Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

The effect of gas standardisation on exhaled breath condensate pH

Z. L. Borrill, J. A. Smith, J. Naylor, A. A. Woodcock, D. Singh
European Respiratory Journal 2006 28: 251-252; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00026706
Z. L. Borrill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. A. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Naylor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. A. Woodcock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Singh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editors:

We have read with interest the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Task Force document on exhaled breath condensate (EBC) 1. EBC pH is emerging as a potential biomarker in respiratory disease. Gas standardisation (or de-aeration) of EBC with argon is commonly performed to remove carbon dioxide prior to pH measurement 2–4. It has been argued that CO2 is unwelcome “noise” in the sample and, although the completeness of CO2 removal has not been confirmed, gas-standardised EBC pH is stable and provides reproducible measurements 3, 4. However, some authors regard CO2 as a relevant component of EBC and have measured pH without gas standardisation 5, 6. These variations in methodology make comparison between studies difficult.

We recently reported a mean change in pH after gas standardisation of 0.94 4, and this pH was stable at room temperature. Despite this rise in EBC pH, samples from patients with respiratory disease may remain acidic. Furthermore, gas standardisation may have little effect on the pH of very acidic samples 3, 7. These observations indicate that the effect of gas standardisation is variable, and that there may still be stable acids present in the sample after presumed removal of CO2. Therefore, we measured EBC pH pre- and post-gas standardisation to investigate the relative contributions of CO2 and other acids to EBC pH. We also investigated the stability of EBC pH samples left at room temperature without gas standardisation.

EBC was collected from a total of 30 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 19 males, mean age 63 yrs, 15 current smokers, mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 62% predicted) and 20 asthma patients (nine males, mean age 50 yrs, zero current smokers, mean FEV1 96% pred). pH was measured prior to and following gas standardisation with argon as previously described 5. In samples collected from six COPD patients, pH was measured immediately and after 30 min and 3 h standing at room temperature without gas standardisation. Informed consent was obtained and the local ethics committee approved the study.

The mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) increase in pH post-argon was 0.91 (0.81–1.01; p<0.00001) and 0.92 (0.77–1.06; p<0.00001; fig. 1⇓) in asthma and COPD, respectively. In asthma, there was a significant correlation between pre-argon pH and subsequent change in pH (r = -0.77; p<0.0001), which was described by the equation y = -0.58x+4.8. Six samples from COPD patients had a pre-argon pH of <6, with the change in pH post-argon ranging -0.05–1.75. Exclusion of these six samples resulted in a similar correlation (r = -0.67; p = 0.0004) and equation (y = -0.6x+4.9). The pH of samples measured after standing at room temperature was significantly higher than those measured immediately; the mean (95% CI) increase was 0.20 (0.11–0.28) after 30 min and 0.67 (0.47–0.86) after 3 h.

Fig. 1—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1—

Exhaled breath condensate pH pre- and post-argon gas standardisation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

EBC pH is unstable at room temperature, presumably because CO2 diffuses out of solution. This raises practical difficulties, as pH measurements may vary if not performed immediately. In contrast, the pH of argon de-aerated EBC samples is stable at room temperature 4.

Gas standardisation caused a significant increase in EBC pH, with a mean change of ∼1, which is similar to a previous study 8. However, we have shown that the effects of gas standardisation are more complex and can be related to the pre-argon value. At pre-argon pH >6, the effect is predictable and described by similar equations in asthma and COPD patients. Gas standardisation removes more CO2 in samples with lower pre-argon pH values.

The effect of gas standardisation in samples with pre-argon pH <6 was unpredictable. Gessner et al. 7 also noted that argon de-aeration may have very little effect on the pH of samples with an initial pH of <6. This suggests that either dissolved CO2 is not being removed, or that the pH is mainly determined by other acids. If we assume that the change in pH after gas standardisation is a surrogate for CO2 concentration, it has been shown that this varies between individuals. Acidic exhaled breath condensate pH could be caused by airway acidification at any level from the mouth to the alveoli. The source and nature of exhaled breath condensate acidification remain controversial 9, 10. The use of gas standardisation allows us to differentiate the probable contribution of CO2 and that of other, as yet unknown, acids to exhaled breath condensate pH.

    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Horvath I, Hunt J, Barnes PJ, et al. Exhaled breath condensate: methodological recommendations and unresolved questions. Eur Respir J 2005;26:523–548.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      Hunt JF, Fang K, Malik R, et al. Endogenous airway acidification. Implications for asthma pathophysiology. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:694–699.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      Vaughan J, Ngamtrakulpanit L, Pajewski TN, et al. Exhaled breath condensate pH is a robust and reproducible assay of airway acidity. Eur Respir J 2003;22:889–894.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      Borrill ZL, Starkey C, Vestbo J, Singh D. Reproducibility of exhaled breath condensate pH in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2005;25:269–274.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      Ojoo JC, Mulrennan SA, Kastelik JA, Morice AH, Redington AE. Exhaled breath condensate pH and exhaled nitric oxide in allergic asthma and cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2005;60:22–26.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      McCafferty JB, Bradshaw TA, Tate S, Greening AP, Innes JA. Effects of breathing pattern and inspired air conditions on breath condensate volume, pH, nitrite, and protein concentrations. Thorax 2004;59:694–698.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      Gessner C, Hammerschmidt S, Kuhn H, et al. Exhaled breath condensate acidification in acute lung injury. Respir Med 2003;97:1188–1194.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      Niimi A, Nguyen LT, Usmani O, Mann B, Chung KF. Reduced pH and chloride levels in exhaled breath condensate of patients with chronic cough. Thorax 2004;59:608–612.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      Effros RM, Casaburi R, Su J, et al. The effects of volatile salivary acids and bases on exhaled breath condensate pH. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:386–392.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      Hunt J. Exhaled breath condensate pH: reflecting acidification of the airway at all levels. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:366–367.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 28 Issue 1 Table of Contents
    European Respiratory Journal: 28 (1)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    The effect of gas standardisation on exhaled breath condensate pH
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    The effect of gas standardisation on exhaled breath condensate pH
    Z. L. Borrill, J. A. Smith, J. Naylor, A. A. Woodcock, D. Singh
    European Respiratory Journal Jul 2006, 28 (1) 251-252; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00026706

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    The effect of gas standardisation on exhaled breath condensate pH
    Z. L. Borrill, J. A. Smith, J. Naylor, A. A. Woodcock, D. Singh
    European Respiratory Journal Jul 2006, 28 (1) 251-252; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00026706
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Reply to questions about FEV1Q and bronchodilator responsiveness
    • FEV1Q: it may be useful, but is it helpful?
    • Improving pulmonary function test interpretation
    Show more Correspondence

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society