Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

ERS guidelines on the assessment of cough

A. H. Morice, G. A. Fontana, M. G. Belvisi, S. S. Birring, K. F. Chung, P. V. Dicpinigaitis, J. A. Kastelik, L. P. McGarvey, J. A. Smith, M. Tatar, J. Widdicombe
European Respiratory Journal 2007 29: 1256-1276; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00101006
A. H. Morice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. A. Fontana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. G. Belvisi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. S. Birring
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. F. Chung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. V. Dicpinigaitis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. A. Kastelik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. P. McGarvey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. A. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Tatar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Widdicombe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Cough

1) All basic scientific articles should refer to cough as a three-phase motor act. For the purposes of acoustic recordings in clinical studies, however, cough should be described as a forced expulsive manoeuvre or manoeuvres against a closed glottis that are associated with a characteristic sound or sounds.

2) All scientific articles should include a clear definition of what the authors have used as their definition of cough.

Capsaicin and citric acid inhalation cough challenge

1) The methodology for the performance of inhalation cough challenge should be standardised so as to facilitate universal interpretation and comparison of data generated by different laboratories.

2) Comprehensive normal ranges need to be developed using the standardised methodology advocated in the present document.

3) The single-breath concentration–response method using a flow-limited dosimeter is recommended for most experimental protocols.

4) Both C2 and C5 should be recorded.

5) Since there is wide inter-individual variation, cough challenge data have no intrinsic significance, but may usefully be used to follow change in cough reflex sensitivity in an individual.

Cough induced by inhalation of aqueous solutions

1) Aerosolised aqueous solutions represent a useful experimental tool in cough research.

2) The cough challenge with ultrasonic distilled water (fog) is difficult to standardise since it is highly dependent upon nebuliser output.

3) Consideration should be given to potential adverse events, such as bronchoconstriction and cross-infection.

Cough monitors

1) No cough monitor is currently the gold standard.

2) Monitors should be developed that are ambulatory, are capable of being digitally processed and permit prolonged (24-h) recording.

3) There is little to commend any particular method of quantifying cough over any other.

Assessment of quality of life of patients with chronic cough

1) Cough can have profound effects on health status, which can be assessed by cough-specific health status questionnaires.

2) Cough visual analogue scale (VAS, 0–100 mm) should be used to assess cough severity in patients with chronic cough.

3) Patients with chronic cough should be assessed with cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaires in clinical studies.

Animal models of cough

1) The most useful animal model of cough is …

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 29 Issue 6 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 29 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ERS guidelines on the assessment of cough
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
ERS guidelines on the assessment of cough
A. H. Morice, G. A. Fontana, M. G. Belvisi, S. S. Birring, K. F. Chung, P. V. Dicpinigaitis, J. A. Kastelik, L. P. McGarvey, J. A. Smith, M. Tatar, J. Widdicombe
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2007, 29 (6) 1256-1276; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00101006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
ERS guidelines on the assessment of cough
A. H. Morice, G. A. Fontana, M. G. Belvisi, S. S. Birring, K. F. Chung, P. V. Dicpinigaitis, J. A. Kastelik, L. P. McGarvey, J. A. Smith, M. Tatar, J. Widdicombe
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2007, 29 (6) 1256-1276; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00101006
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
    • BACKGROUND
    • CAPSAICIN AND CITRIC ACID INHALATION COUGH CHALLENGE
    • COUGH INDUCED BY INHALATION OF AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS
    • COUGH MONITORS
    • ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC COUGH
    • ANIMAL MODELS OF COUGH
    • DESIGN AND CONDUCT OF CLINICAL TRIALS OF ANTITUSSIVE DRUGS
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • ers task force: global lung function equations
  • Respiratory medicines for children: current evidence, unlicensed use and research priorities
  • European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis and management of lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Show more ERS Task Force

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society