Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Effect of low-dose theophylline plus beclometasone on lung function in smokers with asthma: a pilot study

M. Spears, I. Donnelly, L. Jolly, M. Brannigan, K. Ito, C. McSharry, J. Lafferty, R. Chaudhuri, G. Braganza, I. M. Adcock, P. J. Barnes, S. Wood, N. C. Thomson
European Respiratory Journal 2009 33: 1010-1017; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00158208
M. Spears
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. Donnelly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Jolly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Brannigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Ito
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. McSharry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Lafferty
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Chaudhuri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Braganza
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. M. Adcock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. J. Barnes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Wood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. C. Thomson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Fig. 1—
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1—

    Randomisation schedule. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of four treatments and reviewed at 14 and 28 days. Treatment ceased at 28 days. Serious adverse effects: theophylline plus inhaled beclometasone, n = 0; theophylline, n = 2 (viral meningitis and chest pain secondary to reflux oesophagitis); inhaled beclometasone, n = 0.

  • Fig. 2—
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2—

    Change in a) peak expiratory flow (PEF), b) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and c) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores from randomisation to 28 days of treatment (paired t-test). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. p-values were derived from comparison of groups with inhaled beclometasone change using ANCOVA. BD: bronchodilator; ICS: inhaled corticosteroids; Theo: theophylline; Theo+ICS: theophylline and inhaled beclometasone combination. #: p = 0.008; ¶: p = 0.135; +: p = 0.069; §: p = 0.158; ƒ: p = 0.033; ##: p = 0.016.

  • Fig. 3—
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3—

    Change in histone deacetylase activity (HDAC) from randomisation to 28 days of treatment. Individual plots of HDAC activity are shown. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. ICS: inhaled corticosteroids; Theo: theophylline; Theo+ICS: theophylline and inhaled beclometasone combination.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1—

    Baseline demographics

    CharacteristicInhaled beclometasoneTheophylline + inhaled beclometasoneTheophylline
    Subjects n232223
    Age yrs42 (36–53)44 (31–52)46 (38–50)
    Female % of total615565
    BMI kg·m−225.5 (18.4–34.2)26.0 (17.3–36.1)26.6 (18.6–37.1)
    Smoking pack·yrs−124 (15–30)25 (11–40)30 (15–35)
    Duration of asthma yrs16 (8–31)15 (9–21)16 (9–30)
    ICS use at screening
     Total %656874
     Dose beclometasone equivalent μg800 (400–800)800 (400–950)400 (400–900)
    LABA use at screening %263635
    Specific IgE antibody positive %615052
    Total IgE level IU·mL−187 (34–396)91 (31–383)40 (9–346)
    Spirometry pre-BD FEV1 % pred75 (72–89)78 (65–84)73 (64–84)
    Reversibility FEV1 % improvement16 (13–20)15 (14–18)18 (14–24)
    ACQ score#1.8±0.91.8±0.72.1±0.5
    • Data presented as median (interquartile range) and mean±sd, unless stated otherwise. BMI: body mass index; ICS: inhaled corticosteroids; LABA: long-acting β2-agonist; Ig: immunoglobulin; BD: bronchodilator; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; ACQ: Asthma Control Questionnaire. #: range 0–6 with higher scores indicating worse asthma control.

  • Table 2—

    Baseline sputum counts and histone deacetylase activity(HDAC)

    CharacteristicInhaled beclometasone#Theophylline + inhaled beclometasone¶Theophylline§
    Sputum total cell count 1064.3 (2.6–7.3)5.1 (3.1–9.4)6.0 (2.4–16.1)
    Eosinophils %0.9 (0.3–1.6)0.8 (0.4–1.8)1.3 (0.5–2.3)
     Absolute count 104 cells2.1 (0.8–5.8)3.7 (1.9–19.5)6.3 (1.7–28.4)
    Neutrophils %25.5 (9.6–44.6)23.5 (8.6–42.3)16.6 (8.4–40.3)
     Absolute count 104 cells122.7 (25–188)83.0 (35–302)80.0 (25–323)
    Macrophages %52.8 (32.0–64.4)45.1 (38.1–60.8)52.1 (39.1–64.3)
     Absolute count 104 cells184.2 (96–437)271.8 (165–452)78.0 (147–729)
    Lymphocytes %1.3 (0.6–2.6)1.6 (1.0–2.7)1.0 (0.5–2.5)
     Absolute count 104 cells4.9 (2.3–11.2)12.4 (3.2–20.7)7.1 (1.5–22.6)
    Bronchial epithelial cells %10.5 (8.3–15.4)16.4 (8.0–28.9)12.3 (6.1–27.2)
     Absolute count 104 cells40.7 (20.5–99.4)119.1 (63.8–157.6)83.7 (22.1–168.2)
    HDAC activityƒ
     AFU 106 cells2.25 (0.54–3.95)3.75 (0.34–7.16)3.62 (0.61–6.64)
    • Data presented as median (interquartile range). AFU: arbitrary fluorescence units. #: n = 10; ¶: n = 12; §: n = 14; ƒ: mean (95% confidence interval).

  • Table 3—

    Changes in lung function and biomarkers following treatment compared with response to treatment with inhaled beclometasone alone

    Change (relative to inhaled beclometasone)Theophylline + inhaled beclometasone#Theophylline¶
    Pre-BD FEV1 mL
     Day 14133 (-27–293)52 (-109–214)
     Day 28165 (-13–342)128 (-51–307)
    Pre-BD PEF L·min−1
     Day 1425 (-1–51)6 (-20–33)
     Day 2840 (11–69)*22 (-7–51)
    Pre-BD FVC mL
     Day 14132 (-23–286)15 (-141–171)
     Day 28254 (63–445)*176 (-16–368)
    ACQ score-0.47 (-0.91– -0.04)*-0.55 (-0.99– -0.11)*
    Sputum total cell count cells × 106-2.0 (-6.3–1.7)-1.7 (–6.2–2.1)
    Sputum eosinophil
     %0.0 (-1.1–0·6)-0.6 (-1.7–0.3)
     Absolute 104-1.62 (-9.58–1.82)-5.53 (-17.87–1.68)
    Sputum neutrophil
     %0.3 (-12.3–17.7)-2.5 (-22.5–12.8)
     Absolute 10446.8 (-65.1–236.2)-16.0 (-199.5–116.1)
    Sputum macrophage
     %0.5 (-11.8–11.3)-2.5 (-21.0–15.3)
     Absolute 104-52.7 (-251.4–118.7)-0.9 (-250.0–186.3)
    Sputum lymphocyte
     %-0.8 (-1.4– -0.1)*-0.6 (-1.3–0.2)
     Absolute 104-10.99 (-18.15– -1.65)*-3.98 (-10.30–1.36)
    Sputum bronchial epithelial cells
     %1.2 (-5.8–7.4)-1.0 (-11.3–5.7)
     Absolute 104-20.9 (-85.1–50.5)-12.9 (-100.8–57.3)
    Sputum IL-8 pg·mL−1-562.5 (-2131.0–131.4)-1201.3 (-2409.6– -76.6)*
    Sputum MPO ng·mL−1-126.6 (-433.9–58.1)-215.0 (-556.0– -36.7) *
    HDAC activity AFU 106 cells-3.5 (-23.7–5.0)-2.2 (-23.4–3.5)
    • Data are presented as n (95% confidence interval). Lung function data and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score differences are the difference of adjusted means with adjustment for baseline measurement (ANCOVA). Changes in ACQ score, sputum cell counts, supernatant mediator levels and histone deacetylase activity (HDAC) refer to change from randomisation visit to day 28. BD: bronchodilator; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; PEF: peak expiratory flow; FVC: forced vital capacity; IL: interleukin; MPO: myeloperoxidase; AFU: arbitrary fluorescence units. #: n = 7; ¶: n = 7. *: p<0.05.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary table

    Table S1: Changes in exploratory endpoints following treatment (compared to response to treatment with inhaled beclometasone alone) adjusted for multiple comparisons P value of less than 0.00125 is deemed significant (Bonferroni correction)

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary table - Table S1: Changes in exploratory endpoints following treatment (compared to response to treatment with inhaled beclometasone alone) adjusted for multiple comparisons P value of less than 0.00125 is deemed significant (Bonferroni correction)
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 33 Issue 5 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 33 (5)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of low-dose theophylline plus beclometasone on lung function in smokers with asthma: a pilot study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Effect of low-dose theophylline plus beclometasone on lung function in smokers with asthma: a pilot study
M. Spears, I. Donnelly, L. Jolly, M. Brannigan, K. Ito, C. McSharry, J. Lafferty, R. Chaudhuri, G. Braganza, I. M. Adcock, P. J. Barnes, S. Wood, N. C. Thomson
European Respiratory Journal May 2009, 33 (5) 1010-1017; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00158208

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Effect of low-dose theophylline plus beclometasone on lung function in smokers with asthma: a pilot study
M. Spears, I. Donnelly, L. Jolly, M. Brannigan, K. Ito, C. McSharry, J. Lafferty, R. Chaudhuri, G. Braganza, I. M. Adcock, P. J. Barnes, S. Wood, N. C. Thomson
European Respiratory Journal May 2009, 33 (5) 1010-1017; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00158208
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Support statement
    • Clinical Trial
    • Statement of interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Variability in the prevalence of premenstrual asthma
  • Parental occupation is a risk factor for childhood wheeze and asthma
  • Aerobic training reverses airway inflammation and remodelling in an asthma murine model
Show more Original Articles: Asthma

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society