Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Therapeutic regimens in interstitial lung disease guided by genetic screening: fact or fiction?

J. A. Bakker, J. Bierau, M. Drent
European Respiratory Journal 2007 30: 821-822; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00110207
J. A. Bakker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Bierau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Drent
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Drug-induced pulmonary toxicity is a serious and expanding problem 1, 2. Since the mid 1980s, the understanding of the metabolism of pharmaceuticals has increased substantially. Not least because of the introduction of molecular biological techniques, defects in drug-metabolising pathways have been elucidated. Nowadays, pharmacogenetics can guide the clinician in the choice of the best therapeutic regimen, resulting in “personalised medicine” 3.

A decreased drug efficacy and unexpected and serious adverse drug reactions (ADR) are major threats to patients and occur more frequently than expected. Considerable efforts are needed to treat these ADR 4. Therefore, prevention of ADR is of utmost importance for the patient and the clinician. ADR can be due to inherited defects in drug activation, which mostly lead to decreased efficacy of the treatment, or to defects in drug-metabolising enzymes; the latter results in an exuberant concentration of toxic metabolites 5.

In the current issue of the European Respiratory Journal, Perri et al. 6 report the case of a patient suffering from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with azathioprine who developed severe alveolar haemorrhage. The haemorrhage was caused by severe myelosuppression due to deficiency of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT). The increased bioavailability of thioguanine nucleotides results in increased cell death.

Mercaptopurine metabolism is a complicated cascade of reactions, in which several enzymes play an important role in the activation and detoxification of mercaptopurines 7, 8. One of the most intensively studied enzymes in this pathway is TPMT, an enzyme which catalyses the transfer of the methyl group of S-adenosylmethionine to the thiol group on the mercaptopurine molecule 9. Methylation of mercaptopurines is one of the detoxification reactions in mercaptopurine metabolism. The importance of this reaction is emphasised by the study of Perri et al. 6. In the field of pulmonary medicine, this is the first case report on mercaptopurine toxicity due to TPMT deficiency. In the literature, several reports are available on ADR caused by mercaptopurine therapy, commenced for different disease entities 10, 11. In all described cases, the occurrence of severe pancytopaenia was the trigger for determination of red cell TPMT activity or molecular analyses to establish TPMT polymorphisms.

Since mid-2006, we have included pre-treatment screening for TPMT in our protocols for patients with interstitial lung disease who are intended to be treated with mercaptopurines as immunosuppressive therapy. When normal TPMT and inosine triphosphatase (ITPase) activities are found, we advise commencing mercaptopurine therapy with the prescribed dose. When a decreased activity of TPMT is reported, we advise to lower the mercaptopurine dose and, in the case of a complete deficiency, use of an alternative immunosuppressive therapy is recommended. During mercaptopurine therapy a full blood count has to be carried out at regular intervals to avoid leukopaenia or pancytopaenia.

The promise of pharmacogenetics, the study of the role of inheritance in individual variation in drug response, lies in its potential to identify the right drug and dose for each patient. Even though individual differences in drug response may result from the effects of age, sex, disease or drug interactions, genetic factors also influence both the efficacy of drugs and the likelihood of adverse reactions 12, 13. The discussion of a pre-treatment screening strategy for mercaptopurine therapy is still ongoing. Genetic analyses of CYP 3A4 and 3A5, components of the CYP-P450 enzyme system, to determine fast and slow metabolisers in tarcolimus therapy in kidney transplants is accepted as state of the art 14. The benefits of screening in the case of TPMT, and even more so with ITPase, are still controversial 15–17. In pharmacoeconomical terms, prospective testing in the case of mercaptopurine treatment seems valid; the profits for both the patient and health insurance authorities exceed the costs of testing 18, 19. The profit for the patient being the greatest: drug-induced morbidity can be avoided.

The case study of Perri et al. 6 clearly points out the benefit of testing for defects in the mercaptopurine pathway, which we hope will become common practice in the treatment of interstitial lung diseases in the next few years.

    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Camus P, Fanton A, Bonniaud P, Camus C, Foucher P. Interstitial lung disease induced by drugs and radiation. Respiration 2004;71:301–326.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      Nemery B, Bast A, Behr J, et al. Interstitial lung disease induced by exogenous agents: factors governing susceptibility. Eur Respir J 2001;18: Suppl. 32 30s–42s.
      OpenUrlWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      Eichelbaum M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics and individualized drug therapy. Annu Rev Med 2006;57:119–137.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      Kollek R, van Aken J, Feuerstein G, Schmedders M. Pharmacogenetics, adverse drug reactions and public health. Community Genet 2006;9:50–54.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      Candelaria M, Taja-Chayeb L, Arce-Salinas C, Vidal-Milan S, Serrano-Olvera A, Dueňas-Gonzalez A. Genetic determinants of cancer drug efficacy and toxicity: practical considerations and perspectives. Anticancer Drugs 2005;16:923–933.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      Perri D, Cole DEC, Friedman O, Piliotis E, Mintz S, Adhikari NKJ. Azathioprine and diffuse alveolar haemorrhage: the pharmacogenetics of thiopurine methyltransferase. Eur Respir J 2007; 30: 1014–1017
    7. ↵
      Bakker JA, Drent M, Bierau J. Relevance of pharmacogenetic aspects of mercaptopurine metabolism in the treatment of interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2007;13:458–463.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      Cara CJ, Pena AS, Sans M, et al. Reviewing the mechanism of action of thiopurine drugs: towards a new paradigm in clinical practice. Med Sci Monit 2004;10:RA247–RA254.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      Salavaggione OE, Wang L, Wiepert M, Yee VC, Weinshilboum RM. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase pharmacogenetics: variant allele functional and comparative genomics. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2005;15:801–815.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      Gardiner SJ, Gearry RB, Barclay ML, Begg EJ. Two cases of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) deficiency –a lucky save and a near miss with azathioprine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006;62:473–476.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      Richard VS, Al-Ismail D, Salamat A. Should we test TPMT enzyme levels before starting azathioprine?. Hematology 2007;12:359–360.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      Meyer UA. Pharmacogenetics and adverse drug reactions. Lancet 2000;356:1667–1671.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      Weinshilboum R. Inheritance and drug response. N Engl J Med 2003;348:529–537.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      Op den Buijsch RA, Christiaans MH, Stolk LM, et al. Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics: influence of adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette B1 (ABCB1) and cytochrome (CYP) 3A polymorphisms. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2007;21:427–435.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      van Dieren JM, van Vuuren AJ, Kusters JG, Nieuwenhuis EE, Kuipers EJ, van der Woude CJ. ITPA genotyping is not predictive for the development of side effects in AZA treated inflammatory bowel disease patients. Gut 2005;54:1664
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    16. Winter J, Walker A, Shapiro D, Gaffney D, Spooner RJ, Mills PR. Cost-effectiveness of thiopurine methyltransferase genotype screening in patients about to commence azathioprine therapy for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:593–599.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      Bierau J, Lindhout M, Bakker JA. The pharmacogenetic significance of inosine triphosphatase. Pharmacogenomics 2007; (In press)
    18. ↵
      Clunie GP, Lennard L. Relevance of thiopurine methyltransferase status in rheumatology patients receiving azathioprine. Rheumatology 2004;43:13–18.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      Priest VL, Begg EJ, Gardiner SJ, et al. Pharmacoeconomic analyses of azathioprine, methotrexate and prospective pharmacogenetic testing for the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmacoeconomics 2006;24:767–781.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 30 Issue 5 Table of Contents
    European Respiratory Journal: 30 (5)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Therapeutic regimens in interstitial lung disease guided by genetic screening: fact or fiction?
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    Therapeutic regimens in interstitial lung disease guided by genetic screening: fact or fiction?
    J. A. Bakker, J. Bierau, M. Drent
    European Respiratory Journal Nov 2007, 30 (5) 821-822; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00110207

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Therapeutic regimens in interstitial lung disease guided by genetic screening: fact or fiction?
    J. A. Bakker, J. Bierau, M. Drent
    European Respiratory Journal Nov 2007, 30 (5) 821-822; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00110207
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Update March 2022: management of hospitalised adults with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): a European Respiratory Society living guideline
    • Commemorating World Tuberculosis Day 2022
    • Is low level of vitamin D a marker of poor health or its cause?
    Show more Editorial

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society