Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Autofluorescence videothoracoscopy in exudative pleural effusions: preliminary results

M. G. Chrysanthidis, J. P. Janssen
European Respiratory Journal 2005 26: 989-992; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00027505
M. G. Chrysanthidis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. P. Janssen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Videothoracoscopy has been proven to be a safe tool to establish the diagnosis in >90% of patients with exudative pleural effusions of unknown origin. In the majority of patients with malignant pleural diseases, the endoscopic appearance of pleural lesions during white light thoracoscopy is suggestive of malignancy, but could be misleading in some cases. The aim of the present study was to estimate whether the combination of thoracoscopy with autofluorescence modalities would be useful to further improve the diagnostic accuracy of the conventional method.

The present study displays early results of thoracoscopy performed consecutively with a normal light source and with autofluorescence light in 24 patients with exudative pleural effusion during 2003–2004.

In all cases of malignant pleuritis (carcinoma or mesothelioma), the colour of the affected area of the pleura changed from white/pink to red (sensitivity 100%). However, in two cases of chronic pleuritis, a colour change from white/pink to orange/red was recorded (specificity 75%).

In conclusion, the calculated positive predictive value of colour change for malignant pleuritis during autofluorescence thoracoscopy in this study was 92%. However, the clinical value of autofluorescence thoracoscopy in daily practice remains to be proven.

  • Autofluorescence thoracoscopy
  • lung cancer
  • malignant pleural disease
  • mesothelioma

In 1981, Boutin et al. 1 reported that in a series of 1,000 consecutive patients with pleural effusions, thoracoscopy was indicated in 215 cases where it established the diagnosis in 97%. The diagnostic yield of medical thoracoscopy in malignant effusions is high: according to Loddenkemper and Boutin 2 it is 95%, whereas according to Blanc et al. 3 it is 93.3% and 90–100% according to Colt 4. In any case, the sensitivity of thoracoscopy in detecting pleural malignancies is much higher than the sensitivity of percutaneous closed needle pleural biopsy (up to 50% 5), pleural fluid cytology (from 62–80% when three separate specimens are collected 6, 7) or even when the two methods are combined (74% 8). Similar encouraging results have been obtained in studies on the role of thoracoscopy in the staging of patients with bronchial carcinoma or diffuse mesothelioma 2, 9.

The endoscopic appearance of pleural lesions during medical thoracoscopy is suggestive of malignancy in 86% of cases 10. Suggestive appearances include: nodules, polypoid lesions, masses, malignant thickening of the pleura, and localised “candle wax drops”. However, there are malignancies which may resemble nonspecific inflammation and, conversely, certain inflammatory lesions can mimic tumours. Even mesotheliomas, which usually have a characteristic grape-like nodular appearance, can appear as ordinary inflammation.

To improve the diagnostic accuracy of thoracoscopy, autofluorescence was assessed in combination with the conventional method, as the effectiveness of autofluorescence techniques has been proven in both accurate detection of early malignant or invasive lesions and appropriate sampling of tissue during bronchoscopy. In addition, autofluorescence thoracoscopy (AFT) would be helpful for delineating the tumour margins and, therefore, for precise staging of intrathoracic lesions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 24 patients of mean age 66.4 yrs (range 46–82) were prospectively included. Of these, 13 (54%) were male and 11 (46%) were female. All of them had presented with an exudative pleural effusion and/or abnormal pleural findings on computed tomography scans.

AFT was performed in the endoscopy suite under local anaesthesia. The patients breathed spontaneously and 0.25–0.5 mg atropine and 10 mg morphine was used as the pre-medication. First, the entire pleural cavity in the examined hemithorax was thoroughly evaluated using conventional thoracoscopy (white light thoracoscopy; WLT), after removing all pleural fluid. The visceral and parietal pleura were inspected with WLT, and areas of abnormal pleura were mapped. The pleural cavity was then inspected with AFT and the change in colour of the areas of abnormal pleura was assessed. Furthermore, the pleural cavity was inspected with AFT for areas of abnormal pleura which were not noticed during WLT inspection. Biopsies of areas of abnormal pleura were subsequently taken for histology analysis. All thoracoscopic procedures under white or blue light were recorded on videotape and reviewed.

THE VIDEOTHORACOSCOPIC AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING DEVICE

The device used in the current study was the Diagnostic Auto-Fluorescence Endoscopy system (DAFE®), recently developed by Richard Wolf GmbH, Knittlingen, Germany. The autofluorescence excitation in the DAFE® system is achieved by means of a 300 W xenon lamp in the violet-blue range (390–460 nm). The photodetection system relies on one charge-coupled device (CCD) camera and a dual detection range (green region of 500–590 nm wavelength and a red region of 600–700 nm wavelength), as at least two spectral domains are necessary for efficient contrast enhancement. A device clipped to the eyepiece of the standard bronchoscope frames the optical elements to: 1) separate the fluorescence light into its colour components; 2) filter unwanted light; and 3) focus the two resulting light beams (one for the green and one for the red region), side by side on the same micro-head CCD camera. The signal is then processed by a delay line, which first duplicates the camera signal and then delays the two resulting signals, thus allowing the superimposition of the two components in false colours on a colour screen. The system is completed with a standard video cassette recorder 11. In recent studies, the addition of a 3.5 mm spacer, fitted at the distal end of the DAFE® endoscope, ensures that all autofluorescence spectra are taken with the fibre-bundle tip at the same distance from the mucosa surface 12, and that a balance is achieved between two antagonist effects, namely an increase in the probe-sample distance to minimise the geometrical distortion of the spectra and a decrease in this distance to maximise the signal-to-noise ratio 13.

In the process of further development and technical evolution of the DAFE® system, it was recently discovered that the excitation wavelength yielding the highest sensitivity and specificity was >400 nm with a peak value near 405 nm, and that the positive predictive value (PPV) for the tumour detection endoscopies could be raised significantly from 38 to 100% by combining this method with the classical white light endoscopy 12.

With the exception of the imaging device as described before, the AFT system uses the same thoracoscopy equipment as WLT (Wolf thoracoscopy set; 7 mm optical telescope (as developed by C. Boutin); fluid light cables; and Wolf 5 mm biopsy forceps).

RESULTS

Normal areas in the pleural surface appeared white or white/pink in both WLT and AFT in the present study. Areas with fat on the pleural layer appeared yellow under the conventional mode, but orange under the autofluorescence mode.

As shown in table 1⇓, in all cases of histologically proven malignant pleural disease (including nine patients with metastatic pleurae carcinomas and seven cases with mesotheliomas), the colour of the affected area of the pleura changed from white/pink to red in a darker or slighter attenuation (fig. 1⇓). Therefore, the sensitivity of AFT for detecting malignant lesions on the pleural surface was 100%.

Fig. 1—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1—

Breast cancer metastasis to the parietal pleura as shown by a) white light thoracoscopy (WLT) and b) autofluorescence thoracoscopy (AFT). During WLT the colour of the malignant tissue is light pink. During AFT the malignant tissue is deep red, whereas the normal tissue has turned white. The line between the normal and malignant tissue is well demarcated.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table. 1—

Colours of pleural disease during white light thoracoscopy(WLT) and autofluorescence thoracoscopy (AFT)

However, in two out of eight cases of chronic pleuritis, a colour change from white/pink to orange/red was found. In the remaining six patients there was no difference in pleural surface colour between WLT and AFT. Thus, the specificity of AFT in the present study was 75%.

DISCUSSION

Autofluorescence systems have been widely introduced into clinical practice for the early detection of lung cancer during bronchoscopy 14–16, incorporating the most recent advances of optical technologies to provide accurate imaging. Meanwhile, the fluorescence diagnosis of pleural malignancies has only been attempted in an experimental animal setting 17, as the photosensitiser 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) was combined with conventional video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to improve tumour staging in advanced lung cancer with pleural tumour spread in rats. Further increase in the diagnostic accuracy of VATS, ∼100% sensitivity by precise assessment of disseminated intrathoracic tumour spread, was considered important for determining the resectability of the malignant lesions. Prosst et al. 17 induced diffuse pleural carcinosis affecting the entire pleural cavity of nude rats. After 5–7 weeks of tumour growth, a pleural lavage was performed with 1.5 or 3% ALA solution, followed by photosensitisation for 2, 4 or 6 h, after which a conventional white light VATS and a fluorescence examination using the D-Light (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany)/autofluorescence system were consecutively performed. The same researchers reported that the photosensitiser accumulation in the tumour was up to 11 times higher than in normal tissue and detected up to 30% additional pleural malignant lesions by thoracoscopic fluorescence diagnosis compared with conventional white light VATS alone.

More recently, Noppen et al. 18 published a case report concerning fluorescein-inhanced autofluorescence thoracoscopy (FEAT) in primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The findings suggest substantial areas of parenchymal abnormality could be found using FEAT, which were undetected by WLT inspection of the parenchymal surface. Furthermore, satellite areas of parenchymal abnormalities could only be identified with FEAT.

Another recent report by Burgers et al. 19, studied 15 patients with suspected pleural malignancies using 5-aminolevulinic acid induced protoporphyrin IX fluorescence. No false positive fluorescence was observed, but 50% of cases had a false negative fluorescence signal.

A limitation of the current study was that biopsies were obtained from a rather restricted number of sites on the pleural space. Therefore, the estimations of the false negatives would not be accurate enough to be taken under consideration in calculating the sensitivity of the method. The ability to find a lesion if there was one (sensitivity) is the most important parameter to characterise the performance of a detection method, but requires the total number of false negatives to be known. It is impossible to have specimens from the entire pleural surface with the object of obtaining an approximately reliable value of false negatives.

The PPV, defined as the probability that a positive result represents a lesion, is thought to be a more realistic parameter for evaluation of AFT as a diagnostic method. In the group of patients who underwent AFT during the present study, the PPV, calculated as the ratio of the true positive results on the overall (true and false) positive results, was 92%.

In the authors' initial experience, AFT is easy to perform, without significant prolongation of the thoracoscopy procedure. In all patients with biopsy proven malignant pleural disease, either malignant mesothelioma or metastatic pleural carcinoma, a colour change from normal white or white/pink to red (in a deeper or slight attenuation) was found. In contrast to a sensitivity of 100% in patients with malignant effusions, two false positive results were found in patients with chronic pleuritis, which resulted in a specificity of 75% in this group.

In conclusion, an important limitation of the current study was that the patients had extended pleural disease at the moment of thoracoscopy, which was easy to diagnose with white light-guided biopsies. The same malignant lesions were easily found and more precisely mapped during autofluorescence thoracoscopy. The findings with blue light were more obvious than with white light, so it is expected that this new technique will be of help in cases without clear malignant appearance during white light thoracoscopy. To prove the additional value of autofluorescence thoracoscopy in clinical practice, a study including cases of malignant pleural disease in an early stage needs to be performed.

  • Received March 9, 2005.
  • Accepted July 20, 2005.
  • © ERS Journals Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    Boutin C, Viallat JR, Cargnino P, Farisse P. Thoracoscopy in malignant pleural effusions. Am Rev Resp Dis 1981;124:588–592.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Loddenkemper R, Boutin C. Thoracoscopy: present diagnostic and therapeutic indications. Eur Respir J 1993;6:1544–1555.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Blanc F-X, Atassi K, Bignon J, Housset B. Diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy in pleural disease. Chest 2002;121:1677–1683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Colt HG. Thoracoscopy: window to the pleural space. Chest 1999;116:1409–1415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Prakash UBS, Reinman HM. Comparison of needle biopsy with cytologic analysis for the evaluation of pleural effusion: analysis of 414 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1985;60:158–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Johnson WW. The malignant pleural effusion: a review of cytopathologic diagnoses of 584 specimens for 472 consecutive patients. Cancer 1985;56:905–909.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Sears D, Hadju SI. The cytologic diagnosis of malignant neoplasms in pleural and peritoneal effusions. Acta Cytol 1987;31:87–92.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Loddenkemper R, Grosser H, Gabler A, Mai J, Preusler H, Brandt HG. Prospective evaluation of biopsy methods in the diagnosis of malignant effusions–intrapatient comparison between pleural fluid cytology, blind needle biopsy and thoracoscopy. Am Rev Resp Dis 1983;127: Suppl. 4 114
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Harris RJ, Kavuru MS, Rice TW, Kirby TJ. The diagnostic and therapeutic utility of thoracoscopy: a review. Chest 1995;108:828–841.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Boutin C, Viallat JR, Aelony Y. Diagnostic thoracoscopy for pleural effusions. In: Boutin C, Viallat JR, Aelony Y, eds. Practical Thoracoscopy. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1991; pp. 51–64
  11. ↵
    Goujon D, Glanzmann T, Gabrecht T, et al. Detection of early bronchial carcinoma by imaging of the tissue autofluorescence. Proc SPIE 2001;4432:131–138.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    Van den Bergh H. Optimizing autofluorescence bronchoscopy. J Jap Soc Bronchosc 2000;22:624–628.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Zellweger M, Goujon D, Conde R, Forrer M, Van den Burgh H, Wagniérs G. Absolute autofluorescence spectra of human healthy, metaplastic, and early cancerous bronchial tissue in vivo. Applied Optics 2001;40:3784–3791.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    Nakhosteen JA, Khanavkar B. Autofluorescence bronchoscopy: the laser imaging fluorescence bronchoscope. In: Bolliger CT, Mathur PN, eds. Interventional Bronchoscopy. Volume 30. Basel, Karger, Prog Respir Res, 2000; pp. 236–242
  15. Sutedja G, Venmans BJ, Smit EF, Postmus PE. Fluorescence bronchoscopy for early detection of lung cancer. A clinical perspective. Lung Cancer 2001;34:157–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Moro-Sibilot D, Jeanmart M, Lantuejoul S, et al. Cigarette smoking, preinvasive bronchial lesions and autofluorescence bronchoscopy. Chest 2002;122:1902–1908.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Prosst RL, Winkler S, Boehm E, Gahlen J. Thoracoscopic fluorescence diagnosis (TFD) of pleural malignancies: experimental studies. Thorax 2002;57:1005–1009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Noppen M, Stratakos G, Verbanck S, D'Haese J, Meysman M, Vincken W. Fluorescin-enhanced autofluorescence thoracoscopy in primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2004;170:680–682.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Burgers S, Triesscheijn M, Aalders M, Stewart F, Baas P. 5-Ala fluorescence thoracoscopy: a feasibility study. In: World Congress for Bronchology, 2004; pp. 62, presentation 0084
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 26 Issue 6 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Autofluorescence videothoracoscopy in exudative pleural effusions: preliminary results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Autofluorescence videothoracoscopy in exudative pleural effusions: preliminary results
M. G. Chrysanthidis, J. P. Janssen
European Respiratory Journal Dec 2005, 26 (6) 989-992; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00027505

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Autofluorescence videothoracoscopy in exudative pleural effusions: preliminary results
M. G. Chrysanthidis, J. P. Janssen
European Respiratory Journal Dec 2005, 26 (6) 989-992; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00027505
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • PATIENTS AND METHODS
    • THE VIDEOTHORACOSCOPIC AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING DEVICE
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society