Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Differences in microsatellite DNA level between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

M. I. Zervou, E. G. Tzortzaki, D. Makris, M. Gaga, E. Zervas, E. Economidou, M. Tsoumakidou, N. Tzanakis, J. Milic-Emili, N. M. Siafakas
European Respiratory Journal 2006 28: 472-478; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00127305
M. I. Zervou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. G. Tzortzaki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Makris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Gaga
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Zervas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Economidou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Tsoumakidou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Tzanakis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Milic-Emili
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. M. Siafakas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that microsatellite (MS) DNA instability (MSI) is detectable in sputum cells in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether asthma and COPD could be distinguished at the MS DNA level.

DNA was extracted from sputum cells and white blood cells from 63 COPD patients, 60 non-COPD smokers, 36 asthmatics and 30 healthy nonsmokers. Ten MS markers located on chromosomes 2p, 5q, 6p, 10q, 13q, 14q and 17q were analysed.

No MSI was detected in non-COPD smokers or healthy nonsmokers. A significantly higher proportion of COPD patients exhibited MSI (49.2%) compared to asthmatics (22.2%). MSI was detected even in the mild stages of COPD (33.3%) and asthma (22.2%). No relationship was found between MSI and COPD severity. The most frequently affected marker was D14S588 (17.5% in COPD and 2.7% in asthma). The markers D6S344, G29802 and D13S71 showed alterations only in COPD, and G29802 was associated with a significantly decreased forced expiratory volume in one second FEV1 (% predicted), whereas MSI in D6S344 was associated with a significantly higher FEV1 (% pred).

The frequency of microsatellite instability was higher in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than in asthma, and microsatellite instability in three workers showed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease specificity. However, further studies are needed to verify the differences between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma at the microsatellite level.

  • Chronic bronchitis
  • cigarette smoking
  • genetic susceptibility
  • genomic instability
  • somatic mutation
  • sputum

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are considered to be the common respiratory diseases caused by the interaction of genetic susceptibility with environmental factors 1. COPD is a preventable and treatable disease state characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible, caused primarily by cigarette smoking 2. However, few smokers develop clinically relevant COPD, suggesting a genetically predetermined susceptibility. Severe α1-antitrypsin deficiency is the only proven genetic risk factor for COPD; however, it is present in only 1–2% of COPD patients 3, 4. Recently, linkage and candidate gene studies in COPD have suggested a number of candidate genes to be involved in COPD pathogenesis 4–6.

In addition, asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways, which is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness, recurrent symptoms and reversible airflow limitation. Host and environmental factors may influence the development of asthma 7. Recent studies have shown that there are many genes with moderate effects in the pathogenesis of asthma rather than a few major ones. Chromosomal regions likely to harbour asthma susceptibility genes have been identified 8–10.

DNA microsatellites (MSs) are one of the most abundant classes of intergenic repetitive sequences dispersed on eukaryotic genomes and contain minimal repetitive units composed (usually) of one to five base pairs. These sequences are highly polymorphic in human populations and serve as markers for human identification or pedigree analyses 11. Many studies have shown that MSs are important for genomic stability, can affect enzymes controlling the cell cycle, may markedly alter transcriptional activity, or protein-binding ability, and, finally, can affect gene translation 12–14. Their abundance and various functions and effects are associated with a very high mutation rate, as compared with the rates of point mutation at coding gene loci. MS instability (MSI) is predominantly manifested as changes in the number of repetitive units, and, because of its correlation with high mutation rates, as reported previously, has become a useful genetic tool in the identification of regions of potentially altered genes. Moreover, MSI at the level of somatic cells strongly suggests defects in cellular systems maintaining genetic information 15.

Previous studies have shown that genetic alterations in MS markers, including MSI, have been observed in several human malignant conditions 16–18 and benign diseases, such as actinic keratosis, pterygium, diabetic retinopathy, atherosclerosis, asthma, COPD, sarcoidosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and rheumatoid arthritis 19–22.

Recent studies have shown that somatic genetic alterations, such as MSI, are a detectable phenomenon in sputum cells in COPD 23, 24 and asthmatic patients 25. It was suggested that MSI could be considered a useful marker of genetic susceptibility, indicating destabilisation of the genome at various loci 23–25.

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether there are any disease-specific MS markers that would permit distinction between asthma and COPD, and, secondly, whether MSI could be used as a genetic screening tool for further identification of chromosomal regions harbouring susceptibility genes. The results of the study support both hypotheses.

METHODS

Subjects

A total of 166 subjects were studied; 63 COPD patients (mean±sd age 68±10 yrs), 60 non-COPD smokers (age 59±15 yrs), 36 asthmatics (age 50±12 yrs) and 30 normal subjects (age 56±17 yrs) were included in the study. In the COPD group, smoking history revealed 17 current and 46 ex-smokers. Asthmatics and normal subjects were nonsmokers.

The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society consensus statement 2 was used for the diagnosis and assessment of severity of COPD, and the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines 7 for asthmatics. Patients with any upper respiratory tract infection within the 6 weeks before the study, as well those with a history of lung (or other) cancer, were excluded from the present study. The non-COPD smokers showed normal physical examination and chest radiography results, and their spirometric values were within normal limits. The normal subjects were nonasthmatic, nonatopic never-smokers who were receiving no medication (table 1⇓).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

Anthropometric and spirometric data for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) patients#, non-COPD smokers, asthmatics¶ and healthy controls

Spirometry

Spirometry, including a bronchodilation test, was performed in all subjects using a computerised system (MasterLab 2.12; Jaeger, Würzburg, Germany) according to standardised guidelines 26.

Sputum induction

Sputum was induced via inhalation of a hypertonic saline aerosol, generated by an ultrasonic nebuliser (Ultraneb 2000; DeVilbiss, Somerset, PA, USA), according to standard methods 27–30. In detail, three expiratory manoeuvres were performed 15 min after inhalation of 200 μg salbutamol and the highest value was taken as the baseline FEV1. Subjects then inhaled the hypertonic saline aerosols for three periods of 7 min. Flow manoeuvres were performed after each inhalation. Subjects were then encouraged to cough and to expectorate sputum into a sterile plastic container, which was kept on ice. The procedure was terminated after the three periods of 7 min, if the sputum sample was of sufficiently good quality, after a fall in FEV1 of ≥20% from baseline or if troublesome symptoms occurred. The viscid portion of the expectorated sample was separated from the sputum as described previously 31.

DNA extraction

The presence of MSI in sputum cells compared to DNA obtained from peripheral white blood cells from the same individual was investigated.

DNA extraction was carried out according to standard protocols (QIAmp DNA Blood Maxi and Mini kits; QIAGEN, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). DNA samples were stored at -20°C.

Microsatellite markers and microsatellite instability analysis

Ten polymorphic MS markers were used to assess MSI (G29802, RH70958, D17S250, D5S207, D13S71, D14S588, D14S292, D6S2223, D6S263 and D6S344). All markers had previously been shown to be located close to genes involved in asthma and/or COPD 23, 32–39. The sequences of the MS markers used were provided through the National Center for Biotechnology Information database 40. The PCR technique was used to amplify DNA sequences. PCR amplifications were carried out in 50-μL final volume reaction mixtures in a PTC-100 thermal cycler (M.J. Research, Inc., Watertown, MA, USA), using the Qiagen Taq PCR Core Kit (QIAGEN, Inc.). Forward primers were labelled with the LI-COR IR800 fluorochrome (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). The following thermal cycling protocol was applied: 3 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s and 72°C for 5 min, and terminated at 4°C.

The PCR products were analysed and visualised by electrophoresis in 8% Long Ranger polyacrylamide (BMA, Rockland, ME, USA)/7 M urea sequencing gels in a LI-COR 4200 DNA sequencer, and alleles were sized using GeneProfiler version 3.54 software (Scanalytics, BS Biosciences, Rockville, MD, USA). MSI was identified by comparing the electrophoretic patterns of the MS markers of sputum DNA against peripheral blood demonstrating a shift of one or both of the alleles, thus identifying novel alleles, as indicated by an addition or deletion of one or more repeat units. Two scientists who were not aware of the clinical characteristics of the subjects performed independent readings. All MSI-positive samples were tested twice using fresh DNA, and showed 100% reproducibility.

Statistical analysis

The normality of the numerical parameters was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. An unpaired t-test for normally and Mann–Whitney test for non-normally distributed data were used to estimate significant differences between two groups. ANOVA for normally and the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-normally distributed variables were used to compare differences among groups (COPD smokers, non-COPD smokers, asthmatics and normal subjects). The Chi-squared test was used for comparison of percentages (Yates’s test). Pearson’s correlation coefficient for normally and Spearman’s rho for non-normally distributed variables were used to assign significant relationships. Multivariate analysis was performed in order to examine the effect of relevant covariates, such as smoking severity, and to adjust the significant associations with MSI. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Ethics

The present study was approved by Medical Research Ethics Committee of University General Hospital (Iráklion, Greece) and patients gave their informed consent.

RESULTS

Table 1⇑ shows the anthropometric characteristics and spirometric data of COPD patients, non-COPD smokers, asthmatics and normal subjects. COPD patients are presented in groups according to the severity of the disease 2. Figure 1⇓ shows representative samples of MS DNA stability (MSS), as well as MSI, in the D6S344 marker. Samples taken from non-COPD smokers and normal subjects showed no MSI in any of the 10 MS markers tested. The MS marker, chromosomal location and results in COPD patients, asthma, non-COPD smokers and normal subjects are shown in table 2⇓. A significantly higher proportion of COPD patients exhibited MSI in sputum cells versus blood samples compared with asthmatic patients (31 (49.2%) versus eight (22.2%) asthmatics (p = 0.01; Chi-squared test)). The MSI was detected in more than one marker in the same individual (50 MSIs in 31 COPD patients). In detail, 23 COPD patients exhibited MSI in one marker, four in two markers and four patients in more than three markers. Apart from one asthmatic, who showed instability in two markers, all of the others (seven patients) showed instability in one marker.

Fig. 1—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1—

Eight representative electrophoretic profiles involving microsatellite marker D6S344. Blood (B) and sputum (S) DNA samples were obtained from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients (1–4) and asthmatics (5–8). Patient Nos 2 and 8 exhibit microsatellite instability; the rest show microsatellite stability.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2—

Microsatellite(MS) instability (MSI)-positive cases# according to MS marker and chromosomal region in diseases, smokers¶ and normal controls

The most frequently positive test was with the marker D14S588 (17.5% in COPD and 2.7 % in asthma (p = 0.06; Yates-corrected Chi-squared test)). D6S344, G29802 and D13S71 showed frequent positivity, but only in COPD, whereas D6S2223 was positive in only one patient with COPD and none with asthma. No marker showed specificity for asthma (table 2⇑). Figure 2⇓ shows the percentage of MSI-positive cases in the four COPD severity categories according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines 2 and in asthma. MSI was a frequent observation even in the mild COPD group (33.3%; fig. 2⇓). The severity of COPD was not related to MSI frequency, since no significantly different percentages of patients with MSI were found in the various COPD severity groups (Chi-squared test; fig. 2⇓). In addition, no significant relationship was found between forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1; % of the predicted value) and MSI frequency in the total COPD population (p = 0.5, r2 = 0.006; Spearman’s rho).

Fig. 2—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2—

Microsatellite instability (MSI)-positive cases in the four chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity groups and in asthmatics. The mild COPD patients showed a similar forced expiratory volume in one second (percentage of the predicted value) to the asthmatics. No significant differences were found between the four COPD subgroups.

Figure 3⇓ shows the differences in FEV1 (% pred) between the COPD patients who exhibited MSI in markers G29802, D6S344 and D13S71 and those who did not. A significant decrease in FEV1 (% pred) was observed between COPD patients with MSI in the marker G29802 (Mann–Whitney test). The effect of smoking was examined using multivariate analysis, taking as a dependent variable the presence of MSI and as independent variable, the FEV1 (% pred) and smoking severity. Both smoking severity and FEV1 (% pred) were significantly associated with MSI in G29802. Smoking severity was more closely positively associated with MSI than FEV1 (% pred) in G29802 (p = 0.04). Using the same multivariate model after adjustment for smoking severity, the presence of MSI in G29802 remained significant in relation to the decreased FEV1 (% pred; p = 0.02). In contrast, MSI in D6S344 test associated with a significantly higher FEV1 (% pred; p = 0.01). No significant difference in FEV1 (% pred) was found between patients with and without MSI in D13S71 (p = 0.5; Mann–Whitney test; fig. 3⇓).

Fig. 3—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3—

Differences in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients exhibiting microsatellite stability (□) and instability (░) in specific markers (for further details, see Results section). % pred: percentage of the predicted value; ns: nonsignificant. #: p = 0.03; **: p = 0.01.

DISCUSSION

It is well known that asthma shares common clinical and laboratory characteristics with COPD, making differential diagnosis extremely difficult in some cases. In sputum cells, the genetic background of both diseases was investigated at the MS DNA level, in order to find out whether COPD could be distinguished from asthma.

A limitation of the present study is the identification of the specific sputum cell subpopulation(s) that exhibit MSI. Studies currently in progress have shown that MSI is not found in the cells of haematopoietic origin, leaving the epithelial cells as the most likely candidate 41. This may be in agreement with the potentially significant role of epithelial cells in the pathogenesis of COPD 33, 42. Another limitation of the present study is the small number (10) of MS markers tested. However, this is the first study comparing asthma to COPD at the MS DNA level, and thus an investigation was embarked upon with only a limited number of specific MS markers.

The present results showed that 49.2% of COPD patients and only 22.2% of asthmatics exhibited MSI (p = 0.01). These results suggest a different MSI profile in the two diseases.

A possible explanation of this discrepancy is that the burden of the oxidative stress that damages the DNA and promotes MSI is different in the two diseases. Several studies have reported that the magnitude of oxidative stress in COPD is greater than that in asthma 43–49. Similar findings were reported in rheumatoid arthritis patients, in whom oxidative stress was correlated with MSI in synovial tissue 32. The authors suggested that oxidative stress not only creates DNA adducts that are potentially mutagenic but also relaxes the mechanisms that limit the DNA damage by suppressing key genes of the DNA mismatch repair system 50. Thus varying efficiency of DNA repair could be viewed as a potential determinant of disease susceptibility. The present results are in agreement with the hypothesis that acquired somatic mutations caused by cigarette smoke are the fundamental contributors to the molecular pathogenesis of COPD 33.

Three markers, namely D6S344, G29802, and D13S71, were frequently altered in COPD but not at all in asthma (table 2⇑). This suggests that these apparently COPD-specific markers could distinguish COPD from asthma. In addition, COPD patients exhibiting MSI in D6S344 showed a higher mean FEV1 (% pred) than those showing MSS. This may suggest a protective role of MSI in D6S344 in COPD progression or severity. Marker D6S344 is located in chromosomal region 6p25, where proteinase inhibitor (PI) 6 and 9 are also located 51. These members of the serpin superfamily have been shown to prevent cellular damage by scavenging leaking lysosomal proteases 52. The high FEV1 that were associated with D6S344 MSI in COPD may suggest that the observed MSI may lead to upregulation of the PI-9 gene. Similar suggestions have already been put forward in autoimmune disease, graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease 53.

MSI associated with the G29802 marker was colligated with more severe decline in pulmonary function in COPD patients (fig. 2⇑). In addition, positivity in the G29802 marker was related to smoking intensity. This may therefore be an indication of acquired somatic mutations due to smoking 32. This marker is located at the chromosomal position 10q22, where perforin is encoded. Perforin is considered the main mediator of the membranolytic action of cytotoxic CD8+ lymphocytes and is implicated in the apoptotic and destructive process leading to the development of COPD 29. Thus, considering the low FEV1 of the COPD patients showing MSI in G29802, it may be hypothesised that perforin expression may be increased in these patients.

MSI was detectable even in mild COPD, with an FEV1 of ≥80%. Thus, it appears that MSI is a very early alteration of the DNA. The prevalence of MSI did not differ significantly in the four groups of COPD patients, and no relationship was found between FEV1 (% pred) and MSI frequency in COPD. This suggests that MSI is a qualitative alteration. This is in agreement with previous reports by Siafakas and co-workers 23, 30 and Paraskakis et al. 24. In addition, it would be of interest to investigate MSI in moderate and severe asthma, since previous studies have shown that a higher frequency of genetic alterations (more than three) was associated with higher mean immunoglobulin E and blood eosinophil levels in asthmatic patients 24.

In conclusion, the present results show that there are COPD-specific MS markers in chromosomal regions 6p25, 10q22 and 13q32. The presence of MSI was not related to COPD severity. However, an association was found between two different MS markers and FEV1. The D6S344 marker appeared to reveal a locus with potent protective effect in COPD pathogenesis, whereas G29802 was associated with the opposite. However, from the present results, it cannot be concluded that MS DNA per se plays a protective or promoter role in the pathogenesis of COPD. Previous studies, however, have suggested that MSs play a functional role in the genome, affecting gene expression by acting as regulatory sequences that can be recognised by transcription factors 15. The present results are in agreement with this hypothesis, which gives a functional role to the MS DNA. The present authors speculate that MSs act as shields, protecting DNA from environmental hazards. Detecting genetic alterations at the MS DNA level could be a useful technique in the identification of the locus of potential altered genes that may play a key role in disease pathogenesis. Therefore, MSI could be a useful genetic screening tool in molecular epidemiology, identifying smokers susceptible to COPD or atopic individuals susceptible to developing asthma.

Owing to the small number of markers examined, the present results need to be confirmed in further studies with different ethnic populations (not only Greeks), requiring multicentric collaboration. Finally, the present findings highlight the importance of studying disease-associated genetic markers.

  • Received November 1, 2005.
  • Accepted April 21, 2006.
  • © ERS Journals Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    Meyers DA, Larj NJ, Lange L. Genetics of asthma and COPD. Similar results for different phenotypes. Chest 2004; 126: 105S–110S, 159S–161S
  2. ↵
    Celli BR, MacNee W. Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS paper. Eur Respir J 2004;23:932–946.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Laurell CB, Eriksson S. The electrophoretic alpha-1-globulin pattern of serum in α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1963;15:132–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Molfino AN. Genetics of COPD. Chest 2004;125:1929–1940.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. Kauffmann F, Kleisbauer JP, Cambon-De-Mouzon A, et al. Genetic markers in chronic air-flow limitation. A genetic epidemiologic study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;127:263–269.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Lomas DA, Silverman EK. Genetics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 2001;2:20–36.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Diagnosis and classification. In: Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. NIH Publication No. 02-3659. pp. 67–80. http://www.ginasthma.com/Guidelineitem.asp?l1 = 2&l2 = 1&intId = 83 Date updated: October 28, 2004. Date accessed: June 30 2006
  8. ↵
    Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Asthma. A genome-wide search for asthma susceptibility loci in ethnically diverse populations. Nature Genetics 1997;15:389–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. Osmond W, Cookson C. Asthma genetics. Chest 2002;121:7–13.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Spandidos DA, Ergazaki M, Hatzistamou J, et al. Microsatellite instability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Oncol Rep 1996;3:489–491.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature 1994;371:215–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Field D, Wills C. Abundant microsatellite polymorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the different distributions of microsatellites in eight prokaryotes and S. cerevisiae, results from strong mutation pressures and a variety of selective forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:1647–1652.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. Martin-Farmer J, Janssen GR. A downstream CA repeat sequence increases translation from leadered and unleadered mRNA in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 1999;31:1025–1038.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Bertoni F, Codegoni AM, Furlan D, Tibiletti MG, Capella C, Broggini M. CHK1 frameshift mutations in genetically unstable colorectal and endometrial cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999;26:176–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Martin P, Makepeace K, Hill SA, Hood DW, Moxon ER. Microsatellite instability regulates transcription factor binding and gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:3800–3804.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Field JK, Kiaris H, Howard P, et al. Microsatellite instability in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 1995;71:1065–1069.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. Loeb LA, Christians FC. Multiple mutations in human cancers. Mutat Res 1996;350:279–286.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Froudarakis M, Sourvinos G, Fournel P, et al. Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity at chromosomes 9 and 17 in non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 1998;113:1091–1094.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Samara K, Zervou M, Siafakas NM, Tzortzaki EG. Microsatellite DNA instability in benign lung diseases. Respir Med 2006;100:202–211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. Fujisawa T, Ikegami H, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Length rather than a specific allele of dinucleotide repeat in the 5’ upstream region of the aldose reductase gene is associated with diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 1999;16:1944–1947.
    OpenUrl
  21. Detorakis ET, Sourvinos G, Tsamparlakis J, et al. Evaluation of loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability in human pterygium: clinical correlations. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1324–1328.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Hatzistamou J, Kiaris H, Ergazaki M, et al. Loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability in human atherosclerotic plaques. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996;225:186–190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Siafakas NM, Tzortzaki EG, Sourvinos G, et al. Microsatellite DNA instability in COPD. Chest 1999;116:47–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Paraskakis E, Sourvinos G, Passam F, et al. Microsatellite DNA instability and loss of heterozygosity in bronchial asthma. Eur Respir J 2003;22:951–955.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Eur Respir J 2003;5: Suppl. 16 5–40.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    Holz O, Kips J, Magnussen H. Update on sputum methodology. Eur Respir J 2000;16:355–359.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Tsoumakidou M, Tzanakis N, Siafakas NM. Induced sputum in the investigation of airway inflammation of COPD. Respir Med 2003;97:863–871.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. Chrysofakis G, Tzanakis N, Kyriakoy D, et al. Perforin expression and cytotoxic activity of sputum CD8+ lymphocytes in patients with COPD. Chest 2004;125:71–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Tsoumakidou M, Tzanakis N, Kyriakou D, Chrysofakis G, Siafakas NM. Inflammatory cell profiles and T-lymphocyte subsets in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and severe persistent asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:234–340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Siafakas NM, Tzortzaki EG. Few smokers develop COPD. Why? Respir Med 2002;96:615–624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Kips JC, Peleman RA, Pauwels RA. Methods of examining induced sputum: do differences matter? Eur Respir J 1998;11:529–533.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  32. ↵
    Anderson GP, Bozinovski S. Acquired somatic mutations in the molecular pathogenesis of COPD. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2003;24:71–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Chizhikov VV, Chikina SIu. Tatosian AG, Chuchalin AG, Zborovskaia IB. Development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease correlates with mini- and microsatellite locus instability. Genetika 2003;39:694–701.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. Amelung PJ, Postma D, Panhuysen CI, Meyers DA, Bleecker ER. Susceptibility loci regulating total serum IgE levels, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and clinical asthma map to chromosome 5q. Chest 1997;111:77S–78S.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. Nickel R, Wahn U, Hizawa N, et al. Evidence for linkage of chromosome 12q15–q24.1 markers to high total serum IgE concentrations in children of the German Multicenter Allergy Study. Genomics 1997;46:159–162.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. Barnes KC, Neely JD, Duffy DL, et al. Linkage of asthma and total serum IgE concentration to markers on chromosome 12q: evidence from Afro-Caribbean and Caucasian populations. Genomics 1996;7:41–50.
    OpenUrl
  37. Sandford AJ, Pare PD. The genetics of asthma. The important questions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S202–S206.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  38. Dizier MH, Besse-Schmittler C, Guilloud-Bataille M, et al. Genome screen for asthma and related phenotypes in the French EGEA study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1812–1818.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Samara KD, Tzortzaki EG, Zervou MI, et al. Magnetic MicroBeads sputum cell sorting in obstructive airway disease. Eur Respir J 2004;24: Suppl. 48 469s
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    National Center for Biotechnology Information. Summary of Maps in UniSTS. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db = unists. Date last updated: June 28, 2006. Date last accessed: June 30 2006
  41. ↵
    Wistuba II, Mao L, Gazdar AF. Smoking molecular damage in bronchial epithelium. Oncogene 2002;21:7298–7306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Vassilakis DA, Sourvinos G, Spandidos DA, et al. Frequent genetic alterations at the microsatellite level in cytologic sputum samples of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1115–1119.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Crapo JD. Oxidative stress as an initiator of cytokine release and cell damage. Eur Respir J 2003;22: Suppl. 44 4s–6s.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  44. Kostikas K, Papatheodorou G, Psathakis K, Panagou P, Loukides S. Oxidative stress in expired breath condensate of patients with COPD. Chest 2003;124:1373–1380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. Rahman I. Oxidative stress and gene transcription in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: antioxidant therapeutic targets. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 2002;1:291–315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. Barnes PJ, Shapiro SD, Pauwels RA. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Eur Respir J 2003;22:672–688.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. Tsoumakidou M, Tzanakis N, Chrysofakis G, Siafakas NM. Nitrosative stress, heme oxygenase-1 expression and airway inflammation during severe exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest 2005;127:1911–1918.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. Rennard SI. Cigarette smoke in research. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2004;31:479–480.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    Lee SH, Chang DK, Goel A, et al. Microsatellite instability and suppressed DNA repair enzyme expression in rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol 2003;170:2214–2220.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Coughlin P, Nicholl J, Sun J, Salem H, Bird P, Sutherland GR. Chromosomal mapping of the human proteinase inhibitor 6 (PI6) gene to 6p25 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics 1995;26:431–433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    Strik MC, Wolbink A, Wouters D, et al. Intracellular serpin SERPINB6 (PI6) is abundantly expressed by human mast cells and forms complexes with β-tryptase monomers. Blood 2004;103:2710–2717.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Trapani JA, Sutton VR. Granzyme B: pro-apoptotic, antiviral and antitumor functions. Curr Opin Immunol 2003;15:533–543.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    Kashi Y, King D, Soller M. Simple sequence repeats as a source of quantitative genetic variation. Trends Genet 1997;13:74–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 28 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 28 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differences in microsatellite DNA level between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Differences in microsatellite DNA level between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
M. I. Zervou, E. G. Tzortzaki, D. Makris, M. Gaga, E. Zervas, E. Economidou, M. Tsoumakidou, N. Tzanakis, J. Milic-Emili, N. M. Siafakas
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2006, 28 (3) 472-478; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00127305

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Differences in microsatellite DNA level between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
M. I. Zervou, E. G. Tzortzaki, D. Makris, M. Gaga, E. Zervas, E. Economidou, M. Tsoumakidou, N. Tzanakis, J. Milic-Emili, N. M. Siafakas
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2006, 28 (3) 472-478; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00127305
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Safety and feasibility of exhaled breath condensate collection in ventilated infants and children
Show more Original Articles: Bench to bedside: novel biomarkers

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society