Abstract
Health-related quality of life is a potentially important marker for evaluating existing and new therapies in bronchiectasis. The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a symptom specific questionnaire designed to assess the impact of cough severity, a major symptom of bronchiectasis. This study aimed to validate the LCQ in bronchiectasis.
The validity, responsiveness and reliability of the LCQ were assessed as follows: ability to discriminate severe and mild disease; change in score following antibiotic treatment for exacerbations; repeatability over a 6-month period in stable disease; and comparison with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).
In total, 120 patients (51 with severe disease, 29 with moderate disease and 40 with mild disease) completed the LCQ and SGRQ. The area under the receiver–operator curve was good for both severe and mild disease (0.84 and 0.80 respectively, p<0.0001). Following 2 weeks' antibiotic treatment, the median LCQ score (interquartile range) improved from 11.3 (9.3–13.7) to 17.8 (15–18.8) (p<0.0001). The LCQ score was repeatable over 6 months in stable disease (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96 (95%CI 0.93–0.97), p<0.0001). Correlation between the LCQ and SGRQ scores was -0.7 in both stable disease and exacerbations (p<0.0001).
The LCQ can discriminate disease severity, is responsive to change and is reliable for use in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.
Bronchiectasis, first described by Laennec 1 in 1819, is a chronic debilitating condition, with abnormal permanent dilatation of the airways causing impaired mucus clearance, chronic bacterial infection and persistent bronchial inflammation. Patients suffer from daily cough, excess sputum production and frequent exacerbations. They may also report breathlessness, wheeze and fatigue. Such debilitating symptoms impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 2, 3. Improving patients' HRQoL is a major goal of disease management.
Assessing HRQoL allows the clinician to directly quantify the effect of disease on patients' daily life and is recognised as an important tool in the evaluation of both existing and new therapies 4, 5. In chronic conditions, questionnaires targeting symptoms specific to the condition, exploring their physical effects, the subsequent restrictions in daily life and effect on mood are useful and relevant 6, 7. Such questionnaires provide a unique integration of physical and psychosocial morbidity, unlike other clinical parameters.
The only validated questionnaire used in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) 3. This was originally designed for use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and assesses multiple symptoms, including dyspnoea, wheeze, cough and sputum production 8. A symptom specific questionnaire focussing purely on cough and sputum expectoration, the major symptoms of bronchiectasis, would be an ideal measure of HRQoL for bronchiectasis patients.
The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a HRQoL questionnaire validated for assessing chronic cough 9. It is a 19-item, self-completed questionnaire exploring the impact of cough severity across three domains: physical (eight items), psychological (seven items) and social (four items). The total severity score ranges from 3 to 21, with a lower score indicating greater impairment of health status due to cough. It assesses the impact of symptoms over the preceding 2 weeks and its potential has recently been explored in a range of conditions including COPD, asthma and bronchiectasis 10. However, no studies have focussed solely on non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and it has not been validated for use in bronchiectasis.
The LCQ offers a pertinent, timely and useful clinical tool for bronchiectasis. It focuses purely on the impact of cough severity on HRQoL, unlike other questionnaires that encompass multiple respiratory symptoms. Cough is the dominant symptom of bronchiectasis, present in up to 98% of patients and measuring its impact on HRQoL is critical for both disease assessment and targeted management 11. Additionally, the LCQ is concise, consisting of only 19 items, offering greater patient acceptance than lengthier questionnaires.
The aim of this study was to validate the utility of the LCQ as an assessment tool in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.
METHODS
This was a 2-yr prospective cohort study (2006–2008) in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis approved by Lothian Research Ethics Committee (Lothian, UK). To validate the LCQ, we explored its validity, responsiveness and reliability. For validity, we assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), likelihood ratios, and post-test odds, as well as the area under the receiver–operator curve in predicting both severe and mild bronchiectasis. In addition, we assessed the correlation of the LCQ with the SGRQ in stable disease and in exacerbations. For responsiveness, we assessed the change in LCQ score following antibiotic treatment for exacerbations. For reliability, we assessed change in LCQ score over a 6-month period when clinically stable.
Questionnaires
The LCQ is a 19-item, self-completed, quality-of-life measure of chronic cough. It has three domains: physical (eight items), psychological (seven items) and social (four items) 9. The total severity score ranges 3–21, with a lower score indicating greater impairment of health status due to cough. It assesses the impact of symptoms over the preceding 2 weeks.
The SGRQ is a 50-item, self-administered HRQoL questionnaire consisting of three components: symptoms (eight items), activity (16 items) and impacts (26 items). It has previously been validated to reflect impaired HRQoL in bronchiectasis patients 3. The total score ranges 0–100, with a higher score indicating a poorer HRQoL. It assesses the impact of symptoms over the preceding 4 weeks.
Validity
All patients with an established diagnosis of bronchiectasis based on both clinical history and computed tomography (CT) of the chest and who regularly attended the regional bronchiectasis clinic were invited to participate in the study.
Patients were recruited if they were clinically stable (defined as no requirement for antibiotics in the preceding 4 weeks) and had no exclusion criteria. All patients completed the LCQ and the SGRQ 24 h prior to routine outpatient clinic attendance.
Exclusion criteria were: long-term antibiotic therapy (oral or nebulised); current smokers and ex-smokers of ≤2 yrs; coexisting COPD with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <60% predicted; a primary diagnosis of asthma; cystic fibrosis; active sarcoidosis, active allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; or active tuberculosis.
To predict severe and mild bronchiectasis, the following criteria were used. Severe bronchiectasis was defined as meeting all of the following clinical, microbiological and radiological criteria: expectorating purulent sputum when stable assessed using a standardised sputum colour chart 12; chronic sputum colonisation (defined as pathogenic bacteria cultured in at least two sputum samples when clinically stable in the preceding 12 months) and at least three lobes affected on CT scan, with evidence of varicose or cystic bronchial dilatation in at least one lobe (for the purposes of this study, the lingula was considered as a separate lobe). Mild bronchiectasis was defined as meeting all of the following clinical, microbiological and radiological criteria: expectorating mucoid or no sputum when clinically stable assessed using a standardised sputum colour chart 12; evidence of cylindrical bronchiectasis on CT scan in three or fewer lobes; and no evidence of chronic sputum colonisation. All other patients were classified as having moderate bronchiectasis.
Responsiveness
Patients with exacerbations, defined as increasing cough, increasing sputum volume, worsening sputum purulence and a need for intravenous antibiotic therapy, were recruited. Both LCQ and SGRQ questionnaires were filled in immediately prior to commencing antibiotic treatment and 1 week following completion of treatment. Both questionnaires were adapted for the end of exacerbation assessment to ask about symptoms in the preceding week.
For patients who had experienced more than one exacerbation, only the first exacerbation was used. All patients received 14 days of i.v. antibiotics treatment based on individual sputum bacteriology.
Reliability
The first 75 patients with clinically stable bronchiectasis (irrespective of disease severity) and who had had no changes made to therapy in the 6 months following entry to the study, were invited to repeat the LCQ 6 months after completion of the initial questionnaire.
STATISTICS
The utility of the LCQ in indicating severe and mild disease was assessed using sensitivity and specificity, PPV, NPV, likelihood ratio for a positive test and likelihood ratio for a negative test and the post-test odds as well as the area under the receiver–operator curve (AUC). The Kruskal–Wallis test compared severe bronchiectasis with moderate and mild bronchiectasis. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare scores at the start and end of exacerbations. The Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess correlation of the LCQ with SGRQ. For assessment of reliability over time, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was measured. A Bland–Altman plot was used to display repeatability over time 13. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, Version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Graphpad Prism Version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). For interpretation of AUC values the following is widely accepted: AUC 0.50–0.59 shows no value of test; 0.6–0.69 shows poor discrimination value; 0.70–0.79 shows moderate discriminatory value; 0.80–0.89 shows good discriminatory value; and 0.9–1.0 shows excellent discriminatory value 14. A 2-tailed p-value of <0.05 was statistically significant. Data are presented as median (interquartile range).
RESULTS
Validity: the LCQ as a discriminant of severe bronchiectasis
In total, 120 patients were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. Of these, 51 were classified as having severe bronchiectasis, 29 as moderate and 40 as mild. Table 1⇓ details baseline characteristics for each group and table 2⇓ provides details of the aetiology of the bronchiectasis for each group.
In predicting severe bronchiectasis, the LCQ performed well, with an AUC of 0.84 (0.80–0.88, p<0.0001; fig. 1⇓). The lower the LCQ score the greater the likelihood ratio for severe disease (table 3⇓). In predicting mild bronchiectasis, the LCQ performed well, with an AUC of 0.80 (0.76–0.84, p<0.0001; fig. 1⇓). The higher the LCQ score the greater the likelihood ratio for mild disease (table 4⇓).
The total and individual domain scores (physical, psychological and social) were significantly lower in those with severe disease compared with mild and moderate disease (table 5⇓).
The LCQ had a significant inverse correlation with the SGRQ in stable disease. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was -0.7, (95% CI −0.58– −0.78; p<0.0001; fig. 2a⇓).
Responsiveness: the LCQ at the start and end of antibiotic treatment
In total, 32 exacerbations met the study criteria and were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. Of these, 19 were due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 13 were due to other potentially pathogenic microorganisms (three Haemophilus influenzae, three Streptococcus pneumoniae, two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, two Moraxella cattarhalis, one S. aureus, one Escherichia coli and one Serratia spp.). There was a significant improvement (p<0.0001) in both the individual domain and total scores between the start and end of treatment. The actual domain scores at the start and end of treatment, respectively, were: physical domain (3.5 (2.9–4) and 5.4 (4.4–5.7)); psychological domain (3.8 (2.9–5) and 6.1 (4.8–6.7)); and social domain (4.0 (2.7–4.7) and 6.0 (5.2–6.5)). The total LCQ score at the start of treatment was 11.3 (9.3–13.8) and at the end of treatment was 17.8 (14.2–18.8). The changes for each patient are shown in figure 3a⇓. The LCQ had a significant inverse correlation with the SGRQ (Spearman rank correlation coefficient of -0.69 (95% CI −0.53– −0.81; p<0.0001; fig. 2b⇑).
Reliability: the repeatability of the LCQ in stable bronchiectasis over a 6-month period
In total, 67 (89.3%) patients repeated the LCQ 6 months after completion of the initial questionnaire. The ICC for the total LCQ score was 0.96 (95% CI 0.93–0.97; p<0.0001). The mean±sd difference between the total scores was -0.23±1.1. A Bland–Altman plot of the difference between repeat total scores for the LCQ is shown in figure 3b⇑.
DISCUSSION
This study establishes the validity, responsiveness and reliability of the LCQ in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. The validation of this HRQoL questionnaire, which explores the impact of cough severity, is relevant to bronchiectasis and is likely to be of value in the evaluation of both existing and new therapeutic agents.
HRQoL questionnaires are well established useful measures of the direct impact of chronic respiratory disease on patients' daily lives 15–17. In chronic conditions, it has been increasingly recognised over the past decade that improving quality of life is important 4. Achieving an improvement in HRQoL is a major treatment target in bronchiectasis. However, to date, there is a distinct paucity of validated questionnaires available to assess HRQoL in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. There is no questionnaire that has been specifically developed for the disease and, to our knowledge, there is only one validated questionnaire at present, the SGRQ, which was originally designed and intended to assess obstructive airways disease 3.
Cough is a cardinal symptom of bronchiectasis and, as such, may be most likely to impact on HRQoL. A questionnaire that evaluates the effect of perceived cough severity is highly relevant. The LCQ is a symptom-specific questionnaire assessing cough and was selected for validation as it focuses solely on the dominant symptom of bronchiectasis and, additionally, its potential utility in bronchiectasis has been highlighted in previous studies 10, 18. Torrego et al. 18 explored the sensitivity of the cough reflex in bronchiectasis using inhalation of incremental doses of capsaicin and found that capsaicin sensitivity correlated positively with the total LCQ score (r = 0.64, p = 0.005). More recently, since the completion of this study, Polley et al. 10 have compared the LCQ and the Cough Quality of Life Questionnaire together with a generic health status questionnaire (the EUroQol) in different chronic respiratory diseases, including bronchiectasis, and suggested the LCQ may be able to provide useful information about the impact of cough 19, 20. The LCQ itself is more concise than other HRQoL questionnaires assessing cough which may imply greater patient acceptance of the questionnaire 9.
The three key concepts required to ensure a questionnaire is valid for a disease are: validity, responsiveness and reliability. Our study included all patients with an established diagnosis of bronchiectasis attending a specialist clinic. We then selected patients at different ends of the spectrum, mild and severe bronchiectasis, to establish whether the LCQ could demonstrate convergent validity using selected relevant markers of mild and severe disease, respectively. There are no previously established criteria defining disease severity in bronchiectasis. The criteria we used to define mild and severe disease were based on our clinical experience of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and incorporate the major features of the disease, including radiological severity, microbiological history and clinical symptoms. Aspects of these key features have, in previous studies, been independently associated with HRQoL, Wilson et al. 21 explored whether sputum bacteriology affected HRQoL and found that patients colonised with P. aeruginosa had a significantly worse SGRQ score than other patients with H. influenzae or no bacterial growth (p<0.05). Martinez-Garcia et al. 2 found in their cohort of Spanish patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis that dyspnoea, FEV1 and sputum expectoration were associated with a worse SGRQ score. We found that the LCQ performed well for predicting both severe and mild disease. In clinical practice, however, the main value of the LCQ will be in the longitudinal assessment of disease and in the evaluation of existing and new therapies.
To our knowledge, the SGRQ is the only previously validated HRQoL questionnaire in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis 3. We therefore used this as a standard against which to assess the LCQ. We found the LCQ total score had a significant negative correlation with the total SGRQ score in both stable disease and exacerbations, further corroborating the validity of the LCQ in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. The correlation is, however, imperfect suggesting that the two questionnaires are providing information on different aspects of the impact of bronchiectasis on HRQoL.
The LCQ confers advantages over the SGRQ in bronchiectasis. The LCQ focuses on cough, the major symptom of both stable disease and exacerbations, making it highly relevant. The SGRQ assesses other clinical features in addition to cough such as dyspnoea and wheeze, symptoms which are less frequently present in bronchiectasis; a previous study found that dyspnoea was present in only 62% of patients at presentation compared with cough in 98% 11. The LCQ is concise, with only 19 items for completion compared with 50 items contained within the SGRQ, and will be easier to complete particularly if repeated testing is required, for example, in response to exacerbations. Furthermore, the LCQ assesses symptoms over a shorter time period (2 weeks) compared with 4 weeks in the SGRQ. The validation of the LCQ in bronchiectasis in addition to the SGRQ will provide two relevant and important means of assessing the impact of daily symptoms on HRQoL. Improving HRQoL is a major aim of management in chronic disease.
There was a significant improvement across all domains and the total LCQ score in direct response to 2-weeks' i.v. antibiotic treatment for exacerbations with a median improvement in total score of 4.6 (3.2–7.2) following completion of treatment. Mutalithas et al. 22 found a significant improvement in all domains of the LCQ following 4 weeks of outpatient-based physical therapy intervention, with total score improving from 14.2 to 17.3 (p<0.0001). There is debate regarding the minimal important difference in total LCQ score thought to be clinically relevant, with previous studies assessing the LCQ in chronic cough suggesting a change of between 1.3 and 2.7 23, 24. The present study did not address the minimally important difference and further studies are needed.
The reliability of the LCQ was measured by assessing its repeatability over 6 months, a period longer than the 2-week time course used in the initial development and validation of the questionnaire 9. A period of 6 months is representative of the routine follow-up period for patients with stable non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. It is expected that there is some noise in HRQoL questionnaires but in clinically stable bronchiectasis the scores were repeatable over a 6-month period with a high intraclass correlation coefficient. The mean change for clinically stable patients over 6 months was -0.23±1.1 units, lower than the minimal important differences found in the previous studies.
This study validates the LCQ for use in the assessment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. It is able to discriminate disease severity, is responsive to change and is reliable. It assesses one of the most pertinent symptoms of bronchiectasis and is likely to be of value in assessment of both existing and new therapies as well as providing a relevant adjunct to current clinical management. Further studies to externally validate the LCQ in bronchiectasis would be welcome.
Support statement
M.P. Murray is funded by the Chief Scientist Office, Scotland, UK.
Statement of interest
None declared
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank I. Pavord (Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK) and S. Birring (King's College Hospital, London, UK) for their kind permission to use the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and P. Jones (St George's Hospital, London, UK) for his kind permission to use the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.
- Received October 24, 2008.
- Accepted January 11, 2009.
- © ERS Journals Ltd