To the Editors:
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a pulmonary disease that results from a hypersensitivity response to Aspergillus fumigatus 1. It occurs in asthmatic and cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, with a prevalence among CF patients recently estimated at 7.8% 1. The natural course is characterised by acute exacerbations, which can be life-threatening 2, and progressive, irreversible, lung damage leading to long-term pulmonary fibrosis if the disease is not well controlled 1.
Therapy for ABPA has two main targets. The first is the attenuation of the inflammation and immunological activity, for which oral corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy 1. The second is the attenuation of the antigen burden arising from fungal colonisation of the bronchial tree, for which only itraconazole has shown limited evidence of its usefulness 1. However, long-term systemic corticotherapy predisposes to diabetes, osteopaenia, infections and growth retardation, especially in patients with CF, while itraconazole is associated with several drug interactions, suppression of adrenal glucocorticoids synthesis when associated with inhaled budenoside 3, and hepatic toxicity 4, 5. After one of our patients experienced serious side-effects while treated for ABPA with oral corticosteroids, it was decided that a different drug regimen should be used for this disease. We report herein three cases of CF patients with ABPA successfully treated by the association of nebulised budesonide (Nbud) and nebulised amphotericin B (NampB): three children of 7, 12 and 13 yrs of age affected by CF with Δ508 mutation, two of whom were chronically infected with Staphylococcus aureus and one with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The oldest child had developed diabetes.
The three cases benefited from a treatment that associated chest physiotherapy, aerolised recombinant DNase, inhaled aminoglycosides and regular outpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy through a central catheter. In a context of well-controlled disease, these patients developed wheezing dyspnoea, chest pain, new infiltrates on chest radiography and decreased pulmonary function. Additional studies demonstrated peripheral blood eosinophilia, an increase in total serum immunoglobulin (Ig)E and specific IgE, and precipitins to A. fumigatus. The diagnosis of ABPA was established according to the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conference 1.
Cases 1 and 2 benefited from two successive treatments. First, they received an association of Nbud (1 mg twice a day) and oral itraconazole (400 mg daily) for almost 1 yr. Their clinical status improved but due to the lack of improvement of proximal obstruction, hypoxaemia and the persistence of high levels of precipitatins and serum IgE antibodies to A. fumigatus, itraconazole was changed to NamB (5 mg twice a day), while maintaining Nbud at the same dose. Due to a dramatic response in serological status for both cases, case 3 benefited directly from the association of Nbud and NampB. The three children presented a good clinical, biological and functional response to this treatment, from the 6th month on, with improvement of hypoxaemia and forced expiratory volume in one second, net reduction of blood eosinophilia, total and specific serum IgE antibodies to A. fumigatus and a disappearance of precipitatins to A. fumigatus.
To our knowledge, the three cases reported herein are the first cases of ABPA to have benefited from the association of Nbud and NampB. Previous articles have shown the usefulness of inhaled corticosteroids in ABPA but always as a means of discontinuing an oral corticotherapy 6. Another study has failed to support these findings; however, the dose of inhaled corticosteroids was very low 7. A recent article reviewed antifungal therapies in the treatment of ABPA, and NampB showed good results for two patients but always in association with oral prednisone 4. However, our findings support the fact that ABPA can be treated without systemic corticosteroids in patients with CF. The association of Nbud and NampB resulted in a complete clinical remission of ABPA and a substantial improvement of all biological and functional parameters. Cases 1 and 2 first received Nbud associated with itraconazole and showed a good but incomplete response. Then the switch from itraconazole to NampB allowed a complete cure of ABPA. Case 3 benefited straight away from the association of Nbud and NampB, and showed a quick and complete cure. Moreover, none of the cases have shown any side-effects.
This new treatment is two-fold: Nbud decreases the inflammation and immunological activity, while NampB decreases the antigenic load of A. fumigatus. The use of nebulised drugs greatly limited the toxicity of the treatment.
In conclusion, we think the association of nebulised budenoside and nebulised amphotericin B is a safe and efficacious treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cystic fibrosis. We also feel that this nebulised treatment could greatly benefit asthmatic patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, as its long-term side-effects are much lower than those of oral corticotherapy. We recommend that large, controlled studies compare this treatment to oral corticosteroids in cases of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, both in cystic fibrosis and asthmatic patients.
Statement of interest
None declared.
- © ERS Journals Ltd