Costabel U,
    4. et al
    . Clinical diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168: 952–958.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    From the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention. Respiratory illness in workers exposed to metalworking fluid contaminated with nontuberculous mycobacteria: Ohio, 2001. JAMA 2002; 287: 3073–3074.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kreiss K,
    2. Cox-Gaenser J
    . Metalworking-fluid-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a workshop summary. Am J Ind Med 1997:423–432.
  4. ↵
    1. Wilson RW,
    2. Steingrube VA,
    3. Böttger EC,
    4. et al
    . Mycobacterium immunogenum sp. nov., a novel species related to Mycobacterium abscessus and associated with clinical disease, pseudo-outbreaks and contaminated metalworking fluids: an international cooperative study on mycobacterial taxonomy. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51: 1751–1764.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    1. Ismail T,
    2. McSharry C,
    3. Boyd G
    . Extrinsic allergic alveolitis. Respirology 2006; 11: 262–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Bourke SJ,
    2. Dalphin JC,
    3. Boyd G,
    4. et al
    . Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: current concepts. Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl.32, 81s–92s.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Lee H,
    2. Park HJ,
    3. Cho SN,
    4. et al
    . Species identification of mycobacteria by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphismm of the rpoB gene. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 2966–2971.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Telenti A,
    2. Marchesi F,
    3. Balz M,
    4. et al
    . Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 175–178.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Adékambi T,
    2. Colson P,
    3. Drancourt M
    . rpoB-based identification of nonpigmented and late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 5699–5708.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Reboux G,
    2. Piarroux R,
    3. Roussel S,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of four serological techniques in the immunological diagnosis of farmers' lung disease. J Med Microbiol 2007; 56: 1317–1321.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Reboux G,
    2. Piarroux R,
    3. Mauny F,
    4. et al
    . Role of molds in farmer’s lung disease in Eastern France. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163: 1534–1539.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Roussel S,
    2. Reboux G,
    3. Rognon B,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of three antigenic extracts of Eurotium amstelodami in serological diagnosis of farmer's lung disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2010; 17: 160–167.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Gauthier SL
    . Metalworking fluids: oil mist and beyond. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2003; 18: 818–824.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kennedy SM,
    2. Chan-Yeung M,
    3. Teschke K,
    4. et al
    . Change in airway responsiveness among apprentices exposed to metalworking fluids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 87–93.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Bernstein DI,
    2. Lummus ZL,
    3. Santilli G,
    4. et al
    . Machine operator’s lung. A hypersensitivity pneumonitis disorder associated with exposure to metalworking fluid aerosols. Chest 1995; 108: 636–641.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bracker A,
    2. Storey E,
    3. Yang C,
    4. et al
    . An outbreak of hypersensitivity pneumonitis at a metalworking plant: a longitudinal assessment of intervention effectiveness. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2003; 18: 96–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Piacitelli GM,
    2. Sieber WK,
    3. O'Brien DM,
    4. et al
    . Metalworking fluid exposures in small machine shops: an overview. AIHAJ 2001; 62: 356–370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Abrams L,
    2. Seixas N,
    3. Robins T,
    4. et al
    . Characterization of metalworking fluid exposure indices for a study of acute respiratory effects. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2000; 15: 492–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Thorne PS,
    2. DeKoster JA
    . Pulmonary effects of machining fluids in guinea pigs and mice. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1996; 57: 1168–1172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Reponen T,
    3. Lee SA,
    4. et al
    . Size distribution of airborne mist and endotoxin-containing particles in metalworking fluid environments. J Occup Environ Hyg 2007; 4: 157–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Moore JS,
    2. Christensen M,
    3. Wilson RW,
    4. et al
    . Mycobacterial contamination of metalworking fluids: involvement of a possible new taxon of rapidly growing mycobacteria. AIHAJ 2000; 61: 205–213.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Khan IU,
    2. Selvaraju SB,
    3. Yadav JS
    . Occurrence and characterization of multiple novel genotypes of Mycobacterium immunogenum and Mycobacterium chelonae in metalworking fluids. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2005; 54: 329–338.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Trout D,
    2. Weissman DN,
    3. Lewis D,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis among workers exposed to metal removal fluids. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2003; 18: 953–960.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Wallace RJ Jr.,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Wilson RW,
    4. et al
    . Presence of a single genotype of the newly described species Mycobacterium immunogenum in industrial metalworking fluids associated with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68: 5580–5584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Khan IU,
    2. Yadav JS
    . Real-time PCR assays for genus-specific detection and quantification of culturable and non-culturable mycobacteria and pseudomonads in metalworking fluids. Mol Cell Probes 2004; 18: 67–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Dawkins P,
    2. Robertson A,
    3. Robertson W,
    4. et al
    . An outbreak of extrinsic alveolitis at a car engine plant. Occup Med (Lond) 2006; 56: 559–565.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Beckett W,
    2. Kallay M,
    3. Sood A,
    4. et al
    . Hypersensitivity pneumonitis associated with environmental mycobacteria. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: 767–770.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Weiss L,
    2. Pue C,
    3. Lewis R,
    4. et al
    . Respiratory illness in workers exposed to metalworking fluid contaminated with nontuberculous mycobacteria: Ohio 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002; 51: 349–351.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Shelton BG,
    2. Flanders WD,
    3. Morris GK
    . Mycobacterium sp. as a possible cause of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in machine workers. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5: 270–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Thorne PS,
    2. Adamcakova-Dodd A,
    3. Kelly KM,
    4. et al
    . Metalworking fluid with mycobacteria and endotoxin induces hypersensitivity pneumonitis in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 759–768.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Veillette M,
    2. Thorne PS,
    3. Gordon T,
    4. et al
    . Six month tracking of microbial growth in a metalworking fluid after system cleaning and recharging. Ann Occup Hyg 2004; 48: 541–546.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Cyprowski M,
    2. Piotrowska M,
    3. Zakowska Z,
    4. et al
    . Microbial and endotoxin contamination of water-soluble metalworking fluids. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2007; 20: 365–371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Lewis D,
    2. Janotka E,
    3. Whitmer M,
    4. et al
    . Detection of microbial antigens in metal working fluids. Int Biodet Biodeg 2001; 47: 89–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Fenoglio CM,
    2. Reboux G,
    3. Sudre B,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic value of serum precipitins to mould antigens in active hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Eur Respir J 2007; 29: 706–712.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Reynaud C,
    2. Slosman DO,
    3. Polla BS
    . Precipitins in bird breeder's disease: how useful are they? Eur Respir J 1990; 3: 1155–1161.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Lopata AL,
    2. Schinkel M,
    3. Potter PC,
    4. et al
    . Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of bird-specific IgG antibodies. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2004; 134: 173–178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Cohen H,
    2. White EM
    . Metalworking fluid mist occupational exposure limits: a discussion of alternative methods. J Occup Environ Hyg 2006; 3: 501–507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Gupta A,
    2. Rosenman KD
    . Hypersensitivity pneumonitis due to metal working fluids: sporadic or under reported? Am J Ind Med 2006; 49: 423–433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Ross AS,
    2. Teschke K,
    3. Brauer M,
    4. et al
    . Determinants of exposure to metalworking fluid aerosol in small machine shops. Ann Occup Hyg 2004; 48: 383–391.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 37 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 37 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and metalworking fluids contaminated by mycobacteria
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and metalworking fluids contaminated by mycobacteria
I. Tillie-Leblond, F. Grenouillet, G. Reboux, S. Roussel, B. Chouraki, C. Lorthois, J-C. Dalphin, B. Wallaert, L. Millon
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2011, 37 (3) 640-647; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00195009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and metalworking fluids contaminated by mycobacteria
I. Tillie-Leblond, F. Grenouillet, G. Reboux, S. Roussel, B. Chouraki, C. Lorthois, J-C. Dalphin, B. Wallaert, L. Millon
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2011, 37 (3) 640-647; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00195009
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Interstitial and orphan lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Article

  • Lung volumes and survival in chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • Prediction of new-onset asthma and nasal allergy
  • Mortality and causes of death in HIV/tuberculosis patients
Show more Original Article

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

  • hypersensitivity pneumonitis
Show more Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society