Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Semantics or pedantry?

J. Widdicombe
European Respiratory Journal 2010 36: 1494; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00138510
J. Widdicombe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: johnwiddicombej@aol.com
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editors:

Naturally in your positions, you are interested in the use of words, as should be your authors and must be your readers. Here are three examples.

SIGNIFICANT

This has been with us for decades. It is sometimes accompanied by statistical probability values in parentheses. It literally means “full of meaning or import” 1. Used alone it means the authors are stressing, but not justifying, the scientific importance of their results. Even if significant, the results are often unimportant, uninteresting and unconvincing. Unfortunately the word will be with us for many more decades.

ROBUST

Frequent use of the word started a decade or so ago, but its use now seems, thankfully, to be in decline. Its users seem to mean that their results and conclusions are beyond argument and must be accepted, since they are even more than significant. It literally means “strong, vigorous, healthy” 1. Some scientific statements claimed to be robust are like a house of cards.

PARADIGM

This is recently becoming more popular. I have encountered it 15 times in a few recent publications related to my own research interest (cough). The authors usually seem to mean that their results open a new and important understanding into a hitherto perplexing problem. It literally means “a pattern or example” 1. But it is also claimed to be “a buzzword deployed by dumb people wishing to sound important” 2. No less an authority than Mervyn King (Governor of the Bank of England, and possibly a scientist manqué) said: “Paradigm is a word too often used by those who would like to have a new idea but cannot think of one” 2.

Of course the use of “paradigm” is significant, but I hope the word is not so robust that its use in scientific literature survives the present decade.

To complete the analysis, Pubmed 3 gives 1,696,440 references to “significant”, 55,783 to “robust” and 47,082 to “paradigm”. This correspondence contains some paradigms, and it may require a robust but not very significant updating of these numbers.

Footnotes

  • Statement of Interest

    None declared.

  • Received August 29, 2010.
  • Accepted September 2, 2010.
  • ©ERS 2010

references

  1. ↵
    1. Oxford English Dictionary
    . 2nd Edn. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989.
  2. ↵
    1. Bates S
    . Diary: Pickles's way? Axe a quango, get a Jag. Guardian; August 20 2010.
  3. ↵
    1. PubMed
    . www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Date last accessed: August 28, 2010.
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 36 Issue 6 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 36 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Semantics or pedantry?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Semantics or pedantry?
J. Widdicombe
European Respiratory Journal Dec 2010, 36 (6) 1494; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00138510

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Semantics or pedantry?
J. Widdicombe
European Respiratory Journal Dec 2010, 36 (6) 1494; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00138510
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • SIGNIFICANT
    • ROBUST
    • PARADIGM
    • Footnotes
    • references
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Mechanisms of lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Refined risk stratification in PAH and timing of lung transplantation
  • COVID-19 drug research and the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design
  • Early life respiratory infections and pre-adult asthma: could there be an interaction and differential misclassification?
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society