Pulmonary arterial pressure during rest and exercise in healthy subjects: a systematic review

G. Kovacs, A. Berghold, S. Scheidl, H. Olschewski
European Respiratory Journal 2009 34: 888-894; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00145608

Abstract

According to current guidelines, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is diagnosed when mean pulmonary arterial pressure (P̄pa) exceeds 25 mmHg at rest or 30 mmHg during exercise. Issues that remain unclear are the classification of P̄pa values <25mmHg and whether P̄pa >30 mmHg during exercise is always pathological.

We performed a comprehensive literature review and analysed all accessible data obtained by right heart catheter studies from healthy individuals to determine normal P̄pa at rest and during exercise. Data on 1,187 individuals from 47 studies in 13 countries were included. Data were stratified for sex, age, geographical origin, body position and exercise level.

P̄pa at rest was 14.0±3.3 mmHg and this value was independent of sex and ethnicity. Resting P̄pa was slightly influenced by posture (supine 14.0±3.3 mmHg, upright 13.6±3.1 mmHg) and age (<30 yrs: 12.8± 3.1mmHg; 30–50 yrs: 12.9±3.0 mmHg; ≥50 yrs: 14.7±4.0 mmHg). P̄pa during exercise was dependent on exercise level and age. During mild exercise, P̄pa was 19.4±4.8 mmHg in subjects aged <50 yrs compared with 29.4±8.4 mmHg in subjects ≥50 yrs (p<0.001).

In conclusion, while P̄pa at rest is virtually independent of age and rarely exceeds 20 mmHg, exercise P̄pa is age-related and frequently exceeds 30 mmHg, especially in elderly individuals, which makes it difficult to define normal P̄pa values during exercise.

Under physiological circumstances, the pulmonary circulation is characterised by low pressure and low vascular resistance. Several pathological conditions are associated with increased pulmonary pressure, i.e. pulmonary hypertension (PH). PH may be classified as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or PH due to a variety of causes including left heart diseases, lung diseases or pulmonary thromboembolic disease 1. PAH is characterised by the absence of the latter causes and may be idiopathic, familial or associated with a number of other conditions.

According to the current European Society of Cardiology guideline, PH has been haemodynamically defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (P̄pa) >25 mmHg at rest or >30 mmHg during exercise 2. The available data, however, suggests that normal resting P̄pa is considerably lower than 25 mmHg, usually <21 mmHg 3–5. Several studies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or interstitial lung disease have suggested that P̄pa values of 15–25 mmHg might be associated with adverse events and impaired outcome 6–8.

Although exercise haemodynamics have been included in the haemodynamic definition of PH, it does not account for factors such as exercise level, exercise method, position and age that may have an impact on P̄pa.

This literature review was conducted to summarise the available data that have been obtained from healthy individuals to define normal values of P̄pa during rest and exercise. We considered factors that might have an impact on P̄pa, such as posture, workload, age, geographic origin and sex. We found that the normal range of resting P̄pa is considerably lower than 25 mmHg, while exercise values, particularly in individuals aged >50 yrs, often exceed 30 mmHg.

METHODS: SEARCH STRATEGY, SELECTION CRITERIA AND STRATIFICATION

Publications examining pulmonary arterial pressure values during both rest and physical exercise in healthy volunteers were identified by a Medline search using the keywords “pulmonary arterial pressure and exercise”, “right heart catheterisation and exercise” and “right heart catheter and exercise”. The search was restricted to papers available in the English, German or French languages. A secondary search reviewed the reference lists of relevant papers (mostly not available in Medline). This secondary hand search identified the majority of included studies. Two reviewers (G. Kovacs and H. Olschewski) independently screened the studies identified by the two searches. Differences over inclusion of studies were resolved by consensus reached after discussion.

All publications working up original data based on right heart catheterisation were included. Studies were excluded when they were referring to and interpreting previous examinations, or when the original data were not clearly identifiable, as well as when they did not provide detailed descriptions of the applied methods or complete haemodynamic data, or when drug-induced changes of pulmonary pressure were investigated. From studies examining pulmonary haemodynamics at high altitude or under hypoxic conditions, only the control measurements performed at sea level and under normal oxygen tension were considered. All subjects in all studies were described as entirely free of clinical symptoms, or had minor medical conditions that, according to the authors, had no influence on pulmonary haemodynamics.

The Medline search identified a total of 1,932 studies. According to the selection criteria, 138 studies were retrieved for more detailed evaluation and 16 studies were ultimately found to be eligible for inclusion. The reasons for exclusion were as follows: not only healthy subjects (38 studies); no original data (10 studies); no right heart catheterisation or no pulmonary arterial pressure measurements (72 studies); case report (two studies). After the secondary hand search, 31 further studies were found to be eligible and were included in the final analysis. Altogether data from 47 studies published in the English, German and French literature between 1947 and 2003 were reviewed, which included 72 separate study populations 9–58.

The majority of studies used cycle ergometry, but some studies used treadmill exercise, leg or arm presses in the supine or upright position. The investigations were performed in different populations (younger or older, untrained or trained, female or male preponderance) in different countries. Data were stratified upon predefined criteria including sex, age (<30 yrs, 30–50 yrs, ≥50 yrs), origin (USA, Europe), body position (supine, upright) and exercise level. Three exercise levels were distinguished (slight, submaximal and maximal exercise), and the data were assigned to these categories, according to the following hierarchical criteria: 1) the original assessment by the authors; 2) heart rate (slight: 100–110 min−1, submaximal: 130–135 min−1, maximal: 160–170 min−1); 3) work-rate (slight: ∼50 W, submaximal: ∼100 W, maximal: ∼150–200 W); 4) peak oxygen uptake (slight: ∼1,000 mL·min−1, submaximal: ∼1,400–1,600 mL·min−1, maximal: ∼2,100–2,400 mL·min−1); and 5) cardiac output (slight: ∼12–14 L·min−1, submaximal: ∼16 L·min−1, maximal: ∼19–20 L·min−1). Owing to variations between study protocols, not all subjects were examined at all stages of exercise. Time points 2–3 min after start of a certain workload were considered for this analysis.

In some protocols, light sedation was applied before right heart catheterisation. These studies were included, as a previous review of a large database showed that such pre-medication may decrease systemic arterial pressure values, but has no significant impact on pulmonary haemodynamics 5.

Studies performed in the supine position were evaluated separately from studies in the upright position (sitting/exercising on the cycle ergometer, standing/walking on the treadmill). Few investigations involved the same subjects in the supine and upright positions. The comparison of haemodynamics depending on posture in these studies was analysed separately.

The association between sex and P̄pa was examined in studies in which both females and males were included and the results given according to sex.

Data originating from Europe, the USA and other parts of the world were compared to exclude bias due to geographical location.

In most studies, the zero level was set at 10 cm above the table (or 5 cm below the level of the sternum). For a few subjects (∼10% of all subjects) a slightly different levelling was used (e.g. the mid-axillary line).

The recorded data were not reported uniformly in the original publications. Some authors gave the mean values and the standard deviation of parameters for the whole group (∼70% of all subjects), with or without describing individual results; in other studies, only individual data were presented (∼30% of all subjects). In these cases, the present authors calculated the mean values and standard deviations. The number of study populations (e.g. males and females, different age groups, when independently evaluated) and subjects examined for each particular variable at the given exercise level are indicated.

For the final analysis, the weighted mean and the weighted standard deviation values for the whole population reviewed were calculated. To evaluate the effect of position, sex and age at rest and during exercise, subgroup analysis was performed using only those studies in which the results were given according to these variables. A random effects model was used for the meta-analysis (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). To further describe the impact of age on pulmonary arterial pressure during exercise, a meta-regression analysis was performed comparing the haemodynamic data for all subjects aged <50 yrs with those aged ≥50 yrs. To explore the robustness of the results, pre-planned sensitivity analysis of geographical location and exercise method was performed. Upper limits of normal (ULN) were calculated as mean+2sd.

RESULTS

Tables 1⇓–2⇓ and figures 1⇓–⇓3⇓ contain the most important results from the 47 publications included, describing 72 individually evaluated populations, altogether comprising 1,187 subjects (225 females, 717 males, no sex data for 245 subjects). The short description of all included studies (table A) and further haemodynamic analysis (tables B–K) are provided in the online data supplement.

Fig. 1—
Fig. 1—

Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (P̄pa) of healthy subjects at rest according to different strata. Data are presented as mean±sd.

Fig. 2—
Fig. 2—

Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (P̄pa) and cardiac output in healthy subjects at rest, slight exercise and maximal exercise in an upright position. Data are presented as mean±sd. n = 193.

Fig. 3—
Fig. 3—

Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (P̄pa) during rest and slight supine exercise in healthy subjects aged 18–30 yrs (□; n = 144), 30–50 yrs (▓; n = 169) and ≥50 yrs (▪; n = 91). Data are presented as mean±sd.

View this table:
Table 1—

Haemodynamics at rest(supine)

View this table:
Table 2—

Haemodynamics during upright exercise

Mean and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure at rest: upper limit of normal

P̄pa and the most important haemodynamic variables at rest are shown in table 1⇑. Data from the upright measurements and exercise data from all studies are shown in the online data supplement (tables B and C).

Based on the reviewed studies, resting P̄pa is 14.0±3.3 mmHg in the supine (based on data from 882 subjects) and 13.6±3.1 mmHg in the upright position (n = 301) (fig. 1⇑). Consequently, the ULN would be 20.6 mmHg in the supine and 19.8 mmHg in the upright position.

The corresponding resting systolic pulmonary arterial pressure is 20.8±4.4 mmHg in the supine (n = 625, ULN 29.6 mmHg), and 20.9±4.4 mmHg in the upright position (n = 241, ULN 29.7 mmHg).

Pulmonary arterial pressure during exercise

As a response to exercise, P̄pa, heart rate and cardiac output increased. As the studies used different exercise protocols, P̄pa during exercise was evaluated by analysing those studies in which the subjects were examined at rest and at least two different exercise levels 10, 26, 32, 47, 52, 53, 55. According to these studies, P̄pa increase during exercise corresponded to the increase in cardiac output (fig. 2⇑).

Based on this group of patients, the ULN of P̄pa in the upright position was 28.8 mmHg during slight and 36.8 mmHg during maximal exercise (table 2⇑). In studies where individual values were available, a total of 20 out of 97 (21%) subjects (aged <50 yrs) reached P̄pa values >30 mmHg during maximal exercise.

The influence of age on P̄pa at rest and during exercise

Several studies have addressed the effect of age on pulmonary arterial pressure during rest and exercise by comparing different age groups (<30 yrs, 30–50 yrs, >50 yrs) (fig. 3⇑) 42, 48, 50.

Although the differences were small at rest, P̄pa was significantly higher in subjects aged ≥50 yrs compared with younger subjects (p<0.001). The mean values were 14.7±4.0 mmHg, 12.9±3.0 mmHg and 12.8±3.1 mmHg in subjects aged ≥50 yrs, 30–50 yrs and <30 yrs, respectively. There was no significant difference (p = 0.64) between the <30-yr-old and 30–50-yr-old age-groups.

During slight exercise, P̄pa was significantly higher in subjects aged ≥50 yrs compared with younger subjects (p<0.001). The mean values were 29.4±8.4 mmHg, 20.0±4.7 mmHg and 18.2±5.1mmHg in subjects aged ≥50 yrs, 30–50 yrs and <30 yrs, respectively (fig. 3⇑) The combined P̄pa of the <30-yr-old and 30–50-yr-old age-groups was 19.4±4.8mmHg, so the ULN for P̄pa in individuals aged <50 yrs would be 29.0 mmHg, while in subjects aged ≥50 yrs it would be 46.2 mmHg. As only a few subjects aged ≥50 yrs were examined at higher exercise levels, reliable statistical analysis was not possible.

Pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance

Although the primary objective of this study was pulmonary arterial pressure, other haemodynamic parameters were also reviewed. Resting pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (Ppaw) was independent of age (7.7±3.0 mmHg for individuals aged ≥50 yrs versus 8.0±2.8 mmHg for subjects aged <50 yrs; p = 0.61), but similarly to P̄pa, Ppaw showed an age dependency during exercise, when individuals younger (10.9±3.9 mmHg at supine slight exercise) and older than 50 yrs (16.8±6.5 mmHg with supine slight exercise) were compared (p<0.001) (online data supplement, tables E and F). Data on cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance were not always available and might not follow a Gaussian distribution. The mean±sd values given in table 1⇑ should be interpreted with caution.

Influence of sex, geographical origin, exercise method and position on P̄pa

Sex and the geographical origin of the data did not significantly influence resting and exercise P̄pa values (online data supplement, tables G–I) 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 29, 35, 39, 43, 47.

The type of exercise influenced the results. Measured on the treadmill, 26, 32, 46, 55 P̄pa at rest (14.2±4.2 mmHg) and at slight exercise (19.8±4.9 mmHg) was similar to cycle ergometry data, while during submaximal and maximal exercise P̄pa was about 8–13% higher on the treadmill (27.3±6.7 mmHg at maximal exercise resulting in an ULN of 40.7 mmHg; n = 41), than on the cycle ergometer (24.0±6.4 mmHg supine and 25.2±5.1 mmHg upright).

Haemodynamic differences observed between the supine and upright position at rest and during exercise showed slightly decreased P̄pa and cardiac output and increased heart rate values in the upright compared with the supine position and were in agreement with previous reports (online data supplement, table J) 59.

DISCUSSION

We reviewed a substantial body of available data on pulmonary pressure values during rest and different levels of exercise in healthy volunteers. Only haemodynamic data obtained from right heart catheterisations were considered. With 1,187 included individuals, this is to our knowledge the largest survey to date of right heart catheterisation data in healthy individuals.

We stratified data for the most important factors, such as level of exercise, posture, sex, age, and geographical origin.

Resting P̄pa

Resting P̄pa is virtually independent of sex and geographical origin and is influenced slightly by age and posture. If a definition of mean+2sd is accepted for the ULN, the ULN for resting P̄pa is 20.6 mmHg (20.2 mmHg in individuals aged <50 yrs). Historically, the threshold for PAH was defined as 25 mmHg 60 and this value has been used in the current guidelines. In view of the results of the present analysis, it should be considered that the optimal threshold distinguishing between normal and elevated resting P̄pa may be considerably lower. A P̄pa of 20–25 mmHg may represent clinically relevant pulmonary hypertension. In fact, even values above the 1sd limit (17.3 mmHg) may have prognostic relevance as suggested by studies on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung fibrosis, where patients with P̄pa >17–18 mmHg had an unfavourable prognosis 6–8. Until now, patients with a P̄pa <25 mmHg were excluded from randomised controlled trials for PAH. Consequently, we do not know whether patients with P̄pa values of 20–25 mmHg would benefit from targeted PAH therapies.

Factors influencing P̄pa during exercise

P̄pa during exercise is affected by workload. According to studies in which subjects were examined at multiple exercise levels (table 2⇑), the increase in P̄pa was comparable from rest to slight exercise and from slight to maximal exercise, and showed a linear relation to the increase in cardiac output. P̄pa values during lower exercise levels almost always remained <30 mmHg (in subjects aged <50 yrs), but 21% of the examined healthy individuals (aged <50 yrs) surpassed the present threshold for PAH (i.e. 30 mmHg) during maximal exercise.

Age substantially influences P̄pa values. At rest, the difference between age-groups is negligible. During slight exercise, differences become substantial, and the P̄pa in subjects aged >50 yrs exceed the 30 mmHg threshold in ∼47% of all cases.

Consequently, it may not be possible to define a single upper limit of normal P̄pa that fits all individuals and all exercise levels, and so it may be difficult to incorporate exercise haemodynamics in the haemodynamic definition of PH.

Definition of normal ranges for P̄pa

With the assumption that the values follow a Gaussian distribution, it seems quite unlikely that a healthy individual aged <50 yrs would surpass the 25 mmHg P̄pa threshold at rest (one person in 5,000), while this can be expected in 1 in 250 healthy subjects aged ≥50 yrs (online data supplement, table K). However, even in young individuals, a rate of 0.0002 would translate into a prevalence of 200 per million, and would thus by far exceed current estimates of PAH prevalence (15–52 per million) 61, 62. On the other hand, resting P̄pa values >17 mmHg may indicate pathological conditions 6, 7. This highlights the importance of clinical assessment as compared with focusing on haemodynamics only. Further prospective studies will be necessary to justify certain pulmonary arterial pressure thresholds for the definition of PH.

The data of this review do not support the current threshold of P̄pa during exercise. According to the reviewed data, nearly half of subjects aged ≥50 yrs are expected to develop a P̄pa >30 mmHg during slight exercise and about 20% of subjects aged <50 yrs are expected to exceed this value during maximal exercise (online data supplement, table K).

Study limitations

There are certain limitations to this analysis. Despite our effort to review all relevant studies, some published data may have been missed. The interpretation of the results of almost 1,200 subjects examined by right heart catheterisation under controlled conditions should nonetheless allow robust conclusions.

Although studies from three continents (Europe, North America and South America) were included, the population of a large part of the world was not represented. In addition, only studies conducted at sea level with normal oxygen tension were analysed.

There may be an overrepresentation of well-trained subjects due to recruitment bias; however, there was no indication that fitness level has an impact on P̄pa. One study examined this question, by applying the same protocol to trained and untrained individuals 49. It showed differences in heart rate and cardiac output, but not in P̄pa values between the groups, either at rest or during exercise.

Our data originate from normal-weight populations. These results may not apply to overweight subjects 63, 64.

In most studies, the zero level was set either 10 cm above the table level or 5 cm below the level of the sternum. A few studies used the mid-thoracic line for levelling. This might have altered the results slightly.

We accepted the statements in the reviewed studies that the volunteers were healthy, or that their diseases did not influence pulmonary haemodynamics, yet we cannot exclude the possibility that unidentified diseases influenced pulmonary pressure. Of the 72 study populations, five included some subjects with systemic arterial hypertension. P̄pa values at rest and during exercise derived from these five studies showed no significant difference at rest or during exercise compared to those originating from studies excluding all subjects with systemic hypertension. Nevertheless we cannot be sure whether the high P̄pa values during exercise in patients aged ≥50 yrs might have been related partly to underlying diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle.

Conclusion

The data from a large number of right heart catheterisations in healthy individuals suggest a normal mean pulmonary arterial pressure of 14.0±3.3 mmHg at rest and an age-dependent increase during exercise that may exceed 30 mmHg, particularly in subjects aged ≥50 yrs.

Statement of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgments

J. Widimsky (Prague, Czech Republic) kindly provided the summary of a retrospective multicentre WHO study for the authors. We would like to thank E. Lamont (Dept of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria) for careful linguistic revision of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • For editorial comments see page 790.

    This article has supplementary material accessible from www.erj.ersjournals.com

  • Received September 24, 2008.
  • Accepted March 6, 2009.

References

  1. ↵
    Simonneau G, Galie N, Rubin LJ, et al. Clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43: Suppl. S 5S–12S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Galie N, Torbicki A, Barst R, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The Task Force on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2004;25:2243–2278.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Harris P, Heath D. Normal variations in pressure and flow. In: Harris P, Heath D, eds. The Human Pulmonary Circulation. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1986; pp. 149–160
  4. Naeije R. Pulmonary vascular function. In: Peacock A, Rubin LJ, eds. Pulmonary Circulation, 2nd Edn. London, Edward Arnold, 2004; pp. 3–13
  5. ↵
    Widimsky J, Dixon H. Normal values of central hemodynamics at rest and during exercise. A preliminary report of a retrospective WHO study. In: Rulli V, Messin R, Denolin H. Normal Values in Adults Ergometry According to Age, Sex and Training. Rome, Soc. Europea di Cardiologia, 1980; pp. 177–195
  6. ↵
    Hamada K, Nagai S, Tanaka S, et al. Significance of pulmonary arterial pressure and diffusion capacity of the lung as prognosticator in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2007;131:650–656.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Kessler R, Faller M, Fourgaut G, et al. Predictive factors of hospitalization for acute exacerbation in a series of 64 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:158–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Weitzenblum E, Hirth C, Ducolone A, et al. Prognostic value of pulmonary artery pressure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1981;36:752–758.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Hickam JB, Cargill WH. Effect of exercise on cardiac output and pulmonary arterial pressure in normal persons and in patients with cardiovascular disease and pulmonary emphysema. J Clin Invest 1948;27:10–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Wagner PD, Gale GE, Moon RE, et al. Pulmonary gas exchange in humans exercising at sea level and simulated altitude. J Appl Physiol 1986;61:260–270.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. Riley RL, Himmelstein A, Morley HL, et al. Studies of the pulmonary circulation at rest and during exercise in normal individuals and in patients with chronic pulmonary disease. Am J Physiol 1948;152:372–382.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. Dexter L, Whittenberger JL, Haynes FW, et al. Effect of exercise on circulatory dynamics of normal individuals. J Appl Physiol 1951;3:439–453.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Slonim NB, Ravin A, Balchum OJ, et al. The effect of mild exercise in the supine position on the pulmonary arterial pressure of five normal human subjects. J Clin Invest 1954;33:1022–1030.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Donald KW, Bishop JM, Cumming G, et al. The effect of exercise on the cardiac output and circulatory dynamics of normal subjects. Clin Sci (Lond) 1955;14:37–73.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. Freedman ME, Snider GL, Brostoff P, et al. Effect of training on response of cardiac output to muscular exercise in athletes. J Appl Physiol 1955;8:37–47.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Sancetta SM, Rakita L. Response of pulmonary artery pressure and total pulmonary resistance of untrained, convalescent man to prolonged mild steady state exercise. J Clin Invest 1957;36:1138–1149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. Reymond C, Desbaillets P, Baudraz B, et al. Epreuve d'effort et catheterisme cardiaque [Exercise test and cardiac catheterization]. Cardiologia 1957;30:259–278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Fishman AP, Fritts HW Jr, Cournand A. Effects of acute hypoxia and exercise on the pulmonary circulation. Circulation 1960;22:204–215.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Holmgren A, Jonsson B, Sjostrand T. Circulatory data in normal subjects at rest and during exercise in recumbent position, with special reference to the stroke volume at different work intensities. Acta Physiol Scand 1960;49:343–363.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  20. Bevegard S, Holmgren A, Jonsson B. The effect of body position on the circulation at rest and during exercise, with special reference to the influence on the stroke volume. Acta Physiol Scand 1960;49:279–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. Widimsky J, Berglund E, Malmberg R. Effect of repeated exercise on the lesser circulation. J Appl Physiol 1963;18:983–986.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. Bevegard S, Holmgren A, Jonsson B. Circulatory studies in well trained athletes at rest and during heavy exercise. With special reference to stroke volume and the influence of body position. Acta Physiol Scand 1963;57:26–50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. Granath A, Jonsson B, Strandell T. Circulation in healthy old men, studied by right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise in supine and sitting position. Acta Med Scand 1964;176:425–446.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  24. Granath A, Strandell T. Relationships between cardiac output, stroke volume and intracardiac pressures at rest and during exercise in supine position and some anthropometric data in healthy old men. Acta Med Scand 1964;176:447–466.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  25. Ekelund LG, Holmgren A. Circulatory and respiratory adaptation, during long-term, non-steady state exercise, in the sitting position. Acta Physiol Scand 1964;62:240–255.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    Damato AN, Galante JG, Smith WM. Hemodynamic response to treadmill exercise in normal subjects. J Appl Physiol 1966;21:959–966.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. Banchero N, Sime F, Penaloza D, et al. Pulmonary pressure, cardiac output, and arterial oxygen saturation during exercise at high altitude and at sea level. Circulation 1966;33:249–262.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. Ekelund LG, Holmgren A. Central hemodynamics during exercise. Circulat Res 1967;20: /21: Suppl. 1 I33–I43.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Parker JO, Di Giorgi S, West RO. A hemodynamic study of acute coronary insufficiency precipitated by exercise. With observations on the effects of nitroglycerin. Am J Cardiol 1966;17:470–483.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. Gurtner HP, Keller MF, Salzmann C. Die Hämodynamic gesunder Studenten in Ruhe und bei abgestufter Belastung [The hemodynamics of healthy students at rest and under graduated work load]. Med Thorac 1967;24:162–170.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  31. Yu PN, Murphy GW, Schreiner BF Jr, et al. Distensibility characteristics of the human pulmonary vascular bed. Study of the pressure–volume response to exercise in patients with and without heart disease. Circulation 1967;35:710–723.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Epstein SE, Beiser GD, Stampfer M, et al. Characterization of the circulatory response to maximal upright exercise in normal subjects and patients with heart disease. Circulation 1967;35:1049–1062.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. Harris P, Segel N, Bishop JM. The relation between pressure and flow in the pulmonary circulation in normal subjects and in patients with chronic bronchitis and mitral stenosis. Cardiovasc Res 1968;2:73–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. Ekelund LG. Circulatory and respiratory adaptation during prolonged exercise in the supine position. Acta Physiol Scand 1966;68:382–396.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Emirgil C, Sobol BJ, Campodonico S, et al. Pulmonary circulation in the aged. J Appl Physiol 1967;23:631–640.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. Alexander JK, Hartley LH, Modelski M, et al. Reduction of stroke volume during exercise in man following ascent to 3,100 m altitude. J Appl Physiol 1967;23:849–858.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  37. Messin R, Degre S, Demaret B, et al. The effect of age on pulmonary circulation in normal subjects. Prog Resp Res 1970;5:385–394.
    OpenUrl
  38. Stanek V, Jebavy P, Hurych J, et al. Central haemodynamics during supine exercise and pulmonary artery occlusion in normal subjects. Bull Physiopathol Respir (Nancy) 1973;9:1203–1217.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    Gurtner HP, Walser P, Fässler B. Normal values for pulmonary hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in man. Prog Resp Res 1975;9:295–315.
    OpenUrl
  40. Most E, Klempt HW, Korkisch E, et al. Das Verhalten des Pulmonalarterien- und Pulmonalkapillardruckes bei einstufiger Ergometerbelastung [The behaviour of pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise]. Herz/Kreisl 1975;7:399–405.
    OpenUrl
  41. Kubicek F, Zwick H. Pulmonalarteriendruck unter ansteigender Ergometerbelastung [The normal range of the pulmonary artery pressure during ergometrical exercise]. Med Klin 1976;71:409–413.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Keller R, Kopp C, Zutter W, et al. Der Lungenkreislauf als leistungsbegrenzender Faktor bei Patienten [Pulmonary circulation as a limiting factor in physical work capacity]. Pneumonologie 1976; 5: Suppl, 27–39
  43. ↵
    Haerten K, Both A, Krelhaus W, et al. Die Hämodynamic des kleinen Kreislaufs bei Herzgesunden unter mehrstufiger Ergometerbelastung [Hemodynamics of the pulmonary circulation during a multistep exercise test in healthy subjects]. Med Welt 1976;27:2386–2388.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. Kubicek F, Gaul G. Comparison of supine and sitting body position during a triangular exercise test. I. Experiences in healthy subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1977;36:275–283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. Thadani U, Parker JO. Hemodynamics at rest and during supine and sitting bicycle exercise in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:52–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Hossack KF, Bruce RA, Green B, et al. Maximal cardiac output during upright exercise: approximate normal standards and variations with coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1980;46:204–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    Harzbecker K, Krause M, Mährlein W. Referenzwerte der pulmonalen Hämodynamik in Ruhe und unter Ergometerbelastung in sitzender Position [Reference values of the pulmonary hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in the sitting position]. Dtsch Gesundh Wes 1981;36:498–502.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    Wenzel D, Scheuler D, Schiller W. Referenzwerte der pulmonalen Hämodynamik in Ruhe und unter Ergometerbelastung in liegender Position [Reference values of the pulmonary hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in the supine position]. Dtsch Gesundh Wes 1982;37:840–874.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Lehmann M, Ruhle K, Schmid P, et al. Hämodynamik, Plasmakatecholaminverhalten und beta-Adrenozeptorendichte bei Trainierten, Untrainierten und Herzinsuffizienten [Hemodynamics, plasma catecholamine behavior and beta-adrenergic receptor density in trained and untrained subjects and cardiac insufficiency patients]. Z Kardiol 1983;72:529–536.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    Ehrsam RE, Perruchoud A, Oberholzer M, et al. Influence of age on pulmonary haemodynamics at rest and during supine exercise. Clin Sci (Lond) 1983;65:653–660.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. Higginbotham MB, Morris KG, Williams RS, et al. Regulation of stroke volume during submaximal and maximal upright exercise in normal man. Circ Res 1986;58:281–291.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Reeves JT, Groves BM, Sutton JR, et al. Operation Everest II: preservation of cardiac function at extreme altitude. J Appl Physiol 1987;63:531–539.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Groves BM, Reeves JT, Sutton JR, et al. Operation Everest II: elevated high-altitude pulmonary resistance unresponsive to oxygen. J Appl Physiol 1987;63:521–530.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. Janosi A, Apor P, Hankoczy J, et al. Pulmonary artery pressure and oxygen consumption measurement during supine bicycle exercise. Chest 1988;93:419–421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    Hossack KF, Adair OV, Crowley ST. Atrial natriuretic factor production during upright exercise. Cardiology 1990;77:433–442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Richard R, Doutreleau S, et al. Pulmonary hemodynamics during a strenuous intermittent exercise in healthy subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1866–1874.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. Stanek V, Widimsky J, Hurych J. The effect of age on the pressure-flow relationship and on the capacity of the pulmonary vascular bed with special reference to the condition of high flow. Prog Resp Res 1970;5:375–384.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    Degre S, de Coster A, Messin R, et al. Normal pulmonary pressure–flow relationship during exercise in the sitting position. Int Z Angew Physiol 1972;31:53–59.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    Reeves JT, Dempsey JA, Grover RF. Pulmonary circulation during exercise. In: Weir EK, Reeves JT, eds. Pulmonary Vascular Physiology and Physiopathology. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1989; pp. 107–133
  60. ↵
    Hatano S, Strasser T. Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: Report on a WHO Meeting. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1973
  61. ↵
    Humbert M, Sitbon O, Chaouat A, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in France: results from a national registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:1023–1030.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    Peacock AJ, Murphy NF, McMurray JJ, et al. An epidemiological study of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2007;30:104–109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    de Divitiis O, Fazio S, Petitto M, et al. Obesity and cardiac function. Circulation 1981;64:477–482.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Slany J, Mosslacher H, Irsigler K. Beeinfluβt Adipositas die Herzfunktion? [Does obesity have an effect on heart function?]. Z Kardiol 1975;64:851–862.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Email
Print
Citation Tools

Pulmonary arterial pressure during rest and exercise in healthy subjects: a systematic review
G. Kovacs, A. Berghold, S. Scheidl, H. Olschewski
European Respiratory Journal Oct 2009, 34 (4) 888-894; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00145608
del.icio.us logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To