Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Sildenafil treatment for portopulmonary hypertension

F. Reichenberger, R. Voswinckel, E. Steveling, B. Enke, A. Kreckel, H. Olschewski, F. Grimminger, W. Seeger, H. A. Ghofrani
European Respiratory Journal 2006 28: 563-567; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00030206
F. Reichenberger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Voswinckel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Steveling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Enke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Kreckel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Olschewski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Grimminger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Seeger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. A. Ghofrani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is regarded as a subtype of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, established PAH therapies have not been evaluated for this condition.

The current authors treated 14 patients (four male, 10 female; mean (range) age 55 (39–75) yrs) with moderate (n = 1) or severe (n = 13) POPH caused by alcoholic liver disease (n = 7), chronic viral hepatitis (n = 3), autoimmune hepatitis (n = 3), and hepatic manifestation of hereditary haemorrhagic teleangiectasia (n = 1) with oral sildenafil. Eight patients were newly started on pulmonary vasoactive treatment, while six patients were already on treatment with inhaled prostanoids (iloprost, n = 5; treprostinil, n = 1). During treatment with sildenafil, mean±sd 6-min walk distance increased from 312±111 m to 397±99 m after 3 months, and 407±97 m after 12 months. Mean±sd pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels decreased from 582±315 ng·mL-1 to 230±278 ng·mL-1, and to 189±274ng·mL-1 after 3 and 12 months, respectively. Two patients died after 1 and 2 months from liver failure and cardiac failure, respectively. There was a similar response to sildenafil treatment after 3 and 12 months in patients on monotherapy and those on combination therapy.

In conclusion, sildenafil might be effective in monotherapy and in combination therapy with inhaled prostanoids in portopulmonary hypertension, leading to significant improvement by 3 months and sustained response over 12 months.

  • Inhaled prostanoids
  • portopulmonary hypertension
  • pulmonary circulation
  • sildenafil

Patients with liver diseases are at risk of developing pulmonary vascular complications 1. Among these, portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is a rare but severe complication affecting 2–10% of patients with liver cirrhosis. It is associated with increased mortality due to obstructive pulmonary vasculopathy and has a major impact on treatment options for underlying liver disease 2. Development of POPH has been associated with portal hypertension, but it can occur at any stage of liver diseases, with increasing incidence dependent on the severity of hepatic impairment 3. Patients with POPH are at high risk of severe complications during liver transplantation 4.

POPH is regarded as a subtype of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) 5. However, newly developed treatment strategies for PAH have been neither studied nor approved for POPH. Furthermore, POPH has been explicitly excluded from recent published randomised controlled trials on PAH 6.

Currently available compounds for pulmonary vasoactive treatment have been successfully used in POPH, even enabling successful liver transplantation 7, 8. So far, case reports and a case series have been published showing clinical, functional and haemodynamic benefit on treatment with intravenous and inhaled prostanoids, oral bosentan or combination therapy 9–13.

The phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil is currently licensed for the treatment of PAH. It has the advantage of being an oral compound with pulmonary vasoselective action but no hepatotoxicity 14. The successful use of sildenafil in POPH has recently been reported in two case studies 15, 16.

The current authors evaluated long-term sildenafil treatment of POPH, the primary objectives being safety and efficacy as either monotherapy or in combination with inhaled prostanoids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the current authors’ tertiary referral centre for pulmonary vascular diseases, all patients with PAH associated with liver disease were evaluated to ascertain: 1) the degree of liver cirrhosis and the underlying aetiology of liver disease; 2) symptoms related to PAH according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification; 3) exercise capacity using 6-min walking distance (6-MWD) according to American Thoracic Society guidelines 17; and 4) haemodynamic parameters using right-heart catheterisation.

Pulmonary vasoactive treatment was started when patients were in WHO functional stage III–IV, with an impaired exercise tolerance and moderate-to-severe pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension with increase of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >35 mmHg 1, and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >500 dyne·s·cm-5 18.

None of the patients in the present study were being treated with β-blocking agents. Patients on prostanoid treatment received either iloprost 6 inhalations·day-1 with a total daily dose of 30 µg (n = 5), or treprostinil 4 inhalations·day-1 with a total daily dose of 120 µg (n = 1) at mouthpiece using an ultrasonic inhalation device. Sildenafil treatment was started with increasing dosage, reaching 50 mg three times daily within 3 weeks in all patients. Follow-up included: clinical assessment; measurement of 6-MWD; laboratory studies including liver function tests and pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) measurement; and right-heart catheterisation after 3 months and 12 months.

As data are normally distributed, results are shown as mean±sd. To detect statistical significant differences between groups, two-sided unpaired t-tests were used. For the assessment of treatment effects, two-sided paired t-tests were used. For subgroup analysis, ANOVA (α = 0.05) and post hoc analysis were applied. Bonferroni correction was used for correction of multiple comparisons 19.

RESULTS

Among 32 patients with POPH, 20 patients with advanced disease (i.e. moderate or severe stage of the disease according to recent guidelines 1) were identified. Of these, 12 patients were already receiving therapy with inhaled iloprost (n = 7), inhaled treprostinil (n = 2) or endothelin-receptor blockers (n = 3). Sildenafil treatment was considered in newly diagnosed patients and in patients not stable on current therapy. Six patients were stable on treatment with endothelin-receptor blockers (n = 3) or inhaled prostanoids (iloprost, n = 2; treprostinil, n = 1) and were not included in the study.

Sildenafil treatment was started in 13 patients with severe and one patient with moderate POPH but in WHO functional class III (four male, 10 female; mean age 55±12 yrs). Six patients had already been on active treatment with inhaled prostanoids (iloprost, n = 5; treprostinil, n = 1) for mean (range) 20 (3–42) months, but required additional treatment. Underlying aetiologies included liver cirrhosis caused by alcohol liver disease (n = 7), or associated with viral hepatitis (n = 3), autoimmune hepatic diseases (n = 3) or hepatic involvement in hereditary haemorrhagic teleangiectasia (HHT; n = 1). Patients were in either clinical stage Child A (n = 7), B (n = 6) or C (n = 1).

Concerning pulmonary hypertension, patients were in WHO functional classes III (n = 10) and IV (n = 4) with a mean 6-MWD at baseline of 307±109 m.

Pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension was confirmed on right-heart catheterisation with mPAP 55±11 mmHg, cardiac index of 2.2±0.8 L·min-1·m-2 and PVR of 1130±688 dyne·s·cm-5. One patient (patient 5) in WHO class III with mPAP 59 mmHg and PVR 438 dyne·s·cm-5 was also included in the study.

Within 3 months of treatment beginning, two patients had died. The patient with hepatic involvement of HHT (patient No. 13) was already in an advanced stage of liver cirrhosis when referred for assessment of POPH. The patient died in progressive liver failure 1 month after the start of sildenafil therapy. There were no additional causes of liver disorder. Notably, there were no signs of a bleeding event.

Patient No. 14, with severe POPH associated with viral liver cirrhosis, initially improved on treatment with inhaled iloprost; however, she required combination therapy with sildenafil owing to the progression of the disease. The patient died in cardiac failure 2 months after starting combination therapy. Again, there were no signs of a bleeding event.

The other 12 patients completed 3 months’ follow-up, with an increase in 6-MWD from 312±111 m to 397±99 m (p = 0.001). There was a significant decrease in mPAP, from 55±11 mmHg to 46±10 mmHg (p = 0.01), an increase in cardiac index from 2.2±0,8 L·min-1 to 2.8±1.0 L·min-1 (p = 0.06), and a significant decrease in PVR from 1,070±597 dynes·s·cm-5 to 698±358 dyne·s·cm-5 (p<0.05; table 1⇓). Pro-BNP levels decreased from 582±315 ng·mL-1 to 230±278 ng·mL-1 (p = 0.06). Liver function test, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) and haemoglobin levels remained stable (table 2⇓).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

Individual patient characteristics, baseline haemodynamics and response to therapy

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2—

Characteristics of 12 patients completing 3 and 12 months’ follow-up

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3—

Baseline parameters comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in the whole study population

DISCUSSION

POPH comprises a distinct aetiology of PAH. However, it was not investigated in recent randomised controlled trials on treatment for pulmonary hypertension 6, 14. Consequently, the treatment of POPH is dependent on compassionate use of compounds currently available to treat PAH. The available data on the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vasoactive therapy in this patient population are sparse. In the current retrospective study, a significant clinical, functional and haemodynamic improvement was found over 3 months’ treatment with oral sildenafil in patients with severe POPH. Successful treatment of POPH has been reported using prostanoids or endothelin-receptor antagonists, with observation times of 3–12 months 9–13. Subcutaneous, i.v. or inhaled prostanoids are associated with considerable side-effects or require significant patient commitment, and the endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan is associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity (occurring in ∼10% of patients) 20. Sildenafil combines the advantage of oral treatment for severe PAH with an excellent risk-profile regarding hepatic side-effects in these patients with impaired liver function.

In the current study, two patients died, 1 and 2 months after initiation of sildenafil treatment, respectively. One patient died owing to liver failure in advanced liver cirrhosis due to HHT. This patient was not eligible for liver transplantation due to severe pulmonary hypertension 2, 4. The second patient suffered from liver cirrhosis due to viral hepatitis. Despite combination therapy with inhaled iloprost and sildenafil, she developed progressive pulmonary vascular disease and died in right-heart failure.

Although six patients already received inhaled prostanoids with effective dosing, additional pulmonary vasoactive therapy was required for functional stabilisation. Combination of sildenafil add-on therapy with inhaled prostanoids resulted in a favourable improvement after 3 and 12 months, similar to that shown by patients being treated with sildenafil monotherapy. The effects seen in the current study were comparable to those seen in patients with other forms of PAH 21, 22. Differences in response to treatment with regard to the origin of liver disease were found neither in the current study nor in previous reports 1–4. In the current study, patients with a milder degree of liver cirrhosis showed a significant improvement in exercise capacity after 3 months’ sildenafil therapy compared with patients in advanced stages of liver disease (fig. 2⇓). Although this effect might be related to the small sample size, it should be considered in forthcoming investigations.

Fig. 1—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1—

A 6-min walking distance (6-MWD) after 3 and 12 months’ follow-up treatment, comparing sildenafil monotherapy (•; n = 7) and sildenafil and inhaled prostanoids combination therapy (○; n = 5). Data are presented as mean±sem. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups.

Fig. 2—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2—

Follow-up after 3 and 12 months’ sildenafil treatment, comparing degrees of hepatic impairment. Data are presented as mean±sem. Child A: ▴, n = 7; Child B: ▿, n = 5. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at 3 months (post hoc ANOVA). *: p<0.01 versus baseline.

Although there was a slight deterioration in haemodynamic parameters after 12 months, patients remained in a stable clinical and functional condition. In addition, pro-BNP levels remained stable. In the current study, a sildenafil dose 2.5 times as high as the currently approved dosage for treatment of PAH was used. Sildenafil dosage was not increased further owing to the potential for bleeding.

None of the patients in the current study experienced bleeding events or required blood transfusions while on chronic sildenafil treatment. Notably, there were no reported episodes of gastrointestinal haemorrhage, as has been reported previously 23, 24. The two deceased patients showed no signs of a fatal bleeding event and died from liver failure and cardiac failure, respectively.

Goal-directed therapy is the current challenge in PAH, and specific targets might be achievable with growing evidence for, and availability of, combination therapy 25.

In the patient sample of the current study, starting combination therapy with oral sildenafil on top of chronic inhaled prostanoid treatment leads to a significant and sustained haemodynamic and functional improvement without significant side-effects. However, further additional therapy including i.v. epoprostenol might be required when liver transplantation is planned or patients are not stable on combination therapy 1.

There are major limitations in the current study. The rather low number of patients with heterogeneous aetiology of liver disease might indicate a selection bias. Subgroup analyses or potential side-effects require further investigation.

Although the current study was not sufficient to deduce general treatment recommendations, the subjects were recruited from patients referred for assessment and therapy for pulmonary hypertension to a large specialised centre for pulmonary vascular diseases. In the current authors’ opinion, the response to sildenafil treatment was sufficiently pronounced and homogeneous to produce significant results.

In conclusion, sildenafil is a safe and well-tolerated therapy in portopulmonary hypertension which may lead to significant clinical, functional and haemodynamic improvement after 3 months and to a sustained response over 12 months either as monotherapy or in combination with inhaled prostanoids.

Acknowledgments

The current study is part of the doctoral thesis of E. Steveling.

  • Received February 28, 2006.
  • Accepted June 15, 2006.
  • © ERS Journals Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    Rodriguez-Roisin R, Krowka MJ, Hervé P, Fallon MB, on behalf of the ERS Task Force Pulmonary-Hepatic Vascular Disorders (PHD) Scientific Committee. Pulmonary-Hepatic vascular Disorders (PHD). Eur Respir J 2004;24:861–880.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Krowka MJ, Plevak DJ, Findlay JY, Rosen CB, Wiesner RH, Krom RA. Pulmonary hemodynamics and perioperative cardiopulmonary-related mortality in patients with portopulmonary hypertension undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2000;6:443–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Hadengue A, Benhayoun MK, Lebrec D, Benhamou JP. Pulmonary hypertension complicating portal hypertension: prevalence and relation to splanchnic hemodynamics. Gastroenterology 1991;100:520–528.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Krowka MJ. Hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension: implications for liver transplantation. Clin Chest Med 2005;26:587–597.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    McGoon M, Gutterman D, Steen V, et al. Screening, early detection, and diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2004;126:S14–S34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Badesch DB, Abman SH, Ahearn GS, et al. Medical therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2004;126:S35–S62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Tan HP, Markowitz JS, Montgomery RA, et al. Liver transplantation in patients with severe portopulmonary hypertension treated with preoperative chronic intravenous epoprostenol. Liver Transpl 2001;7:745–749.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Kuo PC, Johnson LB, Plotkin JS, Howell CD, Bartlett ST, Rubin LJ. Continuous intravenous infusion of epoprostenol for the treatment of portopulmonary hypertension. Transplantation 1997;63:604–606.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Halank M, Miehlke S, Hoeffken G, Schmeisser A, Schulze M, Strasser RH. Use of oral endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan in the treatment of portopulmonary hypertension. Transplantation 2004;77:1775–1776.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. Halank M, Kolditz M, Miehlke S, Schiemanck S, Schmeisser A, Hoeffken G. Combination therapy for portopulmonary hypertension with intravenous iloprost and oral bosentan. Wien Med Wochenschr 2005;155:376–380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. Halank M, Marx C, Miehlke S, Hoeffken G. Use of aerosolized inhaled iloprost in the treatment of portopulmonary hypertension. J Gastroenterol 2004;39:1222–1223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. Hinterhuber L, Graziadei IW, Kahler CM, Jaschke W, Vogel W. Endothelin-receptor antagonist treatment of portopulmonary hypertension. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:1039–1042.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Hoeper MM, Halank M, Marx C, et al. Bosentan therapy for portopulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2005;25:502–508.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Galie N, Ghofrani HA, Torbicki A, et al. Sildenafil citrate therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2148–2157.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Makisalo H, Koivusalo A, Vakkuri A, Hockerstedt K. Sildenafil for portopulmonary hypertension in a patient undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2004;10:945–950.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Chua R, Keogh A, Miyashita M. Novel use of sildenafil in the treatment of portopulmonary hypertension. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:498–500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:111–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Hoeper MM, Krowka MJ, Strassburg CP. Portopulmonary hypertension and hepatopulmonary syndrome. Lancet 2004;363:1461–1468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Goodman T. Towards evidence-based medical statistics. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:995–1013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Segal ES, Valette C, Oster L, et al. Risk management strategies in the postmarketing period : safety experience with the US and European bosentan surveillance programmes. Drug Saf 2005;28:971–980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Ghofrani HA, Wiedemann R, Rose F, et al. Combination therapy with oral sildenafil and inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary hypertension. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:515–522.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Ghofrani HA, Rose F, Schermuly RT, et al. Oral sildenafil as long-term adjunct therapy to inhaled iloprost in severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:158–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Finley DS, Lugo B, Ridgway J, Teng W, Imagawa DK. Fatal variceal rupture after sildenafil use: report of a case. Curr Surg 2005;62:55–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Sheikh RA, Yasmeen S, Prindiville TP. Hemorrhoidal bleeding associated with sildenafil. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2518–2519.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Hoeper MM, Markevych I, Spiekerkoetter E, Welte T, Niedermeyer J. Goal-oriented treatment and combination therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2005;26:858–863.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 28 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 28 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sildenafil treatment for portopulmonary hypertension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Sildenafil treatment for portopulmonary hypertension
F. Reichenberger, R. Voswinckel, E. Steveling, B. Enke, A. Kreckel, H. Olschewski, F. Grimminger, W. Seeger, H. A. Ghofrani
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2006, 28 (3) 563-567; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00030206

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Sildenafil treatment for portopulmonary hypertension
F. Reichenberger, R. Voswinckel, E. Steveling, B. Enke, A. Kreckel, H. Olschewski, F. Grimminger, W. Seeger, H. A. Ghofrani
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2006, 28 (3) 563-567; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00030206
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • PATIENTS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Increased hyaluronic acid content in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • The responsiveness and validity of the CAMPHOR Utility Index
  • Inhalation of vasoactive intestinal peptide in pulmonary hypertension
Show more Original Articles: Pulmonary hypertension

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society