Abstract
Used appropriately, biomarkers improve the assessment of respiratory tract infections and sepsis. Most prominently, circulating procalcitonin levels increase by a factor of several tens of thousands during sepsis. Using a sensitive assay, procalcitonin safely and markedly reduces antibiotic usage in respiratory tract infections and nonbacterial meningitis. Procalcitonin is the protopye of hormokine mediators. The term “hormokine” encompasses the cytokine-like behaviour of hormones during inflammation and infections. The concept is based on a ubiquitous expression of calcitonin peptides during sepsis. Adrenomedullin, another member of the calcitonin peptide superfamily, was shown to complement and improve the current prognostic assessment in lower respiratory tract infections. Other peptides share some features of hormokines, e.g. natriuretic peptide and copeptin. Hormokines are not only biomarkers of infection but are also pivotal inflammatory mediators. Like all mediators, their role during systemic infections is basically beneficial, possibly to combat invading microbes. However, at increased levels they can become harmful for their host. Multiple mechanisms of action were proposed. In several animal models the modulation and neutralisation of hormokines during infection was shown to improve survival, and thus might open new treatment options for severe infections, especially of the respiratory tract.
Hormones are exclusively produced in endocrine cells and act systemically. Cytokines are produced by multiple cells and have local effects. “Hormokines” can follow either a classical hormonal expression or, upon inflammatory stimulation, show a more cytokine-like behaviour. The concept was based on the finding of a ubiquitous expression of peptides from the calcitonin (CT) family of genes during sepsis 1. CT gene products (e.g. procalcitonin (PCT), CT gene-related peptides (CGRPs) and adrenomedullin) are a prototype of hormokine mediators: they can follow either a classical hormonal expression in neuroendocrine cells or, alternatively, a cytokine-like ubiquitous expression pathway in various cell types 1–5. The ubiquitous inflammatory release can be induced either directly, via microbial toxins (e.g. endotoxin), or indirectly, via a humoral or cell-mediated host response (e.g. interleukin (IL)-1β, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-6). Parenchymal cells (including liver, kidney, adipocytes and muscle cells) provide the largest tissue mass and principal source of circulating hormokines in sepsis. The lowering of circulating hormokine levels by specific antibodies improves survival in various animal models, in different severities and time-points of mono- and polymicrobial sepsis 6, 7. Based on these findings, a better understanding of the hormokine concept is important, as it holds experimental, diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic promises.
CALCITONIN PEPTIDES ARE PROTOTYPES OF HORMOKINES
CT was discovered in the 1960s, when it was assumed to be a single hormone with an unknown role in human physiology 8, 9. Since then, it has been found to be only one entity among related circulating peptides that have pivotal roles in the metabolic and inflammatory host response to microbial infections 2. CT peptides share their origin from a common ancestral gene (the CALC gene) and have pronounced structural homologies (fig. 1⇓). They include PCT, CGRP-I and -II, adrenomedullin and amylin, and their respective precursor peptides. With the exception of amylin, serum concentrations of all CT peptides are increased to variable extents during inflammation and infection 10–12. PCT is a precursor peptide of the hormone CT and is also referred to as being the prototype of hormokine mediators 13. After translation from CT mRNA, PCT is cleaved enzymatically into smaller peptides, to finally yield the 32-amino acid mature CT 14, 15. The CALC-I gene, by alternative processing of the primary RNA transcript, gives rise to two different so-called mature peptides: CT and CGRP-I 2. In the absence of infection, the extra-neuroendocrine transcription of the CALC-I gene is suppressed and is restricted to a selective expression in neuroendocrine cells. Mature CT is produced mostly in neuroendocrine C-cells of the thyroid and K-cells of the lung 16. CGRP is also predominantly expressed in neuroendocrine cells, namely dorsal root ganglions and neurons clustered in the colon. In a similar manner to most neuroendocrine cells, the mature hormone is processed and stored in secretory granules 2, 5, 13, 16.
CALC genes and the calcitonin (CT) superfamily of peptides. Members of the CT gene peptide superfamily are prototypes of hormokines but may serve as a model for the better understanding of the pluripotency of other molecules (hormones and cytokines) and cells. The CALC-I gene gives rise to two different so-called mature peptides: CT and CT gene-related peptide (CGRP)-I. Circulating procalcitonin (PCT) consists of 114 amino acids, in which the mid-portion consists of the 33-amino acid immature CT. No CT is expressed from CALC-II due to a stop codon in exon IV. CALC-III (not shown) is a nontranslated pseudogene. Amylin is also referred to as islet amyloid polypeptide. The amino-terminal peptides of adrenomedullin (ADM), encoded by exons II and III, also have some bioactivity (e.g. pro-ADM amino-terminal 20 peptide, PAMP). The common structural features and marked amino acid homology within the CT peptide superfamily suggest gene duplication of a common ancestral gene.
Administration of endotoxin to normal human volunteers increases serum PCT values to levels seen in sepsis and this increase persists for up to 7 days 17. Several other pro-inflammatory mediators also induce PCT in vivo, e.g. TNF-α, IL-2 and IL-6 18. Interestingly, patients with total or near-total thyroidectomy were also found to have detectable immunoreactive CT in the serum and urine 19, indicating an extra-thyroidal origin. Accordingly, a microbial infection induces a massive and ubiquitous increase of CALC-I gene expression and a constitutive release of PCT from all parenchymal tissues and differentiated cell types throughout the body. This was shown in several mammal species, e.g. hamsters 1, pigs 20, 21, monkeys 22 and humans 5, 23. Thus, under septic circumstances, the entire body could be viewed as being an endocrine gland. Interestingly, CGRP mRNA, the splice variant of the CALC-I gene, is also ubiquitously increased (fig. 2⇓) 24. Thus, the current authors postulated the presence of microbial infection-specific response elements within the CALC-I gene promoter, which, upon an inflammatory stimulus, override the tissue-selective expression pattern. Indeed, the transcriptional expression of CT mRNA is more uniformly upregulated in sepsis than the mRNAs of the classical cytokines 22. Consequently, PCT levels increase several thousand-fold in severe systemic infections, i.e. sepsis, with a superior diagnostic accuracy as compared with other parameters of microbial infections 25, 26. The induction can be attenuated by cytokines that are also released during a viral infection (e.g. interferon (IFN)-γ) 3, 5.
Schematic representation of the CALC-I gene. The presence of a microbial infection-specific transcriptional activation in many, if not all, cell types has been postulated. The presence of one or several stimulus-specific sepsis-response elements in the promoter could explain the specific transcriptional activation found in microbial infections. Calcitonin (CT) mRNA is the default splicing variant. CT gene-related peptide (CGRP) mRNA is spliced in the presence of a sepsis-inducible ubiquitous repressor. MISRE: microbial infection-specific response elements; UTR: untranslated region; PCT: procalcitonin; RAMP: receptor activity-modifying protein.
Interestingly, no CT mRNA is found in leukocytes from septic patients and in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-derived macrophages after incubation with Escherichia coli, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), IL-1β or TNF-α 3. Ex vivo, the current authors observed only a transient expression of CT mRNA in monocytes for the initial 18 h of attachment to plastic dishes and differentiation into macrophages, resulting in a low-level release of PCT (in 42 h: ∼20 ng·L−1; ∼0.1 fg·cell−1) and higher amounts of the potent vasodilator CGRP (80 ng·L−1 after 42 h) 3. Thereafter, both PCT and CGRP expression in macrophages became unresponsive towards stimulation by E. coli, LPS and/or pro-inflammatory cytokines 3. Conversely, in co-culture experiments, these stimulated human macrophages were able to induce CT mRNA induction in adipocytes. Importantly, the differentiation status of parenchymal cells was also pivotal, for the inflammation-related expression of different CALC genes 4. PCT and CGRP productions were induced by IL-1β and LPS in human mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived mature adipocytes, but could not be induced in undifferentiated MSC nor in all dedifferentiated human tumour cell lines tested. In contrast, the expression of adrenomedullin, a product of the CALC-V gene, appears to be regulated differently: its expression occurred before and after adipogenic differentiation. IFN-γ co-administration inhibited IL-1β-mediated PCT and CGRP secretion by 78 and 34%, respectively, but augmented IL-1β-mediated adrenomedullin secretion by 50% 4. CALC-I and -II mRNAs were induced by exogenous CGRP and adrenomedullin, suggesting a positive autocrine feedback loop within the expression of the CT peptide superfamily 3–5, 27. Preliminary experimental evidence also suggests that this feedback loop is markedly enhanced by incubation with cycloheximide, an unspecific inhibitor of protein synthesis. This “superinduction” suggests the presence of one, or several, short-lived proteins, which suppress CALC gene expression in noninflamed nonneuroendocrine cells, i.e. as hormokine silencing factors.
Based on these experimental data, a trimodal expression pattern of the CALC-I gene and a closely regulated biphasic behaviour of infection-related PCT and CGRP secretion has been postulated (table 1⇓) 3, 28. In sepsis, the predominance of PCT as opposed to mature CT is indicative of a constitutive pathway within cells lacking secretory granules and, therefore, a bypassing of much of the enzymatic processing. Consequently, as is the case for most cytokines, there is little intracellular storage of PCT in sepsis 1. The greater mRNA induction and peptide release from parenchymal cells in comparison to circulating cells appears to indicate a tissue-based, rather than leukocyte-based, mechanism of host defence, which is characteristic for hormokines. In the absence of infection, transcription of the CALC-I gene is restricted to a selective expression in endocrine cells found mainly in the thyroid. Therefore, CT hormone is synthesised constitutively, stored in secretory granules and released after appropriate cAMP-dependent stimulation, e.g. with gastrin 2.
Trimodal pattern of CALC-I gene expression occurring in neuroendocrine cells, parenchymal cells and monocytes
What happens after the invasion of bacteria into the host organism? Both inflammatory and infectious stimuli lead to leukocyte recruitment to the site of infection, where they orchestrate the inflammatory reaction. In these blood-derived monocytes and macrophages, PCT and CGRP release is only transient, occurs in very limited amounts and occurs exclusively during a short period following attachment of cells to the dilating endothelium while they are transmigrating to the site of infection. Conversely, microbial products (e.g. LPS) and/or pro-inflammatory mediators of the host response (e.g. IL-1β and TNF-α) override the tissue-selective expression pattern in differentiated parenchymal cells. This is mediated by putative inflammation response elements within the CALC gene promoter 24. A consecutive, ubiquitous and tissue-wide induction of CT mRNA leads to a massive secretion of several CT precursors, including PCT, into the circulation. Therefore, parenchymal organ-specific cells (e.g. adipocyte, liver, lung, brain and muscle cells, among others) and not white blood cells constitute the major source of infection-related PCT secretion, which may reach levels >100,000-fold above normal in sepsis. Increasing levels of PCT can be readily detected and could, therefore, aid in the clinical assessment of patients with suspected infections.
ASSAYS TO MEASURE “PCT”
It has been known for decades that infection, and especially sepsis, are associated with increased serum levels of immunoreactive calcitonin. This differs from the mature 32-amino acid CT peptide by its larger molecular weight and, hence, has been variously referred to as “large molecular weight calcitonin”, “precalcitonin” or “big calcitonin” 29–32. These peptides were also measurable in high levels in patients with small cell lung cancer and medullary thyroid cancer, where they have prognostic implications 33, 34. This large molecular weight material consists of several CT precursors 14, 35, 36. Importantly, in patients with infection the extent to which any specific CT precursor peptide is increased relative to the others varies. For example, in sepsis the levels of CT:CT-carboxypeptide-I (CCP-I) and the aminoprocalcitonin (N-PCT) peptide may be even higher than the PCT values 14. None of the assays presently in use measures the PCT molecule exclusively. Therefore, the current authors also used (and would prefer to use) the term “calcitonin precursors” to indicate, globally, the detected immunoreactive material. Those include PCT, N-PCT, CT:CCP-I, immature CT and CCP-I. This should be kept in mind when reading the literature, which almost exclusively refers to measurement of “procalcitonin” (PCT) in serum of infected patients 37–40.
For the diagnosis of infections, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT and its optimum cut-offs are completely dependent on the use of a sensitive assay in a pre-defined clinical setting. Ideally, an ultra-sensitive assay should reliably measure circulating concentrations of PCT in all healthy individuals. Such assays are currently available for research purposes (PCT-sensitive LIA® and N-PCTKLB) and should be made widely available for the clinician in the near future. A rapid assay assures that results can be incorporated into clinical decision making.
The commercially available Kryptor® PCT assay (Brahms, Hennigsdorf, Germany) takes advantage of a time-resolved amplified cryptate emission technology. It is based on a sheep polyclonal anti-CT antibody and a monoclonal anti-katacalcin antibody, which bind to the CT and katacalcin sequence of CT precursor molecules. The assay has a functional assay sensitivity of 0.06 μg·L−1, i.e. 3–10-fold above normal mean values 14. The assay time is 19 min and in clinical routine results can be obtained within 1 h using 20–50 μL of plasma or serum 41. Another commercially available two-site assay (LUMItest® PCT; Brahms), measures both PCT and the conjoined CT:CCP-I by means of a luminometer. This assay is useful in markedly detecting elevated PCT levels in severe, systemic bacterial infections, i.e. in sepsis. However, this manual assay has the disadvantage of a relative insensitivity, with an accurate detection limit of ∼0.3–0.5 μg·L−1 14, 42. Thus, the LUMItest® assay is not sensitive enough to detect mildly or moderately elevated PCT levels, which limits its diagnostic use in conditions other than overt sepsis. Virtually all published studies, with the exception of the current authors’ intervention studies on antibiotic guidance, were performed using the LUMItest® assay. Due to the limited sensitivity, this assay should only be used with caution, if at all, when considering PCT for antibiotic guidance in or outside the intensive care unit (ICU). A colorimetric, “quick” bedside test (PCT®-Q; Brahms) has the advantage of rapid determination of circulating PCT levels in 30 min. Unfortunately, the assay is only semi-quantitative and is not sensitive enough to detect moderately elevated PCT levels 43.
PCT IN THE DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT OF SEVERE INFECTIONS
Mortality in sepsis remains high, often due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. The traditional clinical signs of infection and the routine laboratory tests in sepsis (e.g. C-reactive protein (CRP) or white blood cell count) lack diagnostic accuracy and are sometimes misleading. In severe infection, most classical pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. TNF-α, IL-1β or IL-6) are increased only briefly or intermittently, if at all. In view of this diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma, a more unequivocal test for the differential diagnosis of infection and sepsis is of paramount importance. Recently, in an attempt to improve current definitions of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis, it was suggested that PCT should be included as an additional diagnostic tool to improve and expedite the difficult clinical diagnosis 44. This was also based on evidence from the literature that in sepsis, PCT levels increase several-fold until they are several thousand-fold greater, and on admission this increase often correlates with the severity of the condition and with subsequent mortality 45. A variety of studies and reviews have shown the superior diagnostic accuracy of PCT as compared with other parameters for the diagnosis of sepsis, independent of the origin of infection (this data is summarised in 1, 45). Whereas the increase of other inflammatory markers such as CRP is attenuated by immunosuppressive medication (namely steroids), the diagnostic accuracy of PCT remains unaffected 46. In addition, PCT seems to have a slight advantage over CRP because of its earlier increase upon infection and a better negative predictive value, as shown, for example, in children with fever of unknown origin 47 and adult patients with systemic inflammatory response in critical illness 25, trauma and surgery 48. In a French pilot study, a blood PCT level <0.5 ng·mL−1 was prospectively used for the diagnosis of the viral origin of meningitis in 58 patients (aged 2 months to 14 yrs), in which enterovirus was isolated by culture or PCR during an outbreak (May–June 2000). On admission, 17 patients received antibiotic therapy. PCT dosage was routinely measured three times per week with the LUMItest®. In nine patients, a PCT result <0.5 ng·mL−1 was obtained after 24 h and after 48 h in a further six: treatment was then stopped and the children left the hospital. Thus, PCT dosage allowed a decrease of hospitalisation time and a reduction of unnecessary antibiotic treatments. The study is important but was not powered to address its safety and external validity for widespread use 49.
The most frequent source of severe systemic infections are lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) 12. A common problem in clinical practice is that, similar to sepsis, in respiratory tract infections the signs and symptoms of bacterial and viral infections are widely overlapping. After obtaining the medical history, physical examination, laboratory, and chest radiograph, the clinician is often left with considerable diagnostic uncertainty. In view of this diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma, a more reliable test for the differential diagnosis of bacterial respiratory tract infections in need of antibiotics from other respiratory disease would be extremely helpful 50.
In recent years, therefore, the current authors have investigated the ability of PCT and other hormones used as biomarkers to improve the clinical diagnosis, the prognostic assessment and therapeutic management of respiratory tract infections.
PCT FOR ANTIBIOTIC STEWARDSHIP OF RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS
LRTI, i.e. acute bronchitis, acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), account for almost 10% of the worldwide burden of morbidity and mortality 51. As much as 75% of all antibiotic doses are prescribed for acute respiratory tract infections, in spite of their predominantly viral aetiology. This excessive use of antibiotics is the main cause of the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria 52, 53. Thus, decreasing the excess use of antibiotics is essential to combat the increase of antibiotic-resistant micro-organisms 54, 55. A reduction of antibiotic use results in fewer side effects, lower costs, and, in the long term, leads to decreasing drug resistance. To limit antibiotic use, a rapid and accurate differentiation of clinically relevant bacterial LRTI from other, mostly viral, causes is pivotal 56, 57.
In this context, the current authors conceived and validated PCT-guided diagnosis and antibiotic stewardship using cut-off ranges in the continuum of LRTIs 51. An algorithm developed at the University Hospital Basel (Basel, Switzerland), was used to classify the patients in the PCT group into four subgroups according to the probability of bacterial infection (fig. 3⇓). The routine use of antimicrobial therapy was compared with PCT-guided antimicrobial treatment for LRTI. PCT was measured using a rapid assay with a functional sensitivity of 0.06 μg·L−1 (Kryptor® PCT; Brahms). Results were routinely available within 1 h (24 h per day, 7 days per week).
Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic (AB) stewardship. Cut-off ranges of PCT were derived by calculating multilevel likelihood ratios and optimised for the setting of an emergency room and hospital. The use of a sensitive assay (Kryptor® PCT; Brahms, Hennigsdorf, Germany) assured adequate sensitivity. Briefly, use of antibiotics was more or less discouraged (<0.1 μg·L−1 or <0.25 μg·L−1) or encouraged (>0.5 μg·L−1 or >0.25 μg·L−1) based on a range of PCT levels. The same cut-offs were used regardless of whether or not patients had been pre-treated with antibiotics prior to admission to the emergency department. In patients with very high PCT values on admission (e.g. >10 μg·L−1), discontinuation of antibiotic therapy was encouraged if levels decreased to <80–90% of the initial value. In patients with an initial PCT level >10 μg·L−1 and smaller reductions during follow-up, continuation of antibiotic treatment was encouraged. Re-evaluation of the clinical status and measurement of serum PCT levels was recommended after 6–24 h in all persistently sick and hospitalised patients in whom antibiotics were withheld. As indicated above, the PCT algorithm should be overruled in patients with immediately life-threatening disease. However, in these patients, despite the immediate administration of intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, a much more likely noninfectious differential diagnosis responsible for the critical illness must be strongly considered and actively sought, especially if PCT levels remain very low during follow-up. Physicians were advised that persistently elevated PCT levels may indicate a complicated course, while PCT levels may remain relatively low in localised infections (e.g. empyema or abscess). PCT levels were reassessed on days 3, 5 and 7 in hospitalised patients with ongoing antibiotic therapy, and in patients showing a worsening or delayed recovery of signs and symptoms, and antibiotic was discontinued using the PCT cut-offs defined above. For antibiotic stewardship in a medical or, especially, surgical intensive care unit (ICU), modified cut-off ranges might be necessary. Because mean PCT levels are increased in a cohort of critically ill patients as compared with patients in an emergency room or hospital setting, the optimal thresholds of the cut-off range are likely to be higher, especially in a immediately post-operative or post-traumatic situation. CAP: community-acquired pneumonia; PSI: pneumonia severity index; CURB65: severity score for CAP based on confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age ≥65 yrs; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GOLD: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease staging system for COPD; Sa,O2: arterial oxygen saturation.
In the PCT group, the physician was advised to follow the antibiotic treatment algorithm based on the PCT value and the likelihood of bacterial disease 1, 12, 58, 59. In four now completed intervention trials enrolling >1,200 patients, the success of the intervention was measured by clinical outcomes, assuming that if the patient recovered without antibiotics then there was no serious bacterial illness 60–63. This circumvented the problem of the nonexistent diagnostic “gold standard” based on traditional criteria (e.g. clinical signs, CRP, leukocytosis, culture result and allegedly favourable response to antibiotics also occurring in spontaneously resolving viral infections). PCT was chosen as the test marker because of its advantages over CRP and other inflammatory markers, namely an earlier increase upon infection, a better negative predictive value, and the unattenuated increase in the presence of immunosuppressive medication (e.g. steroids in patients with COPD) 46.
The ProRESP study assessed for the first time in a randomised intervention trial the capability of the PCT measurement in identifying bacterial LRTIs requiring antimicrobial treatment in the setting of an emergency department 60. In this setting, the percentage of patients in the PCT group who had LRTI and received antibiotic therapy was reduced by almost 50%, as compared with the standard group 60. The clinical and laboratory outcome was similar in both groups. Reduced antibiotic use was most striking in acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of COPD. COPD exacerbations offer a particular challenge in terms of diagnosing an infectious cause. Patients with COPD have an impaired pulmonary reserve and the infection might be locally restricted. Therefore, a PCT cut-off level for withholding antibiotics of <0.1 μg·L−1 is advisable in patients with severe disease and impaired pulmonary reserve. This was validated in the ProCOLD study, which included >200 patients 62. At the index exacerbation, procalcitonin guidance reduced antibiotic prescription (40 versus 72%; p<0.0001) and antibiotic exposure (relative risk (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43–0.73; p<0.0001) compared with standard therapy. Moreover, PCT guidance at the index exacerbation allowed a sustained reduction in total antibiotic exposure for up to 6 months. Clinical outcome and improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second at 14 days and 6 months did not differ between groups. Within 6 months exacerbation rate, re-hospitalisation rate and time to next exacerbation were similar in both groups. Thus, PCT guidance for exacerbations of COPD offers a sustained advantage over standard therapy in reducing antibiotic use for up to 6 months, with a number needed to treat of three. The majority of COPD patients have positive sputum culture results, although these do not necessarily imply an active infection. In the PCT group, positive culture rates were similar in patients in whom antibiotics were given or withheld, as were outcomes, underlining the limited diagnostic usefulness of sputum cultures in COPD.
Pneumonia is defined as inflammation of the pulmonary parenchyma, which is often caused by a bacterial agent, mirrored in markedly elevated PCT levels. In the ProCAP study, to date the largest published interventional study, >300 patients were enrolled 64. Herein, the concept of antibiotic stewardship by PCT was extended from a heterogeneous group of patients with LRTI to a larger cohort of patients with suspected CAP. These patients suffered from a severe bacterial infection and were more likely to experience an adverse outcome compared with patients with any type of LRTI. Accordingly, in bacterial CAP, delayed initiation of antibiotic therapy can be associated with an increased mortality 65. Therefore, in the emergency management of suspected CAP, antibiotic therapy is rapidly initiated in all patients. In patients presenting with CAP, PCT levels were elevated, at >0.1–0.25 μg·L−1 in ∼80–90% of patients. Thus, the primary value of PCT in CAP is not to reduce antibiotic use on admission but to facilitate the differential diagnosis of new or progressing infiltrates (e.g. viral pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, malignancy, cryptogenic organising pneumonia and congestive heart failure, among others). Accordingly, PCT guidance could markedly lower the number of antibiotic courses in patients with infiltrates on chest radiograph unrelated to pneumonia.
The presence of nonbacterial diseases is usually suspected only after failure of antibiotic therapy, with the ensuing risks related to untreated, potentially life-threatening nonbacterial disease 66. In self-limiting viral infections, cure of CAP under antibiotic therapy may be falsely considered as a proof of bacterial aetiology. In the PCT group, antibiotics were withheld in 15% of the patients with suspected CAP based on low PCT levels, confirming previous findings 60. Importantly, in the ProCAP study all measures of clinical and laboratory outcome were similar in both groups. The uneventful course strongly argues against the presence of a clinically relevant bacterial infection in these patients. If a patient shows an infiltrate on chest radiograph in the presence of acute respiratory symptoms and repetitively low PCT levels, clinicians may consider “watchful waiting” or early discontinuation of antibiotic therapy, and actively seek an alternative diagnosis to bacterial pneumonia, which may include viral pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, malignancy, cryptogenic organising pneumonia and congestive heart failure, among others 67. Conversely, in patients with diagnostic ambiguities, the finding of PCT levels of >0.25–0.5 μg·L−1 supports the clinician in the diagnosis of CAP.
Importantly, the optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy in CAP is largely unknown 68. It is likely that it varies from patient to patient and is dependent on the severity of the diseases, the fitness of the host response and the underlying micro-organism, among other factors. Current guidelines recommend antibiotic courses of 7–14 days, depending on illness severity and the type of pathogen 69–71. However, adherence to guidelines is variable 72 and physicians tend to treat for longer, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities and patients with severe CAP 60, 69. The duration of antibiotic therapy can be guided by clinical signs such as defervescence, decrease of sputum production and coughing, or improvement of the general condition. However, the interpretation of the clinical response lacks standardisation and validation, and is prone to interobserver variability 73. Similarly, in >70% of patients with CAP of presumed bacterial origin the causative microbe cannot be identified 60, 70, 74, 75. Therefore, culture results are not considered central to the clinical care of this infection. This wide ambiguity of clinical symptoms and the high rate of negative culture results could explain the reluctance to stop antibiotic therapy early in routine clinical care, as reflected in the control group of a study carried out by the current authors 74. PCT stewardship markedly reduced antibiotic exposure in patients with CAP, mainly by individually reducing the median duration of antibiotic courses from 12 to 5 days. In the PCT group, antibiotic courses were markedly shorter, as suggested by current guidelines 72, 76. Conversely, CAP is associated with adverse outcome, especially in bacteraemic patients, and thus longer antibiotic courses are recommended 77–79. Accordingly, in the PCT group, antibiotic therapy was longer in bacteraemic patients with a median duration of >10 days.
In conclusion, in the emergency room and in hospitalised patients, PCT guidance leads to a more judicious antibiotic use in LRTI, mainly by lowering antibiotic prescription on admission in patients with acute and chronic bronchitis, and individual tailoring and earlier discontinuation of antibiotic therapy in patients with CAP, respectively. It is noteworthy that the vast majority of eligible patients agreed to participate in the current authors’ studies, assuring applicability of the proposed approach under “real-life” conditions.
Acute respiratory infections are the most common reason for antibiotic therapy in primary care, despite their mainly viral aetiology. A PCT-guided diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for acute upper respiratory tract infections and LRTI in primary care is currently being evaluated 63.
To establish the study findings of the current authors as international standards of care, residual limitations have to be resolved. Three of the four studies were performed at a single university hospital, questioning the external validity. Standard care was used in the control group and the use of guidelines was not enforced. Only the study in primary care 63 as a non-inferiority study had adequate power for outcome. However, the low rate of adverse events in an outpatients setting is arguably not representative for hospitalised patients and higher complication rates. Finally, in the ProCAP study, despite a marked reduction of duration of antibiotic therapy in the PCT group, overall length of stay in the hospital was not the target of intervention and was, therefore, similar. One argument is that once a patient is clinically stable and intravenous antibiotics are discontinued, discharge from the hospital should be safe, unless there are extenuating circumstances. In the USA, LRTI are estimated to be responsible for US$15 billion per annum in direct treatment costs 80. CAP is among the most common reasons for hospitalisation, especially in the elderly 81. Patients with LRTI and comorbidities are often hospitalised with bronchitis and in the absence of an infiltrate. Conversely, most patients with respiratory tract infections and low risk of death prefer treatment outside the hospital 82. Antibiotic use and the overall allocation of healthcare resources in LRTI is related to patients', nurses' and physicians' expectations and beliefs about the need and potential benefits 83. Safe and multifocal strategies to reduce admission rate and the duration of hospitalisation will yield marked cost savings 84, 85. These important questions in the context of LRTI are currently addressed in the large multicentre ProHOSP trial, which is ongoing 86.
PCT IN VENTILATOR-ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most frequent nosocomial acquired infection in patients on mechanical ventilation 87. Bacteriological cultures, including endotracheal aspirates, are helpful in the diagnosis of VAP; however, complete results are often not available 24–48 h after the sample has been taken. Recently, it has been shown that PCT levels can be used as complementary diagnostic markers for VAP 88 and are also a useful marker for diagnosing VAP in patients with an already-triggered acute phase response after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation, where PCT levels were elevated a median of 2 days earlier than the clinical diagnosis of VAP 89. PCT kinetics were also found to be helpful prognostic markers of VAP 90. In some studies, however, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT for VAP has been challenged 90–93. In contrast, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (sTREM-1) has been identified for diagnosis and outcome prediction in patients with sepsis, namely due to CAP and VAP. The problem is that any observational study investigating the diagnostic accuracy of a given marker is biased by the choice of the gold standard. In infections, this gold standard does not exist, and thus all studies are prone to a potential bias. Analysing circulating levels of sTREM-1 in the current authors’ stored samples from the ProCAP intervention study revealed unexpected inaccuracies in sTREM-1 levels for the routine use of CAP 94. Circulating sTREM-1 levels were not helpful for the assessment of aetiology and severity in patients with CAP or in predicting outcome of the disease. The current authors found no significant correlation between sTREM-1 levels, which were independent if assessed with the use of immunoblot technique or ELISA using several antibodies (from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA 91 and others), before and after ultracentrifuation, in plasma or serum, respectively. Similarly, sTREM-1 concentrations did not correlate with other markers of infection, i.e. CRP (r = 0.03; p = ns), PCT (r = −0.03; p = ns) and leukocyte count (r = 0.03; p = ns). The negative findings of sTREM in critically ill patients with systemic inflammation and infections were independently confirmed by others 95. Measurement of the local production of sTREM-1 in bronchoalveolar fluid might provide more reliable results 91. However, this is not a cost-effective approach in patients with CAP and LRTI in general.
Interventional studies, in which the antimicrobial therapy is guided by PCT and in which the gold standard is the outcome, have the potential to resolve this dilemma 96. In the context of VAP, such intervention studies are still lacking; this is also true for PCT. Here, a word of caution should be considered. The extent of the inflammatory contribution of the VAP infection per se (i.e. the signal) is very limited compared with the massive underlying systemic inflammatory response syndrome present in every intubated critically ill patient (i.e. the noise). The resulting lower signal-to-noise ratio in VAP will limit the diagnostic occuracy of biomarkers such as PCT.
BIOMARKERS FOR THE PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT OF CAP
In patients with CAP, improved diagnostic assessment by PCT is important in order to differentiate from other noninfectious infiltrates and to guide the duration of antibiotics. It is also pivotal to being able to predict the prognosis of CAP and to estimate CAP severity for the purpose of guiding therapeutic options, such as the need for hospital or ICU admission, suitability for discharge, and choice and route of antimicrobial agents. Again, despite their widespread use in clinical routine, traditional markers, such as severity of disease assessment by the patient, fever, white blood cell count and also CRP are not reliable for the assessment of disease severity and mortality risk in CAP (table 2⇓). The pneumonia severity index (PSI) is a widely accepted and validated severity scoring system that assesses the risk of mortality for pneumonia patients in a two-step algorithm, combining clinical signs, demographic data and laboratory values 97. However, its complexity is high, jeopardising its dissemination and implementation, especially in everyday practice. Therefore, the CURB65 score has been proposed as a simpler alternative.
Evidence from intervention studies of respiratory tract infections with procalcitonin(PCT)-guided antibiotic (AB) therapy
The dynamics of PCT levels have prognostic implications, as persistently elevated levels are associated with adverse outcome 98. Conversely, decreasing PCT levels suggest a favourable outcome, usually showing a log-linear drop-off and a half life of 20–24 h 2. The prognostic accuracy of PCT in the ICU can be markedly improved by considering the course of PCT. Jensen et al. 99 analysed a total of 3,642 PCT measurements in 472 critically ill patients. The absolute PCT level, but especially the PCT increase for 1 day, was an independent predictor of 90-day all-cause mortality in the multivariate Cox regression analysis model. The adjusted hazard ratio for PCT increase for 1 day was 1.8 (95% CI 1.3–2.7) and the RR for mortality in the ICU for patients with an increasing PCT was: 1.8 (1.4−2.4) after 1 days’ increase; 2.2 (1.6−3.0) after 2 days’ increase; and 2.8 (2.0−3.8) after 3 days’ increase. Thus, a PCT increase during the course of disease was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in a 90-day follow-up period after ICU admission. Mortality increased with every day that PCT increased. Levels of increases in CRP and white blood cell count did not seem to predict mortality. In the current authors’ studies, PCT also showed a better prognostic accuracy compared with routinely measured parameters like CRP or leukocyte count, and has therefore been proposed as a marker of disease severity 64, 100. However, there was a wide overlap in PCT levels between different severities of CAP (fig. 4⇓) and only a small difference in PCT levels between survivors and nonsurvivors of CAP. Based on these data, PCT seems to be a reliable diagnostic marker that is able to guide decisions on antibiotic therapy, but not an ideal prognostic tool 64, 102.
Another member of the CALC gene family is adrenomedullin (fig. 1⇑), which is one of the most potent vasodilating agents and has additional immune-modulating metabolic properties 4, 103–105. Adrenomedullin also has a bactericidal activity, which is further enhanced by modulation of complement activity and regulation. Thus, it is not surprising that serum adrenomedullin levels were found to be elevated in sepsis 106. The reliable measurement of adrenomedullin is challenging, since it is rapidly cleared from the circulation 103, 104. The more stable mid-regional fragment of proadrenomedullin directly reflects levels of the rapidly degraded active peptide adrenomedullin 107.
In the current authors’ study of >300 patients with CAP, proadrenomedullin levels measured on admission emerged as good predictors of severity and outcome of CAP, with a similar prognostic accuracy to the PSI and a better prognostic accuracy than commonly measured clinical and laboratory parameters (fig. 4⇑). Importantly, it was found that proadrenomedullin levels could improve the prognostic accuracy of the PSI alone, acting as an additional margin of safety 64.
It is advisable to base the difficult task of prognostic assessment and treatment decisions on several parameters, rather than only one, with each mirroring different pathophysiological aspects. In this context, the current authors also evaluated the prognostic value of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), a member of the family of natriuretic peptides. ANP regulates a variety of physiological parameters, including diuresis and natriuresis, and reduces systemic blood pressure. Mature ANP is cleaved from carboxyl-terminal amino acids of the pro-hormone of ANP. The amino-terminal portion of the pro-hormone is secreted in the same molar ratio as ANP 108, 109. Because of its longer half-life, the amino-terminal portion of pro-ANP, particularly the mid-region of this molecule (MR-pro-ANP) has been shown to be a more reliable analyte 109. In CAP, the MR-pro-ANP level may mirror both the inflammatory cytokine response, correlated with the severity of pneumonia, as well as the presence of disease-relevant comorbidities, namely heart failure and renal dysfunction 110–113. Therefore, the current authors investigated MR-pro-ANP levels in a well-defined cohort of 545 consecutive patients with LRTI, in order to evaluate its prognostic use for the severity of disease and outcome; this study had two main findings 101. First, plasma MR-pro-ANP levels were increased in LRTI, with the highest levels in CAP. Secondly, on admission, MR-pro-ANP levels were a better predictor of severity and outcome of CAP as compared with commonly measured clinical and laboratory parameters, and were comparable to the PSI. Similarly, in a cohort of patients with dyspnoea predominantly due to congestive heart failure, B-type natriuretic peptide was shown to be helpful for risk stratification in the subgroup of patients with CAP 114.
Vasopressin has haemodynamic as well as osmoregulatory effects and reflects the individual stress response. Copeptin is co-synthesised with vasopressin, directly mirroring vasopressin levels, but is more stable in plasma and serum. Both levels are increased in patients with septic shock 115. Copeptin levels were significantly higher in patients with LRTI as compared with controls (p<0.001), with the highest levels in patients with CAP 116. Copeptin levels increased with increasing severity of CAP, as classified by PSI (p<0.001). In patients who died, copeptin levels on admission were significantly higher as compared with levels in survivors. The area under the receiver operating curve for survival was significantly higher for copeptin, as compared with CRP and leukocyte count, but was similar to that of PCT. Recently, in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD, copeptin was shown to be predictive for long-term clinical failure, independent of age, comorbidity, hypoxaemia and lung functional impairment in multivariate analysis 117. The combination of copeptin and previous hospitalisation for COPD increased the risk of poor outcome.
Thus, proadrenomedullin, natriuretic peptides, copeptin and other, as yet unevaluated, biomarkers can be helpful in the risk stratification of patients with CAP and LRTI in general. Various easy-to-determine surrogate biomarkers have been proposed to predict disease severity in CAP patients, thereby aiming to complement the PSI score 100, 116, 118, 119.
Of course, biomarkers will always oversimplify the interpretation of important variables and, therefore, biomarkers are meant to complement, rather than to supersede, the judgment of clinicians and/or validated severity scores. Conceptually, the likelihood of an adverse outcome should determine the medical indication, length of hospitalisation and allocation of healthcare resources. The additional value of these novel biomarkers in the careful clinical assessment is currently being validated in the ProHOSP study in a large cohort of patients 86.
BIOMARKERS FOR PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT IN SEPSIS
The development of a septic infection is a continuum and, in the majority of cases, a sequelae of LRTI. A reliable prognostic assessment is crucial not only in CAP but equally in sepsis. Sepsis is the leading cause of death in critically ill patients in the USA. It develops in 750,000 people annually, and more than 210,000 of them die 120, 121. Roughly 9% of patients with sepsis progress to severe sepsis and 3% progress to septic shock 122. Early and adequate diagnosis and risk assessment is pivotal for the optimised care of critically ill patients. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score as a prognostic scoring system in sepsis was originally not recommended for individual outcome prediction in sepsis patients 123. However, despite its inherent limitations, outcome predictors are clearly helpful in identifying those septic patients with a high risk of death, who are more likely to benefit from intervention treatment.
In an attempt to improve current sepsis definitions, in the “PIRO” (predisposition, insult infection, response, organ dysfunction) concept the use of readily measurable circulating biomarkers is recommended as an additional tool for the timely assessment and severity classification of septic patients and the prediction of mortality 44.
The current authors have shown that proadrenomedullin has a similar prognostic accuracy as compared with the APACHE II score 102. This also validates its prognostic usefulness in patients with CAP 64. Upon availability in the routine setting, proadrenomedullin might prove to be an additional, helpful tool for a broader prognostic classification of infected patients, both in- and outside of the ICU. Two main mechanisms might be responsible for the marked increase of circulating mid-regional proadrenomedullin and mature adrenomedullin in sepsis. Firstly, as a member of the CALC gene family, adrenomedullin is widely expressed and extensively synthesised during sepsis, in a similar manner to other calcitonin peptides, namely PCT and calcitonin-gene related peptides 2. Bacterial endotoxins and pro-inflammatory cytokines upregulate adrenomedullin gene expression in many tissues both in vitro and in vivo in rodents and humans 4. In addition, a decreased clearance by the kidneys may be responsible in part for the increased levels in sepsis 106.
Similarly, the current authors evaluated the same biomarkers as in CAP, which were all higher in nonsurvivors compared with survivors and had a similar accuracy for the prediction of death to the APACHE II score 107, 108, 115, 124–126.
Importantly, no biomarker is a substitute for a careful clinical assessment and the obtainment of appropriate cultures in all patients. However, used appropriately, biomarkers allow an earlier diagnosis of infections and can inform physicians about the course and prognosis of the disease better than more routinely used clinical and laboratory markers.
THE CENTRAL ROLE OF HORMOKINES IN HOST DEFENCE
Sepsis is a catastrophic consequence of overriding inflammation, insufficient host defence and metabolic disturbances. To better understand the role of PCT in the sepsis cascade, the relationship to the proximal pro-inflammatory mediators, IL-1β and TNF-α, was examined in hamster sepsis. PCT did not initiate or enhance IL-1β or TNF-α expression; however, the massive and sustained elevation of PCT seen in hamster sepsis was induced by the proximal cytokine, TNF-α 127. Thus, PCT is a secondary mediator, which may augment and amplify, rather than initiate, the septic response. In addition, PCT might induce the synthesis of inflammatory cytokines by human PBMCs 128. Induction was moderate, but specific, as the effect was not seen with administration of N-PCT or CCP-1, two breakdown products of PCT. PCT is a modulator of cytokine-induced inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in rat vascular smooth muscle cells, with a maximal suppressing effect on nitric oxide (NO) synthesis at PCT levels of 100 ng·mL−1 129. However, at the highest concentration utilised (5 mg·L−1), PCT did not inhibit NO production and had no effect on unstimulated cells. Recent findings suggest a less prominent role of NO in human physiology and metabolism, as compared with rodents 27, 130.
Based on the decrease of circulating calcium induced by mature CT, a role of PCT in the disordered calcium homeostasis of critically ill patients was postulated 45. Both total and ionised hypocalcaemia correlated negatively with the increase of circulating PCT and were also more pronounced with increasing severity of infection. Notably, serum levels of mature CT were normal in sepsis. Thus, in humans, PCT may also play a role in the development of inflammatory hypocalcaemia in vivo, although causal relationships cannot be reliably drawn from correlation of findings in observational studies. Conversely, in hamsters, the injection of PCT neutralised the acute calcium-lowering effects of CT, indicating species-specific differences 131.
Other hormokines appear to be important in humans with infections. In sepsis, mRNAs for CGRP-I, CGRP-II and adrenomedullin also appear to be ubiquitously expressed 132. Accordingly, in humans, circulating levels of CGRPs and adrenomedullin have also been found to be elevated in microbial infections 10, 11, 106, 133. How do these hormokines of the CALC gene family of peptides possibly mediate their effects?
CGRP and adrenomedullin are potent vasodilators during septic shock 134. The LPS-triggered release of CGRP is NO- and prostaglandin-dependent 135. Both CGRP and adrenomedullin have immune-modulating, metabolic and vascular actions 2, which are NO 136, 137, nuclear factor-κB 138, cAMP and calcium mediated 139. CGRP-I, CGRP-II and adrenomedullin are considered to be auto- and/or paracrine factors in many tissues. In sepsis, a competition arises between organs for reduced systemic blood pressure and blood flow. With their very potent vasodilating properties, the tissue-wide production of CGRPs and adrenomedullin assures blood supply to the individual organs. Thus, in a teleological perspective, due to their vasodilatory properties, the tissue-wide production of CGRP and adrenomedullin assures blood supply to the individual tissues, and thereby may oppose vasoconstrictory effects of other stress hormones released during sepsis (e.g. catecholamines and cortisol). Detrimental septic shock might be the ultimate, disastrous outcome of this powerful action.
Interestingly, adrenomedullin also has a potent direct bactericidal activity 140, 141. The adrenomedullin (CALC-V) gene also undergoes alternative splicing, similar to the CALC-I gene, where it yields PCT and CGRP (fig. 1⇑). Toll-like receptor (TLR)4 is involved in LPS-dependent adrenomedullin induction, as it is not found in TLR4 mutant mice after exposure to LPS 142. The shortest mRNA form of adrenomedullin includes exon I–IV and generates adrenomedullin (located on exon IV) and an amino-terminal peptide fragment, proadrenomedullin amino-terminal 20 peptide (PAMP), which is encoded in exons II and III. In a longer mRNA form, an early stop codon omits translation of adrenomedullin, hence, only PAMP is produced 7. An antimicrobial effect of adrenomedullin, and especially for PAMP, against E. coli has been described 141, 143. The amino-terminal structure of adrenomedullin is responsible for this activity 144. In addition, adrenomedullin binds short consensus repeats of factor H (also termed adrenomedullin-binding protein-1) and has complementary regulatory activity 144. Factor H prevents C3 activation by the alternative pathway, it protects host cells from attack by binding to surface-bound C3b and it thereby accelerates decay of C3 convertase and suppresses complementary activation. Adrenomedullin is expected to enhance complementary activation by interfering with factor H activity and, thereby, strengthening the antibacterial defence 7. The binding of adrenomedullin to factor H protects it against degradation 145. Thus, the adrenomedullin-factor H complex regulates the bioactivity and half-life of both molecules.
HOW DO HORMOKINES MEDIATE THEIR EFFECTS?
Based on the structural homologies, different CT peptides have overlapping bioactivities, exerted by binding to the same family of receptors (fig. 5⇓ and table 3⇓) 2, 146.
Receptors for calcitonin (CT) peptides. Based on the structural homologies, different CT peptides have overlapping bioactivities, which they exert by binding to the same family of receptors 16. There are two subgroups of these G protein-coupled receptors with seven transmembrane domains: CT receptors and CT receptor-like receptors (CRLR). Three accessory proteins, which are called receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP-1, -2 and -3), act upon these receptors, thus altering their specific responsiveness and ligand affinity, and hence modifying the physiological profile of the CT-peptide superfamily 146. Depending on which of the different RAMPs is associated with the receptor, each member of the CT-gene family of peptides binds with differing affinities. Whether procalcitonin (PCT) and other CT precursor peptides from the other CALC genes are also ligand for these receptors is currently unknown. CGRP: calcitonin gene-related peptide; ADM: adrenomedullin; NO: nitric oxide; N: amino terminal; C: carboxyl terminal.
Calcitonin(CT) peptides, as hormokines, are a functional entity
There are two subgroups of these G protein-coupled receptors: CT receptors (CR) and CT receptor-like receptors (CRLR). Three accessory proteins, receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP)-1, -2 and -3, alter their ligand affinity and responsiveness. For example, CRLR/RAMP-1 forms a CGRP-I or -II-responsive cell and co-expression of RAMP-2 with CRLR yields adrenomedullin responsiveness. CR, with or without RAMP 2, is a CT receptor, RAMP-3 an amylin receptor and RAMP-1 a combined amylin/CGRP receptor. It is not known whether PCT also binds to CR or CRLR, probably with low affinity, or has an “own” receptor mediating distinct effects. It is tempting to speculate that the extraordinary increase of circulating PCT in sepsis prevents CGRP and adrenomedullin from exerting their actions, and thus acts as a competitive antagonist.
Three main circulating peptide fragments of PCT have been identified 14, including N-PCT. N-PCT is also markedly elevated in sepsis and shares a structural similarity in the amino-terminal end with adrenomedullin, suggesting a bactericidal potential for PCT.
HORMOKINES AS THERAPEUTIC TARGET IN SEVERE INFECTIONS
Conceptually, two therapeutic targets for hormokines could be postulated. Firstly, the antimicrobial properties of hormokines, especially adrenomedullin and PAMP, might be used to develop new antibiotics. The finding of high levels during bacterial infections in body fluids (plasma, sweat, milk, saliva, amniotic fluid and others) also point to a role in the systemic immune defence. Epithelial structures represent the first barrier against pathogenic infections. In mammals, hormokines are produced, like many other endogenous antimicrobial peptides, by mucosal epithelia. The accumulation of hormokines, namely adrenomedullin, in epithelia surfaces (skin, lung, genitourinary tract, digestive system and others) indicates a role in the mucosal defence mechanism 147. The digestive tract in particular is colonised by billions of allegedly harmful micro-organisms and only their preservation within the intestinal lumen prevents microbial invasion and lethal damage to the host. In this perspective, every food intake is a major challenge, as digested micronutrients have to be absorbed from the extremely contaminated environment of the intestinal lumen into the sterile circulation. It is tempting to speculate that hormokines might be an evolutionary tool to protect the organism from bacterial sepsis after food intake. It is interesting that the release of several members of the hormokine family are triggered by and linked to the release of gastro-intestinal hormones during food intake (e.g. CT by (penta)gastrin and amylin to insulin).
In addition, following the principle “sola dosis facit venenum”, very high concentrations of endogenously produced hormokines will become toxic to the host. Conceptually, potent mediators like CGRP or adrenomedullin are tightly regulated; circulating levels are kept within a very narrow range in order to prevent harmful excessive effects. Hence, in sepsis, circulating levels of CGRP are only modestly elevated, prohibiting its use as a diagnostic tool. In contrast, circulating levels of PCT are greatly, i.e. up to 1 million-fold, increased in sepsis 12. The fact that the organism is able to survive a several thousand-fold increase of PCT suggests an attenuated form and strength of action. This wider “therapeutic range” is arguably an advantage for iatrogenic modulation, which is mostly less coordinated compared with endogenous feedback regulation. Several other characteristics favour the “less potent” PCT as a therapeutic target in sepsis. The toxic effects of PCT are restricted to an inflamed organism: injection of human PCT to septic hamsters with peritonitis doubled their death rate 148. In contrast, in healthy animals the administration of similar doses of PCT did not show any detrimental effects. In contrast to the transiently increased classical cytokines, for which immunoneutralisation trials in humans have been disappointing, the massive increase of circulating PCT persists for several days 17. Circulating PCT is virtually always and persistently increased for several days in bacteraemic sepsis; its onset is early (≤3 h) and it can be easily measured as a mid-to-late mediator. The resulting superior diagnostic accuracy could greatly improve patient selection and stratification for clinical studies. Importantly, administration of PCT to septic hamsters with peritonitis doubled their death rate 148. Conversely, treatment with PCT-reactive anti-serum increased survival of septic hamsters and pigs with mono- and polymicrobial sepsis 6, 21, 148. A 1-h i.v. immunoneutralisation of porcine PCT improved all vital parameters of septic pigs: it increased short-term survival from 0 to 80% and was effective even when administered after the animals were moribund 6, 7, 149. These features are not shared by any other known molecule.
In spite of these important findings, there is currently a paucity of knowledge of underlying pathophysiological concepts. Data on the molecular mechanisms mediating these effects are scarce. Clearly, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the regulation and function of CT peptides as hormokines is original, physiopathologically interesting and clinically important 1, 16.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, when used in conjunction with an optimal clinical assessment, biomarkers can improve the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of sepsis and its precursors (i.e. LRTIs, including pneumonia). Both strengths and weaknesses of biomarkers must be considered for a rational and safe implementation in a routine clinical setting. The time has come to move beyond the observational reporting of “promising” biomarkers 150. Specific cut-off ranges must be proposed and intervention studies conducted to tackle the existing vicious cycle of antibiotic overuse, emerging multiresistance and unnecessary allocation of healthcare resources. Only this will open our eyes and reveal whether biomarkers can really help us in the routine care of patients with LRTIs and, ultimately, sites of infection other than the lung.
Elevated serum PCT levels correlate with presence, course and outcome of sepsis in humans. As a marker, PCT is not perfect, but is reliable enough to steward and reduce antibiotic (over)use in respiratory tract infections. No marker other than PCT has been rigorously assessed in intervention studies for its capability to be used safely for antibiotic stewardship in LRTIs, the ultimate proof of its diagnostic accuracy.
Importantly, biomarkers can also improve the prognostic assessment of sepsis and pneumonia to predict failure compared with other routinely used laboratory parameters or compared with a clinical assessment alone.
Several characteristics of hormokines favour these molecules as a therapeutic target in sepsis.
Calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin are potent immune-modulating and vasoactive peptides. Adrenomedullin has antibacterial activity. Procalcitonin is very frequently increased in bacterial infections, its onset is early, and the diagnostic accuracy of the measurement should greatly improve patient selection for any study of the therapeutic efficacy of antibiotic therapy. Because of its sustained and massive increase, procalcitonin, and possibly other hormokines, provides an ideal therapeutic immunoneutralisation target for sepsis in humans. The proof of principle has been successfully shown for procalcitonin in several animal and infectious disease models. These features are not matched by any other known molecules, and the therapeutic promise needs to be further explored.
- Received December 20, 2006.
- Accepted March 15, 2007.
- © ERS Journals Ltd