Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Pre-operative evaluation of lung function test results

B. Houltz, J. Olofson, B. Bake
European Respiratory Journal 2010 35: 935; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00170309
B. Houltz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Olofson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Bake
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editors:

The European Respiratory Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons joint clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy) were published in the July 2009 issue of the European Respiratory Journal 1. This comprehensive and very important document provides guidelines for the risk evaluation of candidates for lung cancer surgery. We fully agree that the lung function variables forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL,CO), together with exercise capacity, are essential components in the risk stratification. We do not, however, agree on the recommended interpretation and evaluation of the test results. In the guidelines, lung function results are evaluated as customary in terms of percent of predicted normal values, i.e. corrected for sex, age, height and, for some variables, also weight (exercise test) 1. In our opinion, the correction for age is inappropriate when estimating peri-operative risk. This is because expressing lung function results in percent of predicted normal values results in ignorance of the normal age-related decline in lung function and exercise capacity. The guidelines recommend a post-operative predicted FEV1 value of 30% predicted to be a high-risk threshold. 30% pred normal FEV1 for a 70-yr-old male with a height of 178 cm is 0.9 L compared with 1.3 L for a male of the same height aged 25 yrs 2. Thus, according to the recommendations, the high-risk threshold regarding FEV1 is 0.9 L for a 70-yr-old patient but 1.3 L for the 25 yr old! There are of course similar consequences regarding DL,CO and exercise capacity.

One of several possible ways to deal with this problem is to express results of lung function tests and exercise tests of adults as percent of predicted normal at age 25 yrs (% pred25yrs) irrespective of the actual age. In the example above regarding the 70-yr-old patient, the guideline recommended high-risk threshold of post-operative predicted 30% pred corresponds to 0.9 L, which is equivalent to a post-operative predicted value of ∼20% pred25yrs. Thus, we suggest the high-risk threshold to be 20% pred25yrs for FEV1, DL,CO and exercise capacity.

Statement of interest

None declared.

    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, et al. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). Eur Respir J 2009;34:17–41.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, et al. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1993;6: Suppl. 16 5–40.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 35 Issue 4 Table of Contents
    European Respiratory Journal: 35 (4)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Pre-operative evaluation of lung function test results
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    Pre-operative evaluation of lung function test results
    B. Houltz, J. Olofson, B. Bake
    European Respiratory Journal Apr 2010, 35 (4) 935; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00170309

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Pre-operative evaluation of lung function test results
    B. Houltz, J. Olofson, B. Bake
    European Respiratory Journal Apr 2010, 35 (4) 935; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00170309
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • Statement of interest
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Inaccuracy of pulse oximetry in darker skinned patients unchanged across 32 years
    • Reply: Inaccuracy of pulse oximetry in darker skinned patients unchanged across 32 years
    • Radiomics in ILD associated with systemic sclerosis
    Show more Correspondence

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society