Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Is NMR-based metabolomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate accurate?

J.L. Izquierdo-García, G. Peces-Barba, S. Heili, R. Diaz, E. Want, J. Ruiz-Cabello
European Respiratory Journal 2011 37: 468-470; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00094010
J.L. Izquierdo-García
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Peces-Barba
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Heili
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Diaz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Want
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Ruiz-Cabello
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ruizcabe@farm.ucm.es
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editors:

The metabolomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a simple noninvasive approach for the study of respiratory system diseases. Previous studies introduced nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics as a method allowing a definite separation between healthy patients and patients with airway disease 1, 2. In these studies, the influence of external contaminants was also considered. de Laurentiis et al. 1 reported that the removal of interfering residual external contaminants was crucial for correct EBC analysis and they proposed a cleaning protocol for the “complete removal of the disinfectant signals” from the reusable parts of the condensers.

In order to verify the influence of the disinfectant signals we have compared the EBC 1H-NMR spectra of a healthy subject obtained after the standard cleaning protocol (disinfected for 15 min using a 1.5% Descogen™ solution and flushed for 15 min with water) recommended by the manufacturer’s guidelines and the International Consensus on EBC (fig. 1a) 3; one that was obtained after the cleaning protocol proposed by de Laurentiis et al. 1 (fig. 1b); and one obtained using a device without reusable condenser parts (fig. 1c). EBCs have been collected using an Anacon condenser (Biostec, Valencia, Spain). Sample collection and concentration (>99% water) were similar to those obtained in the procedure described by de Laurentiis et al. 1 and a similar spectrum (fig. 1f) to the spectrum published by de Laurentiis et al. 1 was obtained (fig. 1f, insert). Figure 1 shows that although many of the disinfectant signals present in the EBC spectrum have been removed by the de Laurentiis et al. 1 cleaning protocol, there are some resistant peaks that are not observed in the spectrum in figure 1c. Furthermore, an EBC 1H-NMR spectrum of a healthy subject acquired using the device without reusable parts (fig. 1d) was compared with another control test (fig. 1e), collected in the same time scale using the condensation of room air pushed into the system by a continuous air spam device using flow and volumes similar to those typical of normal human respiratory function. In this case, it showed similar blank spectra with only two signals (lactate and an unidentified signal).

Figure 1–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1–

1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) from a healthy subject after a) the standard cleaning protocol recommended by manufacturer’s guidelines and the International Consensus on EBC; b) the cleaning protocol proposed by de Laurentiis et al. 1; c) and d) using a device without reusable condenser parts; and e) 1H-NMR spectra of the condensation of the room air pushed into the system by a continuous air spam device. EBC spectra a), b) and c) were collected from the same healthy subject and spectra c) and d) were collected in the same time scale. f) 1H-NMR spectrum of EBC with similar sample collection and disinfection to 1H-NMR spectrum of EBC published by de Laurentiis et al. 1 (insert; reproduced from 1 with permission from the publisher). f1: first frequency dimension.

In our opinion, this comparison indicates that previous studies were not able to remove all disinfectant signals via the cleaning protocols. In addition, when the use of disinfectants was circumvented using a non-reusable device, we obtained blank spectra without metabolic information. We are persuaded to conclude that within the normal time periods used for EBC collection (10 min), NMR-based metabolomics does not have the degree of sensitivity needed to detect the lung metabolic fingerprint present in these samples. For this reason, we propose a mass spectrometry (MS) approach for the metabolomic analysis of EBC.

MS-based metabolomics, here using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to a time-of-flight mass spectrometer (UPLC-TOF-MS) requires similar sample preparation with a high degree of sensitivity. Through this technique, we can detect the metabolic fingerprint of the EBC not detected by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Figure 2 shows the UPLC-TOF mass matrix of an EBC from a healthy subject acquired using the non-reusable device. With the aim of validating the MS-based metabolomics as a discriminatory method between healthy patients and patients with airway disease, preliminary data of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) metabolomic study are presented. A total of 28 EBC samples, 18 COPD and 10 healthy subjects were collected using the non-reusable device and the Anacon condenser. Lyophilised samples were diluted with 200 μL of water and transferred into 96-well plates and maintained at 4°C prior to injection of 5 μL onto the column. Chromatographic separations were performed on a Acquity UPLC system (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA) using a 10 min gradient with mobile phase A of 0.1% formic acid (FA) in water and mobile phase B, 0.1% FA in acetonitrile. Electrospray (ESI) mass spectrometry experiments were performed on a Micromass LCT Premier (Waters) operated in positive ionisation mode. The raw data were processed using the open-source freeware XCMS (Scripps Center for Mass Spectrometry, La Jolla, CA, USA), which is able to detect and align metabolite peaks. Spectral differences between COPD and healthy subjects were verified by principal components analysis and partial least squares analysis as shown in figure 3.

Figure 2–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2–

An ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to a time-of-flight mass spectrometer three-dimensional mass matrix of an exhaled breath condensate from a) a healthy subject and b) a subject with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acquired using the non-reusable device. m/z: mass to charge.

Figure 3–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3–

Multivariate analysis using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to a time-of-flight mass spectrometer spectra of exhaled breath condensate from healthy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects. a) Principal components analysis (PCA) score plot shows a separation between groups, which is clearly confirmed by b) partial least squares (PLS) analysis. ○: control; •: COPD. PC1 and 2 are the first two principal components; PLS1 and 2 are the first two partial least squares.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the cleaning protocols of the reusable condenser parts produce an artificial metabolic fingerprint not related to the endogenous metabolic pathway of the lungs. In addition, although NMR-based metabolomics have been successfully applied in the study of numerous biosamples (e.g. urine 4–6 and tissues 7), this technique cannot be used to analyse EBC samples because the spectroscopic techniques do not have the sensitivity required to observe the endogenous metabolites presented in the EBC. Finally, we propose UPLC-MS and the use of non-reusable devices as a standard metabolomic approach in the analysis of EBC.

Footnotes

  • Support Statement

    Funding was provided by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (SAF2008-05412), the Community of Madrid (S505-AGR-187) and EU under grant agreement ITN-FP7-264864.

  • Statement of Interest

    None declared.

  • ©ERS 2011

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. de Laurentiis G,
    2. Paris D,
    3. Melck D,
    4. et al
    . Metabonomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate in adults by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Eur Respir J 2008; 32: 1175–1183.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Carraro S,
    2. Rezzi S,
    3. Reniero F,
    4. et al
    . Metabolomics applied to exhaled breath condensate in childhood asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175: 986–990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Horvath I,
    2. Hunt J,
    3. Barnes PJ,
    4. et al
    . Exhaled breath condensate: methodological recommendations and unresolved questions. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 523–548.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Slupsky CM,
    2. Rankin KN,
    3. Fu H,
    4. et al
    . Pneumococcal pneumonia: potential for diagnosis through a urinary metabolic profile. J Proteome Res 2009; 8: 5550–5558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Saude EJ,
    2. Obiefuna IP,
    3. Somorjai RL,
    4. et al
    . Metabolomic biomarkers in a model of asthma exacerbation: urine nuclear magnetic resonance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179: 25–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. McClay JL,
    2. Adkins DE,
    3. Isern NG,
    4. et al
    . 1H nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics analysis identifies novel urinary biomarkers for lung function. J Proteome Res 2010; 9: 3083–3090.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Izquierdo-García JL,
    2. del Puerto-Nevado L,
    3. Peces-Barba G,
    4. et al
    . A metabonomic approach to evaluate COPD in a model of cigarette smoke exposure in mice. Metabolomics 2010; 6: 564–573.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 37 Issue 2 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 37 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is NMR-based metabolomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate accurate?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Is NMR-based metabolomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate accurate?
J.L. Izquierdo-García, G. Peces-Barba, S. Heili, R. Diaz, E. Want, J. Ruiz-Cabello
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2011, 37 (2) 468-470; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00094010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Is NMR-based metabolomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate accurate?
J.L. Izquierdo-García, G. Peces-Barba, S. Heili, R. Diaz, E. Want, J. Ruiz-Cabello
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2011, 37 (2) 468-470; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00094010
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Lung structure and function
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Neutrophilia independently predicts death in tuberculosis
  • Fibrosis in dyskeratosis congenita with TINF2 mutation
  • Pneumomediastinum and dehydration in cystic fibrosis
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society