Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Pregnancy and fetal outcomes of symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing

G. Bourjeily, C.A. Raker, M. Chalhoub, M.A. Miller
European Respiratory Journal 2010 36: 849-855; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00021810
G. Bourjeily
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: GBourjeily@wihri.org
C.A. Raker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Chalhoub
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.A. Miller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The physiological changes of pregnancy may predispose females to develop sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) or protect against it. Studies evaluating outcomes of SDB symptoms in pregnancy are scarce. The goal of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of SDB symptoms in pregnancy and their relationship with pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

A cross-sectional survey of randomly selected immediate postpartum females was performed using the multivariable apnoea prediction index. Record review, including demographics and medical history, was performed. Main outcome measures included pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

1,000 subjects were recruited. Mean±sd age was 29.1±6.1 yrs. Factors used in the regression analysis included age, body mass index, diabetes, chronic hypertension, multifetal gestations, smoking and renal disease. Snoring was present in 35.1% of subjects. Symptoms of SDB were associated with a higher likelihood of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia (adjusted OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4–4.0), gestational diabetes (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3–3.4) and unplanned Caesarean deliveries (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4–3.2) after multivariable regression analysis. Gasping may have been associated with a higher likelihood of preterm delivery, after adjusting for age and multifetal pregnancies (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.2) but this association appeared to be mediated by pre-eclampsia.

Symptoms of SDB are common in pregnancy and associated with a higher likelihood of gestational hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes and unplanned Caesarean deliveries.

  • Diabetes
  • fetal outcomes
  • gestational
  • hypertension
  • pregnant females
  • snoring

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) occurs in 9% of young–middle aged females 1 and 56% of older females 2. Females report snoring less commonly than males and have significant differences in sleep latency, sleep architecture, prevalence of obesity, and predictive power of certain anthropometric features 3.

SDB is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in females. Snoring has been associated with higher risk of elevated glycosylated haemoglobin in premenopausal females, 4 and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is linked to decreased insulin sensitivity 5. Associations with the metabolic syndrome have been described 6, 7, especially in females with severe OSA 7. Despite the controversy in the development of new onset hypertension in patients with OSA in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study 8 and the Sleep Heart Health Study 9, the association of OSA with hypertension was described in females 8, 10, 11. In a recent study, the relative risk of hypertension in subjects with OSA was higher than controls (apnoea/hypopnoea index <15) and similar in males and females 11. Another study reported that normotensive females snoring occasionally or regularly have a 29% and 55% increased risk of developing hypertension, respectively, compared with non-snorers 10.

Many physiological changes that predispose to the development of SDB occur in pregnancy 12. Although studies have reported that snoring occurs in 14–45% of pregnant females 13–15, the incidence of SDB remains unknown. A few studies suggest a significant association between habitual snoring and gestational hypertensive disorders 16. Others have assessed a potential association with neonatal outcomes 14, 17, with some showing growth restriction in snorers compared with non-snorers 14 and others failing to show a correlation 17. Despite an association between SDB, glucose intolerance and insulin resistance outside pregnancy 18, 19, no studies have evaluated a link in pregnancy. In addition, there are no studies evaluating an association between SDB symptoms and mode of delivery, although a potential effect of total sleep duration on delivery mode has been described in some studies 20 but not in others 21.

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of SDB symptoms in pregnancy in a large cohort of patients, and to assess potential associations between SDB symptoms and cardiovascular and obstetric maternal outcomes, as well as neonatal birth outcomes.

METHODS

Subjects and protocol

Female subjects

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Women and Infants Hospital of RI, Providence, RI, USA) and consent was obtained. Subjects were selected randomly from daily lists of all deliveries and recruited at a tertiary care obstetric hospital over 18 months. English-speaking patients ≥18 yrs old were surveyed 24–48 h postpartum, with or without a bed partner. Deliveries with fetal or neonatal demise were excluded.

The questionnaire elicited information regarding demographics, medical history, sleep-related symptoms, medications, and pregnancy-related conditions. Neck circumference was measured at the time of consent. Patients' records were reviewed to corroborate patient-reported outcomes and any discrepancies between sources were resolved by the principal investigator. Pre-eclampsia was classified based on the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' definition 22. The definition of gestational diabetes was based on Carpenter and Coustan's criteria 23, and the American Diabetes Association 24. Mode of delivery was vaginal, planned Caesarean delivery or unplanned Caesarean delivery.

SDB symptoms in the 3 months preceding delivery were assessed using index 1 of the Multivariable Apnoea Prediction Index (MAPI) 25. Questions read as follows. In the last 3 months of your pregnancy, how often have you experienced (or were you told) about the following symptoms? 1) You snored loudly; 2)You snorted or gasped; 3)Your breathing stopped, you choked or you struggled for breath. Answers: 0) Never; 1) Rarely (less than once a week); 2) Sometimes (1–2 times a week); 3) Frequently (3–4 times a week); 4) Always (5–7 times a week).

MAPI was calculated using both pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) obtained at the time of the first prenatal visit and BMI at delivery and the two results were compared but not correlated with outcomes since this tool has not been validated in pregnancy.

2 weeks following delivery, patients were surveyed by telephone regarding interim complications.

Newborn subjects

Outcomes evaluated included weight for gestational age, and 1 and 5-min Apgar scores. Growth restriction was defined based on data by Alexander et al. 26 on normal fetal growth based on gestational age. Low birth weight was defined as <2,500 g and growth restriction as <10th percentile for gestational age.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed with SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). SDB symptom frequencies were categorised as never/rarely, sometimes, or frequently/always. Unsure or missing responses were excluded.

Categorical variables were compared by Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were compared between groups by ANOVA. Continuous variables were examined for deviations from normality and homoskedasticity prior to ANOVA. Two-tailed p-values were reported, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Unconditional multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted OR (aOR) and 95% CI for the association of SDB symptom frequency and pregnancy outcomes. Factors used in the regression analysis included age, BMI, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, multifetal gestations, renal disease, and cigarette smoking. Because pre-eclampsia- and pregnancy-induced hypertension were uncommon in the study cohort, they were analysed together as one outcome. Delivery method was examined by multinomial logistic regression with successful vaginal delivery as the referent. Preterm delivery (<37 weeks gestational age) and neonatal outcomes were examined by logistic regression. Robust variance estimates were obtained for neonatal outcomes to account for correlation within multiple births. For all models, continuous variables were entered as linear covariates, since testing of polynomial terms did not suggest nonlinearity. Model fit was checked by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test (logistic regression) or inspection of residuals.

RESULTS

1,000 females agreed to participate in the study with a rate of decline <3%. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics are detailed in table 1. Over 22% had a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥30. Bed partners were present at the time of interview for 36% of the patients and 78% of patients reported having a bed partner.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1– Demographics and clinical characteristics

Symptoms of SDB

Loud snoring occurred frequently/always in 35% of subjects (table 2), and 37% reported at least one symptom. There was a trend toward statistical significance in snoring frequency (p = 0.05) between the groups with and without a bed partner present in the room. However, the presence of the bed partner during the interview did not affect symptom frequency among patients with a bed partner. Greater symptom frequency was associated with neck circumference (fig. 1) and older age but not smoking. Snoring frequency was significantly correlated with pre-pregnancy BMI, delivery BMI, and pregnancy weight gain (fig. 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2– Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) symptom frequency and patient age#
Figure 1–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1–

Frequency of sleep-disordered breathing symptoms and mean neck circumference, weight gain, and body mass index (BMI). •: neck circumference cm; ▴: weight gain lbs; ▪: BMI at delivery; ♦: BMI pre-pregnancy. p<0.05 for all comparisons except for choking and BMI pre-pregnancy (p = 0.3) and at delivery (p = 0.05) and gasping and weight gain (p = 0.3).

MAPI was calculated using both BMI values. As expected, the MAPI predicting ≥50% likelihood of SDB was lower using pre-pregnancy BMI. However, the sensitivity of frequently/always snoring, gasping and choking for MAPI ≥50% was higher using pre-pregnancy BMI. These findings suggest that pre-pregnancy obesity may be a more important risk factor than pregnancy weight gain.

Symptoms of SDB and pregnancy outcomes

Snoring significantly correlated with current pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. The association remained significant even after adjusting for multiple factors (table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3– Association of sleep-disordered breathing symptoms with pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes# in current pregnancy

Snoring and gasping were associated with gestational diabetes and this association remained significant in a multivariable regression analysis (table 3). When all three symptoms were combined, the association with gestational diabetes was stronger (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.3–16.2) even when adjusted for the other factors (aOR 4.0, 95% 1.4–11.1).

Delivery outcomes

Delivery rates are detailed in table 1. Although the rate of Caesarean sections was higher than that of the general population, the association between SDB symptoms and pregnancy-related conditions in the Caesarean section group were otherwise similar to the vaginal delivery group. There was a significantly higher prevalence of Caesarean sections in patients with loud snoring and gasping even after adjusting for multifetal gestations, smoking and fetal weight (table 4). However, when the statistical model was further adjusted for pre-eclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational diabetes, and BMI at delivery, only the association with unplanned Caesarean sections remained significant for both snoring (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.6) and gasping (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 2.0–6.4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4– Association of sleep-disordered breathing symptoms with method of delivery

Mean gestational age at birth was 38.6±2.4 weeks, and 12% of births were preterm (delivery before 37 weeks gestational age). Gasping was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of preterm delivery, even after adjusting for age, smoking and multifetal pregnancies (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3).

Fetal outcomes

When birth weight for gestational age was assessed, there was a trend towards an association between snoring and growth restriction (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.8–4.3) but the outcomes were too few for a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Gasping was significantly associated with Apgar scores at 1 min (fig. 2) even after adjusting for multifetal pregnancy, smoking and maternal age (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0–3.4), but not after adjusting for pre-eclampsia. However, >98% of 5-min Apgar scores were ≥7. For that reason, although 5-min scores appear significant (aOR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1–11.9), this may be due to bias and small numbers.

Figure 2–
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2–

Sleep-disordered breathing symptoms and 1-min Apgar scores. □: never/rarely; ▒: sometimes; ░: frequently/always. Gasping sometimes versus never or rarely was associated with Apgar 1-min <7 (15.4% versus 9.1%; p = 0.04). All other comparisons were nonsignificant.

Follow-up questionnaire

A total of 227 patients were not available for follow-up. When compared to patients who were available, those lost to follow-up were 2 yrs older and more likely to be Hispanic, but otherwise showed no difference in outcomes studied. Of those 227, 16 (7%) had returned to the emergency room within 2 weeks of delivery, most commonly for hypertension. Since this record review would not identify all patients with postpartum hypertension, this group was excluded from further follow-up analysis.

Of the 773 patients who completed follow-up, 5.4% had delivery complications and 6.2% returned to the hospital. These complications were significantly associated with gasping (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4–6.7, and 2.4, 95% CI 1.3–4.6, respectively) and choking (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.4–11.1, and 3.7, 95% CI 1.6–8.3, respectively). Hypertension or pre-eclampsia were the most common postpartum conditions reported (13.1%). After excluding patients with all types of antenatal hypertension, there was a significant association between SDB symptoms and the development of postpartum hypertension in the 2 weeks following delivery (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2–5.5, for snoring).

DISCUSSION

Symptoms of SDB were common in our randomly selected cross-sectional evaluation of immediate postpartum pregnant females. Our results are consistent with other studies showing a prevalence of snoring in 14–45% of pregnant females 14, 15, 27. Although having a bed partner was thought to result in more frequent reporting of SDB symptoms among pregnant females, our study did not substantiate this theory. Snoring is a good predictor of SDB in nonpregnant patients; however, the predictive power of this and other symptoms in pregnancy is not well established and may be lower. In a small study by Sahin et al. 28, only four out of 35 (11.4%) pregnant females suspected of having OSA based on the Berlin questionnaire were found to have OSA on polysomnography, suggesting a suboptimal positive predictive value of the questionnaire in this patient population. Snoring could be indicative of flow limitation, for instance, which would not meet criteria for apnoea or hypopnoea. A recent study has found a significantly elevated apnoea/hypopnoea index, with hypopnoeas defined as a flow limitation without desaturation in females with gestational hypertension; however, the study did not evaluate the association of these findings with symptoms of SDB 29. Evidence evaluating the association of symptoms of SDB with polysomnographic evidence of SDB in pregnancy is lacking. Therefore, the higher prevalence of symptoms in pregnancy does not necessarily portend a higher incidence of SDB.

In our sample population, about 22% of subjects met criteria for obesity (BMI >30), a lower prevalence than the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 30 for adult females, suggesting that our population may be less overweight than the general population, potentially underestimating the incidence of SDB symptoms.

SDB symptoms and gestational hypertensive disorders

Our study shows a significant correlation between SDB symptoms and gestational hypertensive disorders, even after correcting for major risk factors, and is consistent with prior reports 13, 14, 16, 31. The association in this study could have been negatively affected by our definition of pre-eclampsia 22, which was more conservative than the one recently outlined by the Canadian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 32; regardless, the association remained significant.

The underlying mechanism for the association of SDB with pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia has not been elucidated. Hypoxaemia may be a potential contributor. Data from chronically hypoxic high-altitude residents strongly suggest higher rates of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction compared to low-altitude residents 33, 34. Data on intermittent hypoxia and pregnancy outcomes are scarce, but intermittent hypoxia may lead to endothelial dysfunction, which is present in patients with OSA in all severity categories 35, 36. Endothelial dysfunction and angiogenic–antiangiogenic disequilibrium have been implicated as a possible underlying mechanism in pre-eclampsia. A recent study has tied both disorders with endothelial dysfunction and showed a significant association between pre-eclampsia, OSA and endothelial dysfunction in pregnant women 37. These data suggest intermittent hypoxia in OSA as a potential link leading to placental hypoxaemia, triggering a cascade of events resulting in pre-eclampsia.

It is also possible that flow limitations play a mechanistic role in the development of gestational hypertensive disorders. Frequent, prolonged flow limitations without desaturations have been identified in patients with pre-eclampsia 38 or with risk factors for pre-eclampsia 39. Treatment of patients with risk factors for pre-eclampsia and flow limitations (without SDB) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) throughout pregnancy has favourable effects on blood pressure 39, 40 and fetal outcomes compared to controls 40. Although these findings indirectly suggest that flow limitation may have a causative role in blood pressure control in pregnancy, the numbers are quite small, hence the need for larger studies. Moreover, nocturnal CPAP treatment for one night increases cardiac output 41 and improves blood pressure control 42 in patients with pre-eclampsia, suggesting several potential beneficial effects. Therefore, it is possible that even in the absence of hypoxia and re-oxygenation, haemodynamic changes associated with flow limitations may be implicated in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia in patients with SDB symptoms but without SDB.

Another possibility is that pre-eclampsia predisposes to the development of SDB. Patients with pre-eclampsia have lower oncotic pressures than normal pregnant females, a larger neck circumference and a smaller upper airway 43. Additional studies are needed to evaluate this theory further.

Gestational diabetes

Our study is the first to examine the association of gestational diabetes and obstetric outcomes with symptoms of SDB. There was a significant association between SDB symptoms and gestational diabetes even after controlling for BMI at delivery, suggesting a potentially different mechanism than obesity-related insulin resistance. The association with gestational diabetes was even stronger when all three symptoms were combined, suggesting that gestational diabetes is more likely in patients with a higher likelihood of SDB, rather than in those with an isolated symptom. Although no prior studies have suggested this association in pregnancy, data from the non-pregnant population suggest an association between SDB, insulin resistance and glucose intolerance 18, 19, 44, 45. The mechanism behind this association in pregnancy that is independent of BMI needs to be elucidated further.

Mode of delivery

Our study has also shown that unplanned Caesarean deliveries were more likely to occur in snorers compared to non-snorers, even after adjusting for potential confounders, suggesting that snoring may be an independent predictor of unplanned Caesarean sections. Although existing data suggest that obesity is associated with higher rates of Caesarean sections 46, the mechanism in our study seemed to be independent of BMI. A possible hypothesis to explain this association may be that anthropometric measures associated with failed vaginal deliveries may also be associated with SDB.

The effects of sleep duration on labour and delivery outcomes have been inconsistent 20, 21. While the study of Evans et al. 20 showed no effect of sleep duration on delivery outcomes, studies using actigraphy showed that females with sleep deprivation at term had significantly longer labour and more Caesarean deliveries 21. The link between sleep characteristics and the mode of delivery is not clear, but the association of symptoms of SDB with a higher BMI, gestational hypertensive disorders and gestational diabetes may in part explain higher rates of Caesarean sections. Another possibility would be whether sleep fragmentation is associated with adverse outcomes irrespective of SDB. Polysomnography may help elucidate the potential role of hypoxaemia and/or arousal indices.

Neonatal outcomes

A small number of studies have evaluated the association between SDB symptoms and fetal outcomes 14, 17, 29, 47 and are somewhat conflicting 14, 17 with some lacking a control arm 29. A large study has shown an association between snoring and fetal growth restriction 14. However, that study did not report comorbidities or adjust for confounders such as diabetes, hypertension and gestational hypertensive disorders. Our study did not show a significant association with growth restriction and is consistent with other studies 13, 17, 29, 48. A limitation of most existing studies, including this study, relates to the lack of confirmation of gestational age by early gestation ultrasound in some subjects and the lack of longitudinal fetal growth data, leading to the possibility of missing a true effect. Future studies should take this factor into account. Our findings suggest that SDB symptoms may be associated with low 1-min Apgar scores, consistent with other studies 14, but not 5-min scores. However, 5-min scores are more predictive of future outcomes. Preterm birth seems to be associated with SDB symptoms; however, this association appears to be mediated by pre-eclampsia.

Limitations of the study

Our study is limited by the lack of a validated questionnaire for use in screening the pregnant population for SDB, and by a and lack of polysomnographic data. However, findings from our study suggest that, irrespective of the presence of SDB, the symptoms evaluated were common and did correlate with adverse outcomes. Future studies are needed that consider correlation of outcomes with polysomnography findings and validation of screening tools in this population.

Conclusions

In summary, our findings show that symptoms of SDB in pregnant females are associated with adverse pregnancy, delivery and fetal outcomes. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the mechanisms by which SDB causes these adverse outcomes, and to evaluate whether screening and treatment of SDB during pregnancy might improve outcomes.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank S.M. Martin, C. Citino, P. Auger and K. Connors (all Division of Research, Dept of Medicine, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA) for their help with patient recruitment and data collection. These individuals were compensated for their contribution to the work. Perkins Charitable Foundation should also be acknowledged for their generous funding and support of the study. The authors are also grateful to: G. Oliva III and C. McPhee (both Springhill Syndications LLC, Los Angeles, CA, USA) for their help with obtaining funding; and G. Ankner and B. Hott (both Division of Research, Dept of Medicine, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island) for their assistance with manuscript preparation.

Footnotes

  • Earn CME accreditation by answering questions about this article. You will find these at the back of the printed copy of this issue or online at www.erj.ersjournals.com/cmeinfo.dtl

  • Support Statement

    This study was supported by the Perkins Charitable Foundation.

  • Statement of Interest

    None declared.

  • Received February 9, 2010.
  • Accepted April 19, 2010.
  • ©2010 ERS

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Douglas NJ
    . Clinicians' Guide to Sleep Medicine. London, Arnold, 2002.
  2. ↵
    1. Ancoli-Israel S,
    2. Kripke DF,
    3. Klauber MR,
    4. et al
    . Sleep-disordered breathing in community-dwelling elderly. Sleep 1991; 14: 486–995.
  3. ↵
    1. Lin CM,
    2. Davidson TM,
    3. Ancoli-Israel S
    . Gender differences in obstructive sleep apnea and treatment implications. Sleep Med Rev 2008; 12: 481–496.
  4. ↵
    1. Joo S,
    2. Lee S,
    3. Choi HA,
    4. et al
    . Habitual snoring is associated with elevated hemoglobin A1c levels in non-obese middle-aged adults. J Sleep Res 2006; 15: 437–444.
  5. ↵
    1. Theorell-Haglow J,
    2. Berne C,
    3. Janson C,
    4. et al
    . Obstructive sleep apnoea is associated with decreased insulin sensitivity in females. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 1054–1060.
  6. ↵
    1. Onat A,
    2. Hergenc G,
    3. Uyarel H,
    4. et al
    . Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is associated with metabolic syndrome rather than insulin resistance. Sleep Breath 2007; 11: 23–30.
  7. ↵
    1. Sasanabe R,
    2. Banno K,
    3. Otake K,
    4. et al
    . Metabolic syndrome in Japanese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Hypertens Res 2006; 29: 315–322.
  8. ↵
    1. Peppard PE,
    2. Young T,
    3. Palta M,
    4. et al
    . Prospective study of the association between sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1378–1384.
  9. ↵
    1. O'Connor GT,
    2. Caffo B,
    3. Newman AB,
    4. et al
    . Prospective study of sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension: the Sleep Heart Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179: 1159–1164.
  10. ↵
    1. Hu FB,
    2. Willett WC,
    3. Colditz GA,
    4. et al
    . Prospective study of snoring and risk of hypertension in women. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 806–816.
  11. ↵
    1. Yukawa K,
    2. Inoue Y,
    3. Yagyu H,
    4. et al
    . Gender differences in the clinical characteristics among Japanese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 2009; 135: 337–443.
  12. ↵
    1. Bourjeily G
    . Sleep disorders in pregnancy. Obstet Med 2009; 2: 100–106.
  13. ↵
    1. Calaora-Tournadre D,
    2. Ragot S,
    3. Meurice JC,
    4. et al
    . [Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome during pregnancy: prevalence of main symptoms and relationship with pregnancy induced-hypertension and intra-uterine growth retardation]. Rev Med Interne 2006; 27: 291–295.
  14. ↵
    1. Franklin KA,
    2. Holmgren PA,
    3. Jonsson F,
    4. et al
    . Snoring, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and growth retardation of the fetus. Chest 2000; 117: 137–141.
  15. ↵
    1. Schutte S,
    2. Del Conte A,
    3. Gross A,
    4. et al
    . Self-reported snoring and sleep in high risk pregnancies. Sleep Research 1995; 24: 342–
  16. ↵
    1. Ursavas A,
    2. Karadag M,
    3. Nalci N,
    4. et al
    . Self-reported snoring, maternal obesity and neck circumference as risk factors for pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia. Respiration 2008; 76: 33–39.
  17. ↵
    1. Loube DI,
    2. Poceta JS,
    3. Morales MC,
    4. et al
    . Self-reported snoring in pregnancy. Association with fetal outcome. Chest 1996; 109: 885–889.
  18. ↵
    1. Punjabi NM,
    2. Shahar E,
    3. Redline S,
    4. et al
    . Sleep-disordered breathing, glucose intolerance, and insulin resistance: the Sleep Heart Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 160: 521–530.
  19. ↵
    1. Punjabi NM,
    2. Sorkin JD,
    3. Katzel LI,
    4. et al
    . Sleep-disordered breathing and insulin resistance in middle-aged and overweight men. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 677–682.
  20. ↵
    1. Evans ML,
    2. Dick MJ,
    3. Clark AS
    . Sleep during the week before labor: relationships to labor outcomes. Clin Nurs Res 1995; 4: 238–249.
  21. ↵
    1. Lee KA,
    2. Gay CL
    . Sleep in late pregnancy predicts length of labor and type of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 2041–2046.
  22. ↵
    ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 159–167.
  23. ↵
    1. Carpenter MW,
    2. Coustan DR
    . Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 768–773.
  24. ↵
    American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2009; 32 Suppl. 1:S62–S67.
  25. ↵
    1. Maislin G,
    2. Pack AI,
    3. Kribbs NB,
    4. et al
    . A survey screen for prediction of apnea. Sleep 1995; 18: 158–166.
  26. ↵
    1. Alexander GR,
    2. Himes JH,
    3. Kaufman RB,
    4. et al
    . A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 163–168.
  27. ↵
    1. Pien GW,
    2. Fife D,
    3. Pack AI,
    4. et al
    . Changes in symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing during pregnancy. Sleep 2005; 28: 1299–1305.
  28. ↵
    1. Sahin FK,
    2. Koken G,
    3. Cosar E,
    4. et al
    . Obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy and fetal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 100: 141–146.
  29. ↵
    1. Champagne K,
    2. Schwartzman K,
    3. Opatrny L,
    4. et al
    . Obstructive sleep apnoea and its association with gestational hypertension. Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 559–565.
  30. ↵
    National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/databriefs/adultweight.pdf Date last accessed: February 2010. Date last updated: May 11, 2009.
  31. ↵
    1. Perez-Chada D,
    2. Videla AJ,
    3. O'Flaherty ME,
    4. et al
    . Snoring, witnessed sleep apnoeas and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 788–792.
  32. ↵
    1. Magee LA,
    2. Helewa ME,
    3. Moutquin JM,
    4. et al
    . Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Canada 2008; 30: S1–S48.
  33. ↵
    1. Jensen GM,
    2. Moore LG
    . The effect of high altitude and other risk factors on birthweight: independent or interactive effects? Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 1003–1007.
  34. ↵
    1. Miller S,
    2. Tudor C,
    3. Nyima,
    4. et al
    . Maternal and neonatal outcomes of hospital vaginal deliveries in Tibet. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 98: 217–221.
  35. ↵
    1. Jelic S,
    2. Padeletti M,
    3. Kawut SM,
    4. et al
    . Inflammation, oxidative stress, and repair capacity of the vascular endothelium in obstructive sleep apnea. Circulation 2008; 117: 2270–2278.
  36. ↵
    1. Kohler M,
    2. Craig S,
    3. Nicoll D,
    4. et al
    . Endothelial function and arterial stiffness in minimally symptomatic obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178: 984–988.
  37. ↵
    1. Yinon D,
    2. Lowenstein L,
    3. Suraya S,
    4. et al
    . Pre-eclampsia is associated with sleep-disordered breathing and endothelial dysfunction. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 328–333.
  38. ↵
    1. Connolly G,
    2. Razak AR,
    3. Hayanga A,
    4. et al
    . Inspiratory flow limitation during sleep in pre-eclampsia: comparison with normal pregnant and nonpregnant women. Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 672–676.
  39. ↵
    1. Guilleminault C,
    2. Palombini L,
    3. Poyares D,
    4. et al
    . Pre-eclampsia and nasal CPAP: Part 1. Early intervention with nasal CPAP in pregnant women with risk-factors for pre-eclampsia: preliminary findings. Sleep Med 2007; 9: 9–14.
  40. ↵
    1. Poyares D,
    2. Guilleminault C,
    3. Hachul H,
    4. et al
    . Pre-eclampsia and nasal CPAP: Part 2. Hypertension during pregnancy, chronic snoring, and early nasal CPAP intervention. Sleep Med 2007; 9: 15–21.
  41. ↵
    1. Blyton DM,
    2. Sullivan CE,
    3. Edwards N
    . Reduced nocturnal cardiac output associated with preeclampsia is minimized with the use of nocturnal nasal CPAP. Sleep 2004; 27: 79–84.
  42. ↵
    1. Edwards N,
    2. Blyton DM,
    3. Kirjavainen T,
    4. et al
    . Nasal continuous positive airway pressure reduces sleep-induced blood pressure increments in preeclampsia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 252–257.
  43. ↵
    1. Izci B,
    2. Riha RL,
    3. Martin SE,
    4. et al
    . The upper airway in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 137–140.
  44. ↵
    1. Ip MS,
    2. Lam B,
    3. Ng MM,
    4. et al
    . Obstructive sleep apnea is independently associated with insulin resistance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 670–676.
  45. ↵
    1. Okada M,
    2. Takamizawa A,
    3. Tsushima K,
    4. et al
    . Relationship between sleep-disordered breathing and lifestyle-related illnesses in subjects who have undergone health-screening. Intern Med 2006; 45: 891–896.
  46. ↵
    1. Davies GA,
    2. Maxwell C,
    3. McLeod L,
    4. et al
    . Obesity in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32: 165–173.
  47. ↵
    1. Joel-Cohen SJ,
    2. Schoenfeld A
    . Fetal response to periodic sleep apnea: a new syndrome in obstetrics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1978; 8: 77–81.
  48. ↵
    1. Yin TT,
    2. Williams N,
    3. Burton C,
    4. et al
    . Hypertension, fetal growth restriction and obstructive sleep apnoea in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 141: 35–38.
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 36 Issue 4 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 36 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pregnancy and fetal outcomes of symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Pregnancy and fetal outcomes of symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing
G. Bourjeily, C.A. Raker, M. Chalhoub, M.A. Miller
European Respiratory Journal Oct 2010, 36 (4) 849-855; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00021810

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Pregnancy and fetal outcomes of symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing
G. Bourjeily, C.A. Raker, M. Chalhoub, M.A. Miller
European Respiratory Journal Oct 2010, 36 (4) 849-855; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00021810
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Sleep medicine
  • Paediatric pulmonology
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Article

  • Lung volumes and survival in chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • Umeclidinium in patients with COPD
  • EBUS-guided cryobiopsies in peripheral pulmonary lesions
Show more Original Article

Sleep-related Disorders

  • SDB in patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone therapy
  • Detection of OSA by an electronic nose
  • Longitudinal population study of nGOR, asthma and OSA
Show more Sleep-related Disorders

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society