Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Symptom variability in patients with severe COPD: a pan-European cross-sectional study

R. Kessler, M.R. Partridge, M. Miravitlles, M. Cazzola, C. Vogelmeier, D. Leynaud, J. Ostinelli
European Respiratory Journal 2011 37: 264-272; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00051110
R. Kessler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Romain.Kessler@chru-strasbourg.fr
M.R. Partridge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Miravitlles
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Cazzola
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Vogelmeier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Leynaud
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Ostinelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1–
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1–

    Patient recruitment flow chart. #: part A of the questionnaire (symptoms) not completed; ¶: part A of the questionnaire (symptoms) completed.

  • Figure 2–
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2–

    Patients were asked if they had experienced any symptoms (breathlessness (n = 1,769), phlegm (n = 1,552), cough (n = 1,433), wheezing (n = 1,018) or chest tightness (n = 690)) in the 7 days prior to the telephone interview. Multiple answers were possible. □: a little; ░: moderately; ▒: very; ▪: extremely.

  • Figure 3–
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3–

    Patients who reported respiratory symptoms during the week prior to the telephone interview were asked if they experienced daily (black shading) and weekly (grey shading) variations in the severity of the symptom (breathlessness: n = 1,769; phlegm: n = 1,552; cough: n = 1,433; wheezing: n = 1,018; or chest tightness: n = 690). Data shown are percentages of patients who answered “Yes, it varied a little” (hatched bars) or “Yes, it varied a lot” (solid bars).

  • Figure 4–
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4–

    Patients who had reported experiencing symptoms in the previous 7 days were asked during what times of the day the symptoms were most troublesome. a) Breathlessness, n = 1,769; b) phlegm, n = 1,551; c) cough, n = 1,433; d) wheezing, n = 1,018; and e) chest tightness, n = 690.

  • Figure 5–
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5–

    Patients were asked how, if at all, they modified the use of their COPD medications when experiencing symptom variability during the day (n = 2,333) or over the course of several days (n = 2,333).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1– Patient characteristics
    Available data#
    Sex2440 (99.96)
     Male1916 (78.5)
     Female524 (21.5)
    Age yrs2427 (99.43)67.3±9.4
    Body mass index kg·m−22394 (98.07)26.0±5.0
    Smoking status2337 (95.74)
     Current smoker565 (24.2)
     Ex-smoker1772 (75.8)
    Time since COPD diagnosis yrs2365 (96.89)8.9±7.6
    MRC dyspnoea score¶2429 (99.51)
     1172 (7.1)
     2791 (32.6)
     3803 (33.1)
     4561 (23.1)
     5102 (4.2)
    FEV1 % pred
     Pre-bronchodilator2279 (93.36)38.8±9.8
     Post-bronchodilator1510 (61.86)42.2±11.2
    FVC % pred
     Pre-bronchodilator2195 (89.92)66.2±17.5
     Post-bronchodilator1458 (59.73)69.8±18.2
    FEV1/FVC %
     Pre-bronchodilator2077 (85.09)47.1±10.4
     Post-bronchodilator1398 (57.27)48.3±11.4
    Reversibility+1310 (53.67)
     %9.07±14.9
     Yes199 (15.2)
    Type of current COPD maintenance treatment2431 (99.59)
     Only inhaled SABD§50 (2.1)
     Only one inhaled LABDƒ272 (11.2)
     Only a combination of LABD##94 (3.9)
     Only inhaled glucocorticosteroids¶¶39 (1.6)
     LABD plus inhaled glucocorticosteroids++1634 (67.2)
    • Data are presented as n (%) or mean±sd. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MRC: Medical Research Council; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; % pred: % predicted; FVC: forced vital capacity; SABD: short-acting bronchodilator; LABD: long-acting bronchodilator. #: n (%) of the total population of 2,441; ¶: MRC dyspnoea grade 1, “I only get breathless with strenuous exercise”; grade 2, “I get short of breath when hurrying on the level or up a slight hill”; grade 3, “I walk slower than people of the same age on the level because of breathlessness or have to stop for breath when walking at my own pace on the level”; grade 4, “I stop for breath after walking 100 m or after a few minutes on the level”; grade 5, “ I am too breathless to leave the house”; +: reversibility was calculated for patients with available pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1 data, and “yes” is defined as a post-bronchodilator increase in FEV1 of ≥200 mL and ≥12%; §: patients receiving only an inhaled short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) or an inhaled short-acting anticholinergic, or a fixed or free combination of inhaled SABA plus anticholinergic; ƒ: patients receiving only one LABD (inhaled long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), or oral LABA, or long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)) ± SABD ± methylxanthines; ##: patients receiving a combination of LABD (LABA or LAMA) ± SABD ± methylxanthines; ¶¶: patients receiving only inhaled glucocorticosteroids ± SABD; ++: patients receiving inhaled glucocorticosteroids plus LABA (inhaled or oral) and/or LAMA ± SABD ± methylxanthines.

  • Table 2– Patient comorbidities and current concomitant medication
    Comorbidity
     Hypertension1044 (42.8)
     Ischaemic heart disease349 (14.3)
     Diabetes332 (13.6)
     Osteoporosis266 (10.9)
     Left heart failure228 (9.3)
     Depression (current)209 (8.6)
     Metabolic syndrome208 (8.5)
     Sleep apnoea189 (7.7)
     Any other condition that significantly affects mobility#177 (7.3)
     Cancer (other than lung cancer)¶150 (6.1)
     Alcoholism120 (4.9)
    Concomitant medication
     Diuretics620 (25.4)
     Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors521 (21.3)
     Statins465 (19.0)
     Angiotensin receptor blockers308 (12.6)
     Antidiabetics249 (10.2)
     Beta-blockers+242 (9.9)
     Antidepressants179 (7.3)
     Anxiolytics150 (6.1)
     Hypnotics93 (3.8)
    • Data are presented as n (%) of the total population of 2,441. #: e.g. previous stroke or amputation; ¶: past or current; +: systemic and eye drops.

  • Table 3– Determination of factors that may influence breathlessness variation during the day and week#
    FactorWeekDay
    OR (95% CI)p-valueOR (95% CI)p-value
    Age calculated for 10-yr changes0.852 (0.752–0.965)0.01180.852 (0.754–0.963)0.0106
    Severity of breathlessness: answer “moderately” versus “a little”1.228 (0.933–1.615)ns1.469 (1.104–1.954)0.0083
    Severity of breathlessness: answer “very” versus “a little”1.791 (1.286–2.492)0.00062.848 (2.057–3.943)<0.0001
    Severity of breathlessness: answer “extremely” versus “a little”1.787 (1.016–3.144)0.04402.565 (1.518–4.333)0.0004
    Exacerbations during the previous 12 months: >2 versus 01.432 (1.058–1.937)0.0200NA
    Left heart failure: yes versus no0.532 (0.347–0.816)0.0038NA
    Maintenance treatment with only one LABD (LABA or LAMA):¶ no versus yesNA2.062 (1.358–3.132)0.0007
    Physician activity: GP versus specialist1.569 (1.225–2.009)0.00041.390 (1.082–1.785)0.0099
    • ns: not significant; NA: not significant in the univariate analysis and therefore not included in the multivariate analysis; LABD: long-acting bronchodilator; LABA: long-acting β2-agonist; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic antagonist; GP: general practitioner. #: each factor listed was considered significant in the univariate analysis (p = 0.20) and thus eligible for inclusion in the logistic regression model. Factors were then selected using a backward, stepwise procedure with a significance level of p = 0.05 for entering or removing variables. Patients who reported breathlessness during the past 7 days (n = 1,769) and who answered the specific question regarding weekly (n = 1,733) or daily variability (n = 1,668) were included in the univariate analysis. ¶: “yes” indicates patients taking only one LABD ± short-acting bronchodilator ± methylxanthines; “no” indicates other maintenance treatment (see table 1).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary material - Supplementary data
      Participating physicians
      Study validation
    • Patient questionnaire
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 37 Issue 2 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 37 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Symptom variability in patients with severe COPD: a pan-European cross-sectional study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Symptom variability in patients with severe COPD: a pan-European cross-sectional study
R. Kessler, M.R. Partridge, M. Miravitlles, M. Cazzola, C. Vogelmeier, D. Leynaud, J. Ostinelli
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2011, 37 (2) 264-272; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00051110

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Symptom variability in patients with severe COPD: a pan-European cross-sectional study
R. Kessler, M.R. Partridge, M. Miravitlles, M. Cazzola, C. Vogelmeier, D. Leynaud, J. Ostinelli
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2011, 37 (2) 264-272; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00051110
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • COPD and smoking
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Article

  • Lung volumes and survival in chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • Social consequences of sleep disordered breathing
  • Diagnosing airflow obstruction in COPD
Show more Original Article

COPD & Smoking-Related Disorders

  • Once-daily indacaterol versus twice-daily salmeterol for COPD: a placebo-controlled comparison
  • Health-related quality of life and functional status in end-stage COPD: a longitudinal study
Show more COPD & Smoking-Related Disorders

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society