Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Incidence of asthma among workers exposed to sulphur dioxide and other irritant gases

E. Andersson, A. Knutsson, S. Hagberg, T. Nilsson, B. Karlsson, L. Alfredsson, K. Torén
European Respiratory Journal 2006 27: 720-725; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00034305
E. Andersson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Knutsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Hagberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Nilsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Karlsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Alfredsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Torén
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether repeated peak exposure (gassings) to sulphur dioxide (SO2) and other irritant gases increases the risk of new-onset asthma. A questionnaire was sent to 4,112 sulphite workers, of whom 1,919 completed the questionnaire and 396 completed the short-form questionnaire, which was sent out as a last reminder. A sample of 130 nonrespondents completed a telephone interview using the short-form questionnaire.

The incidence of adult-onset, physician-diagnosed asthma during employment duration was analysed in relation to exposure to SO2 and gassings giving rise to respiratory symptoms. Incidence rates, as well as incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated. Further Cox regression models were used allowing assessment of hazard ratios (HR) stratified for sex and adjusted for atopy, smoking habits and age.

The incidence rate for asthma among sulphite mill workers reporting gassings of SO2 was 6.2 out of 1,000 person-yrs, compared with 1.9 out of 1,000 person-yrs among subjects unexposed to SO2 and any gassings (HR (95% CI) 4.0 (2.1–7.7)). Among males reporting gassings to SO2, the HR (95% CI) for asthma was 5.8 (2.6–13) compared with unexposed males.

In conclusion, repeated peak exposure to sulphur dioxide increased the incidence of asthma during work in sulphite pulp mills, which supports the hypothesis of irritant-induced asthma.

  • Gassings
  • irritant-induced asthma
  • occupational asthma
  • pulp and paper industry
  • sulphur dioxide

Over the last 10 yrs, several questionnaire-based studies on the incidence of asthma have been published, showing an incidence of about 1–3 cases per 1,000 person-yrs 1–3. About 15% of all incident cases of asthma among adults are due to exposure in the workplace 4, and it is a well-described fact that many allergens (sensitisers) can induce occupational asthma. However, regarding exposure to irritants, such as sulphur dioxide (SO2), ammonia and chlorine (Cl2), the current knowledge is limited. Vast clinical experience has taught that high accidental exposures to irritants can induce asthma 5, 6. There is a need for better knowledge regarding the clinically important issue as to whether recurrent episodes of irritant gassing exposure (low to medium) increase the risk for asthma 7. However, a few epidemiological studies have been published, mainly dealing with occupational exposure to Cl2/chlorine dioxide (ClO2) and new-onset asthma 8, 9. In none of these studies has the relationship between exposure to SO2 and asthma been investigated.

Regarding this research issue, case reports are of limited interest because the temporal relationship is hard to evaluate. Studies have to be designed in such a way as to make it possible to assess whether exposure increases the risk for new-onset asthma. Another problem is that exposure to irritants, such as SO2, Cl2 or ammonia, is spread over many different occupations, making it difficult to study sufficiently large groups. However, in the pulp and paper industry, large occupational groups are exposed to SO2, ClO2 and ozone. In sulphite mills, where wood is pulped using an acidic method, large groups of workers are exposed to SO2. In addition to SO2, the workers may also infrequently be exposed to other irritant gases. In a previous study, sulphite mill workers were observed to have an increased mortality due to asthma, probably caused by accidental exposures to SO2 10.

Consequently, the aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of adult-onset asthma in association with repeated peak exposures to SO2 by comparing exposed and unexposed workers within a cohort of sulphite mill workers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The entire cohort was identified by searching through all personnel files from four Swedish sulphite mills, where the production of pulp started in 1900, 1903, 1869 and 1960, respectively. All employees who were employed for ≥6 months at any time between 1940 and 2000 were registered. This resulted in a cohort of 10,041 subjects. For all included subjects, information about employment time was obtained from the personnel files.

Workers employed between January 1, 1980, and July 1, 2000, and alive at the last date were eligible for this retrospective questionnaire study (n = 4,279). Of these, 34 could not be located, 13 died during the survey and 120 were excluded because they were aged >80 yrs. This left 4,112 workers eligible for the study.

In 2001, a comprehensive questionnaire titled “Work conditions and health in the pulp industry” was mailed to the 4,112 subjects. The questions had been used in previous studies 8, 11. A last reminder included a short questionnaire, comprising the most important items. The key items from both questionnaires are listed in table 1⇓. The comprehensive questionnaire was answered by 1,919 subjects (47%), whereas 396 subjects responded to the short version, giving a total response rate of 56%. Among the subjects responding to the comprehensive questionnaire, 111 subjects were excluded due to incomplete answers, resulting in a population of 1,808 subjects. Basic data about the study subjects are given in table 2⇓.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

Key items used in the short questionnaire taken from the comprehensive questionnaire answered by sulphite mill workers

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2—

Basic data for 1,808 sulphite mill workers employed during the period of 1980–2000

Definitions

In the present study, asthma was defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma with reported onset from the age of 16 yrs. Atopy was defined as a positive response to the questions about allergy in childhood and/or hay fever. In the short questionnaire, atopy was defined as ever hay fever. Smoking was defined as daily smoking for ≥1 yr. According to the status at follow-up, smokers were divided into current, former and never-smokers. The years of starting and stopping smoking were also obtained and used for time-dependent analysis.

Exposure to SO2 was defined as an affirmative answer to item 4a (table 1⇑), and gassing to SO2 was defined as reported peak exposure giving rise to respiratory symptoms (item 5; table 1⇑). Any gassings was defined as gassings to SO2, Cl2/ClO2 or gassings with any other irritant chemicals.

Unexposed subjects were those not reporting exposure to SO2 and, in addition, not reporting gassings to SO2, Cl2/ClO2 or any other irritant chemicals. Hence, the cohort was divided into three groups: group one, consisting of subjects exposed to SO2 (including those subjected to SO2 gassings); group two, consisting of subjects not reporting exposure to SO2, but reporting gassings other than with SO2; and group three, which contained unexposed subjects.

Workers employed in the digester department, where the pulping process takes place, were the most likely to be exposed to SO2. Therefore, a separate analysis on subjects reporting that they worked in a digester department was performed.

Nonrespondents

A sample of nonrespondents (n = 316) was randomly chosen for a telephone interview based on the short questionnaire. Of these, 130 could be reached for the interview.

Statistical methods

For all items, subjects not answering were excluded from that analysis. The main analyses were performed on the subjects answering the comprehensive questionnaire (n = 1,808).

Data on the year of diagnosis of asthma, time of employment and episodes of gassings allowed calculation of the incidence of asthma (during employment time plus 1 yr) in relation to gassings and other exposure variables. Person-yrs were calculated from each employment period (according to the personnel files) or until the year of reported diagnosis for cases. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for asthma were calculated comparing gassed or exposed workers with unexposed workers and 95% test-based confidence intervals (CI) were outlined 12. To assess the impact of selection bias, additional analyses were performed with information from short questionnaires and nonrespondents included.

Hazard ratios (HR) from Cox regression models were calculated, after stratifying for sex and adjusting for atopy, time-dependent smoking status (never/former/current) and time-dependent age ≥50 yrs.

The attributable fraction of gassings to SO2 on incident asthma among employees in sulphite pulp mills was calculated using the formula HR–1/HR.

RESULTS

In total, 142 subjects reported physician-diagnosed asthma, 78 of which were excluded. The reasons for exclusion were onset of asthma before 16 yrs of age (n = 36) and onset of asthma before (n = 25) or after (n = 17) employment. These exclusions left 1,730 subjects for analysis, of whom 1,489 were male. In the final population, 64 cases of asthma (54 males) had onset of asthma during employment time.

The incidence rate for asthma among sulphite mill workers exposed to SO2 was 4.4 per 1,000 person-yrs (n = 35) as compared with 1.9 per 1,000 person-yrs (n = 15) among subjects classified as unexposed (HR (95% CI) 2.7 (1.4–5.1); table 3⇓). The risk further increased among subjects reporting gassings to SO2 (4.0 (2.1–7.7)) and even further among those with frequent SO2 gassings (6.8 (3.1–15)). The subgroup of workers with gassings only to SO2 also had a high risk (5.8 (2.8–12)). The group with gassings to other irritants had also an increased risk for asthma (4.6 (2.1–10.0)).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3—

Adult-onset asthma during the employment period of 1980–2000# plus 1 yr comparing different irritant exposure to unexposed in a sulphite mill cohort

When a Cox regression model including different kinds of gassings, atopy, smoking and age, and stratified for sex, was applied to all subjects (exposed, other gassings and unexposed), the risk for asthma in relation to SO2 gassings was still high (HR (95% CI) 4.3 (2.3–8.2)). The risk for asthma among those with “other gassings” was 2.8 (1.3–5.9). To evaluate interaction, the incidence and risk was assessed in different strata according to atopy and ever-smoking (table 4⇓). The highest risk for asthma occurred among never-smoking workers with atopy reporting gassings.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4—

Incidence and risk of adult-onset asthma in different strata of atopy and ever-smoking for sulphite mill workers exposed to gassings to sulphur dioxide (SO2) compared with unexposed during the employment period of 1980–2000 plus 1 yr

Working in the digester area, regardless of reported irritant gas exposure, was also associated with a significant increased risk for asthma (HR (95% CI) 4.2 (1.9–9.1)). The attributable fraction of incident asthma among sulphite mill workers due to exposure to SO2 was 63% and 75% for gassings to SO2.

Restricting the analysis to males increased the risks. Among males reporting gassings to SO2, the HR for asthma was 5.8 (2.6–13) compared with unexposed males.

The interview with nonrespondents was completed by 130 subjects (12.5% of nonresponders). Analysing the complete and short questionnaires, together with the interview with nonrespondents, gave an HR for gassings to SO2 of 3.0 (1.8–5.1). The incidence rate among nonrespondents reporting exposure to SO2 was 10.6 per 1,000 person-yrs.

DISCUSSION

The most important result extracted from the present study is that repeated events of peak exposure to an irritant gas, such as SO2, causes a three-fold increased incidence of asthma. Furthermore, 63% of all cases of new-onset asthma were caused by exposure to SO2. These results underscore the importance of preventive actions in this work environment.

The current results are based on a retrospective analysis on information gathered from a postal questionnaire. Retrospective analysis of asthma incidence is associated with less accurate recall the further back in time the analysis is applied 13. In order to limit the magnitude of a possible recall bias, the study was restricted to the period of 1980–2000. There is a possibility that recall of asthma may differ between exposed and unexposed subjects. However, the incidence rate of adult-onset asthma found among unexposed workers in the current study (1.9 per 1,000 person-yrs) was similar to that reported for the general population in other Swedish studies 1, 3.

The reported year of onset for asthma may be sensitive to misclassification, meaning that a subject may report an incorrect year. The current authors are aware of two studies that validated the self-reported year of diagnosis or disease onset among subjects with asthma 3, 14. In the first study, 85% of subjects who reported the onset year deviated <4 yrs. In the second study, 90% of the subjects reported the correct year of asthma onset ±1 yr. In addition, there is one study in which the reliability of the temporal aspect of reported onset of asthma has been analysed. It reports a finding that 80% of the subjects correctly reported the year of asthma onset ±1 yr 15.

Self-reported occupational exposure data could be differentially misclassified by disease status. In a Norwegian study, the sensitivity of the question on exposure to dust and gas was biased by respiratory symptoms, but hardly at all by physician-diagnosed asthma 16, the outcome used in the present study. Bias is more important in sensitivity than it is in specificity for the effect of misclassification of exposure for a common exposure, such as the gassings in the present study 17. Self-reporting of gassings may be sensitive to recall bias, as workers with pre-existing respiratory symptoms may be more prone to recall gassings. In the present study, among workers exposed to irritant gases, 63% of nonasthmatics reported gassings compared with 86% of subjects with childhood asthma (which were excluded in this study) and 69% of subjects with atopy but no asthma. Although the differences are slight, these figures do not indicate an obvious recall bias by disease status. Prompted questions on exposure, as in the present study, are less likely to be subject to recall bias than open-ended questions, according to a Canadian study on reliability of recall of occupational exposure 18. In this study, work in the digester area, regardless of reported irritant exposure, was also associated with an increased risk for asthma. This further supports the present findings of a relationship between irritant gas exposure and asthma. In sulphite mills, workers are mainly exposed to SO2 but exposure to Cl2 also exists. The current authors' underlying assumption, based on interviews with process workers, is that exposed workers can distinguish between gassings to SO2 and Cl2/ClO2.

Possible confounding factors, such as atopy and smoking, were controlled for in the Cox regression models. Among adults <50 yrs of age, the incidence of asthma seems to be similar over age 1, and controlling for age >50 yrs in the models did not change the results. The current authors also observed that workers with atopy and reported gassings had a very high risk of asthma (table 4⇑). This may reflect a biological interaction, i.e. subjects with atopy are more sensitive to exposure to irritating gases. However, an alternative explanation is reporting bias, i.e. workers with atopy, are more prone to report gassings due to an increased sensitivity.

Subjects reporting asthma before the start of employment were excluded, but there could still be subjects with nonidentified previous asthma. There are studies showing that subjects with asthma in remission have asymptomatic airway hyperreactivity and persistent inflammation in the airways 19, 20. Such subjects may be at an increased risk of relapsed asthma due to exposures to gassings, which, to some extent, may explain the increased risk among subjects with atopy.

The response rate in the present study was not high; however, adding results from the late respondents (i.e. the short questionnaire) and the interviews with nonrespondents did not change the results. It has been shown that, when initial respondents are compared with all respondents, hardly any changes in prevalence and odds ratios are noted 21. Even assuming there is no risk increase among those not responding and the same exposure frequency as among respondents, a significant risk of asthma will still be obtained (IRR (95% CI) 2.2 (1.4–3.2) for gassings to SO2).

There are other studies from pulp mills showing similar results, with irritant gassings increasing the risk of asthma. In a Canadian pulp mill, the incidence of asthma among workers in the production area was 4.2 compared with 0.8 per 1,000 person-yrs among railyard workers. However, this difference was not statistically significant 22. The main exposure in that study was Cl2ClO2. Gassings were not studied. In a study of bleachery workers mainly exposed to Cl2ClO2, the present authors found an increased incidence of asthma, 5.4 per 1,000 person-yrs compared with 1.0 among paper workers, especially among subjects reporting gassings 8. In a large recent prospective study, including 62 USA pulp and paper mills, there was an increased incidence of asthma among irritant-exposed workers, of 1.4 and 3.5 per 1,000 person-yrs for males and females, respectively, compared with 1.0 and 2.0 per 1,000 person-yrs, respectively, for unexposed subjects 9. The adjusted risk was 1.48 (1.17–1.86). Compared with the present study, gassings were more strictly defined in that study; however, the asthma outcome was less strict. Asthma was defined as “yes” answered once (there were several examinations during the study period of 1986–1998) to the question “Do you have asthma?”. This outcome is less specific than physician-diagnosed asthma 11.

Occupational exposure to SO2 is common in some industries, in addition to pulp mills. Accidental occupational exposure to SO2 in a pyrite mine resulted in obstructive impairment of ventilatory function and persistent bronchial hyperresponsiveness at follow-up 23. Repeated peak exposures to SO2 have also been reported in seasonal farming workers involved in apricot sulphurisation 24, and several cases of new-onset asthma were described in that group.

The risk of developing respiratory symptoms due to gassings may increase among those already exposed to gassings, as the inflammatory response due to repeated peaks may not completely disappear 25. There is a longitudinal study from Quebec, Canada, showing that Cl2 gassings increase airway responsiveness 26, 27. Olin and coworkers 28–30 found increased nitric oxide in exhaled air among bleachery workers reporting ozone gassings, which may indicate chronic airway inflammation. Irritants are known to trigger inflammation through epithelial injury, but it has also been proposed that neuronal activity through neuropeptides gives rise to, and maintains, inflammation (i.e. neurogenic inflammation) in response to irritant exposure 31.

Irritant-induced asthma not occurring within 24 h of massive irritant exposure has rarely been recognised as being related to occupation, but the current study and other recent studies show that persons exposed to repeat peak exposures to irritant gases, such as SO2, Cl2 and ozone, have a considerably higher risk of new-onset asthma.

The associations observed in the present retrospective study should ideally be studied in a prospective study, with recurring health examinations and exposure assessments. However, there are great problems with catching the “gassings” with continuous personal monitoring; hence, additional methods with diaries and area samplings must be considered.

In conclusion, repeated peak exposure to sulfur dioxide giving rise to respiratory symptoms increased the incidence of asthma during work in sulphite pulp mills supporting the hypothesis of irritant-induced asthma.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank M. Nordqvist for technical assistance.

  • Received March 23, 2005.
  • Accepted November 15, 2005.
  • © ERS Journals Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    Torén K, Hermansson B-A. Incidence rate of adult-onset asthma in relation to age, sex, atopy and smoking. A Swedish population-based study of 15813 adults. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:192–197.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. de Marco R, Locatelli F, Cerveri I, et al. Incidence and remission of asthma: a retrospective study on the natural history of asthma in Italy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;110:228–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Torén K, Gislason T, Omenaas E, et al. Incidence of asthma and its predictors: a prospective study from Northern Europe (RHINE study). Eur Respir J 2004;24:942–946.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Balmes J, Becklake M, Blanc P, et al. American Thoracic Society Statement: Occupational contribution to the burden of airway disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:787–797.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Brooks SM, Weiss MA, Bernstein IL. Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS). Persistent asthma syndrome after high level irritant exposures. Chest 1985;88:376–384.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Kern DG. Outbreak of the reactive airways dysfunction syndrome after a spill of glacial acetic acid. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:1058–1064.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Tarlo S. Workplace respiratory irritants and asthma. Occup Med 2000;15:471–483.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    Andersson E, Olin A-C, Hagberg S, et al. Adult-onset asthma and wheeze among irritant-exposed bleachery workers. Am J Ind Med 2003;43:532–538.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Glindmeyer HW, Lefante JJ, Freyder LM, Friedman M, Weill H, Jones RN. Relationship of asthma to irritant gas exposures in pulp and paper mills. Respir Med 2003;97:541–548.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Andersson E, Nilsson T, Persson B, Wingren G, Toren K. Mortality from asthma and cancer among sulfite mill workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 1998;24:12–17.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Torén K, Brisman J, Järvholm B. Asthma and asthma-like symptoms in adults assessed by questionnaires: a literature review. Chest 1993;104:600–608.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Miettinen O. Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:226–235.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Brögger J, Eagan T, Eide GE, et al. Bias in retrospective studies of trends in asthma incidence. Eur Respir J 2004;23:281–286.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Torén K, Palmqvist M, Löwhagen O, Bakke P, Gulsvik A. Self-reported asthma was biased in relation to disease severity while reported year of asthma onset was accurate. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:90–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Brisman SJ, Järvholm BG. Occurrence of self-reported asthma among Swedish bakers. Scand J Work Environ Health 1995;21:487–493.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Bakke PS, Hanoa R, Gulsvik A. Relation of occupational exposure to respiratory symptoms and asthma in a general population sample: self-reported versus interview-based exposure data. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:477–483.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Flegal KM, Brownie C, Haas JD. The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. Am J Epidemiol 1986;123:736–751.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Teschke K, Smith JC, Olshan AF. Evidence of recall bias in volunteered vs. prompted responses about occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med 2000;38:385–388.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    van den Toorn LM, Overbeek SE, de Jongste JC, Leman K, Hoggsteden HC, Prins J-B. Airway inflammation is present during clinical remission of atopic asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:2107–2113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Laprise C, Boulet L-P. Asymptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness: a three year-follow-up. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:403–409.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Brögger J, Bakke P, Eide GE, Gulsvik A. Contribution of follow-up of nonresponders to prevalence and risk estimates: a Norwegian respiratory health survey. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:558–566.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Enarson DA, Johnson A, Block G, et al. Respiratory health at a pulpmill in British Columbia. Arch Environ Health 1984;39:325–330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Piirilä PL, Nordman H, Korhonon OS, Winblad I. A thirteen-year follow-up of respiratory effects of acute exposure to sulfur dioxide. Scand J Work Environ Health 1996;22:191–196.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Koksal N, Hasanoglu HC, Gokirmak M, Yildirim Z, Gultek A. Apricot sulfurization: an occupation that induces an asthma syndrome in agricultural environments. Am J Ind Med 2003;43:447–453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Kennedy SM, Enarson DA, Janssen RG, et al. Lung health consequences of reported accidental chlorine gas exposures among pulpmill workers. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:74–79.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    Gautrin D, Leroyer C, L'Archeveque J, et al. Cross-sectional assessment of workers with repeated exposure to chlorine over a three year period. Eur Respir J 1995;8:2046–2054.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Gautrin D, Leroyer C, Infante-Rivard C, et al. Longitudinal assessment of airway caliber and responsiveness in workers exposed to chlorine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1232–1237.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Olin A-C, Ljungkvist G, Bake B, Hagberg S, Henriksson L, Toren K. Exhaled nitric oxide among pulpmill workers reporting gassing incidents involving ozone and chlorine dioxide. Eur Respir J 1999;14:828–831.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. Olin A-C, Granung G, Hagberg S, et al. Respiratory health among bleachery workers exposed to ozone and chlorine dioxide. Scand J Work Environ Health 2002;28:117–123.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Olin A-C, Andersson E, Andersson M, Granung G, Hagberg S, Toren K. Prevalence of asthma and exhaled nitric oxide are increased in bleachery workers exposed to ozone. Eur Respir J 2004;23:87–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Nowak D. Chemosensory irritation and the lung. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2002;75:326–331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 27 Issue 4 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Incidence of asthma among workers exposed to sulphur dioxide and other irritant gases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Incidence of asthma among workers exposed to sulphur dioxide and other irritant gases
E. Andersson, A. Knutsson, S. Hagberg, T. Nilsson, B. Karlsson, L. Alfredsson, K. Torén
European Respiratory Journal Apr 2006, 27 (4) 720-725; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00034305

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Incidence of asthma among workers exposed to sulphur dioxide and other irritant gases
E. Andersson, A. Knutsson, S. Hagberg, T. Nilsson, B. Karlsson, L. Alfredsson, K. Torén
European Respiratory Journal Apr 2006, 27 (4) 720-725; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00034305
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Regulation of human lung epithelial cell numbers by diesel exhaust particles
  • Airway inflammation in iron ore miners exposed to dust and diesel exhaust
Show more Original Articles: Environment: particles and gases

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society