Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Long-term oxygen therapy

T. L. Petty
European Respiratory Journal 2005 26: 746-747; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00068605
T. L. Petty
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editors:

The topic of long term oxygen therapy (LTOT) has been a great interest to our group, beginning with our first report in 1967 1. Here, we showed a marked increase in exercise capability with use of ambulatory oxygen (AO) in selected patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). By contrast, the carefully carried out, randomised, controlled study of AO in oxygen-dependent patients, recently published in the European Respiratory Journal, concludes that AO is not associated with increased walk tolerance or improved quality of life 2. The landmark Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial (NOTT), showed improved quality of life with AO and a statistically significant improvement in survival, compared with stationary oxygen (SO). AO patients received oxygen for a mean of 17.7 h compared with 11.8 h for SO patients. Thus, the differences could either be due to the duration of oxygen therapy or the method 3. Furthermore, a re-analysis of the NOTT revealed that those patients who could improve their exercise level prior to randomisation and received AO, had a highly significant improvement in survival, compared with SO patients with low levels of exercise capability on training. AO patients with good exercise capacity had far fewer hospitalisations, compared with SO patients with less ability to exercise 3.

In the study by Lacasse et al. 4, patients who were already receiving oxygen for ≥3 months were selected. Herein lies my criticism. After some four decades of LTOT studies (plus 2 yrs of personal use), I must comment that patients given SO rapidly adjust to the limitations imposed by their system. They tend to avoid going outside the home, even when a portable system is given to them. It has been documented that patients with COPD who receive LTOT have a much lower level of domiciliary activity, compared with COPD patients of equal severity who do not receive LTOT 5.

The patients in the study by Lacasse et al. 4 did not go outside the home for >2 h per day, and most often did this without their portable cylinder. In my experience, this is due to the fixation on use of the oxygen from the home-base stationary system. Furthermore, the patients did not use their ambulatory system in conjunction with prescribed exercise. I believe the previous information explains the lack of improvement in both groups in this study. Thus, this study is not designed to prove that AO is not beneficial to activity, as the authors conclude.

In conclusion, new studies are needed in oxygen-naïve patients for long-term oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, given in conjunction with exercise as a component of a pulmonary rehabilitation programme, as was originally suggested 6.

    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Levine BE, Bigelow DB, Hamstra RD, et al. The role of long-term continuous oxygen administration in patients with chronic airway obstruction with hypoxemia. Ann Intern Med 1967;66:639–650.
    2. ↵
      Lacasse Y, Lecours R, Pelletier C, Begin R, Maltais F. Randomized trial of ambulatory oxygen in oxygen-dependent COPD. Eur Respir J 2005;25:1032–1038.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial Group. Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy in hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease: a clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1980;93:391–398.
    4. ↵
      Petty TL, Bliss PL. Ambulatory oxygen therapy, exercise and survival with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (The Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial Revisited). Resp Care 2000;45:204–211.
      OpenUrl
    5. ↵
      Sandland CJ, Singh SJ, Curcico A, Jones PM, Morgan MD. A profile of daily activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulmon Rehabil 2005;25:181–183.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      Petty TL, Nett LM, Finigan MM, et al. A comprehensive care program for chronic airway obstruction. Methods and preliminary evaluation of symptomatic and functional improvement. Ann Intern Med 1969;70:1109–1120.
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 26 Issue 4 Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Long-term oxygen therapy
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    Long-term oxygen therapy
    T. L. Petty
    European Respiratory Journal Oct 2005, 26 (4) 746-747; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00068605

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Long-term oxygen therapy
    T. L. Petty
    European Respiratory Journal Oct 2005, 26 (4) 746-747; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00068605
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • ERS/ATS standards on lung function test interpretation: some limitations
    • Reply: ERS/ATS standards on lung function test interpretation: some limitations
    • Refined risk stratification in PAH and timing of lung transplantation
    Show more CORRESPONDENCE

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society