Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

QuantiFERON-TB Gold and the TST are both useful for latent tuberculosis infection screening in autoimmune diseases

F. Bartalesi, S. Vicidomini, D. Goletti, C. Fiorelli, G. Fiori, D. Melchiorre, E. Tortoli, A. Mantella, M. Benucci, E. Girardi, M. M. Cerinic, A. Bartoloni
European Respiratory Journal 2009 33: 586-593; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00107608
F. Bartalesi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Vicidomini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Goletti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Fiorelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Fiori
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Melchiorre
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Tortoli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Mantella
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Benucci
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Girardi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. M. Cerinic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Bartoloni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Screening for active tuberculosis (TB) and latent TB infection (LTBI) is mandatory prior to the initiation of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy. However, no agreement exists on the best strategy for detecting LTBI in this population. The aim of the present study was to analyse the performance of the tuberculin skin test (TST) and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-tube (QFT-GIT) on LTBI detection in subjects with immunomediated inflammatory diseases (IMID).

The TST and QFT-GIT were prospectively performed in 398 consecutive IMID subjects, 310 (78%) on immunosuppressive therapy and only 16 (4%) had been bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccinated.

Indeterminate results to QFT-GIT were found in five (1.2%) subjects. Overall, 74 (19%) out of 393 subjects were TST-positive and 52 (13%) were QFT-GIT-positive. Concordance between TST and QFT-GIT results was good (87.7%): 13 were QFT-GIT-positive/TST-negative and 35 QFT-GIT-negative/TST-positive. By multivariate analysis both tests were significantly associated with older age. Only the TST was associated with BCG vaccination and radiological lesions of past TB. Use of immunosuppressive drugs differently modulated QFT-GIT or TST scoring.

Use of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-tube, as a screening tool for latent tuberculosis among immunomediated inflammatory disease subjects, is feasible. Until further data will elucidate discordant tuberculin skin test/QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-tube results, a strategy of simultaneous tuberculin skin and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-tube testing in a low prevalence bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccinated population, should maximise potentials of latent tuberculosis diagnosis.

  • Interferon-γ release assay
  • latent tuberculosis infection
  • rheumatic diseases
  • tuberculin skin test
  • tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors

One-third of the world's population is believed to harbour a latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) 1, defined as the presence of quiescent mycobacteria. Approximately, 10% of immunocompetent persons with LTBI will ever develop tuberculosis (TB). In countries with a low incidence of TB, such as Italy, the tracing and targeted treatment of LTBI subjects constitutes a major pillar of TB control 2.

Ageing of the population and the increased use of immunosuppressive treatments represent risk factors for progression to active TB, and highlight the need for additional strategies to maintain and improve TB control 3.

Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors are approved for the treatment of immunomediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) and provide clinical benefit. However, treatment with TNF-α inhibitors showed an increased risk of serious life-threatening infections, including reactivation of TB infection in patients previously exposed to mycobacteria 4. Thus, screening for active TB and LTBI has become mandatory prior to the initiation of TNF-α inhibitor therapy 5, 6. However, to date, no agreement exists on the best strategy for detecting LTBI in this population, and the tuberculin skin test (TST) remains largely used 7–10.

The TST attempts to measure cell-mediated immunity in the form of a delayed-type hypersensitivity response to purified protein derivative (PPD). However, the TST lacks specificity in populations with high bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) coverage and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) exposure. Moreover, the TST may have a higher probability to have false-negative results in IMID patients than in the general population because of the immune disregulation linked to the disease itself or due to immunosuppressive drugs use 11.

Recently, two new assays have been developed to identify LTBI, QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-tube (QFT-GIT; Cellestis Limited, Carnegie, Australia) and T-SPOT TB (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK). They measure antigen-specific interferon (IFN)-γ secretion by peripheral blood CD4+ T-lymphocytes in response to in vitro stimulation with early secreted antigenic target-6 and culture filtrate protein 10 12, 13, which are more specific for the detection of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection than PPD, as they are not shared with BCG substrains or with most environmental mycobacteria 13, 14.

Several unresolved issues remain on the potential clinical use of IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs). One area of controversy is whether they can be used in immunosuppressed patients such as IMID subjects, in addition or as an alternative to the TST. The lack of a gold standard for LTBI diagnosis has hampered the assessment of diagnostic accuracy of IGRAs, and the comparison of these new tests with the TST. Therefore, it has been suggested that tests for LTBI diagnosis can be validated by analysing the association of positive results with risk factors for TB, and different tests can be compared by evaluating differences in their association with risk factors 15, 16. The current authors used this approach to compare the performance of QFT-GIT and the TST for the detection of LTBI among IMID subjects coming from a low endemic TB country. Moreover, the impact of different classes of drugs on the response to these tests was analysed.

METHODS

Study population

Overall, 398 consecutive subjects were enrolled with rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis) or other immunomediated chronic diseases, which required the use of biological drugs (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab and rituximab). The subjects were recruited at two rheumatological outpatient clinics of two hospitals in Florence, Italy (Careggi University Hospital and Nuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio Hospital), from May 2006 to December 2007 and fulfilled published criteria permitting the use of a biological drug 6.

Demographic information, data on BCG vaccination, treatment regimens in the last 3 months and risk factors for LTBI were collected during a standardised patient interview by a researcher who was not aware of the results of the TST or QFT-GIT. Treatments were classified into systemic corticosteroids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs; including methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, leflunomide, cyclophosphamide and hydroxychloroquine) and TNF-α inhibitors (infliximab, etanercept or adalimumab).

All subjects underwent a chest radiograph. The following characteristics were considered to be risk factors for LTBI: birth or residence for ≥6 months in a high TB prevalence country (>20 cases per 100,000 inhabitants); history of household TB contact; and healthcare workers who work at facilities where patients with TB are treated.

The following were considered as risk factors for progression to active TB: a medically confirmed history of active TB; chest radiograph findings suggestive of TB history (nodules, fibrotic scars, calcified granulomas or basal pleural thickening); being HIV-positive; body weight of <10% of ideal body weight; presence of comorbidity (diabetes mellitus, silicosis, chronic renal failure/haemodialysis, neoplastic or haematological diseases); prolonged therapy with corticosteroids (>4 weeks) or other immunosuppressive therapy; injection drug use; and previous gastrectomy or jejunoileal bypass 17.

QFT and TST

Blood samples for QFT-GIT were obtained immediately before TST performance. Within 2–6 h of blood being taken, the samples were incubated at 37°C. The same biologist, who was unaware of subjects' characteristics and results of the TST, performed all whole blood IFN-γ ELISAs according to the manufacturer instructions.

Immediately after blood was drawn, all participants received an injection of 5 units of PPD (Biocine Test-PPD; Chiron, Siena, Italy) by a trained physician. The transverse diameter of induration was measured in millimeters 72 h later using the ballpen method. TST induration was interpreted relative to risk in accordance with published guidelines 5, 18.

Statistical analysis

Information from the questionnaires, TST and QFT-GIT results were entered into Microsoft Excel 2003 software. The concordance between QFT-GIT and the TST was assessed by computing the κ statistics, with a κ-value of >0.75 representing excellent agreement beyond chance, 0.40–0.75 representing fair to good agreement beyond chance, and <0.40 representing poor agreement beyond chance 19.

A standard univariate analysis was performed to analyse the association of the TST and QFT-GIT results to TB risk factors, the type of IMID and the kind of immunosuppressive therapy.

TB risk factors associated with either QFT-GIT or the TST results in the univariate analysis were entered in two separate logistic regression models in which the outcomes were the QFT-GIT or the TST results. In these models, the use of systemic corticosteroids, conventional DMARDs and TNF-α inhibitor therapy were also entered as independent categorical variables.

Finally, to compare the overall diagnostic performance of the two tests, the current authors evaluated whether the association between the number of risk factors for LTBI, selected a priori according to the prognostic relevance 20, and the odds ratio (OR) for testing positive varied according to the test. To this purpose, generalised estimating equations were used to perform a logistic regression that accounted for the association between results of QFT-GIT and TST performed on the same subject.

RESULTS

Studied population

A total of 398 consecutive subjects with IMID were enrolled (fig. 1⇓). Indeterminate results to QFT-GIT were found in five (1.2%) out of 398 subjects. No association was found between risk factors for TB and immune suppression (data not shown) and these samples were excluded for further analysis.

Fig. 1—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1—

Flow diagram of the study population. QFT: QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-tube (Cellestis Limited, Carnegie, Australia); TST: tuberculin skin testing; +: positive; -: negative.

Demographic and clinical features of the 393 remaining subjects are reported in table 1⇓. The present population was characterised by a high median age (54 yrs), a low prevalence (4.1%) of BCG vaccination and a small number (4.6%) of subjects coming from high endemic TB countries. None of the enrolled subjects were found to have active TB.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

Associations of demographic, epidemiological and clinical characteristics and therapy with QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-tube (QFT-GIT)- and tuberculin skin test (TST)-positive results in subjects with rheumatic diseases: univariate analysis

TST and QFT-GIT results

Concordance between the TST and QFT-GIT

Among the 393 subjects analysed by both the TST and QFT-GIT tests, 52 subjects were positive to QFT-GIT and 74 subjects were positive to TST (p = 0.4). Among them, 306 (77.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 73.4–81.9) subjects were concordant in their negative results and 39 (10%; 95% CI 7.1–13.3) subjects in their positive results, resulting in an overall concordance of 87.8% (κ 0.55; p<0.0001; 95% CI 0.44–0.66).

TST-positive/QFT-GIT-negative discordant results were found in 35 (8.9%) out of 393 (95% CI 6.3–12.2) subjects while TST-negative/QFT-GIT-positive results were found in 13 (3.3%) out of 393 subjects (95% CI 1.8–5.6).

Several factors were evaluated to understand their impact on the discordant QFT-GIT/TST data obtained (history of TB exposure, sex, age, history of BCG vaccination, underlying rheumatic disease, etc.). Among them, a history of previous BCG vaccination was associated with discordant QFT-GIT-negative/TST-positive results (p = 0.004) whereas the use of TNF-α inhibitors was associated with discordant QFT-GIT-positive/TST-negative results (p = 0.03).

Risk factors associated with LTBI and type of IMID

By univariate analysis, both positive TST and QFT-GIT were significantly associated with older age and history of close contact with sputum-positive TB patients. However, only TST positivity was associated with BCG vaccination, radiological lesions suggestive of past TB and origin from countries with a high endemic of TB. Only QFT-GIT positivity was significantly associated with males (table 1⇑). These associations were confirmed by multivariate analysis (table 2⇓). No associations between type of IMID and results of the TST and QFT-GIT were found in the univariate analysis (table 1⇑).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2—

Risk factors associated with QuantiFERON® in-tube (QFT-GIT) and tuberculin skin test (TST) positivity in subjects with rheumatic diseases: multivariate analysis

Impact of immunosuppressive therapy

In the univariate analysis, the proportion of positive scoring was lower for both tests for treated patients (with the exception of those treated with DMARDs or DMARDs associated with steroids) compared with the proportion of positive results in patients who were not receiving treatment. A significant association, however, was only found between treatment with steroids and TST results (table 1⇑).

By multivariate analysis, considering the impact of each drug class, the use of DMARDs was not associated with test scoring while the use of steroids was associated with a lower probability of a QFT-GIT- or TST-positive scoring (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–09; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2–0.6, respectively; table 2⇑). Moreover, treatment including TNF-α inhibitors significantly decreased the positive outcome of TST (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–0.6) without affecting QFT-GIT results.

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of TST and QFT-GIT

In the absence of a gold standard for LTBI diagnosis, the diagnostic performance of the two tests was compared by evaluating the association of the odds of testing positive with the presence of one or more risk factors for LTBI (aged >50 yrs, chest radiograph suggestive of past TB, close contact with patients with sputum-positive TB and birth/residence in a country with a high incidence of TB; table 3⇓). The results indicate a clear-cut trend for an increase in ORs with an increasing number of risk factors for both tests, and show no significant difference between the two tests. Moreover, the prevalence of LTBI was computed in the present cohort using different combinations of the two tests used (table 4⇓). This analysis approach suggests a better single performance of the TST than QFT-GIT, although the combined used of both tests seems to be the best approach to maximise the sensitivity of the screening.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3—

Association between number of risk factors for tuberculosis infection and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-tube (QFT-GIT) and tuberculin skin test (TST) positivity

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4—

Estimate of the prevalence of latent tuberculosis using different approaches

DISCUSSION

Immunosuppressed subjects are one of the most important targets for the screening of LTBI because of the high risk of progression to active TB. Despite its widely recognised limitations, the TST remains the standard method for identifying TB infection before TNF-α inhibitor therapy, due to the lack of sufficient data on IGRA use in this population 7–10. To date, there are limited data describing performance of IGRA for detecting LTBI in IMID subjects awaiting TNF-α inhibitor therapy. Of them only seven studies reported direct comparison with the TST (table 5⇓) 21–30. Moreover, the published results were not easily comparable, due to the small number of enrolled subjects, a high rate of BCG vaccination in the studied population, the nonhomogeneous type of underlying diseases considered and the kind of IGRA used (table 5⇓).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5—

Concordance of the interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) and the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the screening of tuberculosis infection in the immunomediated inflammatory disease population

To the present authors' knowledge, the current study is the largest that has compared the results of an IGRA to the TST for TB screening in IMID subjects coming from a low endemic TB country (only 4.6% subjects coming from a high TB prevalence country) and with a low (4.1%) BCG vaccination rate.

The first relevant finding of the current study was a high positive rate of LTBI for both TST and QFT-GIT testing (18.8 and 13%, respectively). This result was probably due to the high median age of the IMID population (55.7% >50 yrs), who were most likely exposed to the M. tuberculosis infection at a young age when Italy was a high TB prevalence country. Therefore, the need for TB screening was confirmed in IMID subjects even in a low TB prevalence country such as Italy.

The present study showed a lower rate (1.2%) of indeterminate results at QFT-GIT testing compared with other previously published studies utilising the same test (QFT-GIT) 21, 23, 24, 27, where the rate of indeterminate results ranged between 1.5 and 10.3% (table 5⇑). The current finding confirms the feasibility of QFT-GIT in the IMID population that have undergone LTBI screening and have been pre-treated with immunomodulating drugs (steroids, DMARDs and TNF-α inhibitors). In total, 79% of subjects in the present population had been pre-treated.

A fair concordance between QFT-GIT and the TST (87.5% with κ 0.55; p <0.0001; 95% CI 0.43–0.67) was observed, which is higher than reported in previous studies where concordance ranged from 51.7–82.8% (table 5⇑). This is probably due to the lower rate of BCG vaccinated subjects that led to a reduction in the rate of TST-positive/QFT-GIT-negative discordant results compared with the literature, with the exception of the study by Ponce de Leon et al. 27. The present interpretation is supported by multivariate analyses showing a significant association between TST-positive/IGRA-negative results and BCG vaccination status 23, 28. The current multivariate analysis confirmed this association, although the present population accounted for only 16 BCG vaccinated subjects. Therefore, these discordant results most likely represent TST associated to a TB infection. The alternative possibility of a past sensitisation to NTM antigens present in the TST and not in the QFT-GIT assay is difficult to ascertain.

Regarding the 13 (3.3%) TST-negative/QTF-GIT-positive discordant subjects it may be speculated that TST missed these LTBI diagnoses because of the high specificity of QFT-GIT for the M. tuberculosis infection. The two main reasons to explain this finding are as follows. 1) A two-step TST was not performed which would have maximised the TST sensitivity, but this strategy would have required four visits instead of two for every subject. 2) All TST-negative/QTF-GIT-positive discordant subjects were undergoing treatment with immunosuppresive drugs and six out of 13 received TNF-α inhibitors, which may explain the negative results of TST, considering the negative impact of steroids and TNF-α inhibitors on M. tuberculosis-specific responses 31 and on the TST performance (table 2⇑). Moreover no association between any LTBI test and kind of IMID were found (table 1⇑). The present results confirm those reported by Sellam et al. 22 and are consistent with the lack of a relationship with TB infection risk.

Regarding the association of TST and QFT-GIT with risk factors for TB infection, the current data showed a good association for both tests with known risk factors for TB in Italy, such as older age and a history of close contacts of sputum-positive TB patients. However, the TST seems to be more strictly associated with TB infection, considering that only this test was significantly associated with other known risk factors, such as origin from countries with a high endemic of TB and radiological lesions suggestive of TB history.

Establishing sensitivity and specificity for the M. tuberculosis infection is difficult due to the absence of a gold standard for the diagnosis of LTBI. Thus, an approach to index test validation that goes beyond the diagnostic accuracy paradigm is needed for an alternative evaluation process in the absence of a gold standard. In some studies, the association of positive results with risk factors for TB has been analysed, and different tests have been compared by evaluating differences in their association with risk factors 15, 16, 20. The present authors used this approach to assess the accuracy of the TST and QFT-GIT in detecting LTBI, comparing current results to a gradient of risk factors for LTBI selected a priori according to their prognostic relevance. The current findings showed a clear-cut trend for an increase in odds with a growing number of risk factors for LTBI, confirming that both, the TST and QFT-GIT are predictive of LTBI without a difference in the estimation ability between the two tests (table 3⇑).

Based on previous studies that showed a reduced performance of the TST in immunosuppressed rheumatoid arthritis subjects 12, 27, the current authors analysed the impact of different classes of drugs on the response to TST and QFT-GIT tests. By multivariate analysis, steroids were found to significantly affect both QFT-GIT- and TST-positive outcome (OR 0.4 and 0.3, respectively), while treatment including TNF-α inhibitors significantly decreased only the positive outcome of the TST (OR 0.3). This result disagrees with that reported by Matulis et al. 23. However, Matulis et al. 23 did not evaluate the association with the TST results (TST was not performed simultaneously with QFT-GIT). Matulis et al. 23 explained their result with the TNF-α inhibitors that decrease the activation of CD4+ T-lymphocytes by mycobacterial antigens. However, the present results seem to be more consistent with the crucial role, which TNF-α plays in recruiting macrophages in tuberculin-induced delayed-type hypersensitivity that should justify the reduced response to TST in the current population of whom 24.2% were already exposed to TNF-α inhibitors at the time of screening 31.

In conclusion, the present study confirms that QFT-GIT as a screening tool for LTBI among IMID subjects awaiting TNF-α inhibitor therapy is feasible, due to the low incidence of indeterminate results and the strict association with risk factors for TB for this test. However, the current findings do not support the recently published UK national guidelines on TB suggesting the use of IGRA as a confirmatory test in TST-positive subjects 32. Based on these data in a country with a low prevalence of BCG vaccination, such as Italy, this approach would have had the risk of missing subjects with LTBI. Conversely, the present data suggest the potential use of QFT-GIT as a primary test that may offer the advantage of being less impaired by the treatment with TNF-α inhibitors compared with the TST.

In this context, large-scale cohort studies are needed to estimate risk for progression to active disease in persons who have had positive results to the tuberculin skin test and/or interferon-γ release assay, with a particular interest to the risk of disease in persons with discordant reactions. Until further data are available on the implication of discordant tuberculin skin test/QuantiFERON®-TB in-tube results, a strategy of simultaneous tuberculin skin test and QuantiFERON®-TB in-tube testing in populations with a low prevalence of bacille Calmette–Guérin vaccination should maximise the sensitivity for latent tuberculosis diagnosis.

Statement of interest

Statements of interest for A. Bartoloni, S. Vicidomini, C. Fiorelli, A. Mantella and D. Goletti can be found at www.erj.ersjournals.com/misc/statements.shtml

  • Received July 17, 2008.
  • Accepted October 29, 2008.
  • © ERS Journals Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    World Health Organization. WHO Report 2008. Global tuberculosis control: surveillance, planning, financing. www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/2008/pdf/fullreport.pdf Date last accessed: December 19, 2008
  2. ↵
    Jensen PA, Lambert LA, Iademarco MF, Ridzon R. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-care settings, 2005. MMWR Recomm Rep 2005;54:1–141.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Horsburgh CR Jr. Priorities for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2060–2067.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Maini R, St Clair EW, Breedveld F, et al. Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. Lancet 1999;354:1932–1939.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Gardam MA, Keystone EC, Menzies R, et al. Anti-tumour necrosis factor agents and tuberculosis risk: mechanisms of action and clinical management. Lancet Infect Dis 2003;3:148–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, et al. Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2006. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65: Suppl. 3 iii2–iii15.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. BTS recommendations for assessing risk and for managing Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and disease in patients due to start anti-TNF-α treatment. Thorax 2005;60:800–805.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. Fonseca JE, Lucas H, Canhão H, et al. [Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory joint diseases proposed for treatment with tumour necrosis factor α antagonist drugs.]. Rev Port Pneumol 2006;12:603–613.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. Mariette X, Salmon D, Group RATIO. French guidelines for diagnosis and treating latent and active tuberculosis in patients with RA treated with TNF blockers. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 791–792
  10. ↵
    Beglinger C, Dudler J, Mottet C, et al. Screening for tuberculosis infection before the initiation of an anti-TNF-α therapy. Swiss Med Wkly 2007;137:620–622.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Ponce de León D, Acevedo-Vásquez E, Sánchez-Torres A, et al. Attenuated response to purified protein derivative in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: study in a population with a high prevalence of tuberculosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1360–1361.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Andersen P, Munk ME, Pollock JM, Doherty TM. Specific immune-based diagnosis of tuberculosis. Lancet 2000;356:1099–1104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Pai M, Riley LW, Colford JMJ. Interferon-γ assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2004;4:761–776.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Mazurek GH, Jereb J, LoBue P, Iademarco MF, Metchock B, Vernon A. Guidelines for using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 2005;54:49–55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Lalvani A, Pathan AA, Durkan H, et al. Enhanced contact tracing and spatial tracking of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by enumeration of antigen-specific T cells. Lancet 2001;357:2017–2021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Kang YA, Lee HW, Yoon HI, et al. Discrepancy between the tuberculin skin test and the whole-blood interferon gamma assay for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in an intermediate tuberculosis-burden country. JAMA 2005;293:2756–2761.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Jasmer RM, Nahid P, Hopewell PC. Clinical practice. Latent tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1860–1866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    American Thoracic Society. Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S221–S247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Fliess JL. The measurement of inter-rate agreement. In: Bradley RA, Levin B, Cho Paik M, eds. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1981; pp. 212–236
  20. ↵
    Kunst H, Khan KS. New tests for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:672–674.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Cobanoglu N, Ozcelik U, Kalyoncu U, et al. Interferon-γ assays for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection before using tumour necrosis factor α blockers. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007;11:1177–1182.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Sellam J, Hamdi H, Roy C, et al. Comparison of in vitro-specific blood tests with tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis before anti-TNF therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:1610–1615.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Matulis G, Jüni P, Villiger PM, Gadola SD. Detection of latent tuberculosis in immunosuppressed patients with autoimmune diseases: performance of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen specific interferon γ assay. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:84–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Pratt A, Nicholl K, Kay L. Use of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test as part of a screening programme in patients with RA under consideration for treatment with anti-TNFα agents: the Newcastle (UK) experience. Rheumatology 2007;46:1035–1036.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Kobashi Y, Mouri K, Obase Y, Fukuda M, Miyashita N, Oka M. Clinical evaluation of QuantiFERON TB-2G test for immunocompromised patients. Eur Respir J 2007;30:945–950.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Dinser R, Fousse M, Sester U, et al. Evaluation of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with inflammatory arthropathies before treatment with TNFα blocking drugs using a novel flow-cytometric interferon-γ release assay. Rheumatology 2008;47:212–218.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Ponce de Leon D, Acevedo-Vasquez E, Alvizuri S, et al. Comparison of an interferon-γ assay with tuberculin skin testing for detection of tuberculosis (TB) infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a TB-endemic population. J Rheumatol 2008;35:776–781.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Vassilopoulos D, Stamoulis N, Hadziyannis E, Archimandritis AJ. Usefulness of enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT) compared to tuberculin skin testing for latent tuberculosis screening in rheumatic patients scheduled for anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment. J Rheumatol 2008;35:1271–1276.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Bocchino M, Matarese A, Bellofiore B, et al. Performance of two commercial blood IFN-γ release assays for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in pateint candiates for anti-TNF-α treatment. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2008;27:907–913.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Greenberg JD, Reddy SM, Schloss SG, et al. Comparison of an in vitro tuberculosis inteferon-γ assay with delayed-type hypersensitivity testing for detection of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a pilot study in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2008;35:770–775.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Saliu OY, Sofer C, Stein DS, Schwander SK, Wallis RS. Tumor-necrosis-factor blockers: differential effects on mycobacterial immunity. J Infect Dis 2006;194:486–492.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Tuberculosis: clinical diagnosis and management of tuberculosis, and measures for its prevention and control. www.nice.org.uk/CG33#summary Date last accessed: December 19, 2008
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 33 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 33 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
QuantiFERON-TB Gold and the TST are both useful for latent tuberculosis infection screening in autoimmune diseases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
QuantiFERON-TB Gold and the TST are both useful for latent tuberculosis infection screening in autoimmune diseases
F. Bartalesi, S. Vicidomini, D. Goletti, C. Fiorelli, G. Fiori, D. Melchiorre, E. Tortoli, A. Mantella, M. Benucci, E. Girardi, M. M. Cerinic, A. Bartoloni
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2009, 33 (3) 586-593; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00107608

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
QuantiFERON-TB Gold and the TST are both useful for latent tuberculosis infection screening in autoimmune diseases
F. Bartalesi, S. Vicidomini, D. Goletti, C. Fiorelli, G. Fiori, D. Melchiorre, E. Tortoli, A. Mantella, M. Benucci, E. Girardi, M. M. Cerinic, A. Bartoloni
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2009, 33 (3) 586-593; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00107608
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Statement of interest
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Active screening at entry for tuberculosis among new immigrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Predictive value for progression to tuberculosis by IGRA and TST in immigrant contacts
  • Association between Gc genotype and susceptibility to TB is dependent on vitamin D status
Show more Original Articles: Tuberculosis

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society