Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Hot and cold biopsy: implications of study design on outcomes

A. Nath, R. Srinivas, R. Agarwal
European Respiratory Journal 2007 29: 1067-1068; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00007707
A. Nath
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Srinivas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Agarwal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editors:

We read with interest the article in the European Respiratory Journal by Tremblay et al. 1, wherein the authors conclude that the use of hot biopsy forceps for endobronchial biopsy does not appear to have a negative impact on the pathological samples, and that there was a statistically significant (albeit clinically insignificant) reduction in bleeding score with hot biopsy forceps. However, many of the conclusions of the study have limitations because of the study design of alternate hot and cold biopsies.

The authors state that the quantification of bleeding was carried out and recorded by the bronchoscopists between each biopsy on a four-point scale. However, the interval between the two biopsies was not stated. Moreover, it is a common observation that the ooze from an endobronchial lesion continues after the biopsy has been taken and thus it becomes difficult to ascertain whether it was the first or the second “bite” that contributed to the bleeding. This is a potential confounding factor in the analysis. Furthermore, bleeding can continue for 48 h, and even longer, after biopsy, making it difficult to decide which technique has contributed to the bleeding. Therefore, it becomes important to use a protocol in which the hot and cold biopsies are performed in alternate patients rather than alternate biopsies in the same patient. If we follow this design, a semi-quantitative assessment can be made by quantifying the amount of saline instilled and the return amount and comparing between the two. This would also complement the qualitative assessment made by the bronchoscopist.

In addition, the authors have stated minimal damage even with cold biopsies. Whether this is an effect of the previous hot biopsy is also unclear, as multiple biopsies have been taken from the same lesion. Due to the small sample size, and given the fact that previous studies have shown significant pathological changes in the tissues after endobronchial electrocoagulation 2, 3, further investigation is required to confirm the findings of Tremblay et al. 1.

    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Tremblay A, Michaud G, Urbanski SJ. Hot biopsy forceps in the diagnosis of endobronchial lesions. Eur Respir J 2007;29:108–111.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      Verkindre C, Brichet A, Maurage CA, Ramon P, Homasson JP, Marquette CH. Morphological changes induced by extensive endobronchial electrocautery. Eur Respir J 1999;14:796–799.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      van Boxem TJ, Westerga J, Venmans BJ, Postmus PE, Sudetja TG. Tissue effects of bronchoscopic electrocautery: bronchoscopic appearance and histologic changes of bronchial wall after electrocautery. Chest 2000;117:887–891.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 29 Issue 5 Table of Contents
    European Respiratory Journal: 29 (5)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Hot and cold biopsy: implications of study design on outcomes
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    Hot and cold biopsy: implications of study design on outcomes
    A. Nath, R. Srinivas, R. Agarwal
    European Respiratory Journal May 2007, 29 (5) 1067-1068; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00007707

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Hot and cold biopsy: implications of study design on outcomes
    A. Nath, R. Srinivas, R. Agarwal
    European Respiratory Journal May 2007, 29 (5) 1067-1068; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00007707
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Treatable traits in ILD: why not consider acute exacerbations?
    • Inclusion of lung health outcomes in TB treatment trials
    • Understanding confounding in Mendelian randomisation studies
    Show more Correspondence

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society