Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation as a potential novel therapeutic tool

K. Tsushima, T. Koizumi, T. Tanabe, R. Nakagawa, S. Yoshikawa, M. Yasuo, K. Kubo
European Respiratory Journal 2007 29: 1193-1200; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00111306
K. Tsushima
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Koizumi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Tanabe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Nakagawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Yoshikawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Yasuo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Kubo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to assess the safety of bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and compare the effectiveness between new internal cooled-RFA and standard noncooled-RFA.

Normal lungs from sheep were used (n = 6). Internal cooled-RFA and standard noncooled-RFA were set to assess the most suitable RFA conditions, such as power output, flow rate and ablation time. Internal cooled-RFA was then applied under the most optimal conditions of power output and flow rate for 15, 30, 60 and 120 s, and two water temperatures either room temperature (RT) water or cold water. Criteria for the most appropriate conditions were set over 15 s of ablation time and 50°C of the tip's temperature.

Internal cooled-RFA had no complications. Standard noncooled-RFA was complicated with bronchial bleeding after RFA. On the basis of the histological findings, average temperature and average output, the most appropriate conditions of the cooled-RFA were a power output of 30 W and flow rate of 30 or 40 mL·min−1. The cooled-RFA using cold water caused a smaller, more discrete, lesion compared with that using RT water.

Bronchoscopy-guided internal cooled-radiofrequency ablation was an effective, safe and feasible procedure that could become a potential therapeutic tool in managing lung pathology.

  • Fibreoptic bronchoscopy
  • internal cooled-radiofrequency ablation
  • radiofrequency ablation
  • standard noncooled-radiofrequency ablation

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) uses an electromagnetic wave with a frequency band the same as an electric scalpel used in surgery and a radiofrequency interchange electric current. RFA is a new treatment offered as a minimally invasive treatment and is most commonly used to treat patients with liver tumours 1, kidney cancer 2, breast cancer 3 or lung cancer 4. Tumour cells are generally more susceptible to heat than normal cells. This procedure is safe, technically feasible and suitable for use with imaging guidance technologies, such as ultrasonography, radiograph and computed tomography (CT).

Mortality from lung cancer remains high and establishment of new therapeutic modalities are needed. RFA has been described as a new technique for the treatment of lung cancer, and Miao et al. 5 suggested that cooled-RFA is an effective alternative to lobectomy, in certain patients, for the minimally invasive treatment of lung cancer. In the USA, standard RFA has been more widely used than percutaneous imaging-guided therapy 6. Complications from this method include pain, pneumothorax, haemothorax and pleural effusion 7. Tsushima et al. 8 reported fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guidance under real-time CT fluoroscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions. A critical aspect is that this procedure may reduce the above complications if RFA can be applied using real-time chest CT images under fibreoptic bronchoscopy.

The current authors developed a new internally cooled electrode (Japan Application No. 2006-88228) suitable for forceps channel bronchoscopy. The initial aim of the present study was to compare the effective differences between the new internal-cooled electrode and the standard noncooled electrode and to assess the feasibility and safety of bronchoscopy-guided RFA using normal sheep lungs.

METHODS

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board for the care of animals at Shinshu University (Asahi, Matsumoto, Japan). The care and handling of animals was in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institute of Health. The animals had free access to commercial food and drinking water.

Preparation

Ex vivo RFA was performed on six male sheep (weight 35–50 kg) in the Shinshu University animal care facility. They were fasted for 8 h before fibreoptic bronchoscopy to prevent aspiration pneumonia. The sheep were anaesthetised using intravenous probocol (10 mL bolus) and an 8.0-mm tracheal tube was inserted after cutting part of the anterior trachea. Their limbs were fixed to the table in the supine position and spontaneous breathing was maintained under anaesthesia with probocol (0.5 mL·min−1). RFA was performed in the animal operation room under radiograph fluoroscopy (BV-25 Gold; Philips, Linton, UT, USA).

Fibreoptic bronchoscopy

After airway anaesthesia with 2% lidocaine hydrochloride, the sheep underwent fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Supplemental oxygen during the procedure was not needed. A flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope (Olympus; Tokyo, Japan), BF 1T20 (outer diameter; 5.0 mm, forceps channel; 2.2 mm) was inserted via the tracheal cannula route under local anaesthesia.

RFA preparation

Two kinds of electrode were prepared for RFA: an internal cooled-electrode with a 4-mm active tip (fig. 1a⇓; ablation tip: 4 mm, diameter: 1.67 mm; Shinshu University) and a standard noncooled-electrode with a 4-mm active tip (fig. 1b⇓; ablation tip: 4 mm, diameter: 1.67 mm; Shinshu University). These electrodes were attached to a monopolar radiofrequency generator (Shinshu University) able to produce 50 W as the maximum output. Tissue impedance was monitored continuously by a generator and an impedance-controlled radiofrequency algorithm was used. During the RFA procedure, a thermometer embedded within the electrode tip continuously measured the temperature and its upper limit was set at 70°C. Grounding was achieved by attaching one or two standard steel mesh dispersive electrodes to the sheep's abdomen. A peristaltic pump (Shinshu University) was used to infuse water into the internal lumen of the catheter electrode at several rates (20–50 mL·min−1). When the desired power output could not be applied as a result of the elevation of impedance due to tissue boiling, the generator automatically switched off the electrode. Current pulsing was also performed manually to avoid charring of local tissue caused by the rapid increase of impedance, which limited further heat diffusion.

Fig. 1—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1—

a) An internal cooled radiofrequency ablation electrode. b) Tip of the electrode. Only a 4 mm-tipped electrode produced power output, the tip temperature and impedance were measured.

RFA procedure

Various conditions were set to assess the most suitable RFA condition according to the methods of cardiac conduction abnormality for procedure 1 9–11. An X-ray fluoroscopic image was obtained to correlate the location of the electrode tip in peripheral lung lesions with ∼1-cm margin from pleura to prevent pneumothorax complications. Once the appropriate peripheral location of the electrode tip was confirmed and impedance was <300 Ω, RFA was used. The settings regarding the areas which were ablated were as follows.

Procedure 1: To compare between standard noncooled-RFA and internal cooled-RFA, standard noncooled-RFA (power output; 30 W) ablated each right lobe only once and internal cooled-RFA (power output; 30W, flow rate 30mL·min−1) ablated each left lobe only once. RFA was initially applied for 120 s under several conditions of power output and flow rate (table 1⇓). Lungs from one sheep were harvested to assess ablated areas macroscopically and histologically immediately after ablation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

Procedures of radiofrequency ablation(RFA)

Procedure 2–1: To obtain an optimal output of 30 W, several sets of flow rates were performed. Internal cooled-RFA with flow rates of 20, 30 and 40 mL·min−1 were ablated once in the upper, middle and lower lobes, respectively. One sheep was harvested immediately and another harvested 7 days after ablation.

Procedure 2–2: Different output (20 W and 40 W) and flow rate (20, 40 and 50 mL·min−1) parameters were used to compare the data at 30 W. Internal cooled-RFA was ablated once in each right lobe and left lobe using a power output of 20 and 40 W, respectively. Lungs obtained from one sheep were harvested at 7 days after ablation.

Procedure 3: Internal cooled-RFA was applied under the most optimal conditions of power output and flow rate for 15, 30 and 60 s, using two different temperatures of flow water (room temperature water or cold (4°C) water). Internal cooled-RFA was used once for 15, 30 and 60 s in the upper, middle and lower lobes, respectively. Two sheep were harvested 7 days after ablation. Internal cooled-RFA was performed on the bronchial mucosa using the same methods as described previously.

Histopathological analysis

Two sheep were sacrificed immediately and four 7 days (n = 4) after the RFA procedure using an overdose of ketamine. Their lungs were then harvested. Gross examination for bronchial haemorrhage, atelectasis and perforation was performed on all sheep. For microscopic examination, two observers measured the central discoloured region of coagulation necrosis in each pathological specimen and the average was calculated. Tissues were fixed in 10% formalin for routine histological processing with paraffin sectioning and haematoxylin-eosin staining for light microscopic examination.

Data analysis

Technical assessment, therapeutic efficacy and RFA complications were analysed. Changes in the morphology and attenuation of the lesion after RFA were recorded. Optimal conditions were based on complications, local tissue temperature, histology and procedure time in conjunction with power output, flow rate and impedance data. The above criteria were assessed with >15 s of ablation time and the temperature of the electrode at 50°C as a prolonged ablation exposure could have denatured lung tissue due to generation of high temperatures.

RESULTS

As shown in figure 2⇓, a standard noncooled-RFA was continued for up to 120 s. It was complicated with bronchial bleeding immediately after RFA. Impedance increased from 770 to 999 Ω. Macroscopic findings showed bronchial haemorrhage and necrosis of 25×15 mm. Standard noncooled-RFA showed diffuse bronchial bleeding from all ablated lobes. All histological findings showed diffuse alveolar haemorrhage, lung oedema and destruction of the alveolar space. It was concluded that, despite achieving a sufficient area of coagulation necrosis, this electrode was not suitable for lung ablation because of the increase of impedance and bronchial haemorrhage.

Fig. 2—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2—

Radiofrequency ablation for 120 s using a standard noncooled electrode with a power output of 30 W. a) Low power output (mean 1 W and maximum 3 W), b) temperature (mean 68°C and maximum 76°C) and c) impedance (increased from 770 to 999 Ω). d) Macroscopic findings showed large coagulation necrosis. e) Microscopic findings showed diffuse alveolar haemorrhage, destruction of alveolar space (haematoxylin-eosin stain; scale bar  =  0.5 mm).

Internal cooled-RFA had no immediate complications. As shown in figure 3⇓, the average temperature of 20 W power output decreased slightly according to the flow rate. With a power output setting of 20 W and a flow rate of 20 mL·min−1, impedance increased from 300 to 999 Ω. Histological findings showed diffuse alveolar haemorrhage and preserved structure of the alveolar space. With a flow rate of 40 mL·min−1, histological findings did not differ from those with a flow rate of 20 mL·min−1 (table 2⇓).

Fig. 3—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3—

Radiofrequency ablation for 120 s using an internal cooled electrode with a power output of 20 W and flow rate of 20 mL·min−1. a) Power output (mean 16 W and maximum 18 W), b) temperature (mean 43°C and maximum 56°C) and c) impedance (increased from 300 to 999 Ω). Wide wave range meant changes accompanied deep breathing. d) Macroscopic findings showed a ring burn and normal central area. e) Microscopic findings showed some haemorrhage and maintenance of the alveolar space (haematoxylin-eosin stain; scale bar  =  0.5 mm).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2—

Radiofrequency ablation parameters

As shown in figure 4⇓, with a power output setting of 30 W and a flow rate of 40 mL·min−1, impedance decreased from 174 to 97 Ω. Macroscopic findings showed necrosis of 15×15 mm, and no bronchial bleeding. Histological findings showed diffuse alveolar haemorrhage and necrosis. With 30 W power output and a flow rate of 20 mL·min−1, sufficient power output could not be achieved because of the rapid increase in the tip's temperature; however, histopathological findings showed the same lesion and size as with a flow rate of 40 mL·min−1. The findings between a flow rate of 30 and 40 mL·min−1 were almost identical (table 2⇑). Although not illustrated by the data, when using a 40 W power output, the temperature of the electrode tip reached 60°C; therefore, the flow rate remained high because the tip temperature rapidly increased with a low flow rate. Impedance decreased from 245 to 189 Ω. Histological findings showed diffuse alveolar haemorrhage, lung oedema and destruction of the alveolar space. A power output of 40 W achieved almost the same size of coagulation necrosis as 30 W, for clinical safety; therefore, a 40 W power output is suggested to be unnecessary for ablation of the lung tissue. On the basis of these histological findings and the average temperature and output, the most appropriate conditions for the cooled electrode were a 30 W power output and a flow rate of 30 or 40 mL·min−1. In addition, the temperature of the electrode tip needed to ablate the lung tissue was ∼50°C.

Fig. 4—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4—

Radiofrequency ablation using an internal cooled electrode with a power output of 30 W and flow rate of 40 mL·min−1. a) Power output (mean 23 W), b) temperature (mean 51°C) and c) impedance (increased from 245 to 189 Ω). d) Macroscopic findings showed a ring burn with central necrosis. e) Microscopic findings showed haemorrhage in the central area and diffuse alveolar destruction (haematoxylin-eosin stain; scale bar  =  0.5 mm).

As shown in figure 5⇓, internal cooled-RFA was applied under the most appropriate conditions: 30 W power output and a flow rate of 40 mL·min−1 for 15, 30 and 60 s. The electrode tip temperature reached >50°C within 10 s at both water temperatures. The cooled-RFA with cold water achieved coagulation necrosis of ∼7 mm in diameter after 15 s of ablation. There was a major difference histologically between cold water and room temperature water. The macroscopic findings with room temperature water showed larger burn lesions than with cold water (40×45 and 20×15 mm, respectively) after 60 s of ablation; however, after 30 s of ablation, the burn size was almost identical between room temperature and cold water (11×7 mm and 7×5 mm, respectively). From these histological results, a 30-s exposure of RFA affected deeper lung tissues similarly, independent of the temperature of water used.

Fig. 5—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5—

Radiofrequency ablation using an internal cooled electrode with a power output of 30 W, flow rate of 40 mL·min−1 and 60 s ablation time. a,b) Cold water (4°C) and c,d) room temperature water were used as an internal flow. Cold water showed coagulation necrosis of 15 mm in diameter and a burn area of 20 mm in diameter. c) Room temperature water showed coagulation necrosis of 15 mm in diameter and a burn area of ∼40 mm in diameter. The necrotic size was twice as large as that with cold water. b) and d) Microscopic findings indicate the border between the infiltration zone and normal lung; haemorrhage in the alveoli and diffuse alveolar destruction (haematoxylin-eosin stain; scale bar  =  0.5 mm).

On ablation of the bronchial membrane, a sufficient necrotic effect was achieved with white denaturation of the mucous membrane within 10 s using a cooled-RFA with cold water. No bronchial perforation was observed within 30 s of ablation; however, since impedance increased faster compared with the peripheral lung tissue, RFA could not continue for >30 s. This was due to contact resistance around the electrode tip.

DISCUSSION

Percutaneous guided-RFA has found clinical applications for lung cancer with good results reported 4–7, 12. Since the electrode is placed percutaneously directly into the tumour, under cross-sectional imaging guidance such as chest CT, complications such as pneumothorax occur with frequency. The frequency of pneumothorax or haemothorax using a percutaneous method in a rabbit model was 47% 13 and clinical complications occur in 16–35% of percutaneously directly RFA 6, 7. However, it is possible to avoid these complications using the present fibreoptic bronchoscopy guidance; this is the greatest advantage of the authors’ internal cooled electrode. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided cooled-RFA is both safe and technically feasible as the tip of the electrode is confirmed with CT or radiographic imaging guidance. As the present study has shown, cooled-RFA had no complications, such as bronchial bleeding or pneumothorax, and can be used with CT or radiographic imaging guidance technologies. Therefore, to the current authors’ knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided cooled-RFA as a potential therapeutic tool.

The peripheral lung is referred to as the safety zone; however, the anatomically central and middle bronchi are accompanied by the pulmonary artery branches. One complication anticipated with bronchoscopy is bronchial bleeding. The authors tried to ablate several areas of lesions from peripheral lung tissues to central lung tissues using power output of 30 W and flow rate of 40 mL·min−1 (data not shown). On day 7 after ablation there were no complications of macro bronchial haemorrhage from the middle or central artery or atelectasis. Therefore, the authors confirm that cooled-RFA achieved coagulation and haemostasis in the normal lung tissues although the safety in other lung tissues that may bleed more than normal lungs needs to be assessed.

This internal cooled-RFA is constructed as a thin catheter (diameter 1.67 mm) to pass through the bronchoscopy channel. The necrotic size obtained by this electrode is a critical consideration for this method. To achieve higher power output from the electrode and sufficient coagulation necrosis, it was necessary to increase the power output and to reduce impedance around the electrode tip. Using the standard noncooled electrode, the temperature around the tip rose rapidly and the pop phenomenon occurred in the lung tissues. This phenomenon means that coagulated necrotic tissue is formed around the electrode tip and tissue impedance increases rapidly. To avoid this phenomenon, the electrode tip should be cooled using water. On the basis of these results using a cooled-RFA for cardiac conduction disease 14, 15, it is predicted that the lesion occurs in lung tissues away from the cooled-RFA. The cooled-RFA enables greater power output for a longer time compared with the standard noncooled-RFA, resulting in larger coagulation necrosis area. The electrode tip is cooled by circulating water in the electrode catheter. As a result, the tissue temperature just around the electrode tip does not reach an excessive temperature. Based on this theory, the cooled-RFA can reach deeper and wider areas of ablation using the same power output. Therefore, as shown in the current results, the cooled-RFA could obtain coagulation necrosis compared with the standard noncooled-RFA, and the cooled-RFA using circulating room temperature water could obtain larger burn lesions than that using circulating cold water.

RFA is regarded as suitable for use on lung cancer as the radiofrequency energy to a tumour relies on the insulation effect by the existence of normal surrounding lungs 5. However, surgery is recognised as the standard treatment for patients with localised primary lung cancer and metastatic resectable lesions. A minimally invasive procedure such as RFA is usually considered in patients with a generally poor outcome following treatment with systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy, patients with a poor cardiopulmonary status or coexistent medical problems for surgery. There have been some reports of RFA applied clinically for lung tumours 16, 17. The role of RFA in lung cancer is not sufficiently clear. However, bronchoscopy-guided RFA achieves only local coagulation necrosis and is likely to minimise injury to lung tissues and perhaps have a beneficial effect on a patient's condition. When institutions use RFA percutaneously, an epidural anaesthetic consisting of lidocaine, fentanyl or both as needed, needs to be administered percutaneously with an epidural tube 7. If this procedure could be applied to advanced human lung cancer, cooled-RFA could be used with the same method as usual biopsy forceps under topical lidocaine anaesthesia only. The advantages of bronchoscopy-guided cooled-RFA could include the ability to administer treatment nonsurgically as well as a shorter hospital stay for the patient. Based on the current results, it is suggested that RFA for advanced lung cancer might have numerous benefits over systemic chemotherapy or radiation therapy, although trials would be needed to confirm the potential risks/benefits.

One limitation of the present study is that potential tumours requiring ablation would most likely have a different behaviour, and data obtained on RFA in normal lungs cannot be extrapolated to tumour-bearing lungs. As VX2 tumour strains have strong malignant potential, some studies using RFA have been reported 13. As the current authors needed to perform bronchoscopy-guided RFA, larger animals such as sheep, dogs or pigs were required. The authors tried to inject VX2 tumour cells into the right or left lower lung of sheep, but the tumours cells did not grow in the lung. Secondly, as sheep skin is covered with wool, initial impedance was high compared with human lungs (initial impedance of humans: 130–200 Ω). Therefore, the size of coagulation necrosis may have been underestimated because the rapid increase of impedance could not achieve sufficiently long ablation time and power output. As shown in figure 5⇑, although the power output was set at 30 W, an average power output of 30 W was not achieved. However, since this method could achieve adequate coagulation necrosis, if it were applied in humans, larger coagulation necrosis would be achieved under the same conditions as the sheep lung with 30 W power output and a flow rate of 40 mL·min−1. As excessive coagulation necrosis on the surface of ablated sheep lung tissues was not achieved, RFA could be performed using circulating cold water in the electrode tip in humans.

In conclusion, internal bronchoscopy-guided cooled-radiofrequency ablation was a safe, effective and feasible procedure without major complications. The ideal power output of 30 W and a flow rate of 40 mL·min−1 were assessed as safe and technically feasible conditions for bronchoscopy-guided cooled-radiofrequency ablation for this normal sheep lung.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank F. D'Alessio from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Baltimore, MD, USA) for assistance with the language of the manuscript.

  • Received August 26, 2006.
  • Accepted February 21, 2007.
  • © ERS Journals Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    Wood BJ, Ramkaransingh JR, Fojo T, Walther M, Libutti SK. Percutaneous tumor ablation with radiofrequency. Cancer 2002;2:443–451.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Wood BJ, Goldberg SN, McDougal WS, Mueller PR. Renal cell carcinoma: clinical experience and technical success with radiofrequency ablation of 42 tumors. Radiology 2003;226:417–424.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Mirza AN, Fornage BD, Sneige N, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of solid tumors. Cancer J 2001;7:95–102.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Dupuy DE, Zagoria RJ, Akerley W, Mayo-Smith WW, Kavanagh PV, Safran H. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:57–59.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Miao Y, Ni Y, Bosmans H, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for eradication of pulmonary tumor in rabbits. J Surg Res 2001;99:265–271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW, Abbot GF, DiPetrillo T. Clinical applications of radio-frequency tumor ablation in the thorax. Radiographics 2002; 22: Spec No:22S259–S269.
  7. ↵
    Yasui K, Kanazawa S, Sano Y, et al. Thoracic tumors treated with CT-guided radiofrequency ablation: initial experience. Radiology 2004;231:850–857.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Tsushima K, Sone S, Hanaoka T, Takayama F, Honda H, Kubo K. Comparison of bronchoscopic diagnosis for peripheral pulmonary nodule under fluoroscopic guidance with CT guidance. Respir Med 2006;100:737–745.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Matsumoto N, Kishi R, Kasugai H, et al. Experimental study on the effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation with the cooled ablation system. Circ J 2003;67:154–158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. d'Avila A, Houghtaling C, Gutierrez P, et al. Catheter ablation of ventricular epicardial tissue. A comparison of standard and cooled-tip radiofrequency energy. Circulation 2004;109:2363–2369.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Okishige K, Aonuma K, Yamauchi Y, et al. Clinical study of the efficacy of a cooled-tip catheter ablation system for common atrial flutter. Circulation J 2004;68:73–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    Gadaleta C, Mattioli V, Colucci G, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of 40 lung neoplasms: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004: 183; 361–368
  13. ↵
    Lee JM, Jin GY, Li CA, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation of lung VX2 tumors in a rabbit model using a cooled tip-electrode: feasibility, safety and effectiveness. Invest Radiol 2003;38:129–139.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Thiagalingam A, Pouliopoulos J, Barry MA, et al. Cooled needle catheter ablation creates deeper and wider lesions than irrigated tip catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:508–515.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Thiagalingam A, Campbell CR, Boyd AC, Eipper V, Ross DL, Kovoor P. Cooled internal needle catheter ablation creates deeper lesions than irrigated tip catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:965–970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Zagoria RJ, Chen MY, Kavanagh PV, Torti FM. Radiofrequency ablation of lung metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001;166:1827–1828.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Toyoshima M, Matsuoka T, Ohkuma T, et al. [Radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary malignancies]. Nippon Acta Radiol 2002;62:836–838.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 29 Issue 6 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 29 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation as a potential novel therapeutic tool
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation as a potential novel therapeutic tool
K. Tsushima, T. Koizumi, T. Tanabe, R. Nakagawa, S. Yoshikawa, M. Yasuo, K. Kubo
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2007, 29 (6) 1193-1200; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00111306

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation as a potential novel therapeutic tool
K. Tsushima, T. Koizumi, T. Tanabe, R. Nakagawa, S. Yoshikawa, M. Yasuo, K. Kubo
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2007, 29 (6) 1193-1200; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00111306
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society