Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Many a slip?

A. Bush, C. Hogg
European Respiratory Journal 2009 34: 293-294; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00061109
A. Bush
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Hogg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common disease (up to 1 in 2,000 in some populations), and there is a simple, cheap and reliable diagnostic test which is within the compass of a hospital of any size. Yet even so, wrong diagnoses are not uncommon, because there is a long list of causes of a false-positive elevation in sweat electrolytes 1. The most important problem is lack of experience and attention to detail by the operator. Furthermore, borderline cases may need sophisticated testing to establish the diagnosis, such as nasal potential differences or complete sequencing of the CF gene. The consequences of a wrong diagnosis of CF are potentially serious, including the prescription of inappropriate medications, and the generation of a great deal of anxiety.

The situation with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is even more complex. The prevalence is debated, and although probably less than CF, PCD is still an important diagnosis to make. Diagnosis is delayed to a greater extent than CF 2, in part because many of the symptoms (cough and a runny nose) are common in normal children 3. The diagnosis is important; treatment leads to stabilisation of lung function, and those diagnosed late have worse spirometry 4, 5. Furthermore, PCD upper airway disease, specifically chronic secretory otitis media, has different implications than the same problem in otherwise normal children 6, 7. However, the diagnostic difficulties, particularly in terms of false positives, are much greater in PCD than in CF.

The diagnostic pathway for PCD will often start with the elimination of commoner causes of respiratory symptoms, for example CF and hypogammaglobulinaemia, unless there are clear pointers to the diagnosis, such as unexplained neonatal respiratory distress in a baby with mirror image arrangement 8. A number of screening tests for PCD have been advocated. Ciliary function can be measured in vivo using the saccharine test 9, or radionuclide isotope scanning 10, and if normal, may obviate the need for further testing. However, if the patient sniffs during the saccharine test, a taste may be reported, and PCD eliminated incorrectly. Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) is almost invariably low in PCD 11, but this is not specific, and low nNO has been reported in CF 12 and diffuse panbronchiolitis 13. Hence, these screening tests can never be used to make a positive diagnosis of PCD; definitive diagnostic testing is mandatory.

Although newer diagnostic tests such as gene analysis 14 and staining of specific dynein proteins 15 are being developed, the mainstay of diagnosis of PCD remains the careful and detailed assessment of ciliary function and structure, usually on fresh but sometimes on cultured cells 8. These are not simple tests, and should only be performed in tertiary centres that have built up expertise over a period of years. Ciliated epithelium is usually obtained by nasal brush biopsy. Ciliary beat frequency (CBF) and pattern is recorded from frame by frame analysis using a high speed video-camera. In some cases, the beat pattern may be strongly suggestive of particular pathological abnormalities 16. Meticulous attention to detail is essential, and this is underscored by a manuscript in the current issue of the European Respiratory Journal 17. The group, which has been at the forefront of diagnostic studies in PCD for many years, now report for the first time that CBF varies depending on whether it is measured on single cells or on epithelial strips. If single cells are used, then potentially misleading results may be obtained. This is important, because some genuine cases of PCD have normal ciliary ultrastructure and diagnosis rests on CBF and the clinical picture.

Completing the diagnostic pathway is electron microscopy, which should involve a careful examination of a large number of cilia by an experienced and enthusiastic electron microscopist. Image enhancement using computer algorhythms may assist the process 18. It is essential to avoid confusing ultrastructural changes secondary to viral infection, with those of PCD. Increasingly, epithelial cell culture is used in difficult cases 19; if the structural and functional changes seen in the fresh cells are secondary, they will disappear after culture.

The study by Thomas et al. 17 is very timely, because diagnostic testing for PCD is a particularly hot topic in Europe. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) Task Force has produced the largest ever survey of cases of PCD, parts of which were presented at the recent congress as posters 20, 21 and a hot topic. It is very clear that in many parts of Europe, there is no access to the correct diagnostic pathways 8, and, even in those countries where the diagnostic tests exist, many patients are not being referred for proper testing. Thus, there is a real chance that some children labelled as having PCD may in fact just be otherwise normal, catarrhal children. This is an important failing which needs to be addressed, for several reasons. First, although the management of PCD lower airway disease is not dissimilar to that of idiopathic bronchiectasis, the management of the otological issues in PCD, specifically chronic secretory otitis media, is quite different from that in otherwise healthy children 6, 7, and failure to make the diagnosis of PCD can lead to unnecessary and unacceptable morbidity. Specifically, surgical procedures, in particular tympanostomy tube insertion, are avoided because they lead to prolonged, offensive otorrhea and do not improve hearing. Secondly, there is a clear need to undertake proper therapeutic trials in clearly defined groups of PCD patients, to improve the current, virtually nonexistent evidence base for treatment. If the trial is diluted with non-PCD patients, or nonspecifically chesty children, then wrong conclusions may be drawn. Not all bronchiectatic patients respond equally well to a given treatment; the disappointing effects of rhDNAse in idiopathic bronchiectasis 22 are in marked contrast to CF 23. Finally, a new era of therapy for genetic diseases is being opened up; for example, PTC124 (ataluren), which over-rides premature stop codons, may potentially be helpful in up to 30% of genetic diseases 24. Some evidence of benefit has already been shown in CF [25]. However, before the victim of a genetic disease can benefit from therapy, the disease has first got to be accurately diagnosed, and currently large numbers of Europeans do not have access to state of the art diagnostic procedures.

The problem having been highlighted by the ERS Task Force, what are the solutions? The European Union has devoted much praiseworthy effort to the elimination of inequalities across Europe. It is clear that the expense and sophistication of a diagnostic laboratory for PCD is such that relatively few centres across Europe will be able to offer testing. In the UK, it took central government funding to put PCD diagnostic testing on a sound financial basis; is this a model that the EU should adopt, offering funding to appropriate centres in relatively resource poor areas to diagnose PCD? There should be strings attached, as in the UK; centres would need to keep a database, collaborate with the other centres in the network, and undergo regular audits of the diagnostic procedures. But it would mean that across Europe, we could collect together a sufficiently large number of well characterised PCD patients to start to fill the evidence gaps in the treatment of this condition.

Statement of interest

None declared.

    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Wallis C. Diagnosing cystic fibrosis: blood, sweat, and tears. Arch Dis Child 1997;76:85–88.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      Coren ME, Meeks M, Buchdahl RM, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) in children – age at diagnosis and symptom history. Acta Paediatrica 2002;91:667–669.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      Bush A, O'Callaghan C. Primary ciliary dyskinesia. Arch Dis Child 2002;87:363–365.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      Ellerman A, Bisgaard H. Longitudinal study of lung function in a cohort of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J 1997;10:2376–2379.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    5. ↵
      Noone PG, Leigh MW, Sannuti A, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: diagnostic and phenotypic features. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:459–467.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      Hadfield PJ, Rowe-Jones JM, Bush A, et al. Treatment of otitis media with effusion in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Clin Otolaryngol 1997;22:302–306.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      Majitha A, Fong J, Hariri M, et al. Hearing outcomes in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia – a longitudinal study. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:1061–1064.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    8. ↵
      Bush A, Chodhari R, Collins N, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia. Arch Dis Child 2007;92:1136–1140.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      Canciani M, Barlocco EG, Mastella G, et al. The saccharin method for testing mucociliary function in patients suspected of having primary ciliary dyskinesia. Pediatr Pulmonol 1988;5:210–214.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      Marthin JK, Mortensen J, Pressler T, et al. Pulmonary radioaerosol mucociliary clearance in diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Chest 2007;132:966–976.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      Karadag B, James AJ, Gultekin E, et al. Nasal and lower airway level of nitric oxide in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J 1999;13:1402–1406.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      Balfour-Lynn IM, Laverty A, Dinwiddie R. Reduced upper airway nitric oxide in cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 1996;75:319–322.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      Nakano H, Ide H, Imada M, et al. Reduced nasal nitric oxide in diffuse panbronchiolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:2218–2220.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      Geremek M, Witt M. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: genes, candidate genes and chromosomal regions. J Appl Genet 2004;45:347–361.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. ↵
      Fliegauf M, Olbrich H, Horvath J, et al. Mislocalization of DNAH5 and DNAH9 in respiratory cells from patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:1343–1349.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      Chilvers MA, Rutman A, O'Callaghan C. Ciliary beat pattern is associated with specific ultrastructural defects in primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;112:518–524.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      Thomas B, Rutman A, O'Callaghan C. Disrupted ciliated epithelium shows slower ciliary beat frequency and increased dyskinesia. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 401–404
    18. ↵
      Escudier E, Couprie M, Duriez B, et al. Computer-assisted analysis helps detect inner dynein arm abnormalities. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1257–1262.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      Jorissen M, Willems T, Van der Schueren B, et al. Ultrastructural expression of primary ciliary dyskinesia after ciliogenesis in culture. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2000;54:343–356.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. ↵
      Strippoli MP, Frischer T, Barbato A, et al. ERS Task Force. Age at diagnosis in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) across Europe. Eur Respir J 2008;32: Suppl. 52 714S
      OpenUrl
    21. ↵
      Maurer E, Barbato A, Frischer T, et al. ERS Task Force. Treatments for primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) in children across Europe. Eur Respir J 2008;32: Suppl. 52 714S
      OpenUrl
    22. ↵
      Wills PJ, Wodehouse T, Corkery K, et al. Short-term recombinant human DNase in bronchiectasis. Effect on clinical state and in vitro sputum transportability. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:413–417.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    23. ↵
      Fuchs HJ, Borowitz DS, Christiansen DH, et al. Effect of aerosolized recombinant human DNase on exacerbations of respiratory symptoms and on pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmozyme Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994;331:637–642.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      Kerem E, Hirawat S, Armoni S, et al. Effectiveness of PTC124 treatment of cystic fibrosis caused by nonsense mutations: a prospective phase II trial. Lancet 2008;372:719–727.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 34 Issue 2 Table of Contents
    European Respiratory Journal: 34 (2)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Many a slip?
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Many a slip?
    A. Bush, C. Hogg
    European Respiratory Journal Aug 2009, 34 (2) 293-294; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00061109

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Many a slip?
    A. Bush, C. Hogg
    European Respiratory Journal Aug 2009, 34 (2) 293-294; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00061109
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • Statement of interest
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Nefer, Sinuhe and clinical research assessing post-COVID-19 syndrome
    • Asthma and COVID-19: do we finally have answers?
    • Is low level of vitamin D a marker of poor health or its cause?
    Show more Editorial

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • CME
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • ERS author centre

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society