Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound–transbronchial needle aspiration: a systematic review

L. Varela-Lema, A. Fernández-Villar, A. Ruano-Ravina
European Respiratory Journal 2009 33: 1156-1164; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00097908
L. Varela-Lema
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Fernández-Villar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Ruano-Ravina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Tables

  • Table 1—

    Results of studies that assess the effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound(EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in bronchopulmonary cancer

    First author [ref]Type of studyPatients/procedures includedReference/comparison testDiagnostic performancePAdequate sampleSafety
    SSpPPVNPV
    Lee 18#Prospective91 patients with strongly suspected or histologically confirmed potential NSCLC with lymph nodes accessible to EBUS–TBNA (5–20 mm on CT). Exclusion of M1 disease, inoperable T4 disease, N3 disease with spread to supra-clavicular lymph node, lymph nodes >2 cm or extranodal invasion.Cytology results in positive cases Surgery (open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery) in patients without mediastinal metastasis. No mediastinoscopy performed93.8%100%100%96.9%42%92%
    Wallace 19¶Prospective138 consecutive patients with known or suspected lung cancer on the basis of CT abnormality but no proven extrathoracic metastases Blinded comparisonPathological confirmation for positive results Surgical sampling by mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy, open surgical exploration or 6–12 months of follow-upPET28%100%No complications
    24%90%
    CT
    67%53%
    TBNA
    36%100%100%78%
    EUS–FNA
    69%100%100%88%
    EBUS–TBNA
    69%100%100%88%
    EUS–FNA + EBUS–TBNA
    93%100%100%97%
    Bauwens 20#Prospective collection and retrospective assessment106 patients with proven lung cancer (staging) or suspected lung cancer on FDG–PET (33 combined PET/CT)Cytology/histology results in positive cases Surgical staging (30 out of 46), diagnostic procedures or follow-up in negative cases Blind retrospective comparisonEBUS–TBNA (n = 90 patients)58%94%Side-effects, notably cough, seldom encountered
    93%100%100%91%
    FDG–PET (n = 41 patients)
    67%100%
    Vincent 21#Retrospective152 procedures carried out in 152 patients with primary lung masses or/and mediastinal adenopathyCytology results in positive cases with or without surgical confirmation Mediastinoscopy, lung resection, CT, FDG–PET or metabolic activity99.1%100%100%97%74.3%95.4%No complications
    Herth 17#Prospective97 patients highly suspicious for NSCLC with CT scans showing lymph nodes <1 cm and negative PET in mediastinumSurgical results in all patients89%100%100%98.9%9.2%
    Monsó 22#Prospective67 patients with pulmonary neoplasms and mediastinal and/or lobular lymph nodes >5 mm on ultrasoundCytologyDiagnostic yield 92.5%55.2%87.8%No complications
    Nakajima 14#Retrospective43 patients with suspected metastasis of lung cancer and lymph nodes ≥5 mm on CTCytology or histology results in positive cases Thoracotomy, thoracoscopy or clinical follow-up (≥6 months)92%100%100%90%53.5%95.3%No complications
    Herth 15#Prospective502 patients with mediastinal or hilar adenopathies (>1 cm; unknown origin or staging of lung cancer, especially exclusion of N3 nodes)Cytology in positive cases Surgery or clinical follow-up in negative cases94%100%11%98.2%93.5%No complications
    Herth 16#Prospective100 patients with suspected tumour of pulmonary origin evidenced by CT (T1–T4), without enlargement of lymph nodes (measuring <1 cm) or diagnosis of suspected or known NSCLCMediastinoscopy (15%) or thoracotomy (85%) with resection of mediastinal nodes in all patients92.3%100%96.3%17%100%No complications
    Yasufuku 13#Prospective102 patients with suspected or anatomopathologically-confirmed lung cancer who were considered candidates for curative thoracic surgery (patients with stage I, II, or clinical minimal IIIa disease). Extensive N2/N3 disease excludedThoracotomy performed or diagnosis made from dissection of lymph nodes in potentially operable patients, and follow-up conducted in other patients (N3 or extensive N2 disease).EBUS–TBNA100%100%No major complications
    92.3%100%100%97.4%
    CT
    76.9%55.3%37%87.5%
    FDG–PET
    80%70.1%46.5%91.5%
    Yasufuku 12#Prospective108 patients with suspected NSCLC or proven lung cancer and enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (>1 cm) or mediastinal lesions suspected of malignancy detected by CT (N2 or N3)Positive cytologies regarded as final diagnosis Follow-up of the disease and confirmation by thoracic lymphadenopathy in negative cases94.6%100%100%89.5%62.9%97.2%No complications
    Rintoul 23#Prospective18 patients with suspected or known lung cancer and detection of nodular enlargement or presence of paratracheal or parabronchial masses on CTPositive cytologies regarded as final diagnosis Benign results confirmed by surgery (n = 4) or clinical follow-up (n = 1)85%100%100%71.4%72.2%100%No complications
    Vilmann 24#Prospective33 patients for staging of lung cancer (n = 20) or diagnosis of mediastinal lesions (n = 13)Thoracotomy (n = 9), clinical follow-up (n = 19)EBUS–TBNA93.9%95%No complications
    85%100%72%
    EUS–FNA
    80%100%66%
    Yasufuku 9#Prospective70 patients with hilar and/or mediastinal lymphadenopathies (>1 cm) and with suspected or confirmed lung cancer.Positive cytologies regarded as final diagnosis In benign results confirmation by thoracotomy or surgery (n = 21) and by clinical follow-up (n = 3)95.7%100%68.5%96%No complications
    • S: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; P: prevalence of lymph node malignancy; NSCLC: nonsmall cell lung cancer; CT: computerised tomography; M: metastasis; T: tumour; N: lymph node; PET: positron emission tomography; EUS: transoesophageal ultrasonography; FNA: fine-needle aspiration; FDG: fluorodeoxyglucose. #: patient-based analysis; ¶: lesion-based analysis.

  • Table 2—

    Results of studies that assess the effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound(EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in sarcoidosis and lymphoma

    Author and yearType of studyPatients includedReference/comparison testDiagnostic performancePAdequate sampleSafety
    SSpPPVNPV
    Diagnosis of sarcoidosis
     Wong 27Prospective65 patients with clinical and radiological findings suggestive of sarcoidosis and enlargement of lymph and/or mediastinal nodes (>1 cm)Positive cytologies taken as final diagnosis In benign results, mediastinoscopy (n = 5), thoracoscopy (n = 1) and clinical follow-up (n = 3)91.8%87.5%#11%#100%95.3%No important complications
     Oki 28Prospective15 patients with clinical and radiological findings suggestive of sarcoidosis and enlargement of lymph and/or mediastinal nodes (>1 cm)TBNA in all patientsDiagnostic performance of EBUS–TBNA 93%93.3%No complications
    Diagnostic performance of TBNA 94%
     Garwood 29Prospective50 patients with suspicion of sarcoidosis (90% with clinical symptoms and adenopathy on radiographic imaging)Positive cytologies taken as final diagnosis In benign results, histology samples (obtained by EBUS–TBNA or transbronchial lung biopsy, endobronchial biopsy or in one case supraclavicular lymph node aspiration) or follow-up88%100%100%12.5%98%88%No complications
    Diagnosis of lymphoma
     Kennedy 30Retrospective25 patients with suspected lymphoma (clinical, radiological data or other previous lymphoma)Results of the biopsy and clinical and radiological follow-up of patients for 6 months90.9%100%100%92.6%44%96%No complications
    • S: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; P: prevalence. #: For this calculation, four cases without definitive diagnosis were deemed positive.

PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 33 Issue 5 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 33 (5)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound–transbronchial needle aspiration: a systematic review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound–transbronchial needle aspiration: a systematic review
L. Varela-Lema, A. Fernández-Villar, A. Ruano-Ravina
European Respiratory Journal May 2009, 33 (5) 1156-1164; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00097908

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound–transbronchial needle aspiration: a systematic review
L. Varela-Lema, A. Fernández-Villar, A. Ruano-Ravina
European Respiratory Journal May 2009, 33 (5) 1156-1164; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00097908
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Statement of interest
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • The paradox of immune checkpoint inhibition reactivating tuberculosis
  • Corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapies for cardiac sarcoidosis
  • Diagnostic, prognostic and differential-diagnostic relevance of pulmonary hemodynamics during exercise – a systematic review
Show more Review

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society