Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

From the authors:

C. Dehnert, A.M. Luks, E.R. Swenson, P. Bärtsch
European Respiratory Journal 2010 36: 690-691; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00092610
C. Dehnert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: christoph.dehnert@med.uni-heidelberg.de
A.M. Luks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.R. Swenson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Bärtsch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

From the authors:

H. Guénard points out a discrepancy of the transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide (TL,CO) measurements between data published in his group's abstract 1 and data we reported recently 2. De Bisschop et al. 1 observed a small but significant decrease in TL,CO in acclimatised subjects after maximal exercise at 5,000 m, which H. Guénard considers to be in disagreement with the small increase we found in nonacclimatised subjects at rest at 4,559 m. He suggests that the discrepancy is due to an erroneous calculation of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL,CO) on our part. Furthermore, he points out that transfer factor of the lung for nitric oxide (TL,NO), which was also slightly decreased in the study of De Bisschop et al. 1, is a better measure of diffusion than TL,CO, since nitric oxide uptake is dependent only on membrane conductance and is not influenced by blood conductance.

First, we need to emphasise that corrections of the DL,CO measurements for altitude were done properly. The equipment used in the study performed an automated correction of DL,CO for the lower oxygen tension at altitude according to the formula given by MacIntyre et al. 3:Embedded Imagewhere DL,CO and DL,CO,Alt are the measured single-breath DL,CO at low altitude and that predicted for altitude, respectively, PI,O2,Alt is the inspiratory oxygen tension (PI,O2) at altitude, and 150 mmHg is the assumed at sea level.

As pointed out by H. Guénard, this formula predicts DL,CO at high altitude based on measurements performed at low altitude. Since our values measured at high altitude were compared with the baseline values at low altitude, the automated correction multiplied the measured values by (1+0.0031×(PI,O2–150)), i.e. by a term that is less than one. In addition, data were corrected for changes in haemoglobin concentration according to the formula given by MacIntyre et al. 3. We apologise for not having explained these corrections in more detail.

One needs to consider that the diffusing capacity measurement, based as it is on gas diffusion at the alveolar level, is not very sensitive to any early interstitial oedema formation. The work of J.C. Parker and colleagues (reviewed in Effros and Parker 4) shows that the alveolar capillary endothelium at rest has permeability only to hydrostatic stress of ∼5% compared with the larger upstream pulmonary artery endothelium. This means that the vast majority of fluid filtration of the lung vasculature occurs away from the alveolar capillary barrier. This notion is supported by only minor changes in DL,CO in subjects with radiographically evident high-altitude pulmonary oedema in our study 2.

The technique of measuring diffusing capacity of the lung for NO (DL,NO) was not available at the time of the study. H. Guénard suggests that we might have, therefore, missed evidence of interstitial oedema. This method is, however, not a perfect test for diffusion measurement either, because about of a third of NO uptake resistance is dependent upon the erythrocytes. Therefore, DL,NO is not just a reflection of changes in the alveolar capillary membrane 5 as H. Guénard proposes.

We also want to point out that the level of acclimatisation and physical activity of subjects were very different between these two studies and, thus, preclude direct comparison. De Bisschop et al. 1 examined subjects that had acclimatised over 1 week at an altitude of 5,000 m after maximal exercise, while we examined nonacclimatised subjects at rest (4, 20 and 44 h after climbing) at 4,559 m 2. Exercise at low 6 and high altitude 7 can cause mild interstitial oedema. Several studies suggest that a prolonged stay at high altitude may be associated with interstitial fluid accumulation in systemic tissues. This was shown for subcutaneous tissue 8 at 2,300 m and for mild pericardial effusion at 5,200 m, which increased over the first 7 days 9. Furthermore, a small decrease in lung compliance compatible with mild interstitial pulmonary oedema was measured by Pellegrino et al. 10 after 2 days of rest at 3,611 m and 1 day of rest at the same location, where we found no change in lung compliance during the first 48 h at altitude after more rapid ascent.

We thank H. Guénard for making us look again in detail at the published data, because we discovered that table 3 contained erroneous DL,CO values that had been corrected for altitude, in addition to the automated adjustment made by the computer of the body plethysmograph. We encountered problems with the submission of the large tables and were asked several times to repeat the uploading which, at one stage, lead to the submission of an old version of table 3. We apologise for this error and for not detecting it when proof reading. We assure that the description and discussion of the data in the paper were correct. A corrected version of table 3 has been published in the current issue of the European Respiratory Journal, as part of an Author Correction that highlights and rectifies this mistake 11.

Acknowledgments

We thank H-J. Smith (CareFusion GmbH, Hoechberg, Germany; formerly VIASYS Healthcare GmbH) for his technical support.

Footnotes

  • Statement of Interest

    A statement of interest for this article can be found at www.erj.ersjournals.com/misc/statements.dtl

    • ©2010 ERS

    REFERNECES

    1. ↵
      1. De Bisschop C,
      2. Leurquin-Sterk G,
      3. Faoro V,
      4. et al
      . High altitude enhances exercise-induced lung diffusion alterations. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2010; 24 Suppl. 1:103–
      OpenUrl
    2. ↵
      1. Dehnert C,
      2. Luks AM,
      3. Schendler G,
      4. et al
      . No evidence for interstitial lung oedema by extensive pulmonary function testing at 4,559 m. Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 812–820.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. MacIntyre N,
      2. Crapo RO,
      3. Viegi G,
      4. et al
      . Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 720–735.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      1. Effros RM,
      2. Parker JC
      . Pulmonary vascular heterogeneity and the Starling hypothesis. Microvasc Res 2009; 78: 71–77.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      1. Borland CD,
      2. Dunningham H,
      3. Bottrill F,
      4. et al
      . Significant blood resistance to nitric oxide transfer in the lung. J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 1052–1060.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Hopkins SR,
      2. Schoene RB,
      3. Henderson WR,
      4. et al
      . Sustained submaximal exercise does not alter the integrity of the lung blood-gas barrier in elite athletes. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84: 1185–1189.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Anholm JD,
      2. Milne EN,
      3. Stark P,
      4. et al
      . Radiographic evidence of interstitial pulmonary edema after exercise at altitude. J Appl Physiol 1999; 86: 503–509.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Gunga HC,
      2. Kirsch K,
      3. Baartz F,
      4. et al
      . Fluid distribution and tissue thickness changes in 29 men during 1 week at moderate altitude (2,315 m). Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1995; 70: 1–5.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Thompson AA,
      2. Baillie JK,
      3. Toshner M,
      4. et al
      . Pericardial effusions in healthy lowlanders after acute ascent to high altitude. Heart 2006; 92: 539–540.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Pellegrino R,
      2. Pompilio P,
      3. Quaranta M,
      4. et al
      . Airway responses to methacholine and exercise at high altitude in healthy lowlanders. J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 256–265.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Dehnert C,
      2. Luks AM,
      3. Schendler G,
      4. et al
      . Author Correction: No evidence for interstitial lung oedema by extensive pulmonary function testing at 4,559 m. Eur Respir J 2010:36: 699.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 36 Issue 3 Table of Contents
    European Respiratory Journal: 36 (3)
    • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents (PDF)
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    From the authors:
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    From the authors:
    C. Dehnert, A.M. Luks, E.R. Swenson, P. Bärtsch
    European Respiratory Journal Sep 2010, 36 (3) 690-691; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00092610

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    From the authors:
    C. Dehnert, A.M. Luks, E.R. Swenson, P. Bärtsch
    European Respiratory Journal Sep 2010, 36 (3) 690-691; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00092610
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • REFERNECES
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    Subjects

    • Lung structure and function
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Risk factors for disease progression in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis
    • Optimised surveillance of bronchial dysplasia in risky population
    • Reply: Risk factors for disease progression in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis
    Show more Correspondence

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society